- ICH GCP
- US Clinical Trials Registry
- Clinical Trial NCT06396663
DE-eSCALation of Opioids Post-surgical dischargE (DESCALE)
The Role of the Clinical Pharmacist in Reducing Opioid Dependence at the Interface Between Hospital and Primary Care
The Descale Study aims to:
- Look at the prescribing trends of opioids and the scale of long-term use following surgery within East Kent (United Kingdom)
Carry out a feasibility study to:
- see if clinical pharmacists can support patients following surgery to manage their post-surgical pain safely and prevent long-term opioid use
- calculate how much it costs the National Health Service (NHS)
- see how the patients experienced the intervention
For Aim 1, historic records of patients who have had surgery and were discharged on opioids will be reviewed. Data collected will include type and strength of pain-relieving medication prescribed; type of surgery; number of additional opioid prescriptions following discharge; use of medical services (e.g., General Practice appointments, physiotherapy); and patient demographics.
For Aim 2, clinical pharmacists will carry out early high-risk medication safety reviews to ensure that patients have their pain managed safely. Investigators will collect key data from patients receiving the clinical pharmacist intervention to see how it affected opioid use, costs and healthcare use. Patients who took part in the study will be invited to participate in an interview and will be asked what they know about opioids and the health risks, and their experiences of the intervention.
Study Overview
Status
Conditions
Intervention / Treatment
Study Type
Enrollment (Estimated)
Phase
- Not Applicable
Contacts and Locations
Study Contact
- Name: Research Coordinator
- Phone Number: +441227764000
- Email: descalestudy@kent.ac.uk
Study Locations
-
-
Kent
-
Faversham, Kent, United Kingdom, ME13 8FH
- Recruiting
- Newton Place Surgery
-
Contact:
- Research Team
- Phone Number: +4401795530777 000-000-0000
- Email: descalestudy@kent.ac.uk
-
Principal Investigator:
- Dr Short
-
-
Participation Criteria
Eligibility Criteria
Ages Eligible for Study
- Adult
- Older Adult
Accepts Healthy Volunteers
Description
Inclusion Criteria:
- Aged 18 years old or above.
Undergone surgery and discharged with opioid medication* less than 120mg MME/day from a participating hospital and taking it for the treatment of acute non-malignant post-surgical pain.
- Investigators have used the British National Formulary (BNF) definition of opioids and will recruit participants who have been prescribed one or more of the following drugs: Codeine, Dihydrocodeine, Buprenorphine transdermal patches, Fentanyl transdermal patches, Morphine, Oxycodone, Tramadol, Diamorphine, Dipipanone, Tapentadol, Pentazocine.
Exclusion Criteria:
- Aged under 18 years of age.
- Unable to provide written informed consent.
- More than 90 days opioid use pre-surgery.
- On > 120 mg MME/day.
- Additional surgical procedures planned during the 3-month intervention.
- A history of methadone treatment.
- Regularly inject opioids.
- Using opioids for malignant pain.
- Undergone a caesarean section.
- Is pregnant*.
Classified as vulnerable (e.g., severe dementia, severe co-existing or terminal medical condition).
- Risk of miscarriage or stillbirth from opioid withdrawal
Study Plan
How is the study designed?
Design Details
- Primary Purpose: Other
- Allocation: N/A
- Interventional Model: Single Group Assignment
- Masking: None (Open Label)
Arms and Interventions
Participant Group / Arm |
Intervention / Treatment |
|---|---|
|
Experimental: Opioid de-escalation
An early opioid deprescribing intervention, delivered by clinical pharmacists, targeting surgical patients discharged from one-of-three East Kent University Foundation Trust hospitals, with opioids.
|
Option 1: 10% - 50% decrease/day until opioids discontinued (≤ 10 days). For Fentanyl patches in decrements of 12 mcg/hr. Option 2: Stop all opioid medication completely
Option 1: 20% - 50% decrease/weekly until opioids discontinued Option 2: 10% - 20% decrease/weekly until 30 mg daily.
Then reduce by 5% - 10% everyday.
Continue on opioids and review in 1 weeks time.
|
What is the study measuring?
Primary Outcome Measures
Outcome Measure |
Measure Description |
Time Frame |
|---|---|---|
|
Determination of the fidelity of an early opioid deprescribing intervention led by trained clinical pharmacists in primary care and their role in the wider medicine's optimisation programme.
Time Frame: Month 3
|
Measure the capabilities of trained clinical pharmacists to deliver an early opioid medication review by completed intervention delivery training.
|
Month 3
|
|
Determination of the fidelity of an early opioid deprescribing intervention led by trained clinical pharmacists in primary care and their role in the wider medicine's optimisation programme.
Time Frame: Month 3
|
Measure the capabilities of trained clinical pharmacists to deliver an early opioid medication review by observational competency checks by clinical lead.
|
Month 3
|
|
Determination of the fidelity of an early opioid deprescribing intervention led by trained clinical pharmacists in primary care and their role in the wider medicine's optimisation programme.
Time Frame: Month 3
|
Measure the capabilities of trained clinical pharmacists to deliver an early opioid medication review by completed medication review case reports.
|
Month 3
|
|
Determination of the fidelity of an early opioid deprescribing intervention led by trained clinical pharmacists in primary care and their role in the wider medicine's optimisation programme.
Time Frame: Month 3
|
Measure the capabilities of trained clinical pharmacists to deliver an early opioid medication review by the number of participants successfully deescalated.
|
Month 3
|
|
Determination of the barriers/enablers that affect the delivery of the intervention from the perspective of the NHS stakeholders.
Time Frame: Up to 3 months after final follow up
|
Maintain detailed records of any barriers or enablers that may occur in response to setting up the intervention and whilst delivering the intervention.
Captured via Stakeholder Interviews.
|
Up to 3 months after final follow up
|
|
Determination of the barriers/enablers that affect the delivery of the intervention from the perspective of the surgical patient.
Time Frame: Up to 3 months after final follow up
|
Ascertain participant satisfaction of the intervention by measuring the number of participants that enrol in the study.
|
Up to 3 months after final follow up
|
|
Determination of the barriers/enablers that affect the delivery of the intervention from the perspective of the surgical patient.
Time Frame: Up to 3 months after final follow up
|
Ascertain participant satisfaction of the intervention by measuring the number of withdrawals from the study.
|
Up to 3 months after final follow up
|
|
Determination of the barriers/enablers that affect the delivery of the intervention from the perspective of the surgical patient.
Time Frame: Up to 3 months after final follow up
|
Ascertain participant satisfaction of the intervention by measuring the adherence to pharmacist medication recommendations.
|
Up to 3 months after final follow up
|
|
Determination of the barriers/enablers that affect the delivery of the intervention from the perspective of the surgical patient.
Time Frame: Up to 3 months after final follow up
|
Ascertain participant satisfaction of the intervention by measuring the responses to participant satisfaction questionnaire.
|
Up to 3 months after final follow up
|
|
Determination of the barriers/enablers that affect the delivery of the intervention from the perspective of the surgical patient.
Time Frame: Up to 3 months after final follow up
|
Ascertain participant satisfaction of the intervention by measuring the responses to participant interviews.
|
Up to 3 months after final follow up
|
|
Establishment of the cost of delivering the intervention from the health/social care provider (NHS), perspective.
Time Frame: Up to 3 months after the end of recruitment
|
Apply a micro-costing approach to estimate the intervention costs (combining opioid medication costs and staff costs, with Health resource use (primary care services, community-based services, hospital inpatient and outpatient services) to establish overall cost).
|
Up to 3 months after the end of recruitment
|
Secondary Outcome Measures
Outcome Measure |
Measure Description |
Time Frame |
|---|---|---|
|
Determination of the percentage of participants that reduce or stop opioids in 90 days
Time Frame: Month 3
|
Measurement of the mean difference in morphine milligram equivalent (MME) dose at baseline and at 90 days.
|
Month 3
|
|
Obtaining an understanding of trends in surgical opioid prescribing, surgical related pain, and risk factors that contribute to long term opioid use.
Time Frame: After the final follow up, up to 3 months
|
Collect medication use data at baseline and at all follow-up appointments.
|
After the final follow up, up to 3 months
|
|
Obtaining an understanding of trends in surgical opioid prescribing, surgical related pain, and risk factors that contribute to long term opioid use.
Time Frame: After the final follow up, up to 3 months
|
Compare opioid prescribing (type, dose, amount) at baseline for each surgical speciality and hospital.
|
After the final follow up, up to 3 months
|
|
Obtaining an understanding of trends in surgical opioid prescribing, surgical related pain, and risk factors that contribute to long term opioid use.
Time Frame: After the final follow up, up to 3 months
|
Measure pain scores at baseline and final visits.
|
After the final follow up, up to 3 months
|
|
Obtaining an understanding of trends in surgical opioid prescribing, surgical related pain, and risk factors that contribute to long term opioid use.
Time Frame: After the final follow up, up to 3 months
|
Measurement of risk factors in the participant population that have been previously linked to long-term opioid use, from Baseline demographics and Medical, prescription and surgical histories.
|
After the final follow up, up to 3 months
|
|
Obtaining an understanding of trends in surgical opioid prescribing, surgical related pain, and risk factors that contribute to long term opioid use.
Time Frame: After the final follow up, up to 3 months
|
Response to Quality-Of-Life questionnaire (The EuroQol-5 Dimension (EQ5D-5L)) complete at baseline and final appointment.
|
After the final follow up, up to 3 months
|
|
Determination of the integrity, robustness, and transferability of the protocol for future adoption by the NHS.
Time Frame: Up to 3 months after final follow up
|
Measurements of time spent finding and recruiting participants.
|
Up to 3 months after final follow up
|
|
Determination of the integrity, robustness, and transferability of the protocol for future adoption by the NHS.
Time Frame: Up to 3 months after final follow up
|
Measurement of number of possible surgical participants per week that could receive intervention.
|
Up to 3 months after final follow up
|
|
Determination of the integrity, robustness, and transferability of the protocol for future adoption by the NHS.
Time Frame: Up to 3 months after final follow up
|
Measurement of number of pharmacists available to deliver the intervention.
|
Up to 3 months after final follow up
|
|
Determination of the integrity, robustness, and transferability of the protocol for future adoption by the NHS.
Time Frame: Up to 3 months after final follow up
|
Measurement of number of surgical participants that accept an early Medicines Utilisation Review versus the number that are asked.
|
Up to 3 months after final follow up
|
|
Determination of the integrity, robustness, and transferability of the protocol for future adoption by the NHS.
Time Frame: Up to 3 months after final follow up
|
Measurement of time taken from hospital discharge to receiving first Medicines Utilisation Review.
|
Up to 3 months after final follow up
|
|
Determination of the integrity, robustness, and transferability of the protocol for future adoption by the NHS.
Time Frame: Up to 3 months after final follow up
|
Average time taken for each appointment.
|
Up to 3 months after final follow up
|
|
Determination of the integrity, robustness, and transferability of the protocol for future adoption by the NHS.
Time Frame: Up to 3 months after final follow up
|
Average time taken to successfully deescalate opioids in surgical patients.
|
Up to 3 months after final follow up
|
|
Determination of the integrity, robustness, and transferability of the protocol for future adoption by the NHS.
Time Frame: Up to 3 months after final follow up
|
Number of participants that are successfully deprescribed opioids within 3 months.
|
Up to 3 months after final follow up
|
|
Determination of the integrity, robustness, and transferability of the protocol for future adoption by the NHS.
Time Frame: Up to 3 months after final follow up
|
Number of patients that require additional appointments with the pharmacist.
|
Up to 3 months after final follow up
|
|
Determination of the integrity, robustness, and transferability of the protocol for future adoption by the NHS.
Time Frame: Up to 3 months after final follow up
|
Number of participants that require additional support post-90 days.
|
Up to 3 months after final follow up
|
Collaborators and Investigators
Sponsor
Investigators
- Principal Investigator: Dr Emma Veale, University of Kent
- Principal Investigator: Dr Johanna Theron, Kent Community Health NHS Foundation Trust
Publications and helpful links
General Publications
- Brummett CM, Waljee JF, Goesling J, Moser S, Lin P, Englesbe MJ, Bohnert ASB, Kheterpal S, Nallamothu BK. New Persistent Opioid Use After Minor and Major Surgical Procedures in US Adults. JAMA Surg. 2017 Jun 21;152(6):e170504. doi: 10.1001/jamasurg.2017.0504. Epub 2017 Jun 21. Erratum In: JAMA Surg. 2019 Mar 1;154(3):272.
- Benyamin R, Trescot AM, Datta S, Buenaventura R, Adlaka R, Sehgal N, Glaser SE, Vallejo R. Opioid complications and side effects. Pain Physician. 2008 Mar;11(2 Suppl):S105-20.
- Jani M, Birlie Yimer B, Sheppard T, Lunt M, Dixon WG. Time trends and prescribing patterns of opioid drugs in UK primary care patients with non-cancer pain: A retrospective cohort study. PLoS Med. 2020 Oct 15;17(10):e1003270. doi: 10.1371/journal.pmed.1003270. eCollection 2020 Oct.
Helpful Links
- Public Health England, 2019. Prescribed medicines review: clinical commission group data.
- Public Health England, 2019, Dependence and withdrawal associated with some prescribed medicines.
- Office of National Statistics, 2020. Deaths related to drug poisoning in England and Wales: 2020 registrations.
- Surgery and the NHS in numbers
Study record dates
Study Major Dates
Study Start (Actual)
Primary Completion (Estimated)
Study Completion (Estimated)
Study Registration Dates
First Submitted
First Submitted That Met QC Criteria
First Posted (Actual)
Study Record Updates
Last Update Posted (Actual)
Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria
Last Verified
More Information
Terms related to this study
Keywords
Additional Relevant MeSH Terms
Other Study ID Numbers
- University of Kent
Plan for Individual participant data (IPD)
Plan to Share Individual Participant Data (IPD)?
Drug and device information, study documents
Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated drug product
Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated device product
This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.
Clinical Trials on Opioid Dependence
-
MindLight, LLCMclean HospitalRecruitingOpioid Dependence | Opioid Use | Opioid Abuse | Opiate Dependence | Opioid Use, Unspecified | Opioid Use Disorder, ModerateUnited States
-
National Development and Research Institutes, Inc.Unknown
-
Milton S. Hershey Medical CenterWithdrawnOpioid Dependence FentanylUnited States
-
New York State Psychiatric InstituteNational Institute on Drug Abuse (NIDA)Completed
-
National Development and Research Institutes, Inc.St. Luke's-Roosevelt Hospital CenterUnknownOpioid-Dependence Among AdolescentsUnited States
-
Orexo ABWorldwide Clinical TrialsCompletedOpioid Dependence, on Agonist TherapyUnited States
-
University of PennsylvaniaNational Institute on Drug Abuse (NIDA)CompletedOpioid Dependence | Opioid-use Disorder | Opiate DependenceUnited States
-
Orexo ABWorldwide Clinical TrialsCompletedOpioid Dependence, on Agonist TherapyUnited States
-
Indivior Inc.CompletedOpioid Dependence | Cocaine Dependence | Opioid Related DisordersUnited States
-
NYU Langone HealthNational Institute on Drug Abuse (NIDA)Completed
Clinical Trials on Rapid Opioid de-escalation
-
The Cleveland ClinicActive, not recruitingCommunity-Acquired Pneumonia | Antimicrobial Stewardship | Point-of-Care TestingUnited States
-
Universitaire Ziekenhuizen KU LeuvenKU Leuven; Stichting tegen KankerRecruitingSquamous Cell Carcinoma of Head and NeckBelgium
-
Region SkaneExact Sciences CorporationRecruiting
-
British Columbia Cancer AgencyCompletedEndometrial CancerCanada
-
University Medical Centre MariborCompletedAggression | Education | Physical RestraintSlovenia
-
Bergen University CollegeHelse-Bergen HFCompleted
-
Royal College of Surgeons, IrelandRecruiting
-
Royal North Shore HospitalRecruitingHPV Positive Oropharyngeal Squamous Cell CarcinomaAustralia
-
Technische Universität DresdenGerman Cancer Research Center; National Center for Tumor Diseases, Heidelberg; Radiation Oncology Working Group of the German Cancer Society and other collaboratorsRecruitingHead-and-neck Squamous Cell CarcinomaGermany
-
National Cancer Institute, EgyptRecruitingHead and Neck CarcinomaEgypt