Consecutive Dual-Session tDCS in Chronic Subjective Severe to Catastrophic Tinnitus With Normal Hearing

May 16, 2024 updated by: Dongtan Sacred Heart Hospital
We aimed to analyze the effect of continuous dual session tDCS in patients with severe chronic subjective tinnitus without any evidence of hearing loss in terms of relief of tinnitus perception, distress, and loudness. Also, we investigated the difference in the maintenance duration of the tinnitus suppression effect of consecutive dual session tDCS compared to other groups followed up for 2 months.

Study Overview

Status

Completed

Detailed Description

The participants were randomly allocated with three different arms (control, single-session, and dual session) using block to balance the size of each group. Pure tone audiometry, speech audiometry, tinnitogram (pitch matching, loudness, minimal masking level and residual inhibition), auditory evoked potential, THI, visual analogue scale (VAS) of loudness, awareness and annoyance, and BDI were evaluated as a baseline tests. Participants who assigned to the control group underwent dual sham stimulation per day, twice a week for 1 month. Patients were received sham and true stimulation once alternately in the single session group and two true stimulation per day in the dual session group for the same period as the control group. All subjects who enrolled this study were given a conventional treatment such as tinnitus retraining therapy, sound therapy using sound generator, and medications like clonazepam, selective serotonin reuptake inhibitors for patients who wanted to take for relief of symptoms.

Study Type

Interventional

Enrollment (Actual)

42

Phase

  • Not Applicable

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Locations

    • Gyeonggi-Do
      • Hwaseong Si, Gyeonggi-Do, Korea, Republic of, 445-170
        • Dongtan Sacred Heart Hospital

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Ages Eligible for Study

  • Adult
  • Older Adult

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

Yes

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

  • Individuals who have experienced subjective tinnitus for over 3 months.
  • Individuals with normal hearing, defined as an average pure tone threshold of less than 25 dB between 0.5-4 kHz, and the presence of the V wave at 30 dBnHL with a difference in V wave latency of less than 0.2 ms in both ears during the ABR test.
  • Individuals with severe tinnitus, as indicated by a Tinnitus Handicap Inventory (THI) score of 58 or higher, and who have been assessed for symptoms of anxiety and depressive mood using the Beck Depression Inventory (BDI) questionnaire.

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Those requiring treatment for neurological disorders such as epilepsy, migraine, or intracranial masses.
  • Pregnant individuals on the day of providing consent and those with metal-based electric implantable prosthetics.
  • Individuals with objective or somatic tinnitus, auditory hallucinations, unwillingness to provide written consent, or unwillingness to continue the trial, and those who have participated in previous trials involving tDCS for tinnitus.

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

  • Primary Purpose: Treatment
  • Allocation: Randomized
  • Interventional Model: Parallel Assignment
  • Masking: Single

Arms and Interventions

Participant Group / Arm
Intervention / Treatment
Sham Comparator: control
The subjects in control group were received two consecutive sessions of sham stimulation twice a week for 4 weeks (8 sessions in total).
The device used for tDCS in this study was DC-Stimulator Plus (NeuroConn GmbH, Ilmenau, Germany). The localization of stimulation area (DLPFC) was determined according to the 10/20 EEG system. Non-conducting, elastic head strap was placed around the head to prevent displacement during stimulation. The recording electrode covered with 5 x 7 cm sized traditional rectangular sponge was soaked with 6-7 mL of 0.9% NaCl saline solution per side and placed on the F3 (anode, left frontal) and F4 (cathode, right frontal) EEG location. Subjects were given 2 mA stimulation intensity for 20 min per session including fade-in and fade-out times for 20 seconds each. Interval between each session was 20 min. Sham procedure has been adopted a Fade In of current, Short Stimulation, Fade Out (FISSFO) protocol that consist of initial ramp up for 20 seconds, 2 mA stimulation for 40 seconds, and 20 seconds for ramp down. To check to impendence, brief current of 110 µA over 15ms every 550ms was delivered.
Active Comparator: single-session
Patients enrolled to the single-session group received tDCS on one random session out of two consecutive sessions.
The device used for tDCS in this study was DC-Stimulator Plus (NeuroConn GmbH, Ilmenau, Germany). The localization of stimulation area (DLPFC) was determined according to the 10/20 EEG system. Non-conducting, elastic head strap was placed around the head to prevent displacement during stimulation. The recording electrode covered with 5 x 7 cm sized traditional rectangular sponge was soaked with 6-7 mL of 0.9% NaCl saline solution per side and placed on the F3 (anode, left frontal) and F4 (cathode, right frontal) EEG location. Subjects were given 2 mA stimulation intensity for 20 min per session including fade-in and fade-out times for 20 seconds each. Interval between each session was 20 min. Sham procedure has been adopted a Fade In of current, Short Stimulation, Fade Out (FISSFO) protocol that consist of initial ramp up for 20 seconds, 2 mA stimulation for 40 seconds, and 20 seconds for ramp down. To check to impendence, brief current of 110 µA over 15ms every 550ms was delivered.
Experimental: dual-session
In the dual-session group, the patients underwent two consecutives tDCS.
The device used for tDCS in this study was DC-Stimulator Plus (NeuroConn GmbH, Ilmenau, Germany). The localization of stimulation area (DLPFC) was determined according to the 10/20 EEG system. Non-conducting, elastic head strap was placed around the head to prevent displacement during stimulation. The recording electrode covered with 5 x 7 cm sized traditional rectangular sponge was soaked with 6-7 mL of 0.9% NaCl saline solution per side and placed on the F3 (anode, left frontal) and F4 (cathode, right frontal) EEG location. Subjects were given 2 mA stimulation intensity for 20 min per session including fade-in and fade-out times for 20 seconds each. Interval between each session was 20 min. Sham procedure has been adopted a Fade In of current, Short Stimulation, Fade Out (FISSFO) protocol that consist of initial ramp up for 20 seconds, 2 mA stimulation for 40 seconds, and 20 seconds for ramp down. To check to impendence, brief current of 110 µA over 15ms every 550ms was delivered.

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Visual analogue scale (VAS) related to tinnitus
Time Frame: All participants were checked the VAS immediately after the last stimulation of every week for 4 weeks and 8th week (4 weeks after the end of treatment).
To achieve a more quantitative evaluation of tinnitus reduction, we assessed the Visual Analog Scale (VAS).
All participants were checked the VAS immediately after the last stimulation of every week for 4 weeks and 8th week (4 weeks after the end of treatment).
Tinnitus Handicap Inventory (THI)
Time Frame: THI was assessed at the 4th and 8th week visits.
The subjective improvement of tinnitus was evaluated using THI.
THI was assessed at the 4th and 8th week visits.
Beck depression inventory (BDI)
Time Frame: THI was assessed at the 4th and 8th week visits.
To assess the association between tinnitus relief and depression, we evaluated the Beck Depression Inventory (BDI).
THI was assessed at the 4th and 8th week visits.

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Investigators

  • Study Director: Sung Kyun Kim, University of Michigan

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start (Actual)

December 15, 2021

Primary Completion (Actual)

September 30, 2022

Study Completion (Actual)

September 30, 2022

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

May 16, 2024

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

May 16, 2024

First Posted (Actual)

May 21, 2024

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Actual)

May 21, 2024

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

May 16, 2024

Last Verified

May 1, 2024

More Information

Terms related to this study

Drug and device information, study documents

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated drug product

No

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated device product

No

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Clinical Trials on Tinnitus, Subjective

Clinical Trials on Transcranial direct current stimulation

Subscribe