Clinical Outcome in Patients With INPH

May 20, 2024 updated by: Xuanwu Hospital, Beijing

Phenotypes, Biomarkers and Pathophysiology in INPH

The aim of this study is to determine the clinical spectrum and natural progression of idiopathic normal pressure hydrocephalus (iNPH ) and related disorders in a prospective single center study, identify digital, imaging and molecular biomarkers that can assist in diagnosis and therapy development and study the etiology and molecular mechanisms of these diseases.

Study Overview

Detailed Description

Due to the heterogeneity of the etiology of idiopathic normal pressure hydrocephalus , almost all published studies on the clinical outcome and prognostic factors of iNPH are relatively limited, and most of them are retrospective. It is not clear which is the most reliable predictor of clinical outcome. Therefore, the researchers conducted this prospective cohort study to identify the occurrence, development and outcome of iNPH and determine the main prognostic factors through clinical scales, biomarkers and imaging.

At study visits a standardized clinical examination will be performed including application of clinical rating scales. At all study visits, patients will be asked to donate biosamples; biomaterial collection is optional and participants can elect to participate in sampling of blood, urine, CSF, and/or a muscle biopsy.

Optionally, additional examinations may be performed including imaging,such as DTIALPS, neurophysiological examination, analysis of patient or observer reported outcomes and analysis to characterize molecular biomarkers.

Study Type

Observational

Enrollment (Estimated)

200

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Contact

Study Contact Backup

Study Locations

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Ages Eligible for Study

  • Adult
  • Older Adult

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

Yes

Sampling Method

Probability Sample

Study Population

patients who was diagnosed as idiopathic normal pressure hydrocephalus

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

  • patients who was diagnosed as idiopathic normal pressure hydrocephalus

Exclusion Criteria:

  • patient received surgical treatment or interventional treatment before patient is pregnant patient unable to complete follow-up patient with other types of hydrocephalus other nervous system diseases

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

Cohorts and Interventions

Group / Cohort
Intervention / Treatment
hydrocephalus
high throughput sequencing and electromyography Whole Genome Sequencing, Whole Exome Sequencing, Transcriptomics, Proteomics, Metabolomics and imaging, such as DTIALPS
Diagnostic Test: high throughput sequencing and electromyography Whole Genome Sequencing, Whole Exome Sequencing, Transcriptomics, Proteomics, Metabolomics and imaging, such as DTIALPS
Normal group
Whole Genome Sequencing, Whole Exome Sequencing, Transcriptomics, Proteomics, Metabolomics
Whole Genome Sequencing, Whole Exome Sequencing, Transcriptomics, Proteomics, Metabolomics and imaging, such as DTIALPS

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
DTIALPS
Time Frame: Change from Baseline at 6 months after VP shunt
Change of DTIALPS singal intensity in the resting state fMRI in iNPH patients compared with normal healthy group. Also, the responsive and non-responsive iNPH patients functional MRI were analzed.
Change from Baseline at 6 months after VP shunt

Secondary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Kiefer score
Time Frame: Change from Baseline at 6 months after VP shunt
A score for iNPH severity; range 0-26; higher indicates higher severity.
Change from Baseline at 6 months after VP shunt
Mini mental state Examination
Time Frame: Change from Baseline at 6 months after VP shunt
A score for cognitive ability; range 0-30; higher indicates higher severity.
Change from Baseline at 6 months after VP shunt
Gait evaluation
Time Frame: Change from Baseline at 6 months after VP shunt
10 meters walking test were evaluated of iNPH patients.
Change from Baseline at 6 months after VP shunt
modified Rankin scale
Time Frame: Change from Baseline at 6 months after VP shunt
A score for functional neurological status ; range 0-5; higher indicates higher severity.
Change from Baseline at 6 months after VP shunt
Change in the resting state fMRI
Time Frame: Change from Baseline at 6 months after VP shunt
Change of BOLD singal intensity in the resting state fMRI in iNPH patients compared with normal healthy group. Also, the responsive and non-responsive iNPH patients functional MRI were analzed.
Change from Baseline at 6 months after VP shunt
omic pattern of CSF in iNPH patients
Time Frame: Before surgery in lumbar CSF
Comparing the omic pattern differences in CSF between iNPH patients and normal age-matched normal volunteers by the analysis of mass spectrometry. Also, the responsive and non-responsive iNPH patients omic pattern were analzed.
Before surgery in lumbar CSF
omic pattern of CSF in iNPH patients
Time Frame: Change from Baseline at 6 months after VP shunt
Comparing the omic pattern differences in CSF of iNPH patients before surgery and after VP shunt by the analysis of mass spectrometry. Also, the responsive and non-responsive iNPH patients omic pattern were analzed.
Change from Baseline at 6 months after VP shunt

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Publications and helpful links

The person responsible for entering information about the study voluntarily provides these publications. These may be about anything related to the study.

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start (Estimated)

May 15, 2024

Primary Completion (Estimated)

May 15, 2026

Study Completion (Estimated)

May 1, 2027

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

May 20, 2024

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

May 20, 2024

First Posted (Actual)

May 24, 2024

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Actual)

May 24, 2024

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

May 20, 2024

Last Verified

May 1, 2024

More Information

Terms related to this study

Drug and device information, study documents

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated drug product

No

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated device product

No

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Clinical Trials on Hydrocephalus

Clinical Trials on hydrocephalus group

Subscribe