A Prospective Analysis of the Efficacy of Allosync Expand and Autograft Bone Graft in Open Lumbar Spinal Fusion

August 18, 2025 updated by: Research Source
The purpose of this study is to assess the radiographic and clinical outcomes of spinal fusion following use of Allosync Expand and autograft bone graft.

Study Overview

Status

Enrolling by invitation

Intervention / Treatment

Detailed Description

This is a single site, prospective study with patients selected as study subjects from the Investigator's standard patient population who fulfill the Inclusion/Exclusion Criteria and agree to participate in the study. The study surgery is standard of care, with patients identified as requiring surgery prior to enrollment. The study surgery is lumbar posterior fixation with supplemental posterolateral fusion at from 1 to 3 levels. One side of the posterolateral fusion will be Allosync Expand (utilizing the BMA Angel kit to hydrate) and the other side to autograft bone (control).

Study Type

Observational

Enrollment (Estimated)

40

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Locations

    • Michigan
      • Southfield, Michigan, United States, 48033
        • Michigan Orthopaedic Surgeons

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Ages Eligible for Study

  • Adult
  • Older Adult

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

N/A

Sampling Method

Non-Probability Sample

Study Population

A patient who meets all inclusion criteria and none exclusion criteria will be enrolled in the study. A patient is considered enrolled upon placement of the Allosync Expand during the surgical procedure. If the surgeon decides intra-operatively not to utilize Allosync Expand, the patient will be considered a screen failure.

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

  1. At least 22years of age at the time of consent
  2. Subject must have a documented diagnosis of spondylolisthesis up to Grade I. and have confirmed back and/or radicular pain with associated spinal stenosis as documented by conditions such as:

    1. Instability as defined by >3mm translation or >5 degree angulation
    2. Osteophyte formation of facet joints or vertebral endplates
  3. Subject presents with one or more of the following:

    1. Radiculopathy
    2. Sensory deficit
    3. Motor weakness
    4. Reflex changes
  4. Subject requires lumbar posterolateral arthrodesis at 1-3 contiguous levels (L1-S1).
  5. The number of levels decompressed must equal the number of levels fused.
  6. Subject must have been unresponsive to conservative care for at least 3 months prior to fusion surgery.
  7. Subject must be willing and able to sign an informed consent document.
  8. Subject must be willing and able to return for all follow-up visits, agree to participate in postoperative clinical and radiographic evaluations and comply with the required study regimen.

Exclusion Criteria:

  1. Subject has had prior lumbar spine fusion surgery at any level.
  2. Subject has greater than grade 1 spondylolisthesis of the lumbar spine.
  3. Subject is pregnant or nursing or planning to become pregnant during the two years (24 months) following arthrodesis
  4. Subject has an active local or systemic infection.
  5. Subject is a prisoner
  6. Patient has any condition (including malignancy), that in the opinion of the Investigator, would prohibit the patient from complying with and/or completing the protocol

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

Cohorts and Interventions

Group / Cohort
Intervention / Treatment
Allosync Expand
All enrolled patients will received Allosync Expand at 1-3 contiguous levels (L1-S1).
Allosync Expand is used in lumbar posterolateral arthrodesis at 1-3 contiguous levels (L1-S1)
Other Names:
  • Acceell Family of Products (Accell DBM 100, Accell TBM, A2i, and Accell Connexus)

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Lumbar fusion rate assessed via CT
Time Frame: 12 months post surgery
Lumbar fusion rate assessed via CT at 12 months post surgery
12 months post surgery

Secondary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Clinical outcome via neck visual analog scale (VAS)
Time Frame: 12 months post surgery
Standard of care patient reported neck visual analog scale (VAS) will be used to evaluate patient pain. On a scale of 0 to 10 with a score of 0 being no pain and a score of 10 being worst pain. A low score means a better clinical outcome. A high score means a worse clinical outcome.
12 months post surgery
Clinical outcome via Overall Quality of Life (EQ-5D) EuroQol Research Foundation
Time Frame: 12 months post surgery
Standard of care patient reported Overall Quality of Life (EQ-5D) EuroQol Research Foundation will be used to evaluate patient quality of life. On a scale of 3 levels: no problems, some problems, and extreme problems. With a score of "no problems" being no interference in quality of life and a score of "extreme problems" being a high interference in quality of life. "No problems" responses means a better clinical outcome. "Extreme problems" responses mean a worse clinical outcome.
12 months post surgery
Clinical outcome via PROMIS short form - Physical Evaluation
Time Frame: 12 months post surgery
Standard of care patient reported PROMIS short form - Physical Evaluation will be used to evaluate patient physical function. On a scale of 5 levels: without any difficulty, with a little difficulty, with some difficulty, with much difficulty, and unable to do. With a score of "without any difficulty" being no interference in physical function and a score of "unable to do" being high interference in physical function. "Without any difficulty" means a better clinical outcome. "Unable to do" means a worse clinical outcome.
12 months post surgery

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Sponsor

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start (Actual)

June 5, 2024

Primary Completion (Estimated)

May 1, 2026

Study Completion (Estimated)

May 1, 2027

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

May 10, 2024

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

May 10, 2024

First Posted (Actual)

May 16, 2024

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Actual)

August 22, 2025

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

August 18, 2025

Last Verified

August 1, 2025

More Information

Terms related to this study

Other Study ID Numbers

  • Allosync Expand

Plan for Individual participant data (IPD)

Plan to Share Individual Participant Data (IPD)?

NO

Drug and device information, study documents

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated drug product

No

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated device product

Yes

product manufactured in and exported from the U.S.

No

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Clinical Trials on Spondylolisthesis, Grade 1

Clinical Trials on Allosync Expand

Subscribe