- ICH GCP
- US Clinical Trials Registry
- Clinical Trial NCT06107751
Ramped and Sniffing Position for Cesarean Section Intubation.
December 13, 2023 updated by: muhammet korkusuz, Karaman Training and Research Hospital
Comparison of Ramped and Sniffing Positions in Video-laryngoscopy-guided Tracheal Intubation for Elective Cesarean Section: a Prospective Randomized Study.
This study will include pregnants who preferred to undergo general anesthesia for elective cesarean section.
Ramped and sniffing positions of pregnant women during ventilation and intubation will be compared.
The aim of this study is to investigate which position provides easier and faster intubation in pregnant women for cesarean section.
Study Overview
Status
Completed
Conditions
Intervention / Treatment
Detailed Description
Estimates of the frequency of difficult and failed intubation in the obstetric population vary within a wide range of percentiles.
Several times higher than those reported for the general surgery population.
Functional Residual Capacity decreases by 10% - 25% in Pregnant women.
Pregnant women are more susceptible to hypoxia as a result of this decline, which also encourages intubation to occur more rapidly.
Intubation success and shortening of intubation time have improved positively with videolaryngoscopes.
On the other hand, the position of the patient during intubation contributes to the speed and success of intubation.
It has been shown that intubation is faster and first-pass success is higher in the ramped position in morbidly obese patients.This study will compare the effectiveness of ramp and sniffing positions on intubation time and success in obese patients and pregnant women with similar physical changes.
Study Type
Interventional
Enrollment (Actual)
60
Phase
- Not Applicable
Contacts and Locations
This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.
Study Locations
-
-
-
Karaman, Turkey, 70200
- Karaman Training and Research Hospital
-
-
Participation Criteria
Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.
Eligibility Criteria
Ages Eligible for Study
- Adult
Accepts Healthy Volunteers
Yes
Description
Inclusion Criteria:
- Patients with American Society of Anesthesiologists physical status classification of II-III, who are planned for elective cesarean section, who are between the ages of 18 and 40, and who prefer general anesthesia will be included.
Exclusion Criteria:
- Patients who refuse to participate in the study, have orientation and cooperation disorders, have undergone head and neck surgery, have a history of difficult intubation, have a cervical spine defect, and have a risk of pulmonary aspiration will be excluded from the study.
Study Plan
This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.
How is the study designed?
Design Details
- Primary Purpose: Treatment
- Allocation: Randomized
- Interventional Model: Parallel Assignment
- Masking: Double
Arms and Interventions
Participant Group / Arm |
Intervention / Treatment |
---|---|
Active Comparator: Ramped position group
This position will be achieved by elevation of the shoulders and the head elevation till achieving alignment of sternal notch and external auditory meatus
|
This position will be achieved by elevation of the shoulders and the head elevation till achieving alignment of sternal notch and external auditory meatus
Other Names:
|
Sham Comparator: Sniffing position group
This position will be achieved by placing a 7 cm pillow under the occiput.
|
This position will be achieved by placing a 7 cm pillow under the occiput.
Other Names:
|
What is the study measuring?
Primary Outcome Measures
Outcome Measure |
Measure Description |
Time Frame |
---|---|---|
1. Total intubation time
Time Frame: 5 minutes after induction of general anesthesia
|
Total intubation time will be calculated by adding up the laryngoscopy time and tube insertion time.
|
5 minutes after induction of general anesthesia
|
Secondary Outcome Measures
Outcome Measure |
Measure Description |
Time Frame |
---|---|---|
Incidence of difficult intubation
Time Frame: 5 minutes after induction of general anesthesia
|
The Intubation Difficulty Scale (IDS) will be used to define the intubation difficulty.
Intubation is considered easy if IDS=0, slight difficulty if 0 < IDS < 5, Moderate to Major Difficulty if 5 < IDS, impossible if IDS = ∞.
|
5 minutes after induction of general anesthesia
|
Incidence of difficult mask ventilation
Time Frame: 5 minutes after induction of general anesthesia
|
The Warters Scale will be used to define the mask ventilation difficulty.
Difficult mask ventilation is defined as a score ≥ 4 on the Warters scale
|
5 minutes after induction of general anesthesia
|
Laryngoscopy time
Time Frame: 5 minutes after induction of general anesthesia
|
The timing measurements will begin when the videolaryngoscope blade first passes between the teeth and will end when the best glottic view is obtained on the videolaryngoscopy monitor.
|
5 minutes after induction of general anesthesia
|
Tube insertion time
Time Frame: 5 minutes after induction of general anesthesia
|
The timing measurements will begin when the endotracheal tube first passes between the teeth and ended when the tube passes through the glottis.
|
5 minutes after induction of general anesthesia
|
Complications related to intubation
Time Frame: postoperative 4th hour
|
A postoperative follow-up assessment will be performed approximately 4 hr after surgery by a co-investigator blinded to the intubation position to evaluate the presence and severity of sore throat, any changes in voice, trauma to the lip, tongue, palate, or teeth.
|
postoperative 4th hour
|
Collaborators and Investigators
This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.
Investigators
- Principal Investigator: Muhammet Korkusuz, MD, Karamanoğlu Mehmetbey University
Study record dates
These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.
Study Major Dates
Study Start (Actual)
October 28, 2023
Primary Completion (Actual)
November 30, 2023
Study Completion (Actual)
December 5, 2023
Study Registration Dates
First Submitted
October 20, 2023
First Submitted That Met QC Criteria
October 25, 2023
First Posted (Actual)
October 30, 2023
Study Record Updates
Last Update Posted (Estimated)
December 14, 2023
Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria
December 13, 2023
Last Verified
December 1, 2023
More Information
Terms related to this study
Keywords
Other Study ID Numbers
- 05-2023/14
Drug and device information, study documents
Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated drug product
No
Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated device product
No
This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.
Clinical Trials on Intubation; Difficult or Failed
-
Catharina Ziekenhuis EindhovenCompletedAnesthesia Intubation Complication | Intubation; Difficult | Failed or Difficult Intubation | Failed or Difficult Intubation, Initial EncounterNetherlands
-
Lazarski UniversityCompletedIntubation; Difficult or Failed | Difficult Airway | Intubation;DifficultPoland
-
Children's Hospital of PhiladelphiaEunice Kennedy Shriver National Institute of Child Health and Human Development... and other collaboratorsCompletedIntubation Complication | Intubation;Difficult | Failed or Difficult Intubation, SequelaUnited States, Canada, Singapore
-
Children's Hospital of PhiladelphiaAgency for Healthcare Research and Quality (AHRQ)RecruitingIntubation Complication | Intubation; Difficult | Failed or Difficult Intubation, SequelaUnited States, Canada, Japan, Italy, New Zealand, Singapore, Australia, Austria, Germany, India, United Kingdom
-
Eskisehir Osmangazi UniversityCompletedIntubation; Difficult or Failed | Difficult LaryngoscopyTurkey
-
Spanish Network for Research in Infectious DiseasesCompletedIntubation | Intubation Complication | Intubation; Difficult or FailedSpain
-
Groupe Hospitalier de Bretagne SudCentre National d'Etudes SpatialesCompletedIntubation Complication | Intubation; Difficult or FailedFrance
-
Seoul National University HospitalCompletedIntubation Complication | Intubation; Difficult or FailedKorea, Republic of
-
B.P. Koirala Institute of Health SciencesUnknownIntubation Complication | Intubation; Difficult or FailedNepal
-
Selcuk UniversityCompletedIntubation Complication | Intubation; Difficult or FailedTurkey
Clinical Trials on Ramped position group
-
Singapore General HospitalCompleted
-
Cairo UniversityCompleted
-
Cairo UniversityCompleted
-
Acibadem UniversityCompleted
-
Fujian Medical UniversityUnknownEndoscopy | Thyroid CancerChina
-
Selcuk UniversityCompletedNewborn Jaundice | BilirubinemiaTurkey
-
Ayse Sonay Turkmen, Prof.DrCompletedPremature | Orogastric Tube | Oral SucroseTurkey
-
Damanhour UniversityCompletedCoronavirus Disease 2019 | Prone Position | OxygenationEgypt
-
Children's Hospital of Fudan UniversityCompletedApnea of Prematurity
-
Changhai HospitalCompleted