- ICH GCP
- US Clinical Trials Registry
- Clinical Trial NCT05139563
South African Male User Research on Acceptability of Implants and Injections (SAMURAI)
Study Overview
Status
Conditions
Intervention / Treatment
Detailed Description
Long-acting (LA) pre-exposure prophylaxis (PrEP) offers a promising alternative to existing HIV prevention methods. Research to assess end-user acceptability and actual experiences of novel delivery formulations has neglected, however, to include male perspectives, despite these products being appropriate for use by both men and women. This research aims to assess acceptability of and preferences for novel LA PrEP delivery formulation use among key end users: heterosexual men and men who have sex with men (MSM) in South Africa. Early involvement of men in product development is an important opportunity to measure and address product acceptability and foster male ownership of novel strategies, thereby enhancing potential effectiveness and impact, and broadening male engagement in HIV prevention.
LA PrEP delivered by implant or injection addresses user preferences for simplicity, discretion, and longer dose duration. Currently, there are several PrEP implants in preclinical development and a few injectable formulations in early human phase trials. Biomedical strategies have two core components: the active pharmaceutical ingredient and the delivery mechanism; both of which contribute to acceptability and successful use of products. Research to assess acceptability of placebo use of LA PrEP delivery forms among end users provides insight that may apply to the many products under development. The contraceptive field provides substantial information about potential acceptability and use of LA delivery methods among women in sub-Saharan Africa (SSA). However, there is a gap in knowledge regarding acceptability of implant and injectable dosing platforms among men, particularly in SSA.
The investigators propose a four-year study to comparatively examine acceptability and preferences of placebo implants and injectables using a crossover-designed mixed methods study among heterosexual men and MSM in Johannesburg and Cape Town, South Africa. The investigators hypothesize that men will find implant use acceptable as a delivery form and no less acceptable than intramuscular injections. First, formative qualitative research with men (n=40) will be conducted to assess knowledge and experiences and inform messages and materials for our Aim 2 and 3 work. Subsequently, a clinical crossover study will be conducted, in which men (n=200) will wear placebo implants for 6 months and have three bimonthly injections in a randomized sequence. Preferences for these delivery forms and product attributes of these LA methods, oral PrEP, and condoms will then be measured using a discrete choice experiment survey.
Study Type
Enrollment (Actual)
Phase
- Not Applicable
Contacts and Locations
Study Locations
-
-
-
Cape Town, South Africa
- Desmond Tutu Health Foundation, Philippi Village
-
Johannesburg, South Africa
- Wits RHI
-
-
Participation Criteria
Eligibility Criteria
Ages Eligible for Study
Accepts Healthy Volunteers
Study Population
Description
Inclusion Criteria:
- Being cis-gender male per self-identification
- Aged 18-35 years
- In good physical health, as determined by the site investigator or designee based on clinical history
- Willing and able to comply with study procedures and attend follow-up visits over 1 year
- Fluent in English, Xhosa, or Zulu
- Sexually active, defined by receptive or insertive anal or vaginal intercourse at least once a month in the past 3 months
- Able and willing to comply with all study procedural requirements
- Able and willing to provide informed consent
- Intention to stay within study catchment area for study duration and willingness to give adequate locator information
- At Screening and Enrollment, states a willingness to refrain from participation in other research studies involving drugs, vaccines, or medical devices during study participation. Participation in other behavioral studies is subject to Investigator discretion.
Exclusion Criteria:
- Known or suspected allergy to study product components (active or placebo), including egg or soy products (egg and soy products are contained in Intralipid).
- At Screening or Enrollment, has a positive HIV test.
Diagnosed or suspected sexually transmitted infection (STI) requiring treatment at Enrollment such as gonorrhea (GC), chlamydia, trichomonas, and/or syphilis. Enrollment will be considered after treatment of STIs.
Note: Genital warts requiring treatment and frequent recurrence of herpes simplex virus (HSV) are considered exclusionary; however, infrequent HSV outbreaks are not. Genital warts requiring treatment are defined as those that cause undue burden or discomfort to the participant, including bulky size, unacceptable appearance, or physical discomfort.
- As determined by the Investigator/designee, any current or historical physical or mental health condition that the site investigator or designee determines should exclude participation (for example, injection drug use within the past year).
- Has any other condition that, in the opinion of the Investigator/designee, would preclude informed consent, make study participation unsafe, complicate interpretation of study outcome data, or otherwise interfere with achieving the study objectives.
- At Enrollment, participant reports current or recent (30 days or less prior to enrollment) participation in any research study involving drugs, vaccines, or medical devices. Allowance for co-enrollment in other types of studies is indicated below.
Study Plan
How is the study designed?
Design Details
- Primary Purpose: Other
- Allocation: Randomized
- Interventional Model: Crossover Assignment
- Masking: None (Open Label)
Arms and Interventions
Participant Group / Arm |
Intervention / Treatment |
|---|---|
|
Sham Comparator: Placebo injection
This group will first receive 3 mL intramuscular injections of a 20% fat emulsion (Intralipid 20%) every 2 months for 6 months.
|
placebo intralipid 20% intramuscular (IM) injection
placebo subdermal implant rod
|
|
Experimental: Placebo implant
This group will first receive a single-use subdermal implant in the inner side of the upper arm for a duration of 6 months before removal.
|
placebo intralipid 20% intramuscular (IM) injection
placebo subdermal implant rod
|
What is the study measuring?
Primary Outcome Measures
Outcome Measure |
Measure Description |
Time Frame |
|---|---|---|
|
Product initial attitudes rating (4-point Likert scale)
Time Frame: Baseline
|
Assessment of participants' attitudes towards placebo long-acting (LA) PrEP study product physical attributes, expected ease of use, delivery method, and expected physical discomfort
|
Baseline
|
|
Product satisfaction rating (4-point Likert scale)
Time Frame: Month 6
|
Assessment of participants' satisfaction with placebo long-acting (LA) PrEP study product physical attributes, ease of use, delivery method, and physical discomfort
|
Month 6
|
|
Product satisfaction rating (4-point Likert scale)
Time Frame: Month 12
|
Assessment of participants' satisfaction with placebo long-acting (LA) PrEP study product physical attributes, ease of use, delivery method, and physical discomfort
|
Month 12
|
|
Adherence to study product regimen
Time Frame: throughout study completion, average 1 year
|
Documentation of initiation and sustained use of placebo LA-PrEP study product
|
throughout study completion, average 1 year
|
Secondary Outcome Measures
Outcome Measure |
Measure Description |
Time Frame |
|---|---|---|
|
Assessment of Social Harms
Time Frame: throughout study completion, average 1 year
|
Number and severity of Social Harms (i.e., non-medical adverse consequences of participation such as discrimination, stigma, abuse, etc.) reported by participants
|
throughout study completion, average 1 year
|
|
Preference comparison for PrEP Delivery method
Time Frame: Month 12
|
Self-comparison of participants' stated preferences of currently available and possible PrEP delivery methods [i.e., discrete choice experiment (DCE)] implemented at the exit clinical study visit.
Investigators will assess preferences for implants as compared with injections; as well as preferences for product-specific attributes of each approach.
|
Month 12
|
|
Burden of placebo product-specific pain
Time Frame: throughout study completion, average 1 year
|
Assessed by participant self-reported rating of physical pain from placebo product administration using a 10-point visual analogue scale
|
throughout study completion, average 1 year
|
|
Assessment of Adverse Events (AEs) for study product delivery methods
Time Frame: throughout study completion, average 1 year
|
Number, relatedness, and severity of reported AEs and serious adverse events
|
throughout study completion, average 1 year
|
Collaborators and Investigators
Sponsor
Investigators
- Principal Investigator: Elizabeth Montgomery, PhD, RTI International
Study record dates
Study Major Dates
Study Start (Actual)
Primary Completion (Actual)
Study Completion (Actual)
Study Registration Dates
First Submitted
First Submitted That Met QC Criteria
First Posted (Actual)
Study Record Updates
Last Update Posted (Actual)
Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria
Last Verified
More Information
Terms related to this study
Additional Relevant MeSH Terms
Other Study ID Numbers
- 00021779
- 00021820 (Other Identifier: RTI International)
Plan for Individual participant data (IPD)
Plan to Share Individual Participant Data (IPD)?
Drug and device information, study documents
Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated drug product
Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated device product
product manufactured in and exported from the U.S.
This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.
Clinical Trials on Acceptability
-
Institut National de la Santé Et de la Recherche...CompletedHPV Vaccine AcceptabilityFrance
-
Centre Hospitalier de CayenneCompleted
-
University of PittsburghUnited States Agency for International Development (USAID); Oak Crest Institute...TerminatedSafety | AcceptabilityUnited States, South Africa, Zimbabwe
-
University of LiverpoolLiverpool John Moores University; Liverpool Women's NHS Foundation TrustCompletedTolerance | Acceptability | Human FactorsUnited Kingdom
-
Beni-Suef UniversityCompletedAcceptability of Health CareEgypt
-
Arizona State UniversityNational Institute on Drug Abuse (NIDA)RecruitingFeasibility Studies | AcceptabilityUnited States
-
Rohan, Lisa, PhDUnited States Agency for International Development (USAID)CompletedSafety | Usability | AcceptabilityUnited States, Kenya, South Africa, Zimbabwe
-
University of California, BerkeleyUniversity of California, DavisCompletedConsumption | Side Effect | AcceptabilityUnited States
-
Cairo UniversityNot yet recruitingAcceptability, Preferences, and Needs
-
Universidad de ZaragozaActive, not recruitingAcceptability of Percutaneous InterventionsSpain
Clinical Trials on Placebo injection: Intralipid 20% fat emulsion
-
Indiana UniversityCompletedComparison of Smoflipid to Soy-based Lipid Reduction for Cholestasis Prevention in Surgical NeonatesCholestasis of Parenteral NutritionUnited States
-
Fresenius KabiTerminatedMalnutrition, ChildUnited States
-
Emory UniversityBaxter Healthcare CorporationCompletedParenteral NutritionUnited States
-
Fresenius KabiTerminatedHospitalized Neonates and Infants, Expected to Require Parenteral Nutrition for 28 DaysUnited States
-
Emory UniversityAmerican Heart AssociationCompletedHypertension | Endothelial DysfunctionUnited States
-
University of MichiganUniversity of Colorado, Denver; University of Florida; Seattle Children's Hospital and other collaboratorsCompleted
-
Ain Shams UniversityRecruiting
-
Woman's Health University Hospital, EgyptCompleted
-
Nkanyiso HadebeUnknown
-
Ain Shams UniversityUnknown