Capsaicin in Digital Osteoarthritis Versus Control (CADOR)

March 12, 2025 updated by: University Hospital, Clermont-Ferrand

Capsaicin in Digital Osteoarthritis Versus Control : a Randomized Study

The objective of this multicentric, randomized controlled double-blind clinical trial is to demonstrate the efficacy of transdermal application of capsaicin in patients with painful digital osteoarthritis with a neuropathic pain component.

Participants will receive either a transdermal patch of capsaicin 179 mg (8%) or the control treatment (capsaicin 0.04%).

Researchers will compare the intensity of pain in the fingers at day 60 in the capsaicin 8% group versus capsaicin 0.04% (control arm)

Study Overview

Detailed Description

Visit 0 : Screening visit (D0 - 30 days): Screen for eligibility

Visit 1 :Inclusion visit (D0): Randomization and blinded patch application of capsaicin 8% or 0.04%

Visit 2: Follow-up visit 1 (D60 + 7 days): Assessment +/- Patch renewal. Patients with finger pain still greater than 4/10 may receive an open application of a capsaicin 8%

Visit 3:Follow-up visit 2 (D120 +/- 7 days): Final assessment.

For the duration of the study, the patient will record in a notebook: analgesics, anti-inflammatories, corticoids and daily hand pain VAS.

Blood samples will be taken at V1 and V2 for subsequent measurement of pro-inflammatory cytokines (IL6, IL8, TNFa) and markers of cartilage degradation, in order to build up a serum library.

Study Type

Interventional

Enrollment (Estimated)

120

Phase

  • Phase 4

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Contact

Study Locations

      • Clermont-Ferrand, France
        • Recruiting
        • CHU de Clermont-Ferrand
        • Contact:
          • Lise LACLAUTRE
        • Principal Investigator:
          • Sylvain MATHIEU
      • Lyon, France
        • Recruiting
        • HCL Hopital Edouard Herriot
        • Contact:
          • Lise LACLAUTRE
        • Principal Investigator:
          • Roland Chapurlat
      • Paris, France
        • Recruiting
        • AP-HP Hôpital Saint-Antoine
        • Contact:
          • Lise LACLAUTRE
        • Principal Investigator:
          • Jérémie SELLAM
      • Saint-Étienne, France
        • Recruiting
        • CHU de Saint-Etienne
        • Contact:
          • Lise LACLAUTRE
        • Principal Investigator:
          • Thierry Thomas

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Ages Eligible for Study

  • Adult
  • Older Adult

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

  • Diagnosis of digital osteoarthritis fulfilling the American College of Rheumatology criteria;
  • Presence of finger pain of ≥ 40 mm on a visual analogue scale (VAS);
  • Presence of finger pain with a neuropathic pain component (DN4 score ≥ 4/10)
  • Inadequate response, adverse reactions, and/or contraindications to conventional analgesics and NSAIDs;

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Patient with isolated rhizarthrosis;
  • Patient with other joint disease affecting the fingers (gout, chondrocalcinosis, RA, spondyloarthritis, psoriatic arthritis);
  • Patient with upper extremity pain syndrome that may interfere with the assessment of finger pain;
  • Patient with another pathology responsible for neuropathic hand pain (carpal tunnel syndrome, diabetic neuropathy, Guyon's tunnel syndrome, cervicobrachial neuralgia, brachial plexitis);
  • Patient with skin lesions on the fingers (psoriasis, wounds, chronic ulcers, eczema, shingles, dermatitis);
  • Patient with poorly controlled high blood pressure;
  • Patient with hypersensitivity to capsaicin;
  • Patient who had 8% capsaicin patch use in the year prior to the study;
  • Patient who has received intramuscular, intra-articular or intravenous corticosteroid therapy, another disease-modifying anti-rheumatic therapy (methotrexate, salazopyrine) or an intra-articular injection into the joints of the fingers within the previous 3 months;
  • Patient wearing wrist or finger orthoses in the previous month;
  • Patient with fibromyalgia;

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

  • Primary Purpose: Treatment
  • Allocation: Randomized
  • Interventional Model: Parallel Assignment
  • Masking: Double

Arms and Interventions

Participant Group / Arm
Intervention / Treatment
Experimental: Capsaicin 8%
patch 179 mg, 30 min
patch application for 30 minutes on the painful fingers.
Other Names:
  • QUTENZA
Sham Comparator: Capsaicin 0.04%
patch low dose, 30 min
patch application for 30 minutes on the painful fingers. the low-dose patch has a similar appearance to the active patch. It allows you to keep the blind, because it also causes reactions at the capsaicin application site (erythema, burning).
Other Names:
  • control treatment

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Intensity of pain in the fingers
Time Frame: Day 60
measured on a visual analogic scale ranging from 0 to 100 mm
Day 60

Secondary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Treatment safety
Time Frame: Day 60
side effect rate
Day 60
Functional disability
Time Frame: Day 60
Cochin Hand Functional Disability Scale score, Each question is rated from 0 (no difficulty) to 5 (impossible). Total score for 18 questions: 0 - 90. The higher the score, the more impaired the physical function.
Day 60
Functional index
Time Frame: Day 60
Modified Functional Index for Hand OsteoArthritis score (FIHOA), Each question is rated from 0 (no difficulty) to 3 (impossible). Total score for the 10 questions: 0 - 30. The higher the score, the greater the functional disability.
Day 60
Anxiety and depression
Time Frame: Day 60
Hospital Anxiety and Depression Scale score (HADs), Each question is scored from 0 to 3. Total score for the 7 anxiety or depression questions: 0-21. The higher the score, the more anxious or depressed the patient.
Day 60
Painful symptoms of osteoarthritis
Time Frame: Day 60

Osteoarthritis Symptom Inventory Scale score (OASIS9). Localized pain component = 4 questions rated from 0 (no sensation) to 10 (extreme sensation) score = 0-40.

Neuropathic pain component = 2 questions rated from 0 to 10 score = 0-20. Deep pain component = 3 questions rated from 0 to 10 score = 0-30. Total OASIS score: 0-90. A high score indicates intense pain.

Day 60
Patient impression of change
Time Frame: Day 60

Patient Global Impression of Change " (PGIC) score. The patient evaluates the degree of improvement of his pain

  1. - Strongly improved
  2. - Moderately improved
  3. - Slightly improved
  4. - No change
  5. - Slightly worsened
  6. - Moderately worsened
  7. - Strongly worsened
Day 60

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Collaborators

Investigators

  • Principal Investigator: Sylvain MATHIEU, University Hospital, Clermont-Ferrand

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start (Estimated)

March 7, 2025

Primary Completion (Estimated)

January 1, 2028

Study Completion (Estimated)

January 1, 2028

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

May 31, 2024

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

May 31, 2024

First Posted (Actual)

June 6, 2024

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Actual)

March 25, 2025

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

March 12, 2025

Last Verified

February 1, 2025

More Information

Terms related to this study

Plan for Individual participant data (IPD)

Plan to Share Individual Participant Data (IPD)?

NO

Drug and device information, study documents

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated drug product

No

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated device product

No

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Clinical Trials on Neuropathic Pain

Clinical Trials on Capsaicin 179 Mg Cutaneous Patch

Subscribe