Prospective Pilot Trial to Address Feasibility and Safety of Oral Zinc in GNAO1 Associated Disorders (ZINCGNAO1)

January 30, 2026 updated by: Moritz Thiel, MD, Children's University Hospital Cologne, Germany

Prospective Pilot Trial to Address the Feasibility and Safety of Treatment With Oral Zinc in GNAO1 Associated Disorders

The goal of this clinical trial is to investigate feasibility and safety of an oral therapy with zinc in patients affected by Guanine nucleotide-binding protein G(o) subunit alpha (GNAO1) associated disorders.

The main questions it aims to answer are:

  • Is a daily oral therapy with zinc in GNAO1 associated disorders a safe and feasible therapy?
  • Are there potential changes in general motor skills, general behaviour and well being, day/night rhythm, level of dyskinesia and dystonia, frequency of seizures, quality of life and changes in the microbiome of the patients.

Participants with GNAO1 associated disorders will be given an oral zinc therapy for 6 month and will be assessed in 3 visits and 2 phone calls within this trial.

Study Overview

Study Type

Interventional

Enrollment (Actual)

13

Phase

  • Phase 2

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Locations

      • Cologne, Germany, 50937
        • Children's Hospital, University Hospital Cologne, University of Cologne

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Ages Eligible for Study

  • Child
  • Adult

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

  • GNAO1 associated neurological disorder, documented by either

    • Proven pathogenic or likely pathogenic mutation in GNAO1 or
    • a variant of unknown significance in GNAO1 and clinical symptoms likely to be consistent with GNAO1 as determined by the investigators and
    • at least one of the common symptoms of GNAO1: Movement disorder (Dystonia, Chorea, Ataxia, clonic), central muscular hypotonia, epilepsy, global developmental delay
  • Age: 6 month - 30 years
  • GMFM ≤ 75
  • written informed consent prior to any trial-related procedure (according to age and status of psycho-intellectual development)

    • of parents or legal guardian
    • of parents or legal guardian and patient
    • of the patient
  • stable on following concomitant treatments for at least 3 months prior to trial inclusion: anti-seizure drugs (ASD); baclofen, Deep brain stimulation settings

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Treatment of Zinc in the last 4 months before inclusion
  • known other genetic variants that are known to cause symptoms like observed in GNAO1-related disorders, additional to the proven GNAO1 mutation
  • implantation of Deep brain stimulation planned during the duration of the trial, i.e. in the six months after inclusion
  • start of intrathecal baclofen therapy planned during the duration of the trial, i.e. in the six months after inclusion
  • Known allergy/hypersensitivity to the scheduled trial drug
  • Concomitant participation in other clinical drugs with investigational drugs or with competing interventions
  • sexually active patients who are not willing to use/ not using a highly effective contraception method with a pearl-index < 1. Sexually active patients, unless surgically sterile, must be using a highly effective contraception method (including oral, transdermal, injectable or implanted contraceptives, intrauterine device (IUD), using a condom of the sexual partner or sterile sexual partner) and must agree to continue using such precautions during the whole study period.
  • Pregnant women and nursing mothers

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

  • Primary Purpose: Treatment
  • Allocation: N/A
  • Interventional Model: Single Group Assignment
  • Masking: None (Open Label)

Arms and Interventions

Participant Group / Arm
Intervention / Treatment
Experimental: Interventional Arm
Zinc acetate dihydrate in age-adapted dosage ranging from 50mg to 150mg Zn2+ per day according to the recommended dosage in Wilsons Disease.
In this single arm trial, all participants will be receive the trial drug zinc acetate dihydrate orally. The Investigational medicinal product (IMP) will be given one hour after meal in a dosage which is recommended in Wilson Disease and has been given in this condition without observing severe adverse effects. If oral administration is not possible due to the disability level of the patient, the IMP can be mortared and suspended and can then be given as suspension orally or via the Percutaneous endoscopic gastrostomy. The total treatment duration in each patient is 6 months with stable dosage over the duration of the trial. If the therapy shows effects, the parents and participants may continue medication after the end of the trial. If not, they will stop the medication after the last visit at the trial site.
Other Names:
  • WILZIN 25mg
  • WILZIN 50mg
  • Wilzin

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Feasibility of daily treatment with oral zinc in GNAO1 as assessed by diary.
Time Frame: From first visit at Inclusion to visit after 6 month
The feasibility is measured by the actual days that zinc was taken in the right dosage. If zinc was taken in the scheduled dosage at least on 80% of the days it is assumed to be feasible. Parents/caregivers document the daily intake into a diary.
From first visit at Inclusion to visit after 6 month
Safety of daily administered zinc in GNAO1 as assessed by regular evaluation of the side effects
Time Frame: From first visit at inclusion until last phone call after 7 month
To assess side effects: two phone calls are made and in each visit at site potential side effects are assessed.
From first visit at inclusion until last phone call after 7 month
Safety of daily administered zinc in GNAO1 as assessed by regular blood tests
Time Frame: Blood analysis at baseline, after 3 and 6 month
Serum ferritin and copper detect potential deficiencies, caused by regular zinc administration and therefore reduced uptake. Liver enzymes, alkaline phosphates, lipase and amylase are assessed 3 times, since these parameters can be elevated as side effect.
Blood analysis at baseline, after 3 and 6 month

Secondary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Level of motor-skills assessed by Gross-motor function measure
Time Frame: Compare measure at baseline to visit after 3 and 6 month
The Gross-motor function measure(GMFM-66) is a standardized test for gross motor function, carried out by a physiotherapist. Minimum value 0, maximum value 100; a higher score is a better outcome.
Compare measure at baseline to visit after 3 and 6 month
Change in quality of life score assessed by Caregiver Priorities and Child Health Index of Life with Disabilities (CPCHILD) questionnaire for caregivers
Time Frame: Compare measure at baseline to visit after 3 and 6 month

The CPCHILD questionnaire is a validated measure of health-related quality of life for children with severe disabilities and is evaluated 3 times in this trial. Parents/caregivers are asked to fill out the questionnaire. The CPCHILD currently consists of 37 items distributed among six sections representing the following domains:

  1. Activities of daily living/personal care (nine items)
  2. Positioning, transferring and mobility (eight items)
  3. Comfort and emotions (nine items)
  4. Communication and social interaction (seven items)
  5. Health (three items)
  6. Overall quality of life (one item) In Section 7, caregivers rate the importance of each of these items' contribution to their child's quality of life.Scores for each domain and for the total survey are standardized and range from a minimum: 0 (worse) to a maximum 100 (best). A higher score is a better outcome.
Compare measure at baseline to visit after 3 and 6 month
Level of Dystonia assessed by the Burke-Fahn-Marsden Dystonia Rating scale
Time Frame: Compare measure at baseline to visit after 3 and 6 month
The Burke-Fahn-Marsden Dystonia Rating Scale is a universally applied instrument for the quantitative assessment of dystonia in both children and adults. It is divided into movement score and disability score. Movement score minimum value 0, maximum value 120; a higher score is a worse outcome with more dystonia present. Disability score minimum value 0; maximum value 30; a higher score is a worse outcome with more disabilities due to dystonia.
Compare measure at baseline to visit after 3 and 6 month
Level of dyskinesia assessed by the Abnormal involuntary movement scale (AIMS)
Time Frame: Compare measure at baseline to visit after 3 and 6 month

The AIMS is a 12-item clinician-rated scale to assess severity of dyskinesias (specifically, orofacial movements and extremity and truncal movements) and will be assessed 3 times at each visit at site.

The minimum score is 0 and the maximum score is 4 (severe). A higher score is a worse outcome showing higher level of dyskinesia.

Compare measure at baseline to visit after 3 and 6 month
Level of dyskinesia assessed by a movement log for parents/caregivers
Time Frame: Compare first two weeks of treatment to two weeks before the end of the trial
Parents/caregivers are given a diary in which they are asked to document the hours per day which are disturbed by movement disorder and involuntary movements.
Compare first two weeks of treatment to two weeks before the end of the trial
Changes in sleep assessed by diary for parents/caregivers
Time Frame: Compare first two weeks of treatment to two weeks before the end of the trial
Parents/Caregivers are asked to fill out a diary addressing time of sleep per day and sleep disturbances.
Compare first two weeks of treatment to two weeks before the end of the trial
Changes in general behaviour assessed by diary.
Time Frame: Compare answers of diary of first two weeks of treatment to two weeks before the end of the trial
Parents/Caregivers are asked to fill out a diary addressing the general behaviour with two questions.
Compare answers of diary of first two weeks of treatment to two weeks before the end of the trial
Changes in seizure frequency assessed by seizure log.
Time Frame: Compare first two weeks of treatment to two weeks before the end of the trial
Parents/Caregivers are requested to document frequency in a seizure log which is part of the diary
Compare first two weeks of treatment to two weeks before the end of the trial
Changes in seizure duration assessed by seizure log.
Time Frame: Compare first two weeks of treatment to two weeks before the end of the trial
Parents/Caregivers are requested to document duration of seizures in a seizure log which is part of the diary
Compare first two weeks of treatment to two weeks before the end of the trial
Changes in serum level of zinc assessed by regular blood analysis
Time Frame: Serum controls at baseline, after 3 and 6 month
Serum controls of zinc are assessed three times to measure the changes in serum levels of zinc before and while zinc administration
Serum controls at baseline, after 3 and 6 month
Microbiome of stool assessed by regular analysis
Time Frame: Samples compared from baseline to samples collected after 3 and 6 month
Analyze of the microbiome in stool to detect changes under therapy with oral zinc.The stool samples should be collected at home in the three days before visit 2 and 3 in special sample tubes that are handed out to the patient at visit 0. The first stool samples should be collected at visit 0 or on the first three days thereafter.
Samples compared from baseline to samples collected after 3 and 6 month

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Investigators

  • Principal Investigator: Moritz Thiel, MD, Children's Hospital, University Hospital Cologne, University of Cologne

Publications and helpful links

The person responsible for entering information about the study voluntarily provides these publications. These may be about anything related to the study.

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start (Actual)

August 2, 2024

Primary Completion (Actual)

August 4, 2025

Study Completion (Actual)

August 4, 2025

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

February 29, 2024

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

May 8, 2024

First Posted (Actual)

May 14, 2024

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Actual)

February 3, 2026

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

January 30, 2026

Last Verified

January 1, 2026

More Information

Terms related to this study

Plan for Individual participant data (IPD)

Plan to Share Individual Participant Data (IPD)?

NO

IPD Plan Description

Trial results will be published in a scientific journal and presented at national or international congresses. Publication of the results of the trial as a whole is intended. Anonymized individual patient data (IPD) can be made available on reasonable request to the PI after the results are published.

Drug and device information, study documents

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated drug product

No

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated device product

No

product manufactured in and exported from the U.S.

No

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Clinical Trials on Epilepsy

Clinical Trials on Zinc Acetate Dihydrate

Subscribe