Efficacy of Simulation-based Neonatal Echocardiography Training (SimuEchoNeo) (SimuEchoNeo)

February 13, 2026 updated by: University Hospital, Caen

Efficacy of Simulation-based Neonatal Echocardiography Training: a Randomized Controlled Trial

Echocardiographic examination plays a critical role in neonatology, but its bedside training faces challenges due to limited patient access. While simulation training has proven effective in different fields of adult medical care, its application in neonatal echocardiography remains unexplored.

Researchers will compare simulation-based training to usual training (theorical and bedside) for neonatal echocardiography among pediatric residents to see if simulation-trained residents have better skills.

Participants will undergo :

  • theorial, simulation-based and bedside training or
  • theorical and bedside training only.

Study Overview

Detailed Description

All participants were granted full access to the online theorical course throughout the semester of participation, which encompass a presentation of the study and a theorical training. In addition, during their Neonatal Intensive Care Unit (NICU) residency/night shifts, all residents had the possibility to learn bedside transthoracic echocardiography (TTE) and document their experiences using a collection form provided at the time of inclusion.

Beyond access to the e-learning, the simulation group participated in standardized training using the neonatal simulator EchoCom|Neo during the first month of their 6-month residency in NICU. The training session involved a maximum of four residents at the same time, one teacher and one EchoCom|Neo simulator.

The session consisted of the modified Peyton 4-steps process (demonstration, deconstruction, comprehension, performance) with the normal heart scenario set on the simulator, presentation of a persistent ductus arteriosus (PDA), a pericardial effusion case and an evaluation of each resident individually, on the simulator set with normal heart scenario, performing a TTE with a description of the visible structures. The minimum passing score for the validation of the training session was set at 12 out of 14 (reference score, table 1). If the minimum passing score was not achieved, a second training session must have been scheduled until the minimum passing score was reached.

The entire simulation session typically lasted between 2.5 to 3 hours. For standardization of training sessions, pre-registered videos were used whenever applicable (presentation of the simulation session, presentation of the simulator, and first and second Peyton's steps), and the training was conducted by the same teacher throughout the study, in the respective hospital of each resident (Caen, Rouen or Tours).

Two evaluation timepoints were defined at the middle (3 to 4 months after initial training, M3-M4), and at the end of the 6-month residency (6 months after the training, M6).

The evaluation session took place using the EchoCom|Neo simulator (EchoCom GmbH, Nieheim, Germany), set with the normal heart scenario, and placed on an open neonatal warmer, in the respective hospital of each resident. Each resident was evaluated individually with video recording for second evaluation.

Before starting the evaluation, each resident had 5 minutes to familiarize themselves with the handling of the simulator probe. They were asked to perform 7 TTE sections, with the teacher listing each expected TTE section at the beginning of the evaluation.

At each evaluation session, two evaluators conducted independent assessments. One evaluator was a pediatric cardiologist, blinded to the randomization, while the other was a pediatric resident (the simulation TTE training's teacher). One evaluator was physically present during the evaluation, while the other used video recording. Each evaluator assigned two scores for each resident:

  • A reference score: 2 points for each section (optimal, suboptimal, not found), total out of 14 points.
  • A custom-made score: 1 point for each anatomic structure within each section, emphasizing visualization and recognition of heart structures, total out of 33 points.

The duration of the TTE at 3 and 6 months were also recorded with second precision. Following the second evaluation at M6, the number of bedside TTE performed was documented, and a satisfaction questionnaire based on a Likert scale was requested.

Study Type

Interventional

Enrollment (Actual)

52

Phase

  • Not Applicable

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Locations

    • France
      • Caen, France, France, 14000
        • University hospital of Caen
      • Rouen, France, France, 76000
        • University Hospital of Rouen
      • Tours, France, France, Tours
        • University hospital of Tours

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Ages Eligible for Study

  • Child
  • Adult
  • Older Adult

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

  • residents at all training levels (from first to fifth year) completing a 6-month residency or at least night shifts in neonatology at one of the 3 French NICUs involved (University Hospitals of Caen, Rouen or Tours)

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Residents who had already received a TTE training (cardiology or cardiopediatrics 6-month residency or postgraduate training in cardiology or echocardiography)

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

  • Primary Purpose: Other
  • Allocation: Randomized
  • Interventional Model: Parallel Assignment
  • Masking: Double

Arms and Interventions

Participant Group / Arm
Intervention / Treatment
Experimental: Simulation group
Theorical training, simulation-based training and bedside training
half-day simulation-based neonatal echocardiography training.
No Intervention: Control group
Theorical and bedside training

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Transthoracic echocardiography (TTE) score at 3 months
Time Frame: 3 to 4 months after initial training
Difference in TTE score at 3 months between the two groups
3 to 4 months after initial training

Secondary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
TTE score at 6 months
Time Frame: 6 months after initial training
Difference in TTE score at 6 months between the two groups
6 months after initial training
TTE duration
Time Frame: 3-4 months and 6 months
TTE duration at 3 and 6 months
3-4 months and 6 months
Satisfaction score at 6 months
Time Frame: 6 months
Satisfaction score over 25 points
6 months

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Publications and helpful links

The person responsible for entering information about the study voluntarily provides these publications. These may be about anything related to the study.

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start (Actual)

May 2, 2021

Primary Completion (Actual)

October 31, 2023

Study Completion (Actual)

October 31, 2023

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

May 27, 2024

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

June 3, 2024

First Posted (Actual)

June 4, 2024

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Actual)

February 17, 2026

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

February 13, 2026

Last Verified

May 1, 2024

More Information

Terms related to this study

Other Study ID Numbers

  • ID2259

Plan for Individual participant data (IPD)

Plan to Share Individual Participant Data (IPD)?

YES

IPD Plan Description

Deidentified individual participant data (including data dictionaries) will be made available, in addition to study protocols, the statistical analysis plan, and the informed consent form. The data will be made available upon publication to researchers who provide a methodologically sound proposal for use in achieving the goals of the approved proposal. Proposals should be submitted to amelie.blanchetiere[at]unicaen.fr.

IPD Sharing Time Frame

when asked.

IPD Sharing Supporting Information Type

  • STUDY_PROTOCOL
  • ICF
  • CSR

Drug and device information, study documents

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated drug product

No

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated device product

No

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Clinical Trials on Simulation-based Training on Residents

Clinical Trials on TTE simulation-based medical training

Subscribe