Comparative Effectiveness of Gadopiclenol for Evaluation of Adult Congenital Heart Anatomy and Hemodynamics

May 6, 2024 updated by: Albert Hsiao, University of California, San Diego

The goal of this clinical trial is to learn how well and at what doses gadopiclenol, a new intravenous (IV) contrast agent used for MRI, works to produce high-quality MRI images of the heart, in patients with a history of congenital heart disease, when compared to gadobenate dimeglumine, the IV contrast agent that is normally used at our institution for heart (cardiac) MRI. The main questions it aims to answer are:

  • Does using gadopiclenol result in similar or superior image quality, similar signal-to-noise ratio (SNR), and similar flow measurements with 4-dimensional (4D) flow cardiac MRI when compared to gadobenate dimeglumine?
  • At what dose(s) does gadopiclenol result in similar image quality (using the above metrics) for cardiac MRI when compared to gadobenate dimeglumine?

Researchers will compare cardiac MRI images obtained after administration of gadopiclenol to cardiac MRI images obtained after administration of gadobenate dimeglumine (called the standard of care treatment) to see if the images are of similar or superior quality.

Participants will:

  • Be randomized to receive either gadopiclenol at one of three different doses or gadobenate dimeglumine before their congenital heart cardiac MRI
  • Undergo their congenital heart cardiac MRI as they would during the course of normal clinical care.

Study Overview

Status

Not yet recruiting

Detailed Description

At the University of California San Diego (UCSD), we have developed a premier advanced clinical cardiovascular imaging program, which is a critical component of our Adult Congenital Heart Association (ACHA)-accredited adult congenital heart program. Central to these programs is 4D Flow MRI, which enables hemodynamic assessment of patients with repaired and unrepaired congenital heart disease. Adults with congenital heart disease require routine MRI for surveillance and management of complications of disease and repairs, and 4D Flow allows us to reliably perform these exams efficiently and accurately. Multiple works by our group, and confirmed by others, have highlighted the value of 4D Flow MRI for evaluating this patient population, and for vascular imaging applications beyond the heart.

Gadopiclenol is a recently FDA-approved intravenous, extracellular gadolinium contrast agent indicated for use in MRI. Though it has been shown to be effective in detection of central nervous system (CNS) lesions and of lesions outside the CNS, its performance in cardiovascular imaging is unknown, particularly in cardiac MRI performed for evaluation of adult congenital heart disease. We therefore seek to evaluate whether use of gadopiclenol results in superior image quality compared to, and therefore may be used in place of, gadobenate dimeglumine, our current standard of care in 4D Flow MRI and MR Angiography (MRA).

In our current clinical practice, like many others, gadobenate dimeglumine at 0.3 mL/kg (0.15 mmol/kg) is our standard of care for vascular enhancement and cardiac MRI, favored due to its long blood pool residence time, which parallels the longer acquisition time for 4D Flow MRI (~10 minutes), and its strong T1 shortening properties. Gadopiclenol, with its stronger T1 shortening properties and similar pharmacokinetics, may achieve similar effects but as a macrocyclic agent is a more stable gadolinium agent, and theoretically may have a better retention profile than older linear agents due to its lower approved dose. We therefore seek to determine whether gadopiclenol may be used in place of gadobenate dimeglumine for contrast-enhanced 4D Flow MRI and MRA. Since the optimal dose of gadopiclenol for this purpose is unknown, we will assess the relative performance of gadopiclenol across a dose range.

Standard dosing for gadopiclenol for CNS and abdominal imaging in adult and pediatric patients is 0.05 mmol/kg actual body weight (equivalent to 0.1 mL/kg). However, its safety has been evaluated at doses ranging from 0.025 mmol/kg to 0.3 mmol/kg. We therefore plan to assess the signal to noise ratio and image quality of patients undergoing cardiac MRI using gadopiclenol at three doses (0.075 mmol/kg, 0.10 mmol/kg, 0.15 mmol/kg) against our standard of care (gadobenate dimeglumine at 0.3 mL/kg (0.15 mmol/kg)). We hypothesize that gadopiclenol at each dose will be non-inferior to gadobenate dimeglumine, achieving similar qualitative image quality, similar SNR, and similar standard deviation amongst flow measurements with 4D Flow MRI. There is a strong possibility that gadopiclenol at an equimolar gadolinium dose to gadobenate dimeglumine will provide superior qualitative image quality and superior SNR in contrast-enhanced MRA and reduce standard deviation amongst flow measurements with 4D Flow MRI.

Study Type

Interventional

Enrollment (Estimated)

160

Phase

  • Phase 3

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Contact

Study Locations

    • California
      • San Diego, California, United States, 92037
        • University of California San Diego Health
        • Contact:

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Ages Eligible for Study

  • Adult
  • Older Adult

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

  • Adult patients (≥ 18 years old)
  • History of congenital heart disease and scheduled to undergo standard of care cardiac MRI and chest MRA as part of routine clinical care
  • English is patient's primary spoken language

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Pediatric patients
  • Pregnant patients
  • Patients with ongoing acute kidney injury (AKI) or severe, chronic kidney disease (GFR < 30 mL/min/1.73m2)
  • History of hypersensitivity reaction to gadolinium based contrast agent
  • English is not the patient's primary spoken language

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

  • Primary Purpose: Other
  • Allocation: Randomized
  • Interventional Model: Parallel Assignment
  • Masking: Triple

Arms and Interventions

Participant Group / Arm
Intervention / Treatment
Active Comparator: Gadobenate dimeglumine 0.15 mmol/kg (standard of care)
Gadobenate dimeglumine is an FDA-approved GBCA that is used in standard clinical practice at UCSD for contrast-enhanced MRI/MRA studies, including cardiac MRI/MRA. This contrast agent is the standard of care to which gadopiclenol will be compared.
Other Names:
  • Multihance
Experimental: Gadopiclenol 0.075 mmol/kg
Gadopiclenol is an FDA-approved gadolinium-based contrast agent (GBCA) for neurological and abdominal contrast-enhanced MRI. Participants will receive this contrast agent at one of three different doses prior to undergoing a congenital heart cardiac MRI/MRA. This contrast agent will be compared to gadobenate dimeglumine, the standard-of-care.
Other Names:
  • Vueway
Experimental: Gadopiclenol 0.10 mmol/kg
Gadopiclenol is an FDA-approved gadolinium-based contrast agent (GBCA) for neurological and abdominal contrast-enhanced MRI. Participants will receive this contrast agent at one of three different doses prior to undergoing a congenital heart cardiac MRI/MRA. This contrast agent will be compared to gadobenate dimeglumine, the standard-of-care.
Other Names:
  • Vueway
Experimental: Gadopiclenol 0.15 mmol/kg
Gadopiclenol is an FDA-approved gadolinium-based contrast agent (GBCA) for neurological and abdominal contrast-enhanced MRI. Participants will receive this contrast agent at one of three different doses prior to undergoing a congenital heart cardiac MRI/MRA. This contrast agent will be compared to gadobenate dimeglumine, the standard-of-care.
Other Names:
  • Vueway

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Image Quality
Time Frame: Image Quality will be assessed on a rolling basis during the study by all radiologists and will be completed within one month of the conclusion of enrollment.
Images will be qualitatively scored by three attending radiologists for quality of contrast enhancement on a 5-point likert Scale
Image Quality will be assessed on a rolling basis during the study by all radiologists and will be completed within one month of the conclusion of enrollment.
Signal-to-Noise Ratio (SNR)
Time Frame: SNR will be assessed on a rolling basis during the study by the study team and will be completed within one month of the conclusion of enrollment.
Signal-to-noise will be measured from the blood pool in the aorta and main pulmonary artery and compared against myocardial signal for contrast-to-background calculations in contrast-enhanced MRA and 4D Flow signal images. This ca be readily performed by placing a region of interest (ROI) within the vessel of interest and calculating the standard deviation of signal intensities relative to mean signal intensity.
SNR will be assessed on a rolling basis during the study by the study team and will be completed within one month of the conclusion of enrollment.
Standard Deviation of Volumetric Flow Measurements
Time Frame: Standard deviation of flow measurements will be assessed on a rolling basis during the study by all attending radiologists and will be completed within one month after the conclusion of enrollment.
We will measure standard deviation of volumetric flow measurements from the aorta and main pulmonary artery from ROIs that are typically used in our clinical routine to measure systemic and pulmonary blood flow. The standard error in these measurements will be compared between each of the four randomized conditions.
Standard deviation of flow measurements will be assessed on a rolling basis during the study by all attending radiologists and will be completed within one month after the conclusion of enrollment.

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Collaborators

Investigators

  • Principal Investigator: Albert Hsiao, MD/PhD, Department of Radiology, UC San Diego

Publications and helpful links

The person responsible for entering information about the study voluntarily provides these publications. These may be about anything related to the study.

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start (Estimated)

May 1, 2024

Primary Completion (Estimated)

June 1, 2025

Study Completion (Estimated)

June 1, 2025

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

May 6, 2024

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

May 6, 2024

First Posted (Actual)

May 9, 2024

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Actual)

May 9, 2024

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

May 6, 2024

Last Verified

April 1, 2024

More Information

Terms related to this study

Plan for Individual participant data (IPD)

Plan to Share Individual Participant Data (IPD)?

NO

Drug and device information, study documents

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated drug product

Yes

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated device product

No

product manufactured in and exported from the U.S.

No

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Clinical Trials on Congenital Heart Disease

Clinical Trials on Gadobenate dimeglumine

Subscribe