Accuracy of an Artificial Intelligence-assisted Diagnostic System for Caries Diagnosis: a Prospective Multicenter Clinical Study

July 8, 2024 updated by: Fan Yang, Zhejiang Provincial People's Hospital
This clinical trial was designed as a prospective, multicenter, multi-reader multi-case (MRMC), superiority, parallel-controlled study. Participants who met the trial criteria and signed the informed consent form were enrolled. The trial group involved diagnoses of caries on panoramic radiographs using an artificial intelligence-assisted diagnostic system, while the control group involved diagnoses made by dental practitioners specializing in operative dentistry and endodontics with five years of experience, who interpreted oral panoramic radiographs to determine the presence and severity of caries.

Study Overview

Status

Not yet recruiting

Study Type

Observational

Enrollment (Estimated)

220

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Ages Eligible for Study

  • Adult
  • Older Adult

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Sampling Method

Probability Sample

Study Population

Patients visiting the all the three centers during the study period with symptoms of caries as their chief complaint.

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

-

Inclusion Criteria:

  1. Patients presenting with clinical manifestations of caries as their chief complaint;
  2. Age ≥18 and ≤70 years, irrespective of gender;
  3. Oral panoramic radiographs showing a complete dentition, specifically with the second molars and all premolars intact in each quadrant;
  4. On the oral panoramic radiographs, the number of teeth with restorations or fillings does not exceed one in any quadrant;
  5. Oral panoramic radiographs that are clear, easy to interpret, and free from significant artifacts;
  6. Participants who voluntarily agree to partake, can comprehend the purpose of the study, and are capable of signing an informed consent form.

Exclusion Criteria:

  1. Oral panoramic radiographs that are unclear, with overlapping, blurring, or artifacts present;
  2. Insufficient number of teeth available for study;
  3. Severe tooth wear or erosion leading to significant alteration in tooth morphology;
  4. Presence of supernumerary teeth, microdontia, or missing teeth;
  5. Conditions not suitable for oral radiography, such as pregnancy or undergoing radiation therapy for tumors;
  6. Limited mouth opening that precludes clinical examination;
  7. Neurological disorders, psychiatric illnesses, or psychological impairments;
  8. Participation in another clinical trial within the last three months;
  9. Any other condition deemed by the researchers as unsuitable for inclusion in the study.

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

Cohorts and Interventions

Group / Cohort
Control group
Dentist specializing in endodontics with over five years of experience independently reviewed the participants' oral panoramic radiographs in a random order.
Trial group
The diagnoses of caries on oral panoramic radiographs were made with the assistance of an artificial intelligence-aided oral panoramic diagnostic system.

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Sensitivity, specificity, and accuracy of caries diagnosis
Time Frame: Immediately after the completion of all participant information collection.

Sensitivity: Sensitivity assesses the diagnostic method's ability to identify the disease, that is, how many true cases of caries can be correctly identified among all actual cases of caries.

Specificity: Specificity evaluates the diagnostic tool's ability to recognize the absence of disease, meaning how many true non-caries cases can be correctly identified among all actual non-caries cases.

Accuracy: Accuracy evaluates the overall correctness of the diagnostic tool in diagnosing the disease.

Immediately after the completion of all participant information collection.

Secondary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Miss rate and false positive rate of caries diagnosis
Time Frame: Immediately after the completion of all participant information collection.

Miss rate (False Negative Rate): The miss rate refers to the proportion of true caries cases that the diagnostic method fails to correctly identify among all actual cases of caries. In this study, the effectiveness of the artificial intelligence-assisted diagnostic system is evaluated by comparing the miss rate of caries diagnosis between the artificial intelligence-assisted diagnostic system and dentists with five years of experience.

False positive rate: The false positive rate refers to the proportion of cases that are incorrectly identified as having caries among all actual non-caries cases. In this study, the effectiveness of the artificial intelligence-assisted diagnostic system is evaluated by comparing the false positive rate of caries diagnosis between the artificial intelligence-assisted diagnostic system and dentists with five years of experience.

Immediately after the completion of all participant information collection.
Accuracy of Caries Severity Level Diagnosis
Time Frame: Immediately after the completion of all participant information collection.
This study utilizes the International Caries Detection and Assessment System (ICDAS) to evaluate the grading of caries severity, categorizing caries severity into five levels: E0, E1, E2, D1, and D2. Wherein: E0 indicates no apparent signs of caries; E1 represents early caries, primarily initial enamel lesions; E2 designates enamel caries without involvement of the dentin; D1 denotes superficial dentin caries, not reaching half of the dentin thickness; D2 signifies deep dentin caries, reaching or exceeding half of the dentin thickness. This study will assess and compare the diagnostic accuracy at each grading level between the trial group and the control group.
Immediately after the completion of all participant information collection.

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start (Estimated)

August 1, 2024

Primary Completion (Estimated)

December 1, 2026

Study Completion (Estimated)

June 1, 2027

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

May 20, 2024

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

May 20, 2024

First Posted (Actual)

May 24, 2024

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Actual)

July 10, 2024

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

July 8, 2024

Last Verified

July 1, 2024

More Information

Terms related to this study

Drug and device information, study documents

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated drug product

No

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated device product

No

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Clinical Trials on Dental Caries

Subscribe