- ICH GCP
- US Clinical Trials Registry
- Clinical Trial NCT06401629
Outcomes After Unified Versus Standard GDM Diagnosis (UPDATE-GDM)
May 6, 2024 updated by: Suhail A. Doi, Qatar University
The UPDATE-GDM Study: OUtcomes After NPRP anD ConventionAl CriTEria for GDM Diagnosis: A Pragmatic Randomised Trial
Gestational diabetes mellitus (GDM) is a condition that can affect pregnant women during pregnancy and may cause complications for the mother and the baby.
Therefore, early and accurate detection is necessary to provide the woman and the baby with better health outcomes.
Currently, the most commonly used criteria to detect GDM is the International Association of Diabetes and Pregnancy Study Groups (IADPSG) criterion.
However, there is a suggestion that it results in over-diagnosis of GDM, and newer methods of diagnosis have been proposed.
One such proposal is to have more than a binary outcome of assessment of dysglycemia in pregnancy.
The investigator group created this criterion known as the National Priorities Research Program (NPRP) criterion.
This clinical trial compares the IADPSG to the NPRP criteria in pregnant women in Qatar to determine if this newer method mitigates overdiagnosis and more accurately identifies women at risk of complications.
Study Overview
Status
Not yet recruiting
Conditions
Intervention / Treatment
Detailed Description
This research project explores a crucial aspect of maternal and fetal health: the diagnosis of gestational diabetes mellitus (GDM), a condition that poses risks to both pregnant women and the babies.
Gestational diabetes is a condition that can develop during pregnancy, characterized by dysglycemia and associated risks of complications such as pre-eclampsia, cesarean delivery, and macrosomia.
For the baby, it raises the risk of developing obesity, type 2 diabetes later in life, and metabolic syndrome.
Therefore, early and accurate diagnosis is paramount to manage and mitigate these risks.
The IADPSG (International Association of Diabetes and Pregnancy Study Groups) criteria, the current standard for GDM diagnosis, has been widely adopted due to its putative sensitivity in detecting GDM and potential for reducing GDM-related complications.
However, this method is not without its limitations, including the risk of over- or under-diagnosis of GDM.
This project will investigate the efficacy of an alternative diagnostic method, the National Priorities Research Program (NPRP) criteria, against the conventional IADPSG criteria, diagnosis usually being undertaken between the 24th and 28th weeks of pregnancy.
The NPRP criteria are based on a unified assessment of the oral glucose tolerance test (GTT), which could offer a four-level classification of dysglycemia in pregnancy as opposed to the binary diagnosis by the IADPSG criteria, thus having the added benefit of glycemic risk stratification during pregnancy.
By comparing the outcomes of pregnancies diagnosed using the NPRP criteria against those diagnosed using the IADPSG criteria, the investigators aim to assess whether the NPRP criteria can provide improved outcomes (Bashir et al. 2021) in terms of maternal and fetal health through better informed GDM-related decision-making.
In addition, this study proposes the NPRP criteria as potentially able to mitigate over- and under-diagnosis of GDM.
This study will employ a parallel-group, prospective, randomized, pragmatic, controlled trial design and the study investigators will work closely with a cohort of pregnant women throughout pregnancy, employing both diagnostic methods to evaluate their impact on the health of the mother and the baby.
The evaluation will not only focus on the immediate outcomes during pregnancy but will also aim to follow up on longer-term metabolic health implications for both mother and child post-delivery after the trial is completed and if the participant consents to such additional follow-up.
The significance of this research lies in its potential to transform the current practices in GDM diagnosis, by offering evidence on the effectiveness and benefits of the NPRP criteria, thus paving the way for a shift towards a more patient-centered approach to the diagnosis of gestational diabetes.
Determining if the NPRP criteria can lead to better health outcomes for mothers and babies can have profound implications for maternal and child health.
Improved diagnostic methods could lead to more timely interventions, reducing the prevalence of complications associated with gestational diabetes and improving the quality of life for countless families.
Through this study, the investigators hope to make a significant contribution to the well-being of pregnant women and babies, ensuring a healthier start for the next generation.
Study Type
Interventional
Enrollment (Estimated)
2650
Phase
- Not Applicable
Contacts and Locations
This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.
Study Contact
- Name: Suhail A. Doi, MBBS, PhD
- Phone Number: +974 66001271
- Email: sdoi@qu.edu.qa
Study Contact Backup
- Name: Mohammed Bashir, MD
- Email: mbashir@hamad.qa
Participation Criteria
Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.
Eligibility Criteria
Ages Eligible for Study
- Adult
Accepts Healthy Volunteers
No
Description
Inclusion Criteria:
- This will include broad eligibility criteria of age 18-45 years with or without risk factors at first antenatal care (ANC) visit who are willing to undergo testing at 24-28 weeks and able to provide informed consent.
Exclusion Criteria:
- a multiple pregnancy at the time of screening, pre-existing diabetes (T1DM, T2DM)
- any medical condition affecting glucose metabolism or the results of the GTT (e.g., Cushing's syndrome, bariatric surgery history)
- known history of major conditions that could interfere with the study or pregnancy outcomes (e.g., severe liver, renal or cardiovascular disorders, chronic infections).
Study Plan
This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.
How is the study designed?
Design Details
- Primary Purpose: Diagnostic
- Allocation: Randomized
- Interventional Model: Parallel Assignment
- Masking: Double
Arms and Interventions
Participant Group / Arm |
Intervention / Treatment |
|---|---|
|
Experimental: National Priorities Research Program (NPRP) diagnostic criterion
Interventional diagnostic strategy
|
Under the NPRP criterion, the plasma glucose level at each time point (TP1, TP2, and TP3) is multiplied by its weight (Doi et al. 2022), and the sum of these products yields the unified Doi's Weighted Average Glucose (dwAG) value for each woman.
The dwAG is then categorized into four groups: a dwAG of 6.8 or lower, >6.8 to ≤7.5, >7.5 to ≤8.6, and above 8.6 mmol/L, indicating normal gestational glycemia (NGG), impaired gestational glycemia (IGG), gestational diabetes mellitus (GDM), and high-risk gestational diabetes mellitus (hGDM), respectively (Doi et al. 2022).
|
|
Active Comparator: International Association of Diabetes and Pregnancy Study Groups (IADPSG) diagnostic criterion
Control diagnostic strategy
|
The IADPSG criteria define GDM as any one of the three-time points above specific thresholds: the time point prior to glucose ingestion (TP1) is considered abnormal when the fasting plasma glucose (FPG) value is ≥ 5.1 mmol/L, the 1-hour time-point after glucose ingestion (TP2) is considered abnormal when the value is ≥ 10 mmol/L, and the 2-hour time-point after glucose ingestion (TP3) is considered abnormal when the Post-Load Plasma Glucose levels are ≥ 8.5 mmol/L (Metzger et al. 2010).
Put simply, meeting any one of these cut-offs results in a GDM diagnosis, regardless of whether the other time points show normal values or not (Metzger et al. 2010).
|
What is the study measuring?
Primary Outcome Measures
Outcome Measure |
Measure Description |
Time Frame |
|---|---|---|
|
large for gestational age (LGA)
Time Frame: Through pregnancy completion, an average of 9 months
|
infants who weigh > 90th percentile for gestational age
|
Through pregnancy completion, an average of 9 months
|
Secondary Outcome Measures
Outcome Measure |
Measure Description |
Time Frame |
|---|---|---|
|
Glycemic targets unmet
Time Frame: Through pregnancy completion, an average of 9 months
|
Reports: Number with any of the following: Need to move to insulin; readmission for poor glycemic control; intervention targets unmet
|
Through pregnancy completion, an average of 9 months
|
|
Adverse events related to treatment
Time Frame: Through pregnancy completion, an average of 9 months
|
Report: Number (by group) reporting any GI or systemic adverse effects and split by:
|
Through pregnancy completion, an average of 9 months
|
|
Hypoglycemia within 1 hour of birth
Time Frame: Through pregnancy completion, an average of 9 months
|
Report: Number (by group) with hypoglycemia (<=1.65 mmol/L)
|
Through pregnancy completion, an average of 9 months
|
|
Assisted labor/delivery (including cesarean)
Time Frame: Through pregnancy completion, an average of 9 months
|
Report: Number (by group) of all assisted deliveries as well as split by:
|
Through pregnancy completion, an average of 9 months
|
|
Preterm delivery
Time Frame: Through pregnancy completion, an average of 9 months
|
Report: Number (by group) with delivery at <37 weeks of gestation
|
Through pregnancy completion, an average of 9 months
|
|
Average plasma glucose
Time Frame: Through pregnancy completion, an average of 9 months
|
Report: Group mean and standard deviation (SD); for both pre-prandial and 2 hour postprandial glucose
|
Through pregnancy completion, an average of 9 months
|
|
Total weight gain in pregnancy (kg)
Time Frame: Through pregnancy completion, an average of 9 months
|
Report: Group means and SD of total weight gained during pregnancy
|
Through pregnancy completion, an average of 9 months
|
|
Birth weight (newborn's weight at birth)
Time Frame: Through pregnancy completion, an average of 9 months
|
Report: Numbers (by group) with LGA as well as group means and SD of continuous birth weight
|
Through pregnancy completion, an average of 9 months
|
|
Neonatal composite morbidity and mortality outcome
Time Frame: Through pregnancy completion, an average of 9 months
|
Report: number (by group) of any neonatal death, stillbirth, or neonatal intensive care unit (NICU) admission and also split by:
|
Through pregnancy completion, an average of 9 months
|
|
Peripartum infection
Time Frame: Through pregnancy completion, an average of 9 months
|
Report: Number (by group) of any of chorioamnionitis, urinary tract infections (UTI) or any other maternal infections
|
Through pregnancy completion, an average of 9 months
|
|
Pregnancy induced hypertension (PIH) or pre-eclampsia/ eclampsia
Time Frame: Through pregnancy completion, an average of 9 months
|
Report: Number (by group) of all PIH as well as split by
|
Through pregnancy completion, an average of 9 months
|
Other Outcome Measures
Outcome Measure |
Measure Description |
Time Frame |
|---|---|---|
|
Additional composite outcome
Time Frame: Through pregnancy completion, an average of 9 months
|
A composite of PIH, preterm delivery, LGA, NICU admission for >24h, and stillbirth after 24 weeks)
|
Through pregnancy completion, an average of 9 months
|
Collaborators and Investigators
This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.
Sponsor
Collaborators
Investigators
- Principal Investigator: Suhail A. Doi, MBBS, PhD, Qatar University
Publications and helpful links
The person responsible for entering information about the study voluntarily provides these publications. These may be about anything related to the study.
General Publications
- International Association of Diabetes and Pregnancy Study Groups Consensus Panel; Metzger BE, Gabbe SG, Persson B, Buchanan TA, Catalano PA, Damm P, Dyer AR, Leiva Ad, Hod M, Kitzmiler JL, Lowe LP, McIntyre HD, Oats JJ, Omori Y, Schmidt MI. International association of diabetes and pregnancy study groups recommendations on the diagnosis and classification of hyperglycemia in pregnancy. Diabetes Care. 2010 Mar;33(3):676-82. doi: 10.2337/dc09-1848. No abstract available.
- Doi SAR, Bashir M, Sheehan MT, Onitilo AA, Chivese T, Ibrahim IM, Beer SF, Furuya-Kanamori L, Abou-Samra AB, McIntyre HD. Unifying the diagnosis of gestational diabetes mellitus: Introducing the NPRP criteria. Prim Care Diabetes. 2022 Feb;16(1):96-101. doi: 10.1016/j.pcd.2021.08.006. Epub 2021 Aug 19.
- Bashir M, Syed A, Furuya-Kanamori L, Musa OAH, Mohamed AM, Skarulis M, Thalib L, Konje JC, Abou-Samra AB, Doi SAR. Core outcomes in gestational diabetes for treatment trials: The Gestational Metabolic Group treatment set. Obes Sci Pract. 2021 Feb 3;7(3):251-259. doi: 10.1002/osp4.480. eCollection 2021 Jun.
Study record dates
These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.
Study Major Dates
Study Start (Estimated)
January 1, 2025
Primary Completion (Estimated)
June 1, 2026
Study Completion (Estimated)
June 1, 2027
Study Registration Dates
First Submitted
May 1, 2024
First Submitted That Met QC Criteria
May 3, 2024
First Posted (Actual)
May 7, 2024
Study Record Updates
Last Update Posted (Actual)
May 8, 2024
Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria
May 6, 2024
Last Verified
May 1, 2024
More Information
Terms related to this study
Additional Relevant MeSH Terms
Other Study ID Numbers
- ARG02-0403-240134
Plan for Individual participant data (IPD)
Plan to Share Individual Participant Data (IPD)?
NO
IPD Plan Description
No plans at this point.
Drug and device information, study documents
Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated drug product
No
Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated device product
No
This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.
Clinical Trials on Pregnancy
-
Far Eastern Memorial HospitalCompletedCornual PregnancyTaiwan
-
Peking Union Medical College HospitalPeking Union Medical CollegeUnknownPregnancy | Pregnancy Related | Infant | Pregnancy Disease | Risk FactorChina
-
Meir Medical CenterRecruiting
-
Bagcilar Training and Research HospitalRecruitingEctopic PregnancyTurkey (Türkiye)
-
MELISA Institute Genomics & Proteomics Research...RecruitingHealthy | Pregnancy | Early Pregnancy | Early Pregnancy Loss | ChildbirthChile
-
Turku University HospitalUniversity of TurkuCompleted
-
Ufuk UniversityNot yet recruitingPregnancy Complications | Pregnancy Loss | Pregnancy Preterm
-
Hadassah Medical OrganizationCompleted
-
Centre Hospitalier Universitaire de Saint EtienneCompletedProlonged PregnancyFrance
-
Zagazig UniversityCompleted
Clinical Trials on IADPSG criteria
-
Hospital Mutua de TerrassaUnknownGestational DiabetesSpain
-
Universiti Kebangsaan Malaysia Medical CentreUnknownGestational Diabetes MellitusMalaysia
-
Xueqin YangRecruitingNSCLC | Targeted Therapy | EvaluationChina
-
Tanta UniversityNot yet recruitingUltrasonography | Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease (COPD) | Mechanical Ventilation WeaningEgypt
-
Tianjin Huanhu HospitalCompletedImage Evaluation | Endovascular Thrombectomy | Fluid-attenuated Inversion Recovery Sequence Vascular Hyperintensity-diffusion-weighted Imaging Mismatch(FVH-DWI Mismatch)China
-
Peking University Third HospitalChinese University of Hong KongCompletedAmyotrophic Lateral SclerosisChina
-
Monash UniversityHospital Raja Permaisuri BainunActive, not recruitingAged | Polypharmacy | Inappropriate Prescribing | Deprescriptions | Potentially Inappropriate MedicationsMalaysia
-
Assiut UniversityNot yet recruitingMonitor Adverse Events
-
Ain Shams UniversityNot yet recruiting
-
Central Hospital, Nancy, FranceCompleted