Chocolate or Sevoflurane: Use of Parosmia to Facilitate More Cooperative Inhalation Inductions in Children

August 7, 2025 updated by: Johns Hopkins University

Children undergoing surgery and anesthesia are often negatively impacted by anxiety and fear in the preoperative period. Routine inhalational anesthetic induction is a unique aspect of pediatric anesthesia. Inhalation inductions are usually initiated with sevoflurane with or without nitrous oxide. While less pungent than other volatile agents, sevoflurane at high concentrations and flows used for inhalation inductions still causes children to often repel from the smell. This can lead to an unpleasant interaction and cause heightened anxiety for any subsequent procedures.

Olfactory senses are processed in the hippocampus and amygdala and tied to emotion and memory. Parosmia is the distortion of smell perception which can utilized to the pediatric anesthesiologists advantage. It has been demonstrated that using this phenomenon, the anesthesiologist can induce a better smell for the child leading to improved cooperation during an inhalation induction. However, limitations of this study include lack of randomization, small sample size, and use of a nominal scale of yes or no for face mask acceptance. The investigators identified no other studies to validate this potentially powerful tool to optimize anesthetic induction for pediatric patients.

The overall objective of this pilot randomized trial is to determine the feasibility of parosmia during inhalation inductions to decrease perioperative stress for children and provide key pilot data to power a larger study to determine effectiveness of parosmia during inhalation inductions to decrease perioperative stress for children and provide key pilot data to power a larger study to determine effectiveness of parosmia.

Study Overview

Status

Completed

Conditions

Study Type

Interventional

Enrollment (Actual)

50

Phase

  • Not Applicable

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Locations

    • Maryland
      • Baltimore, Maryland, United States, 21287
        • Johns Hopkins Hospital

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Ages Eligible for Study

  • Child

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

  • Ages of 5-12 years old
  • American Society of Anesthesiologist physical status classification system (ASA) I and II
  • Patients coming from home

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Patients undergoing emergent surgery
  • Patients who have not adequately maintained preoperative nothing per mouth/os (NPO) status
  • Patients with inability to communicate verbally
  • Tracheostomy patients
  • ASA III , IV, V patients

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

  • Primary Purpose: Other
  • Allocation: Randomized
  • Interventional Model: Parallel Assignment
  • Masking: Double

Arms and Interventions

Participant Group / Arm
Intervention / Treatment
Experimental: Inhalation induction with parosmia
The experimental group will be told about a magical machine that can change the smell of the mask to any flavor the patient desires. The participant will be asked to take a deep breath thinking about that smell and then sevoflurane will be introduced. The patient will be asked if the the chosen flavor is smelled and the response will be noted.
The experimental group will then be told that the patient's favorite smell will be put into the face mask via the "magical machine". The patient will be asked to take a deep breath thinking about that smell and then introduce sevoflurane. The patient will be asked if the chosen flavor is smelled and their response will be noted.
No Intervention: Standard inhalation induction
Standard inhalation induction.

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Perioperative anxiety as assessed by the Modified Yale Preoperative Anxiety Scale-Short Form (mYPAS-SF)
Time Frame: perioperatively
The modified Yale Preoperative Anxiety Scale-Short Form (mYPAS-SF) will be used to evaluate perioperative anxiety. Patients are evaluated in 4 domains: activity (score 1,2,3, or 4), vocalizations (score 1,2,3,4,5 or 6), emotional expressivity (1,2,3 or 4), and state of apparent arousal (1,2,3, or 4), with higher numbers indicating the highest severity within that item. Each score is calculated by dividing each item rating by the highest possible rating (i.e., 6 for the "vocalizations" item and 4 for all other items), adding all the produced values, dividing by 5, and multiplying by 100. This calculation produces a score ranging from 23.33 to 100, with higher values indicating higher anxiety.
perioperatively

Secondary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Number of antiemetic mediations administered post-operatively
Time Frame: immediately after the surgery
Measuring statistical difference in 1) number of antiemetic medications administered
immediately after the surgery
Type and total dose of opioids administered post-operatively
Time Frame: immediately after the surgery
Type and total dose of opioids administered
immediately after the surgery
Length of time (minutes) to post-anesthesia care unit (PACU) discharge
Time Frame: admission to the PACU through discharge from the PACU (<2 hours post-operatively)
Length of time from admission to PACU discharge between the control group and the intervention group
admission to the PACU through discharge from the PACU (<2 hours post-operatively)

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Investigators

  • Principal Investigator: Pooja O'Neil, MD, Johns Hopkins School of Medicine

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start (Actual)

October 10, 2024

Primary Completion (Actual)

August 7, 2025

Study Completion (Actual)

August 7, 2025

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

May 31, 2024

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

June 6, 2024

First Posted (Actual)

June 7, 2024

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Actual)

August 11, 2025

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

August 7, 2025

Last Verified

August 1, 2025

More Information

Terms related to this study

Other Study ID Numbers

  • IRB00434506

Plan for Individual participant data (IPD)

Plan to Share Individual Participant Data (IPD)?

NO

Drug and device information, study documents

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated drug product

No

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated device product

No

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Clinical Trials on Anesthesia

Clinical Trials on Inhalation induction with parosmia

Subscribe