Urine DNA Methylation Detection for Hematuria Evaluation

June 17, 2024 updated by: Changhai Hospital

Urine Exfoliated Cell DNA Methylation Detection for Urothelial Carcinomas Diagnosis in Patients With Hematuria--A Prospective, Single-center, Cohort Study

Background: Hematuria, a common symptom of urinary system diseases, can result from various causes including infection, stones, trauma, and tumors. Urothelial carcinoma (UC), the most common malignancy of the urinary system, often presents with hematuria. Current diagnostic methods like urine cytology and cystoscopy have limitations in sensitivity and specificity, and cystoscopy is invasive. DNA methylation biomarkers offer potential for non-invasive UC detection, improving diagnostic accuracy in hematuria patients.

Objective: This study aims to evaluate the diagnostic performance of DNA methylation biomarkers in detecting UC in patients with hematuria.

Methods: This prospective pilot study will involve collecting preoperative urine samples from hematuria patients for DNA methylation testing using MSRE-qPCR. Sample size calculation was based on an assumed 25% prevalence of UC in hematuria patients, resulting in a total of 71 participants after accounting for a 20% dropout rate. Sensitivity, specificity, and diagnostic performance will be assessed using ROC curves.

Conclusion: This study seeks to validate the effectiveness of urine DNA methylation testing for UC detection in hematuria patients, providing a basis for its clinical application and informing the design of larger future studies.

Study Overview

Detailed Description

  1. Background Hematuria is a common symptom of urinary system diseases and can be caused by various factors, including infection, stones, trauma, and tumors. Urothelial carcinoma (UC) is the most common malignant tumor of the urinary system, primarily occurring in the bladder, renal pelvis, and ureter. The early symptoms of UC are often not obvious, with hematuria being the most common symptom. However, current diagnostic methods such as urine cytology and cystoscopy have limitations in sensitivity and specificity for diagnosing UC. Additionally, cystoscopy is invasive and can cause discomfort for patients. DNA methylation biomarkers have shown potential in detecting UC, providing a non-invasive method to improve diagnostic sensitivity and specificity, especially in patients with hematuria.
  2. Objective This study aims to evaluate the diagnostic performance of DNA methylation biomarkers in detecting urothelial carcinoma in patients with hematuria. By collecting preoperative urine samples from a small cohort of hematuria patients and performing DNA methylation testing, we aim to explore the feasibility and advantages of this method in clinical applications.
  3. Methods

    Study Design:

    This is a prospective pilot study aimed at evaluating the effectiveness of DNA methylation biomarkers in detecting urothelial carcinoma in patients with hematuria.

    Sample Size Calculation:

    Based on our previous observations, the incidence of urothelial carcinoma in patients with hematuria is 20%-30%, slightly higher than reported in other literature. Therefore, we hypothesize that 25% of the patients in the hematuria cohort have UC. The group allocation ratio (R): N-/N+ = 75%/25% = 3.

    Assumptions:

    Area under the curve (AUC) under H0: 0.5 AUC under H1: 0.8 Power: 0.95 Significance level (Alpha): 0.05 Type of data: Continuous FPR range: 0.00 to 1.00

    Results: Using PASS 15.0 software for sample size calculation to ensure sufficient statistical power. The calculated sample size is:

    N+ (number of patients with UC): 14 N- (number of patients without UC): 42 Total sample size (N): 56

    Considering a 20% dropout rate, the adjusted sample size is:

    N+': 18 N-': 53 Total sample size (N'): 71

    Inclusion and Exclusion Criteria:

    Inclusion Criteria:

    Aged between 18 and 99 years, with gross or microscopic hematuria (>3/HP). Able to provide 50ml urine for testing before surgery. Consent to participate in the study and sign the informed consent form.

    Exclusion Criteria:

    With history of malignancy or concomitant malignancies other than UC. Severe urinary tract infection leading to sepsis. Patients with indwelling catheters, nephrostomy, or cystostomy. Severe liver or kidney failure or other conditions deemed unsuitable for the study.

    Patients who did not undergo surgical treatment for various reasons. Samples with insufficient DNA content or other quality control failures.

    Sample Collection:

    Clinicians will collect fresh urine samples from enrolled hematuria patients and record their basic information, clinical information, and medical history.

    Samples will be randomly numbered and provided to DNA methylation testing personnel to ensure blinding.

    Testing Method:

    Urine samples were collected in EP Genomic DNA Kit with an automated nucleic acid extraction instrument. Subsequently, 100 ng of genomic DNA was used for methylation-sensitive restriction enzyme qPCR (MSRE-qPCR) detection as described previously. Different from bisulfite PCR relying on bisulfite conversion, MSRE-qPCR is based on the selective digestion of DNA by methylation-sensitive enzyme followed by qPCR with primers that surround the cutting site.

    Unblinding and Data Organization:

    After the last sample is successfully enrolled and tested, non-recruiting personnel and testing personnel will unblind the samples and organize clinical and pathological information.

    Data Analysis:

    Using pathological results as the gold standard. Calculate the sensitivity, specificity, positive predictive value, and negative predictive value of DNA methylation biomarkers.

    Use statistical methods (such as ROC curves) to evaluate the diagnostic performance of DNA methylation biomarkers and calculate the AUROC.

    Ethics and Informed Consent:

    This study has been approved by the hospital's ethics committee, and all participants must sign an informed consent form.

  4. Conclusion This study aims to validate the effectiveness of urine DNA methylation testing in detecting urothelial carcinoma in patients with hematuria and provide evidence for its clinical application. The results of this preliminary study will offer essential data support and design optimization suggestions for future larger-scale studies.

Study Type

Observational

Enrollment (Estimated)

71

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Locations

    • Shanghai
      • Shanghai, Shanghai, China
        • Changhai Hospital
        • Contact:
        • Principal Investigator:
          • Chuanliang Xu, Dr

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Ages Eligible for Study

  • Adult
  • Older Adult

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Sampling Method

Probability Sample

Study Population

This is a prospective pilot study aimed at evaluating the effectiveness of DNA methylation biomarkers in detecting urothelial carcinoma in patients with hematuria.

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

  1. Aged between 18 and 99 years, with gross or microscopic hematuria (>3/HP).
  2. Able to provide 50ml urine for testing before surgery.
  3. Consent to participate in the study and sign the informed consent form.

Exclusion Criteria:

  1. With history of malignancy or concomitant malignancies other than UC.
  2. Severe urinary tract infection leading to sepsis.
  3. Patients with indwelling catheters, nephrostomy, or cystostomy. 4 Severe liver or kidney failure or other conditions deemed unsuitable for the study.

5. Patients who did not undergo surgical treatment for various reasons. 6. Samples with insufficient DNA content or other quality control failures.

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Diagnostic performance of DNA methylation test
Time Frame: 1 year
Evaluate the diagnostic performance of DNA methylation biomarkers by calculating the AUROC value.
1 year

Secondary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Sensitivity, specificity, positive predictive value, and negative predictive value of DNA methylation biomarkers
Time Frame: 1 year
Calculate the sensitivity, specificity, positive predictive value, and negative predictive value of DNA methylation biomarkers.
1 year

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start (Estimated)

June 15, 2024

Primary Completion (Estimated)

June 30, 2025

Study Completion (Estimated)

December 31, 2025

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

May 20, 2024

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

May 20, 2024

First Posted (Actual)

May 24, 2024

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Actual)

June 20, 2024

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

June 17, 2024

Last Verified

May 1, 2024

More Information

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Clinical Trials on Bladder Cancer

3
Subscribe