South African Male User Research on Acceptability of Implants and Injections (SAMURAI)

April 3, 2025 updated by: RTI International
The overall aims of SAMURAI (South African Male User Research on Acceptability of Implants and Injections) are to assess acceptability of, and preferences for, novel long-acting pre-exposure prophylaxis (LA-PrEP) delivery formulation use among key end-users: heterosexual men and men-who-have-sex-with-men (MSM) in South Africa, a country most impacted by human immunodeficiency virus (HIV) incidence and prevalence. Early involvement of men in product development is an important opportunity to measure and address product acceptability and factors that may influence adherence and to foster male ownership of novel HIV prevention delivery modalities.

Study Overview

Detailed Description

Long-acting (LA) pre-exposure prophylaxis (PrEP) offers a promising alternative to existing HIV prevention methods. Research to assess end-user acceptability and actual experiences of novel delivery formulations has neglected, however, to include male perspectives, despite these products being appropriate for use by both men and women. This research aims to assess acceptability of and preferences for novel LA PrEP delivery formulation use among key end users: heterosexual men and men who have sex with men (MSM) in South Africa. Early involvement of men in product development is an important opportunity to measure and address product acceptability and foster male ownership of novel strategies, thereby enhancing potential effectiveness and impact, and broadening male engagement in HIV prevention.

LA PrEP delivered by implant or injection addresses user preferences for simplicity, discretion, and longer dose duration. Currently, there are several PrEP implants in preclinical development and a few injectable formulations in early human phase trials. Biomedical strategies have two core components: the active pharmaceutical ingredient and the delivery mechanism; both of which contribute to acceptability and successful use of products. Research to assess acceptability of placebo use of LA PrEP delivery forms among end users provides insight that may apply to the many products under development. The contraceptive field provides substantial information about potential acceptability and use of LA delivery methods among women in sub-Saharan Africa (SSA). However, there is a gap in knowledge regarding acceptability of implant and injectable dosing platforms among men, particularly in SSA.

The investigators propose a four-year study to comparatively examine acceptability and preferences of placebo implants and injectables using a crossover-designed mixed methods study among heterosexual men and MSM in Johannesburg and Cape Town, South Africa. The investigators hypothesize that men will find implant use acceptable as a delivery form and no less acceptable than intramuscular injections. First, formative qualitative research with men (n=40) will be conducted to assess knowledge and experiences and inform messages and materials for our Aim 2 and 3 work. Subsequently, a clinical crossover study will be conducted, in which men (n=200) will wear placebo implants for 6 months and have three bimonthly injections in a randomized sequence. Preferences for these delivery forms and product attributes of these LA methods, oral PrEP, and condoms will then be measured using a discrete choice experiment survey.

Study Type

Interventional

Enrollment (Actual)

184

Phase

  • Not Applicable

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Locations

      • Cape Town, South Africa
        • Desmond Tutu Health Foundation, Philippi Village
      • Johannesburg, South Africa
        • Wits RHI

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Ages Eligible for Study

18 years to 35 years (Adult)

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

Yes

Study Population

Cisgender, HIV-negative, heterosexual men and men who have sex with men (MSM) ages 18-35 years in South Africa.

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

  1. Being cis-gender male per self-identification
  2. Aged 18-35 years
  3. In good physical health, as determined by the site investigator or designee based on clinical history
  4. Willing and able to comply with study procedures and attend follow-up visits over 1 year
  5. Fluent in English, Xhosa, or Zulu
  6. Sexually active, defined by receptive or insertive anal or vaginal intercourse at least once a month in the past 3 months
  7. Able and willing to comply with all study procedural requirements
  8. Able and willing to provide informed consent
  9. Intention to stay within study catchment area for study duration and willingness to give adequate locator information
  10. At Screening and Enrollment, states a willingness to refrain from participation in other research studies involving drugs, vaccines, or medical devices during study participation. Participation in other behavioral studies is subject to Investigator discretion.

Exclusion Criteria:

  1. Known or suspected allergy to study product components (active or placebo), including egg or soy products (egg and soy products are contained in Intralipid).
  2. At Screening or Enrollment, has a positive HIV test.
  3. Diagnosed or suspected sexually transmitted infection (STI) requiring treatment at Enrollment such as gonorrhea (GC), chlamydia, trichomonas, and/or syphilis. Enrollment will be considered after treatment of STIs.

    Note: Genital warts requiring treatment and frequent recurrence of herpes simplex virus (HSV) are considered exclusionary; however, infrequent HSV outbreaks are not. Genital warts requiring treatment are defined as those that cause undue burden or discomfort to the participant, including bulky size, unacceptable appearance, or physical discomfort.

  4. As determined by the Investigator/designee, any current or historical physical or mental health condition that the site investigator or designee determines should exclude participation (for example, injection drug use within the past year).
  5. Has any other condition that, in the opinion of the Investigator/designee, would preclude informed consent, make study participation unsafe, complicate interpretation of study outcome data, or otherwise interfere with achieving the study objectives.
  6. At Enrollment, participant reports current or recent (30 days or less prior to enrollment) participation in any research study involving drugs, vaccines, or medical devices. Allowance for co-enrollment in other types of studies is indicated below.

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

  • Primary Purpose: Other
  • Allocation: Randomized
  • Interventional Model: Crossover Assignment
  • Masking: None (Open Label)

Arms and Interventions

Participant Group / Arm
Intervention / Treatment
Sham Comparator: Placebo injection
This group will first receive 3 mL intramuscular injections of a 20% fat emulsion (Intralipid 20%) every 2 months for 6 months.
placebo intralipid 20% intramuscular (IM) injection
placebo subdermal implant rod
Experimental: Placebo implant
This group will first receive a single-use subdermal implant in the inner side of the upper arm for a duration of 6 months before removal.
placebo intralipid 20% intramuscular (IM) injection
placebo subdermal implant rod

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Product initial attitudes rating (4-point Likert scale)
Time Frame: Baseline
Assessment of participants' attitudes towards placebo long-acting (LA) PrEP study product physical attributes, expected ease of use, delivery method, and expected physical discomfort
Baseline
Product satisfaction rating (4-point Likert scale)
Time Frame: Month 6
Assessment of participants' satisfaction with placebo long-acting (LA) PrEP study product physical attributes, ease of use, delivery method, and physical discomfort
Month 6
Product satisfaction rating (4-point Likert scale)
Time Frame: Month 12
Assessment of participants' satisfaction with placebo long-acting (LA) PrEP study product physical attributes, ease of use, delivery method, and physical discomfort
Month 12
Adherence to study product regimen
Time Frame: throughout study completion, average 1 year
Documentation of initiation and sustained use of placebo LA-PrEP study product
throughout study completion, average 1 year

Secondary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Assessment of Social Harms
Time Frame: throughout study completion, average 1 year
Number and severity of Social Harms (i.e., non-medical adverse consequences of participation such as discrimination, stigma, abuse, etc.) reported by participants
throughout study completion, average 1 year
Preference comparison for PrEP Delivery method
Time Frame: Month 12
Self-comparison of participants' stated preferences of currently available and possible PrEP delivery methods [i.e., discrete choice experiment (DCE)] implemented at the exit clinical study visit. Investigators will assess preferences for implants as compared with injections; as well as preferences for product-specific attributes of each approach.
Month 12
Burden of placebo product-specific pain
Time Frame: throughout study completion, average 1 year
Assessed by participant self-reported rating of physical pain from placebo product administration using a 10-point visual analogue scale
throughout study completion, average 1 year
Assessment of Adverse Events (AEs) for study product delivery methods
Time Frame: throughout study completion, average 1 year
Number, relatedness, and severity of reported AEs and serious adverse events
throughout study completion, average 1 year

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Investigators

  • Principal Investigator: Elizabeth Montgomery, PhD, RTI International

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start (Actual)

July 12, 2022

Primary Completion (Actual)

August 1, 2024

Study Completion (Actual)

August 1, 2024

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

November 4, 2021

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

November 18, 2021

First Posted (Actual)

December 1, 2021

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Actual)

April 6, 2025

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

April 3, 2025

Last Verified

April 1, 2025

More Information

Terms related to this study

Other Study ID Numbers

  • 00021779
  • 00021820 (Other Identifier: RTI International)

Plan for Individual participant data (IPD)

Plan to Share Individual Participant Data (IPD)?

UNDECIDED

Drug and device information, study documents

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated drug product

No

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated device product

No

product manufactured in and exported from the U.S.

No

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Clinical Trials on Acceptability

Clinical Trials on Placebo injection: Intralipid 20% fat emulsion

Subscribe