The 'Lombard Effect' in Patients Affected by Adductor Laryngeal Dystonia (LoQVAdSD)

The 'Lombard Effect' in Patients Affected by Adductor Laryngeal Dystonia: a Pilot Study

Adductory spasmodic dysphonia (AdSD) is a rare condition characterised by irregular and uncontrolled voice interruptions, most commonly affecting women around the age of 45. The diagnosis is clinical and usually requires evaluation by several specialists. The exact cause is not known, but a disturbance of the motor system is hypothesised, probably related to various causes such as loss of cortical inhibition or problems with sensory input.

Neuroimaging studies have shown hyperactivity in various brain regions during speech production in patients with AdSD, but it is still unclear whether this hyperactivity is due to a malfunction of auditory and somatosensory feedback or an impairment of motor programming.

Recent research indicates that patients with AdSD show excessive muscle activation during phonation, probably due to abnormal processing of auditory feedback. This suggests that intervention in the auditory system may offer new treatment opportunities.

The proposed study aims to describe the acoustic, auditory-perceptual and subjective voice and speech changes in AdSD subjects during the Quick-Lombard Test (LT), a test that assesses vocal response under noisy conditions.

Study Overview

Status

Not yet recruiting

Intervention / Treatment

Study Type

Interventional

Enrollment (Estimated)

18

Phase

  • Not Applicable

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Contact

Study Contact Backup

Study Locations

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Ages Eligible for Study

  • Adult
  • Older Adult

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

Yes

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

  • Native Italian-speaking patients;
  • Normal hearing, hearing threshold < 20 dB HL for frequencies from 0.5 to 4 KHz;
  • Age >18 years and <65 years;
  • Written informed consent.

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Non-Italian-speaking patients.
  • Patients undergoing treatment for dystonia.
  • Previous laryngeal surgery.
  • Patient undergoing speech therapy.
  • Patient undergoing dopaminergic therapy.
  • Inability to sustain phonation of sufficient duration >3 seconds or to perform sufficient tests to assess vocal outcomes.
  • Lack of written informed consent.

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

  • Primary Purpose: Other
  • Allocation: Non-Randomized
  • Interventional Model: Single Group Assignment
  • Masking: None (Open Label)

Arms and Interventions

Participant Group / Arm
Intervention / Treatment
Experimental: Case group
patients affected by adductor laryngeal dystonia
In this study a single-subject enrolment session will be set up, with the presence of a dedicated physician for informed consent, the performance of a tonal audiometric examination and a clinical practice phoniatric examination for all enrolled subjects, the collection of voice recordings both before and during the Lombard Test (LT) and the administration of the rating scales both before and after the LT performance. For each subject, voice recordings will be made of the vowel /a/ sustained for at least four seconds with a comfortable tone and volume and of the speech obtained from the reading aloud and volume of normal conversation of a phonetically balanced text (The Desert) lasting about 1 minute, first in a silent condition and then in the presence of noise. Specifically, for the LT, each subject will be exposed to a free-fieldwhite noise of speech(SWN) administered through headphones. The intensity of the noise will be 70 dB SPL. Voice recordings will be made in a quiet room.
Active Comparator: Control group
healthy patients
In this study a single-subject enrolment session will be set up, with the presence of a dedicated physician for informed consent, the performance of a tonal audiometric examination and a clinical practice phoniatric examination for all enrolled subjects, the collection of voice recordings both before and during the Lombard Test (LT) and the administration of the rating scales both before and after the LT performance. For each subject, voice recordings will be made of the vowel /a/ sustained for at least four seconds with a comfortable tone and volume and of the speech obtained from the reading aloud and volume of normal conversation of a phonetically balanced text (The Desert) lasting about 1 minute, first in a silent condition and then in the presence of noise. Specifically, for the LT, each subject will be exposed to a free-fieldwhite noise of speech(SWN) administered through headphones. The intensity of the noise will be 70 dB SPL. Voice recordings will be made in a quiet room.

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
OMNI Vocal Effort Scale
Time Frame: At the time of enrollement
It is a validated instrument for the assessment of vocal effort perceived by the patient with AdSD. The OMNI-VES is a visual analogue scale 0-10 with graphic representation of vocal effort. The OMNI-VES will be administered under silent conditions and after the LT
At the time of enrollement
Auditory-perceptual assessment
Time Frame: At the time of enrollement
Blinded perceptual assessment, using the Global Grading Scale - Hoarseness - Straining - Asthenia - Straining (GRBAS) 0-3 (0 = normal; 1 = mild; 2 = moderate; 3 = severe) will be performed on the recorded voice samples by two speech therapists who will not be involved in the patients' care. Each voice sample will be anonymised and randomly distributed to the assessors.
At the time of enrollement
Maximum Phonation Time
Time Frame: at the time of enrollement
The maximum phonatory time (TMF) will be obtained by asking the subject to sustain the vowel /a/ as long as possible in one breath. The longest of the three attempts will be calculated as TMF in seconds. The TMF will be obtained before and during LT.
at the time of enrollement
Average Frequency (Hz)
Time Frame: At the time of enrollement
The Average Frequency is the fundamental frequency of the voice (pitch) usually ranges from approximately 30-300 Hz, but this varies according to different speakers: typically males' pitch ranges from 50-180Hz and females from 80-250Hz, so we usually set the pitch range to a reasonable range of 50-400Hz for general usage
At the time of enrollement
Maximum Frequency (Hz)
Time Frame: At the time of enrollement
The Maximum Frequency (Hz) is the highest frequency recorded within the voice signal
At the time of enrollement
Maximum Intensity (dB SPL)
Time Frame: At the time of enrollement
The Maximum Intensity (dB SPL) parameter refers to the highest intensity of the recorded voice signal
At the time of enrollement
Degree of Voice Interruptions (%)
Time Frame: At the time of enrollement
Degree of Voice Interruptions (%) is useful for the evaluation of temporary vocal interruption
At the time of enrollement
Cepstral Peak Prominence-Smoothed (CPPS)
Time Frame: At the time of enrollement
Cepstral Peak Prominence-Smoothed (CPPS) has been defined as a spectrum of a spectrum, whereby an inverse Fast Fourier Transform of the natural log of a frequency-domain spectrum is applied, transforming the spectrum to the time domain. The cepstral peak (CP) is a representation of the most dominant peak in the cepstrum - normally the fundamental frequency (fo) in a type I signal. After its first applications to voice was established the method of normalizing the amplitude of the overall cepstrum using a linear regression line. When applied to the cepstrum, the level difference (dB) between the cepstral peak and the regression line at the same quefrency provides the cepstral peak prominence (CPP). The CPPS values obtained from speech and vowel tasks proved reliable in predicting overall grade of dysphonia as well as breathiness.
At the time of enrollement
Number of Voice Interruptions
Time Frame: At the time of enrollement
Number of Voice Interruptions is useful for the evaluation of temporary vocal interruption
At the time of enrollement

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Investigators

  • Principal Investigator: Maria Raffaella Marchese, Fondazione Policlinico Universitario A. Gemelli, IRCCS

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start (Estimated)

May 1, 2024

Primary Completion (Estimated)

April 30, 2025

Study Completion (Estimated)

May 1, 2025

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

April 19, 2024

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

May 2, 2024

First Posted (Actual)

May 7, 2024

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Actual)

May 7, 2024

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

May 2, 2024

Last Verified

April 1, 2024

More Information

Terms related to this study

Plan for Individual participant data (IPD)

Plan to Share Individual Participant Data (IPD)?

NO

IPD Plan Description

The data are paper-based

Drug and device information, study documents

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated drug product

No

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated device product

No

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Clinical Trials on Adductor Spasmodic Dysphonia

Clinical Trials on Lombard test

Subscribe