De-scalation or swItch of Treatment According to Circulating tuMOr DNA Variation After 2 Cycles of Doublet Chemotherapy Plus Targeted Agent in Metastatic Unresectable Colorectal Cancer (DIAMOND)

February 17, 2026 updated by: University Hospital, Rouen

De-scalation or swItch of Treatment According to Circulating tuMOr DNA Variation After 2 Cycles of Doublet Chemotherapy Plus Targeted Agent in Metastatic Unresectable Colorectal Cancer (DIAMOND Study): A Randomized Phase III of PRODIGE Intergroup

Background : In unresectable mCRC, a de-escalation strategy using maintenance or chemotherapy (CT) discontinuation in selected cases is considered as a valid option in non-progressive patients after a first-line induction of doublet CT + targeted agent (TA) (1-7).

In this context, circulating tumor DNA (ctDNA) is considered very promising to optimize decision making. Indeed, ctDNA harbour the same main alterations of the tumor and has been recognized as biologically relevant to reflect tumor dynamics and therapeutic efficacy (8).

As reported in mCRC, that early variation of ctDNA during CT may be relevant to predict outcome (9-11). Indeed, patients with a ctDNA decrease from the first (C1) to the third (C3) cycles of CT (∆≥80% or ctDNA<0.1 ng/ml at C3) or without ctDNA detectable at C1 and C3 have significant better survival as compared to patients with less decrease or with ctDNA increase (10). ctDNA monitoring had never been prospectively evaluated to guide early adaptation in the treatment strategy in mCRC.

Aim: A randomized phase III, open label, strategy trial of the superiority in overall survival (OS) adjusted on quality of life of an early treatment adaptation guided by ctDNA variation versus a standard management in unresectable left-side, MSS-BRAFV600E non-mutated mCRC treated by first-line doublet CT + TA.

Patients and methods :

-Main inclusion criteria will be (i) unresectable left-side and non-pre-treated mCRC (ii) MSS and non-mutated BRAFV600E tumor (iii) at least one measurable lesion (iv) ECOG 0-1 and adequate biological functions for first-line doublet CT + TA (antiEGFR if RAS WT, bevacizumab (BV) if RAS MUT).

Randomization (1:1) between an experimental strategy guided by ctDNA variation with de-escalation (Arm A1 or A2) or switch of treatment (Arm A3) versus standard strategy (Arm B). The analysis of variation of ctDNA from C1-C3 will be centralized and detected using Digital PCR targeting hypermethylation of WIF1/NPY genes (10) in real-time in arm A and in second step in arm B.

Randomization in Arm A: after 4 cycles of doublet + TA, non-progressive patients will be allocated to a strategy according to ctDNA value and variation from C1-C3:

Arm A1: CT discontinuation (ctDNA normalization < 0.1 ng/ml or ctDNA not detectable) Arm A2 : maintenance with fluoropyrimidine + TA (ctDNA ≥ 0.1 ng/ml and ∆ctDNA≥ 80%).

Arm A3 : ctDNA non-responders (∆ctDNA < 80% or increase) : switch of CT +/- TA.

Randomisation in Arm B: at least 8 cycles of doublet CT + TA before adaptation of sequence at physician choice.

Statistical considerations : with an expected median OS at 32 months (mean 37.6 months), a mean QoL at 70.0% in first-line mCRC, corresponding to 0.700 x 37.6 = 26.3 QALM or 2.19 QALY (SD 1.18 QALY), 408 patients are required (randomization 1:1) to show a gain of 4 months of quality-adjusted OS (4 QALM or 0.33 QALY) in experimental ctDNA strategy versus standard strategy (5% two-sided type I error rate, 81% power and 1.18 QALY SD).

The secondary objectives will be:

  • To compare strategies (standard vs ctDNA guided) overall and in the subgroups of ctDNA response on 18, 24 and 36-months restricted mean of QoL-adjusted OS, OS, PFS, response rate, toxicity, Quality of Life and cost utility.
  • Bio-collection for further ctDNA analysis. Only cost of samples collection and their transportation to the resource center is requested. Further ancillary analysis will be subject to independent funding requests to evaluate :
  • ctDNA kinetics during the induction and its impact on outcome in overall population and in each arm
  • ctDNA changes between time points during de-escalation arms to determine thresholds of variations predictive of clinical and/or radiological progression.

Conclusion: DIAMOND is a randomized phase III strategy trial to show the superiority in OS adjusted on quality of life of an early treatment adaptation guided by ctDNA versus a standard management in unresectable left-side, MSS-BRAFV600E non-mutated mCRC treated by first-line doublet CT + TA.

Study Overview

Study Type

Interventional

Enrollment (Estimated)

408

Phase

  • Phase 3

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Ages Eligible for Study

  • Adult
  • Older Adult

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

  • Histologically proven diagnosis of RAS WT or mutant, MSS, BRAFV600E non-mutated colorectal cancer.
  • Left side or rectal cancer
  • An unresectable metastatic colorectal cancer not previously treated with chemotherapy for metastatic disease.
  • At least one measurable lesion according to RECIST criteria version 1.1.
  • Age ≥ 18 years.
  • ECOG PS ≤ 1
  • Neutrophils ≥ 1.5 x 10^9/L, Platelets ≥ 100 x 10^9/L, Hb > 9 g/dl.
  • Total bilirubin ≤ 1.5 time the upper-normal limits (UNL) and ASAT (SGOT) and/or ALAT (SGPT) ≤ 2.5 x UNL, or 5 x UNL in case of liver metastases, alkaline phosphatase ≤ 2.5 x UNL, or 5 x UNL in case of liver metastases.
  • Creatinine clearance > 50 mL/min or serum creatinine ≤ 1.5 x UNL.
  • The patient's urinary protein is ≤ 1+ on dipstick or routine urinalysis.
  • Adequate coagulation function [International Normalized Ratio (INR) ≤1.5 and Partial. Thromboplastin Time (PTT) or activated PTT (aPTT) ≤1.5 x ULN.
  • Written informed consent.

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Right side colon cancer
  • First-line chemotherapy +/- biologic agents for mCRC before C1
  • Radiotherapy to any site within 4 weeks before C1
  • Adjuvant oxaliplatin-based treatment completed less than 6 months before relapse.
  • Treatment with any investigational drug within 30 days prior to C1
  • Known allergy to any of the study treatment components.
  • Dihydropyrimidine dehydrogenase (DPD) deficiency.
  • Documented and/or symptomatic brain or leptomeningeal metastases.
  • Patient with active infection, symptomatic congestive heart failure, unstable angina pectoris, symptomatic or poorly controlled cardiac arrhythmia, uncontrolled thrombotic or hemorrhagic disorder, or any other serious uncontrolled medical disorders in the opinion of the investigator.
  • Uncontrolled or poorly controlled hypertension despite standard medical management.
  • Severe renal or hepatic failure
  • Serious or non-healing wound, ulcer, or bone fracture within 28 days prior to C1
  • Other co-existing malignancies or malignancies diagnosed within the last 3 years with the exception of basal and squamous cell carcinoma or cervical cancer in situ.
  • Major surgical procedure, open biopsy, or significant traumatic injury within 28 days prior to study treatment start.
  • Infection with the human immunodeficiency virus.
  • Symptomatic peripheral neuropathy grade 1 according the NCI CTC.
  • Acute or subacute bowel obstruction or history of chronic diarrhea, which is considered clinically significant in the opinion of the investigator.
  • Chronic antiplatelet therapy, including aspirin, nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory drugs (NSAIDs, including ibuprofen, naproxen, and others), dipyridamole or clopidogrel, or similar agents. Once-daily aspirin use (maximum dose 325 mg/day) is permitted.
  • Pregnant or lactating women.
  • Patient with active psychiatric illness or social situation that would severely limit compliance with study requirements.

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

  • Primary Purpose: Treatment
  • Allocation: Randomized
  • Interventional Model: Parallel Assignment
  • Masking: None (Open Label)

Arms and Interventions

Participant Group / Arm
Intervention / Treatment
Experimental: ctDNA Arm
After 4 cycles of doublet + TA, non-progressive patients will be allocated to a strategy according to ctDNA value and variation from C1-C3

after 4 cycles of doublet + TA, non-progressive patients will be allocated to a strategy according to ctDNA value and variation from C1-C3: Arm A1: CT discontinuation (ctDNA normalization < 0.1 ng/ml or ctDNA not detectable) Arm A2 : maintenance with fluoropyrimidine + TA (ctDNA ≥ 0.1 ng/ml and ∆ctDNA≥ 80%).

Arm A3 : ctDNA non-responders (∆ctDNA < 80% or increase) : switch of CT +/- TA.

Active Comparator: Control Arm
At least 8 cycles of doublet CT + TA before adaptation of sequence at physician choice.
At least 8 cycles of doublet CT + TA before adaptation of sequence at physician choice.

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Evaluate the superiority in quality-adjusted OS of an early treatment adaptation guided by ctDNA variation
Time Frame: through study completion, an average of 7 years

The primary endpoint is the superiority in overall survival (OS) adjusted on quality-adjusted life years (QALYs) for the experimental arm guided by ctDNA (Arm A1 + A2 + A3) as compared to the standard management (Arm B).

The follow-up will start from the date of randomization. Patients alive at last follow-up will have an extrapolation of their QALY, based on the OS curve and the patient QoL at last follow-up.

through study completion, an average of 7 years

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start (Estimated)

June 1, 2026

Primary Completion (Estimated)

June 1, 2032

Study Completion (Estimated)

June 1, 2032

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

February 26, 2024

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

June 4, 2024

First Posted (Actual)

June 6, 2024

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Actual)

February 20, 2026

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

February 17, 2026

Last Verified

February 1, 2026

More Information

Terms related to this study

Plan for Individual participant data (IPD)

Plan to Share Individual Participant Data (IPD)?

NO

Drug and device information, study documents

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated drug product

No

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated device product

No

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Clinical Trials on Metastatic Colon Cancer

Clinical Trials on treatment adaptation guided by ctDNA variation

Subscribe