Exploring the Effectiveness of an Interprofessional Game-based Learning

August 23, 2024 updated by: The Hong Kong Polytechnic University

An Exploratory Study on the v-Care Interprofessional Online Game for Healthcare Students

The goal of this waitlist control study is to evaluate the benefits of online game pedagogy to evaluate the readiness of health care students for interprofessional learning in nursing students.

Interprofessional (IP) collaboration is a core competence of health care education to enable effective teamwork and improve health outcomes. Taking into account the characteristics of our students and the pragmatic issues, v-Care (Virtual Care) is a novel strategy to deliver Interprofessional Education using gamification. Colleagues from nursing (SN), rehabilitation sciences (RS) and health technology and informatics (HTI) will collaborate in the design of v-Care, and implement and evaluate it effectiveness in nursing, physiotherapy and radiography related subjects.

To evaluate the effectiveness of interprofessional learning of the health faculty students using a multi-player point-and-click on line motivational game.

Theoretical Framework The v-Care design is based on the Self-Determination Theory (SDT) and Motivational Gamification.

Outcomes:

The primary outcome is to improve the readiness for interprofessional learning. A peer learning community will be established to improve the motivation to learn based on SDT: (1) autonomy, (2) competence and (3) relatedness.

Study Overview

Detailed Description

BACKGROUND lnterprofessional education is a core competence of health care education to enable effective collaboration and improve health outcomes [1] (lnterprofessional Education Collaborative Expert Panel, 2011). Numerous initiatives were implemented, including the Freshman Seminar for Broad Disciplines in Health Science (FS) in the undergraduate curriculum. IPE was explicitly listed in the FS intended learning outcomes to (1) understand the professional identity of the learners' own discipline and the other professional's roles on the health care team; and (2) Identify innovative strategies in managing selected major health issues implement using an interprofessional (IP) collaborations approach; and (3) reflect on the experience on interprofessional learning and its implications on lifelong learning and career development. Starting from 2002/23 academic year, this subject was replaced by artificial intelligence and data analytics (AIDA). Since IP is an integral part of the curriculum, implementing IPE under other teaching modes (such as gamification, peer-learning or learner-directed) must be reconsidered.

Motivational gamification is a strategy rooted in the Self-Determination Theory (SDT), gamification and micro-learning are the merits much preferred by the millennials in learning. This strategy leverages on the millennial characteristics that technology has been embedded to their daily life, they enjoy fun and games and are motivated by immediate positive rewards, such as points and badges. Furthermore, they have relatively shorter attention span and enjoy simulation in virtual environments with high quality visuals and graphics. Game features such as click-to-reveal, drag-and-drop, pop quizzes tend to engage the millennial learners. As such, the proposed project is feasible to improve the learning experience and possibly learning outcomes.

AIM To evaluate the effectiveness and impact of interprofessional learning of health faculty students using a multi-player point-and-click on line motivational game. A pretest-posttest non-equivalent waitlist control group design was employed.

METHOD Convenience sampling was adopted to recruit subjects. Inclusion criteria - Participants were recruited from the students who had enrolled in the nursing, physiotherapy and radiography subjects. Students retaking the subject will be excluded from the study.

They were assigned into two study groups according to the tutorial teaching schedule: the control and the experimental groups. The Control group attended the usual teaching activities: paper case study, whereas the intervention group participated in the vCare eGame (intervention). Surveys will be implemented before any learning activities, and at the same time for both groups after the intervention group completed the vCare eGame.

OUTCOME MEASURES Primary outcome will be measured by the Readiness for Interprofessional Learning Scale (19-items).

Secondary outcome on students' autonomy will be measured by a 24-items Perceived Peer Autonomy Support Scale and the 18-item Intrinsic Motivation Inventory.

Study Type

Interventional

Enrollment (Estimated)

350

Phase

  • Not Applicable

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Contact

Study Locations

    • Hong Kong Island
      • Hung Hom, Hong Kong Island, Hong Kong
      • Hung Hom, Hong Kong Island, Hong Kong
        • Recruiting
        • The Hong Kong Polytechnic University
        • Contact:

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Ages Eligible for Study

  • Adult

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

  • All students learning colorectal cancer and or frailty when taking the specified subject in the Bachelor Nursing Programme and,
  • all students taking Bachelor of Science (Honours) Scheme in Medical Laboratory Science and Radiography in Radiography will be recruited

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Students retaking these specified subjects will be excluded.
  • Students learning other disorders but not colorectal cancer or frailty are not eligible

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

  • Primary Purpose: Other
  • Allocation: Non-Randomized
  • Interventional Model: Parallel Assignment
  • Masking: Single

Arms and Interventions

Participant Group / Arm
Intervention / Treatment
Experimental: v-Care online game

the v-Care online game consist of a clinical scenario. Participants are requested to join the online game in small groups, consisting of nursing and radiography students, to discuss the patient's condition presented in the scenario. They will also be required to watch relevant mini-videos that cover the knowledge check points within the game.

As part of the activity, participants will be expected to submit a mini interprofessional project that explains their respective roles and responsibilities in managing the patient's condition.

To enhance engagement and motivation, an online game reward system has been implemented. This system includes the opportunity to earn badges upon completing the knowledge check points or participating in learning activities such as watching tutorials or engaging in interprofessional discussions. These discussions will be recorded and summarized to highlight the key points of their conversation.

A regular 2 hours traditional learning mode session - case study session and 2-hour online game session with peer-led discussion and interprofessional project submission. This spreads in 3 weeks interval
Active Comparator: Case-based online discussion

Participants are requested to engage in case-based discussions within small groups, comprising nursing and radiography students. As part of this activity, students are required to complete a conventional assignment using a worksheet, which will allow them to elaborate on their individual roles and responsibilities in managing the patient's condition.

In addition, students are encouraged to utilize traditional learning and teaching methods by reading and exploring relevant materials pertaining to the patient's condition.

A 2-hour traditional learning mode session with online peer-led discussion and submission of an interprofessional worksheet as an assignment

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Readiness of Health Care Students for Interprofessional Learning (RIPLS)
Time Frame: This will be administered immediately before the start of the learning activity and immediately after the activity is completed
A 5-point Likert scale questionnaire will be used. There are four subscales that included teamwork and collaboration, negative professional identity, positive professional identity, and roles and responsibility. The higher scores mean a better outcome.
This will be administered immediately before the start of the learning activity and immediately after the activity is completed

Secondary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Intrinsic Motivation Inventory
Time Frame: This will be administered immediately before the start of the learning activity and immediately after the activity is completed

This is a 9-items instrument with 3 subscales: interest/enjoyment, perceived competence, and pressure/tension; on a 7-point Likert Scale - Not at all true, somewhat true to very true.

The higher scores mean a better outcome

This will be administered immediately before the start of the learning activity and immediately after the activity is completed
Perceived Autonomy Scale
Time Frame: This will be administered immediately before the start of the learning activity and immediately after the activity is completed

One 6-items scale will be used to assess the perceive autonomy after the students have completed the learning activity. This is rated on a 7-point Likert Scale - from 1 strongly disagree to 7 strongly agree.

The higher scores mean a better outcome

This will be administered immediately before the start of the learning activity and immediately after the activity is completed

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Investigators

  • Principal Investigator: Kitty Chan, PhD, The Hong Kong Polytechnic University

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start (Actual)

April 19, 2024

Primary Completion (Estimated)

December 30, 2024

Study Completion (Estimated)

December 30, 2024

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

January 24, 2024

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

May 28, 2024

First Posted (Actual)

May 30, 2024

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Actual)

August 26, 2024

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

August 23, 2024

Last Verified

January 1, 2024

More Information

Terms related to this study

Other Study ID Numbers

  • HSEARS20230729001

Plan for Individual participant data (IPD)

Plan to Share Individual Participant Data (IPD)?

YES

IPD Plan Description

Once the project is completed, and paper published, we are happy to share the IPD.

IPD Sharing Time Frame

When the project is completed and publication available

IPD Sharing Access Criteria

access by sending email to the corresponding author

IPD Sharing Supporting Information Type

  • STUDY_PROTOCOL
  • CSR

Drug and device information, study documents

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated drug product

No

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated device product

No

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Clinical Trials on Educational Problems

Clinical Trials on v-Care Online Game

Subscribe