Metvix PDT Versus Vehicle PDT With Aktilite CL128 Lamp in Patients With Actinic Keratosis on the Face and Scalp

August 3, 2022 updated by: Galderma R&D

A Multicenter, Double Blind, Vehicle-controlled, Randomized Study of Photodynamic Therapy (PDT) With Metvix 160 mg/g Cream and Aktilite CL128 LED Light in Patients With Multiple Actinic Keratosis on the Face and/or Scalp

The purpose of this study was to compare the efficacy of Photodynamic Therapy (PDT) with methyl aminolevulinate (MAL) cream to PDT with vehicle cream, using the Light-emitting diode (LED) light source Aktilite CL128, in treatment of participants with multiple actinic keratosis (sun-damaged skin) on the face and/or scalp.

Study Overview

Detailed Description

Actinic keratoses are pre-malignant skin lesions, which may develop to squamous cell carcinomas (SCC). They are usually small, thin, erythematous, de-squamating lesions on light exposed atrophic skin and the lesions are often multiple.

Photodynamic therapy (PDT) is the selective destruction of abnormal cells through light activation of a photosensitiser in the presence of oxygen. These cells accumulate more photosensitiser than normal cells. The photosensitiser generates reactive oxygen species upon illumination.

For skin diseases, such as actinic keratosis (AK), there has been an increasing interest in using topically applied precursors of the photoactive porphyrins (PAP). The most commonly used precursors have been 5-aminolevulinic acid (ALA) and its derivatives. The present test drug contains methyl aminolevulinate, which penetrates the lesions well and shows high lesion selectivity.

Different light sources (i.e. CureLight, Aktilite CL16 and Aktilite CL128) had been used for the activation of PAP, which absorbs light in the range of 400-700 nanometer (nm). The present study used the Aktilite CL 128 lamp. Aktilite 128 was based on LED technology and emits a narrow red light spectrum with an average wavelength of 630 (+/-5) nm. This study was similar to two other studies performed, on which the U.S. approval of Metvixia cream was based except for the light source used. This study was one of two studies performed to document the safety and efficacy of the Aktilite CL 128 lamp when used in combination with Metvixia cream.

Previous studies have shown that the risks attributed to Metvixia PDT are few and related mainly to transient pain and local erythema during and shortly after treatment. These reactions are part of the expected local phototoxicity reaction. PDT offers an advantage to other treatment modalities for actinic keratosis, being a non-invasive treatment available on an outpatient basis. Several separate lesions can be treated simultaneously and the same lesion(s) can be treated repeatedly with success. There are no known systemic toxicity or interaction with other medication. The treatment is also lesion selective, leaving the surrounding tissue intact and functional, also allowing excellent cosmetic results after treatment.

Study Type

Interventional

Enrollment (Actual)

131

Phase

  • Phase 3

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Locations

      • Dusseldorf, Germany, 40223
        • Hautklinik Heinrich Heine Universität
      • Frankfurt, Germany, 60590
        • Klinikum der Johann Wolfgang Goethe-Universität Frankfurt am Main
      • Gilching, Germany, 82205
        • Praxis Dr. Winfried Klövekorn
      • Lubeck, Germany, 23538
        • Klinik für Dermatologie und Venerologie Universitätsklinikum Schleswig-Holstein, Campus Lübeck
      • Munchen, Germany, 80337
        • Klinikum der Universität München, Klinikum und Poliklinik für Dermatologie und Allergologie
      • Regensburg, Germany, 93053
        • Klinik und Poliklinik für Dermatologie, Klinikum der Universität Regensburg
      • Tutzing, Germany, 82327
        • Praxis Dr. Klemm
    • Illinois
      • Naperville, Illinois, United States, 60563
        • Ashish C. Bhatia
    • Kentucky
      • Louisville, Kentucky, United States, 40202
        • Joseph Fowler
    • Oregon
      • Portland, Oregon, United States, 97223
        • Robert T. Matheson
    • Texas
      • San Antonio, Texas, United States, 78229
        • Steven A. Davis

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Ages Eligible for Study

18 years and older (Adult, Older Adult)

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

  • Clinical diagnosis of 4-10 previously untreated, not pigmented, non-hyperkeratotic AK lesions of 3 mm or more diameter of Grade 1 and/or 2 of the face and/or scalp where other therapies are unacceptable or considered medically less appropriate.
  • Males or females above 18 years of age.
  • Written informed consent.

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Participants with porphyria.
  • Participants immunosuppressed for idiopathic, disease specific or therapeutic reasons.
  • Known allergy to MAL, a similar PDT compound or excipients of the cream.
  • Participants with history of hypersensitivity to nut products or other known protein antigens.
  • Participation in other clinical studies either currently or within the last 30 days.
  • Participants receiving local treatment (including cryotherapy and curretage) in face / scalp area within the last 30 days.
  • Participants receiving topical treatment (including imiquimod, 5-FU and diclofenac) in face / scalp area within the last 3 months.
  • Pregnant or breast-feeding: All women of child-bearing potential must use adequate contraception (oral contraceptives, intrauterine device, contraceptive skin patch, etc) during the treatment period and one month thereafter. In addition, they must have a negative pregnancy test prior to treatment.
  • Any conditions that may be associated with a risk of poor protocol compliance.
  • Participants currently receiving regular ultraviolet radiation therapy.

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

  • Primary Purpose: Treatment
  • Allocation: Randomized
  • Interventional Model: Parallel Assignment
  • Masking: Double

Arms and Interventions

Participant Group / Arm
Intervention / Treatment
Experimental: Metvix-PDT
Participants received Metvix-PDT (methyl aminolevulinate hydrochloride-Photodynamic therapy) 160 milligrams per gram (mg/g) cream on face and/or scalp for 3 hours on Day 0 and Day 7.
Metvix 160 mg/g Cream was applied for 3 hours with occlusive dressing, and illumination with non-coherent red light using the Aktilite CL128 lamp, with a total light dose 37 Joule/square centimeter (J/cm²). All eligible lesions on the participant were treated twice with an interval of 1 week between treatments.
Placebo Comparator: Vehicle-PDT
Participants received Vehicle cream (Vehicle-PDT) on face and/or scalp for 3 hours on Day 0 and Day 7.
Vehicle Cream was applied for 3 hours with occlusive dressing, and illumination with non-coherent red light using the Aktilite CL128 lamp, with a total light dose 37 J/cm². All eligible lesions on the participant were treated twice with an interval of 1 week between treatments.

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Participant Complete Response Rate (CRR)
Time Frame: At Week 13
Participant complete response rate was defined as the percentage of participants with complete response. Complete response was defined as the complete disappearance of the lesion determined by clinical assessment (visual inspection and palpation) by an investigator.
At Week 13

Secondary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Lesion Complete Response Rate
Time Frame: At Week 13
Lesion complete response rate was defined as the percentage of pre-existing and treated lesions at baseline that were assessed as clear (complete disappearance of the lesion, visually and by palpation) after treatment. Percentage of lesions reported by location.
At Week 13
Number of Participants With at Least One Treatment Site Adverse Events
Time Frame: From start of study drug administration up to Week 13
An AE was any untoward medical occurrence in a participant or clinical investigation participant administered a pharmaceutical product and which does not necessarily had a causal relationship with this treatment. An AE can therefore be any unfavorable and unintended sign (including an abnormal laboratory value), symptom, or disease temporally associated with the use of a medicinal (investigational) product, whether or not related to the medicinal (investigational) product. Number of participants with at least one treatment site adverse events were reported.
From start of study drug administration up to Week 13

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Sponsor

Investigators

  • Principal Investigator: Rolf M Szeimies, Professor, Klinik und Poliklinik für Dermatologie, Klinikum der Universität Regensburg

Publications and helpful links

The person responsible for entering information about the study voluntarily provides these publications. These may be about anything related to the study.

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start (Actual)

March 13, 2006

Primary Completion (Actual)

January 23, 2007

Study Completion (Actual)

January 23, 2007

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

March 16, 2006

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

March 16, 2006

First Posted (Estimated)

March 17, 2006

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Actual)

July 3, 2023

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

August 3, 2022

Last Verified

August 1, 2022

More Information

Terms related to this study

Drug and device information, study documents

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated drug product

Yes

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated device product

No

product manufactured in and exported from the U.S.

No

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Clinical Trials on Actinic Keratosis

Clinical Trials on Metvix-PDT

Subscribe