Improving Detection of Fetuses at Risk - Who Needs Systematic Training?

June 26, 2018 updated by: Lisbeth Andreasen, Copenhagen Academy for Medical Education and Simulation
Detection of growth restricted fetuses relies primarily on abdominal ultrasound examinations during pregnancy. Many clinicians, however, have not received systematic training and may therefore perform inadequately. We wish to examine, whether systematic, simulation-based training can improve diagnostic accuracy of estimated fetal weight by ultrasound at different levels of clinical experience.

Study Overview

Status

Completed

Intervention / Treatment

Detailed Description

Participants are physicians working at obstetric departments. Participant characteristics (age, experience in years and number of monthly scans) are recorded. Participants perform two abdominal growth scans prior to randomization and estimated fetal weight is compared to birth weight. Mean absolute percentage error is calculated as a measure of diagnostic accuracy.

Participants are then randomized to either control (no intervention) or intervention. The latter group receives training on the Metaphor Scantrainer trans abdominal ultrasound simulator until they pass a previously validated test. After completing the training the participants use a mannikin to practice systematic approach and 'knobology'.

All participants then perform another two growth scans. Diagnostic accuracy before and after the intervention or control period is compared.

We wish to examine the effect of systematic training on the diagnostic accuracy of estimated fetal weight by ultrasound across different levels of clinical experience.

If an effect can be found in the inexperienced participants, simulation-based training in obstetric ultrasound could be implemented as a part of basic obstetric training and/or as a means of maintaining skills.

Study Type

Interventional

Enrollment (Actual)

70

Phase

  • Not Applicable

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Locations

      • Copenhagen, Denmark
        • Copenhagen University Hospital
      • Hillerød, Denmark, 3400
        • Departments of Gynecology and Obstetrics, Hillerød Hospital

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Ages Eligible for Study

  • ADULT
  • OLDER_ADULT
  • CHILD

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

Yes

Genders Eligible for Study

All

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

  • proficiency in the Danish language
  • no prior experience with obstetric ultrasound simulation
  • doctors who work within the field of gynecology and obstetrics

Exclusion Criteria:

  • lack of proficiency in the Danish language
  • prior experience with obstetric ultrasound simulation

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

  • Primary Purpose: OTHER
  • Allocation: RANDOMIZED
  • Interventional Model: PARALLEL
  • Masking: NONE

Arms and Interventions

Participant Group / Arm
Intervention / Treatment
NO_INTERVENTION: Control
No intervention.
EXPERIMENTAL: Intervention
Simulation-based training: Virtual-reality simulation training on the Medaphor Scantrainer Transabdominal Simulator until expert level is reached. Then training on a physical mannikin until an average OSAUS-score of 3 or more is attained.
As described under group descriptions

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Diagnostic accuracy of estimated fetal weight by ultrasound.
Time Frame: 1 month
percentage error of fell weight estimate compared to actual fetal weight
1 month

Secondary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Ratings of ultrasound images
Time Frame: 1 month
Images are rated using the image-scoring method by Salomon et al. (Salomon et al. Feasibility and reproducibility of an image-scoring method for quality control of fetal biometry in the second trimester. Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol 2006;27;34-40) The images are scores on the number of landmarks, correct caliper placement and image optimization. A minimum of 0 and a maximum of 16 points can be given (best possible score).
1 month

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Investigators

  • Study Director: Ann Tabor, DMSc, Copenhagen University Hospital at Herlev

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start

July 1, 2016

Primary Completion (ACTUAL)

March 1, 2018

Study Completion (ACTUAL)

March 1, 2018

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

January 30, 2017

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

April 3, 2017

First Posted (ACTUAL)

April 10, 2017

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (ACTUAL)

June 28, 2018

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

June 26, 2018

Last Verified

June 1, 2018

More Information

Terms related to this study

Plan for Individual participant data (IPD)

Plan to Share Individual Participant Data (IPD)?

UNDECIDED

Drug and device information, study documents

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated drug product

No

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated device product

No

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Clinical Trials on Improving Obstetric Ultrasound Skills

Clinical Trials on simulation-based training

3
Subscribe