- ICH GCP
- US Clinical Trials Registry
- Clinical Trial NCT06403397
Assessing the Impact of Monitor Maintenance Package Utilization
May 3, 2024 updated by: Ogretim Uyesi Serpil Topcu, Istanbul Demiroglu Bilim University
Assessing the Impact of Monitor Maintenance Package Utilization on Patient Monitor Alarms and Nurse Alarm Fatigue
Bedside monitors are frequently used in monitoring vital signs of critically ill patients.
Nurses working in healthcare facilities, especially in intensive care units, are required to manage devices with different alarm threshold values, categories, and types of alerts, leading to alarm fatigue.
In response to this serious threat to patient safety, the FDA and The Joint Commission worked to develop strategies to address alarm fatigue in 2011.
Alarm monitoring, identification of the cause, and silencing are typically performed by nurses.
When reviewing alarm control studies in the literature, the CEASE care package developed by Levis et al. in 2019 was encountered.
The tool was developed for personalized clinical alarm monitoring for the patient.
Study Overview
Status
Not yet recruiting
Conditions
Intervention / Treatment
Detailed Description
Bedside monitors are frequently used in monitoring vital signs of critically ill patients.
Patient monitors assist healthcare professionals in continuous monitoring of basic vital signs such as EKG (electrocardiogram), blood pressure, pulse oximetry, respiration, as well as advanced hemodynamic parameters like central venous pressure, pulmonary artery pressure.
These devices alert healthcare personnel visually and audibly in case of any abnormality in the monitored parameters.
According to the Sentinel Event Alert report published by The Joint Commission (TJC) in 2013, each unit can receive thousands of alarm alerts in a single day.
It is stated that 85% to 99% of these alarms are either not related to the patient's clinical condition, false, or do not require any action.
This situation leads to necessary alarms being silenced, ignored, or muted, thereby threatening patient safety.
Thousands of patient injuries and deaths have been reported due to alarm system errors.
The main reasons for alarm errors include failure to recognize the alarm, desensitization in nurses, inadequate training in monitor usage, decreased response time to alarms, deficiencies in device interface design, equipment failures, and staff shortages.
Monitor alarms occur in a hierarchy of high, medium, and low priority.
Each hierarchical alarm produces a different auditory tone.
Clinicians use these alarm tones to determine the urgency level and appropriate alarm response.
When clinically irrelevant alarms occur more frequently, there is a higher likelihood of overall alarm fatigue.
Nurses working in healthcare facilities, especially in intensive care units, are required to manage devices with different alarm threshold values, categories, and types of alerts, leading to alarm fatigue.
Alarm fatigue is defined as healthcare workers becoming desensitized and indifferent to many recurring or simultaneous alarm sounds.
In response to this serious threat to patient safety, the FDA and The Joint Commission worked to develop strategies to address alarm fatigue in 2011.
The published report emphasizes the need to identify the problem clinically and develop solution strategies tailored to the problem, to be implemented alongside general standard interventions.
The report primarily focuses on adjusting alarm parameters appropriately and establishing clinic-specific protocols and procedures.
Alarm monitoring, identification of the cause, and silencing are typically performed by nurses.
When reviewing alarm control studies in the literature, the CEASE care package developed by Levis et al. in 2019 was encountered.
The tool was developed for personalized clinical alarm monitoring for the patient.
The name CEASE is formed by combining the initials of the words Communication, Electrodes, Appropriateness, Setup, and Education.
Researchers found a decrease in the number of monitor alarms and alarm fatigue levels in nurses after using the CEASE care package.
More supportive studies are needed for the widespread adoption of this package in clinics.
In this study, the investigators aimed to demonstrate a reduction in unnecessary alarm counts and a decrease in nurse alarm fatigue levels with the use of the CEASE care package.
Study Type
Interventional
Enrollment (Estimated)
142
Phase
- Not Applicable
Contacts and Locations
This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.
Study Contact
- Name: Serpil Topçu
- Phone Number: 05324676179
- Email: serpilakkustopcu@gmail.com
Study Locations
-
-
Şişli
-
İstanbul, Şişli, Turkey, 34394
- Demiroglu Bilim University
-
-
Participation Criteria
Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.
Eligibility Criteria
Ages Eligible for Study
- Adult
- Older Adult
Accepts Healthy Volunteers
Yes
Description
Inclusion Criteria:
- Working in the intensive care unit,
- Willing to participate in the study voluntarily,
- Nurses willing to use the monitor alarm control tool (for intervention group).
Exclusion Criteria:
- Nurses who leave the intensive care unit during the data collection process and those who do not use the monitor alarm control tool
Study Plan
This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.
How is the study designed?
Design Details
- Primary Purpose: Prevention
- Allocation: Non-Randomized
- Interventional Model: Parallel Assignment
- Masking: Single
Arms and Interventions
Participant Group / Arm |
Intervention / Treatment |
|---|---|
|
Experimental: Experimental group
|
Before the intervention, the intervention group will first undergo the 'Nurse Identification Form' and the 'Alarm Fatigue Scale'.
The current root cause analysis of monitor alarms in the clinical setting will be conducted through the 'CEASE Care Package' and the 'Current Situation Analysis Form'.
Each patient monitor in the intensive care unit will be observed and recorded by two observers for a period of 24 hours.The Monitor Alarm Control Tool - "Remember Me" will be attached beneath each monitor to facilitate easier monitoring by nurses.
Nurses are expected to use the tool for a period of 15 days.
After intervention; Two observers will conduct a re-evaluation using the "CEASE Care Package" and the "Current Status Analysis Form".
Monitor alarms will be continuously assessed and recorded for 24 hours.
Following the completion of this stage, the "Alarm Fatigue Scale" will be reapplied to the intervention group.
|
|
No Intervention: Control group
|
What is the study measuring?
Primary Outcome Measures
Outcome Measure |
Measure Description |
Time Frame |
|---|---|---|
|
The use of the CEASE care package tool will result in a decrease in the number of alarms in the intensive care unit end of the 3 weeks.
Time Frame: 2 months
|
This outcome will measured by Current Situation Analysis Form and CEASE care package tool.
|
2 months
|
|
The use of the CEASE care package tool will lead to a reduction in alarm fatigue levels end of the 3 weeks.
Time Frame: 2 months
|
This outcome will measured by alarm fatigue scale.
|
2 months
|
Collaborators and Investigators
This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.
Publications and helpful links
The person responsible for entering information about the study voluntarily provides these publications. These may be about anything related to the study.
General Publications
- Cvach M. Monitor alarm fatigue: an integrative review. Biomed Instrum Technol. 2012 Jul-Aug;46(4):268-77. doi: 10.2345/0899-8205-46.4.268.
- Schmid F, Goepfert MS, Reuter DA. Patient monitoring alarms in the ICU and in the operating room. Crit Care. 2013 Mar 19;17(2):216. doi: 10.1186/cc12525. No abstract available.
- Joint Commission. Medical device alarm safety in hospitals. Sentinel Event Alert. 2013 Apr 8;(50):1-3. No abstract available.
- De Vaux L, Cooper D, Knudson K, Gasperini M, Rodgerson K, Funk M. Reduction of Nonactionable Alarms in Medical Intensive Care. Biomed Instrum Technol. 2017 Feb;51(s2):58-61. doi: 10.2345/0899-8205-51.s2.58. No abstract available.
- Clark, T., David, Y., & Baretich, M. Impact of clinical alarms on patient safety. ACCE Healthcare Technology Foundation 2006: 1-20
- Sendelbach S, Funk M. Alarm fatigue: a patient safety concern. AACN Adv Crit Care. 2013 Oct-Dec;24(4):378-86; quiz 387-8. doi: 10.1097/NCI.0b013e3182a903f9.
- Graham KC, Cvach M. Monitor alarm fatigue: standardizing use of physiological monitors and decreasing nuisance alarms. Am J Crit Care. 2010 Jan;19(1):28-34; quiz 35. doi: 10.4037/ajcc2010651.
- Association for the Advancement of Medical Instrumentation (2011). A siren call to action: Priority issues from the medical device alarms summit. Clinical Alarms AAMI Summit Proceedings, 5(6).
- Erbay-Dalli O, Bagci-Demirpinar K. Adaptation and validation of the Turkish version of the alarm fatigue assessment questionnaire. Enferm Intensiva (Engl Ed). 2023 Oct 5:S2529-9840(23)00055-1. doi: 10.1016/j.enfie.2023.09.001. Online ahead of print.
- Alarm management. Crit Care Nurse. 2013 Oct;33(5):83-6. No abstract available.
- Ashrafi, S., Najafi Mehri, S., & Nehrir, B. (2017). Designing an Alarm Fatigue Assessment Questionnaire: Evaluation of the Validity and Reliability of an Instrument. Journal of Critical Care Nursing, 10(4), 0-0.
- Lewis CL, Oster CA. Research Outcomes of Implementing CEASE: An Innovative, Nurse-Driven, Evidence-Based, Patient-Customized Monitoring Bundle to Decrease Alarm Fatigue in the Intensive Care Unit/Step-down Unit. Dimens Crit Care Nurs. 2019 May/Jun;38(3):160-173. doi: 10.1097/DCC.0000000000000357.
Study record dates
These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.
Study Major Dates
Study Start (Estimated)
June 15, 2024
Primary Completion (Estimated)
August 15, 2024
Study Completion (Estimated)
December 15, 2024
Study Registration Dates
First Submitted
April 29, 2024
First Submitted That Met QC Criteria
May 3, 2024
First Posted (Actual)
May 7, 2024
Study Record Updates
Last Update Posted (Actual)
May 7, 2024
Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria
May 3, 2024
Last Verified
May 1, 2024
More Information
Terms related to this study
Additional Relevant MeSH Terms
Other Study ID Numbers
- Remember Me Tool
Plan for Individual participant data (IPD)
Plan to Share Individual Participant Data (IPD)?
NO
IPD Plan Description
Researchers may share IPD data after the completion and publication of the study.
Drug and device information, study documents
Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated drug product
No
Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated device product
No
This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.
Clinical Trials on Patient Safety
-
Radboud University Medical CenterZonMw: The Netherlands Organisation for Health Research and DevelopmentTerminatedPatient Empowerment | Patient Safety | Medication SafetyNetherlands
-
Anne Estrup OlesenAalborg University; University College of Northern Denmark; Aalborg KommuneCompletedPatient Safety | Medication SafetyDenmark
-
Ondokuz Mayıs UniversityCompletedNursing Education | Patient Safety | Medication SafetyTurkey (Türkiye)
-
NHS Education for ScotlandRecruitingPatient SafetyUnited Kingdom
-
University of NottinghamCompletedPatient SafetyUnited Kingdom
-
Kepler University HospitalRISC Software GmbH; innovethic eU; FiveSquare GmbHActive, not recruitingPatient SafetyAustria
-
Fundació d'investigació Sanitària de les Illes...Instituto de Investigación Biomédica de Salamanca; Andalusian School of Public... and other collaboratorsActive, not recruiting
-
University of California, San FranciscoCompleted
-
Manuela EicherRecruitingPatient Reported Outcome Measures | Patient SafetySwitzerland
-
VA Office of Research and DevelopmentUniversity of California, San FranciscoNot yet recruiting
Clinical Trials on Experimental group: CEASE Care Package and Remember Me Tool
-
Chang Gung Memorial HospitalChang Gung University of Science and Technology; National Science and Technology...Recruiting
-
Fondazione Don Carlo Gnocchi OnlusUnknownOsteoarthritis of Multiple Joints
-
Istanbul University - Cerrahpasa (IUC)Completed
-
University Hospital, LimogesCompleted
-
Rennes University HospitalUniversity of RennesRecruiting
-
Washington University School of MedicineCompletedOptimizing Decision Making About Breast Reconstruction After Mastectomy: A Patient-Centered ApproachBreast CancerUnited States
-
University of Maryland, BaltimoreEunice Kennedy Shriver National Institute of Child Health and Human Development... and other collaboratorsCompletedGram-Positive Bacterial Infections | Pharmacokinetics | Pharmacodynamics | VancomycinUnited States
-
Istanbul University - CerrahpasaBaltalimani Bone Diseases Research and Training HospitalNot yet recruitingPostoperative Anxiety | Patient Comfort | Upper Extremity FracturesTurkey (Türkiye)
-
University of Health Sciences LahoreNot yet recruiting
-
Sakarya UniversityCompleted