Preparation for Medical and Surgical Procedures in Oncogeriatry. (PRIMECHO)

March 17, 2026 updated by: Centre Hospitalier Universitaire de Nice

Preparation for Medical and Surgical Procedures in Oncogeriatry. Pilote Study PRIMECHO

Surgical management is one of the most frequently used interventions in the treatment of many cancers, but it can be associated with a high risk of postoperative complications.

The maintenance and optimization of functional abilities before, during and after treatment are major for elderly cancer patients, as it is now well established that there is a link between the level of functional capacity and the occurrence of these complications.

The scientific literature shows that the benefits of pre- and post-operative training programs, but these benefits only apply to a fraction of the patients adhering to the programs. The modalities of intervention (training load, follow-up, etc.) as well as patient involvement in these programs are major issues that need to be addressed to optimize their benefits.

Individualizing pre-habilitation, on the basis of the management of the training load, and therefore objective fatigue, would enable better patient adherence to the program, and optimize its benefits.

In this context, the PRIMECHO project aims to individualize pre-habilitation in order to improve functional of patients in the pre-habilitation or accelerated recovery after surgery phase. The aim is for the patient to be in optimum physical condition at the time of the intervention or treatment.

Study Overview

Status

Recruiting

Conditions

Study Type

Interventional

Enrollment (Estimated)

20

Phase

  • Not Applicable

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Contact

Study Contact Backup

Study Locations

      • Nice, France
        • Recruiting
        • Chu de Nice
        • Contact:
          • frederic Chorin, PhD

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Ages Eligible for Study

  • Older Adult

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

  • Patient aged 70 or over
  • Cancer patient with planned surgery,
  • Mini Mental State Examination score greater than or equal to 24 (performed in advance by the geriatrician),
  • Patient affiliated to or benefiting from a social security insurance
  • Signed free and informed consent.

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Inability to walk or perform unsupervised exercises.
  • Vulnerable people

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

  • Primary Purpose: Prevention
  • Allocation: N/A
  • Interventional Model: Single Group Assignment
  • Masking: None (Open Label)

Arms and Interventions

Participant Group / Arm
Intervention / Treatment
Experimental: Personalized pre-habilitation program

Each patient will undergo 4 weeks of individualized pre-habilitation before surgery.

Each session (1 session per day) will be carried out autonomously by the patient at home, via a dedicated application (Activiti Pro) installed on their tablet or smartphone.

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Maximal walking distance to 6 -MWT
Time Frame: at inclusion
Metres walked during 6 minutes
at inclusion
Maximal walking distance to 6 -MWT
Time Frame: at 4 weeks
Metres walked during the test
at 4 weeks
Maximal walking distance to 6 -MWT
Time Frame: at 8 weeks
Metres walked during the test
at 8 weeks
Maximal walking distance to 6 -MWT
Time Frame: at 16 weeks
Metres walked during the test
at 16 weeks

Secondary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
EORTC-QLQC30
Time Frame: at inclusion, 4 weeks, 8 weeks, 16 weeks

QLQC30 is a 30-item instrument designed to measure quality of life in all cancer patients.

It contains 30 questions and assesses the quality of life of oncological patients multidimensionally over 10 subscales. All sub-scales and the 6 individual items have a score range from 0 to 100 points. A higher score represents better function and a higher quality of life. In the symptom subscale, however, a higher score represents a higher level of symptoms or problems. Since there is no total score, all subscales and the individual items must be considered individually and evaluated using normative data.

at inclusion, 4 weeks, 8 weeks, 16 weeks
Fatigue scale (MFI-20)
Time Frame: at inclusion, 4 weeks, 8 weeks, 16 weeks

Multidiensional Fatigue Inventory-20 (MFI-20) questionnaire. 5 scales. Higher scores means worse outcome.

General Fatigue dimension: Minimum value: 4. Maximum Value: 20. Physical fatigue dimension: Minimum value: 4. Maximum Value: 20. Reduced activity dimension: Minimum value: 4. Maximum Value: 20. Reduced motivation dimension: Minimum value: 4. Maximum Value: 20. Mental fatigue dimension: Minimum value: 4. Maximum Value: 20.

at inclusion, 4 weeks, 8 weeks, 16 weeks
Internationnal Physiqual activity questionaire (IPAQ-short)
Time Frame: at inclusion, 4 weeks, 8 weeks, 16 weeks

This questionnaire assesses overall physical activity and sedentary time over the last seven days. The questionnaire looks at intense, moderate and walking activity, as well as time spent sitting down (sedentary lifestyle), whether during leisure activities, at work, in daily life or during transport.

The questionnaire composed with 7 questions classifies the subject according to 3 levels of activity: inactive, moderate, high.

at inclusion, 4 weeks, 8 weeks, 16 weeks

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Investigators

  • Principal Investigator: Rabia Boulahssass, MD, Centre Hospitalier Universitaire de Nice

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start (Actual)

November 6, 2024

Primary Completion (Estimated)

November 10, 2027

Study Completion (Estimated)

November 10, 2027

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

May 23, 2024

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

May 29, 2024

First Posted (Actual)

June 5, 2024

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Actual)

March 19, 2026

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

March 17, 2026

Last Verified

March 1, 2026

More Information

Terms related to this study

Keywords

Additional Relevant MeSH Terms

Other Study ID Numbers

  • 23-AOIP-03

Plan for Individual participant data (IPD)

Plan to Share Individual Participant Data (IPD)?

UNDECIDED

Drug and device information, study documents

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated drug product

No

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated device product

No

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Clinical Trials on Geriatric Oncology

Clinical Trials on Personalized pre-habilitation program

Subscribe