Antibacterial Effect and Substantivity of a New Chlorhexidine and Cymenol Gel on Oral Biofilm and Saliva

July 25, 2024 updated by: Inmaculada Tomás, University of Santiago de Compostela

Randomized Clinical Trial on the Immediate Antibacterial Effect and Substantivity of a Single Application of a New Chlorhexidine Gel on Oral Biofilm and Saliva

The objective of this project was to compare the immediate antimicrobial effect and in situ substantivity of a new 0.20% chlorhexidine (CHX) gel and cymenol with the current CHX gel formulation on dental plaque biofilm and salivary flora up to 7 hours after a single application.

Study Overview

Study Type

Interventional

Enrollment (Actual)

30

Phase

  • Phase 1

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Locations

    • A Coruña
      • Santiago de Compostela, A Coruña, Spain, 15782
        • University of Santiago de Compostela

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Ages Eligible for Study

  • Adult

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

Yes

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

  • Systemically healthy volunteers
  • Age between 20-45 years
  • Presence of minimum 24 permanent teeth
  • No evidence of gingivitis or periodontitis (CPITN= 0)
  • No presence of untreated caries at the start of the study

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Smoker or ex-smoker
  • Presence of dental protheses or orthodontic appliances
  • Antibiotic treatment and/or routine use of oral antiseptics in the previous three months
  • Presence of any systemic disease that could alter saliva production or composition

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

  • Primary Purpose: Prevention
  • Allocation: Randomized
  • Interventional Model: Parallel Assignment
  • Masking: Quadruple

Arms and Interventions

Participant Group / Arm
Intervention / Treatment
Active Comparator: 0.20% CHX gel
Participants underwent a single application of the 0.20% CHX gel. Samples were collected in basal conditions (i.e., before application) and at 5 minutes, 1 hour, 3 hours, 5 hours and 7 hours after application.
In vivo application of a gel on the vestibular and palatal/lingual gingival mucosa of both arches at minute 0 for posterior saliva collection at different time-points.
Ex vivo application of a gel on the glass disks of the removable intraoral appliance at minute 0 for subsequent one-by-one disk removal from the device at different time-points.
Experimental: 0.20% CHX and Cymenol gel
Participants underwent a single application of the 0.20% CHX + Cymenol gel. Samples were collected in basal conditions (i.e., before application) and at 5 minutes, 1 hour, 3 hours, 5 hours and 7 hours after application.
In vivo application of a gel on the vestibular and palatal/lingual gingival mucosa of both arches at minute 0 for posterior saliva collection at different time-points.
Ex vivo application of a gel on the glass disks of the removable intraoral appliance at minute 0 for subsequent one-by-one disk removal from the device at different time-points.

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Intergel bacterial viability at baseline: 0.20% CHX gel vs 0.20% CHX and cymenol gel
Time Frame: Baseline
Percentage of bacterial viability (Ratio of viable bacteria to total bacteria -viable + non-viable- multiplied by 100) at baseline: 0.20% CHX gel vs 0.20% CHX and cymenol gel.
Baseline
Intergel bacterial viability after 5 min: 0.20% CHX gel vs 0.20% CHX and cymenol gel
Time Frame: 5 minutes
Percentage of bacterial viability (Ratio of viable bacteria to total bacteria -viable + non-viable- multiplied by 100) after 5 minutes: 0.20% CHX gel vs 0.20% CHX and cymenol gel.
5 minutes
Intergel bacterial viability after 1 hour: 0.20% CHX gel vs 0.20% CHX and cymenol gel
Time Frame: 1 hour
Percentage of bacterial viability (Ratio of viable bacteria to total bacteria -viable + non-viable- multiplied by 100) after 1 hour: 0.20% CHX gel vs 0.20% CHX and cymenol gel.
1 hour
Intergel bacterial viability after 3 hours: 0.20% CHX gel vs 0.20% CHX and cymenol gel
Time Frame: 3 hours
Percentage of bacterial viability (Ratio of viable bacteria to total bacteria -viable + non-viable- multiplied by 100) after 3 hours: 0.20% CHX gel vs 0.20% CHX and cymenol gel.
3 hours
Intergel bacterial viability after 5 hours: 0.20% CHX gel vs 0.20% CHX and cymenol gel
Time Frame: 5 hours
Percentage of bacterial viability (Ratio of viable bacteria to total bacteria -viable + non-viable- multiplied by 100) after 5 hours: 0.20% CHX gel vs 0.20% CHX and cymenol gel.
5 hours
Intergel bacterial viability after 7 hours: 0.20% CHX gel vs 0.20% CHX and cymenol gel
Time Frame: 7 hours
Percentage of bacterial viability (Ratio of viable bacteria to total bacteria -viable + non-viable- multiplied by 100) after 7 hours: 0.20% CHX gel vs 0.20% CHX and cymenol gel.
7 hours
Intragel bacterial viability: baseline vs 5 minutes
Time Frame: Baseline, 5 minutes
Percentage of bacterial viability (Ratio of viable bacteria to total bacteria -viable + non-viable- multiplied by 100) with either 0.20% CHX gel or 0.20% CHX and cymenol gel: baseline vs 5 minutes
Baseline, 5 minutes
Intragel bacterial viability: baseline vs 1 hour
Time Frame: Baseline, 1 hour
Percentage of bacterial viability (Ratio of viable bacteria to total bacteria -viable + non-viable- multiplied by 100) with either 0.20% CHX gel or 0.20% CHX and cymenol gel: baseline vs 1 hour
Baseline, 1 hour
Intragel bacterial viability: baseline vs 3 hours
Time Frame: Baseline, 3 hours
Percentage of bacterial viability (Ratio of viable bacteria to total bacteria -viable + non-viable- multiplied by 100) with either 0.20% CHX gel or 0.20% CHX and cymenol gel: baseline vs 3 hours
Baseline, 3 hours
Intragel bacterial viability: baseline vs 5 hours
Time Frame: Baseline, 5 hours
Percentage of bacterial viability (Ratio of viable bacteria to total bacteria -viable + non-viable- multiplied by 100) with either 0.20% CHX gel or 0.20% CHX and cymenol gel: baseline vs 5 hours
Baseline, 5 hours
Intragel bacterial viability: baseline vs 7 hours
Time Frame: Baseline, 7 hours
Percentage of bacterial viability (Ratio of viable bacteria to total bacteria -viable + non-viable- multiplied by 100) with either 0.20% CHX gel or 0.20% CHX and cymenol gel: baseline vs 7 hours
Baseline, 7 hours
Intragel bacterial viability: 5 minutes vs 1 hour
Time Frame: 5 minutes, 1 hour
Percentage of bacterial viability (Ratio of viable bacteria to total bacteria -viable + non-viable- multiplied by 100) with either 0.20% CHX gel or 0.20% CHX and cymenol gel: 5 minutes vs 1 hour
5 minutes, 1 hour
Intragel bacterial viability: 5 minutes vs 3 hours
Time Frame: 5 minutes, 3 hours
Percentage of bacterial viability (Ratio of viable bacteria to total bacteria -viable + non-viable- multiplied by 100) with either 0.20% CHX gel or 0.20% CHX and cymenol gel: 5 minutes vs 3 hours
5 minutes, 3 hours
Intragel bacterial viability: 5 minutes vs 5 hours
Time Frame: 5 minutes, 5 hours
Percentage of bacterial viability (Ratio of viable bacteria to total bacteria -viable + non-viable- multiplied by 100) with either 0.20% CHX gel or 0.20% CHX and cymenol gel: 5 minutes vs 5 hours
5 minutes, 5 hours
Intragel bacterial viability: 5 minutes vs 7 hours
Time Frame: 5 minutes, 7 hours
Percentage of bacterial viability (Ratio of viable bacteria to total bacteria -viable + non-viable- multiplied by 100) with either 0.20% CHX gel or 0.20% CHX and cymenol gel: 5 minutes vs 7 hours
5 minutes, 7 hours

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Collaborators

Investigators

  • Principal Investigator: Inmaculada Tomás, Prof, University of Santiago de Compostela, Spain

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start (Actual)

September 1, 2022

Primary Completion (Actual)

June 30, 2023

Study Completion (Actual)

July 31, 2023

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

May 25, 2024

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

May 25, 2024

First Posted (Actual)

May 31, 2024

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Actual)

July 29, 2024

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

July 25, 2024

Last Verified

July 1, 2024

More Information

Terms related to this study

Other Study ID Numbers

  • 2021-CE161

Plan for Individual participant data (IPD)

Plan to Share Individual Participant Data (IPD)?

NO

Drug and device information, study documents

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated drug product

No

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated device product

No

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Clinical Trials on Healthy

Clinical Trials on 0.20% CHX gel on saliva

Subscribe