Allied Cleft & Craniofacial Quality-Improvement and Research Network (ACCQUIREnet) (ACCQUIREnet)

December 5, 2023 updated by: Duke University

Allied Cleft & Craniofacial Quality-Improvement and Research Network (ACCQUIREnet): Prospective Data-collection System and Learning Health-care Network for the Comprehensive Appraisal of Cleft and Craniofacial Care

The Allied Cleft & Craniofacial Quality-Improvement and Research Network (ACCQUIREnet) is a group of multidisciplinary cleft teams that have implemented a system for prospective collection of outcomes data, based on the ICHOM Standard Set for the Comprehensive Appraisal of Cleft Care, CLEFT-Q, and other outcomes instruments. Participating cleft teams may analyze clinical and psychosocial outcomes related to care of the child with cleft lip and/or palate (CL/P), compare its performance with those of other cleft centers, and identify opportunities for quality improvement.

Study Overview

Detailed Description

The purpose of this project is to implement a system of prospective, standardized data collection for all patients with cleft lip and/or palate (CL/P) treated by the cleft and craniofacial centers that participate in ACCQUIREnet.

Adoption of this prospective data-collection system has two principal goals:

  1. To enable on-demand and scheduled review of cleft-care-related safety and outcomes data and team performance for the purpose of internal audits and continuous quality improvement; and
  2. To permit participation in multi-site, collaborative quality-improvement projects and/or research networks that require usage of these standardized data-collection methods. (These collaborations are described in corresponding IRB protocols and data-transfer agreements. Patient privacy and confidentiality is protected at all times.)

All patients with CL/P treated at cleft and craniofacial centers participating in ACCQUIREnet will be invited to participate in this project. Duke University serves as the coordinating center and statistical support center for the study. Data are maintained in a local, secured database.

The IRB protocol details methods of quality assurance, data monitoring, and auditing. Data dictionaries employed in ACCQUIREnet include the CleftCap REDCap project template, CleftKit Common Data Model (an extension of the PCORnet Common Data Model), the ICHOM Standard Set for the Comprehensive Appraisal of Cleft Care, and the CLEFT-Q patient-reported outcome manual, maintained by the International Consortium for Health Outcomes Measurement (ichom.org) and McMaster University, respectively.

Study Type

Observational

Enrollment (Estimated)

1000

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Locations

    • Nova Scotia
      • Halifax, Nova Scotia, Canada, B3K 6R8
        • Dalhousie University - IWK Health Centre
    • Florida
      • Gainesville, Florida, United States, 32608
        • University of Florida - Shands Hospital
      • Hollywood, Florida, United States, 33021
        • Joe DiMaggio Children's Hospital
      • Orlando, Florida, United States, 32806
        • Orlando Health - Arnold Palmer Hospital for Children
      • Saint Petersburg, Florida, United States, 33701
        • Johns Hopkins - All Children's Hospital (JHACH)
    • Maine
      • Portland, Maine, United States, 04102
        • Maine Medical Center
    • Massachusetts
      • Boston, Massachusetts, United States, 02115
        • Harvard University - Boston Children's Hospital (BCH)
    • Missouri
      • Saint Louis, Missouri, United States, 63110
        • Washington University - St. Louis Children's Hospital (WUSTL)
    • North Carolina
      • Durham, North Carolina, United States, 27710
        • Duke University - Duke Children's Hospital & Health Center
      • Winston-Salem, North Carolina, United States, 27157
        • Wake Forest University - Brenner Children's Hospital
    • Texas
      • Houston, Texas, United States, 77030
        • University of Texas at Houston - Children's Memorial Hermann Hospital

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Ages Eligible for Study

1 day to 22 years (Child, Adult)

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Sampling Method

Non-Probability Sample

Study Population

All patients born with cleft lip and/or palate are eligible for inclusion in this study.

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

  • Typical orofacial clefts, of which subtypes are:
  • Unilateral or bilateral cleft lip
  • Unilateral or bilateral cleft lip and alveolus
  • Unilateral or bilateral cleft lip and alveolus and palate
  • Unilateral or bilateral cleft lip and palate
  • Overt cleft palate
  • Occult cleft palate

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Atypical (Tessier) facial clefts

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

Cohorts and Interventions

Group / Cohort
Intervention / Treatment
uCL(A)
Children with unilateral cleft lip with/without cleft alveolus but intact secondary palate. Subgroup analysis by severity of lip (complete, incomplete, or lesser-form).
Other Names:
  • cheiloplasty
Other Names:
  • orthognathic surgery
Other Names:
  • nasoalveolar molding
  • dentofacial orthopedics
  • Georgiade-Latham appliance
  • Latham appliance
uCL(A)P
Children with unilateral cleft lip with/without cleft alveolus and with cleft secondary palate. Subgroup analysis by severity of lip (complete, incomplete, or lesser-form) and severity of palate (submucous, Veau-I, Veau-II, or Veau-III).
Other Names:
  • cheiloplasty
Other Names:
  • orthognathic surgery
Other Names:
  • nasoalveolar molding
  • dentofacial orthopedics
  • Georgiade-Latham appliance
  • Latham appliance
Other Names:
  • palatoplasty
Other Names:
  • sphincteroplasty
Other Names:
  • hearing aid
bCL(A)
Children with bilateral cleft lip with/without cleft alveolus but intact secondary palate. Subgroup analysis by severity of lip (complete, incomplete, or lesser-form).
Other Names:
  • cheiloplasty
Other Names:
  • orthognathic surgery
Other Names:
  • nasoalveolar molding
  • dentofacial orthopedics
  • Georgiade-Latham appliance
  • Latham appliance
bCL(A)P
Children with unilateral cleft lip with/without cleft alveolus and with cleft secondary palate. Subgroup analysis by severity of lip (complete, incomplete, or lesser-form) and severity of palate (submucous, Veau-I, Veau-II, Veau-III, or Veau-IV).
Other Names:
  • cheiloplasty
Other Names:
  • orthognathic surgery
Other Names:
  • nasoalveolar molding
  • dentofacial orthopedics
  • Georgiade-Latham appliance
  • Latham appliance
Other Names:
  • palatoplasty
Other Names:
  • sphincteroplasty
Other Names:
  • hearing aid
CP
Children with cleft secondary palate only, but intact lip and alveolus. Subgroup analysis by severity (submucous, Veau-I, or Veau-II).
Other Names:
  • orthognathic surgery
Other Names:
  • palatoplasty
Other Names:
  • sphincteroplasty
Other Names:
  • hearing aid

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Speech: intelligibility
Time Frame: ~5 years of age
Utilizes the intelligibility in context scale (ICS)
~5 years of age
Speech: intelligibility
Time Frame: ~8 years of age
Utilizes the intelligibility in context scale (ICS)
~8 years of age
Speech: intelligibility
Time Frame: ~12 years of age
Utilizes the intelligibility in context scale (ICS)
~12 years of age
Speech: intelligibility
Time Frame: ~22 years of age
Utilizes the intelligibility in context scale (ICS)
~22 years of age
Speech: velopharyngeal competence
Time Frame: ~5 years of age
~5 years of age
Speech: velopharyngeal competence
Time Frame: ~8 years of age
~8 years of age
Speech: velopharyngeal competence
Time Frame: ~12 years of age
~12 years of age
Speech: velopharyngeal competence
Time Frame: ~22 years of age
~22 years of age
Speech: articulation
Time Frame: ~5 years of age
Utilizes the modified percent correct consonants (mPCC) scale
~5 years of age
Speech: articulation
Time Frame: ~8 years of age
Utilizes the modified percent correct consonants (mPCC) scale
~8 years of age
Speech: articulation
Time Frame: ~12 years of age
Utilizes the modified percent correct consonants (mPCC) scale
~12 years of age
Speech: articulation
Time Frame: ~22 years of age
Utilizes the modified percent correct consonants (mPCC) scale
~22 years of age
Speech: patient-reported outcomes related to speech and speaking
Time Frame: ~8 years of age
Utilizes the CLEFT-Q PROM
~8 years of age
Speech: patient-reported outcomes related to speech and speaking
Time Frame: ~12 years of age
Utilizes the CLEFT-Q PROM
~12 years of age
Speech: patient-reported outcomes related to speech and speaking
Time Frame: ~22 years of age
Utilizes the CLEFT-Q PROM
~22 years of age
Hearing: puretone average
Time Frame: ~5 years of age
~5 years of age
Dental: dmft and DMFT scores
Time Frame: ~5 years of age
Utilizes the dmft score for deciduous teeth and DMFT score for permanent teeth
~5 years of age
Dental: dmft and DMFT scores
Time Frame: ~12 years of age
Utilizes the dmft score for deciduous teeth and DMFT score for permanent teeth
~12 years of age
Dental: dmft and DMFT scores
Time Frame: ~22 years of age
Utilizes the dmft score for deciduous teeth and DMFT score for permanent teeth
~22 years of age
Dental: occlusion (Uses modifications of the GOSLON scale)
Time Frame: ~5 years of age
~5 years of age
Dental: occlusion (Uses modifications of the Bauru scale)
Time Frame: ~5 years of age
~5 years of age
Dental: occlusion (Uses modifications of the GOSLON scale)
Time Frame: ~12 years of age
~12 years of age
Dental: occlusion (Uses modifications of the Bauru scale)
Time Frame: ~12 years of age
~12 years of age
Dental: occlusion (Uses modifications of the GOSLON scale)
Time Frame: ~22 years of age
~22 years of age
Dental: occlusion (Uses modifications of the Bauru scale)
Time Frame: ~22 years of age
~22 years of age
Dental: patient-reported outcomes related to mastication
Time Frame: ~8 years of age
Uses the CLEFT-Q PROM
~8 years of age
Dental: patient-reported outcomes related to mastication
Time Frame: ~12 years of age
Uses the CLEFT-Q PROM
~12 years of age
Dental: patient-reported outcomes related to mastication
Time Frame: ~22 years of age
Uses the CLEFT-Q PROM
~22 years of age
Dental: patient-reported outcomes related to oral health
Time Frame: ~8 years of age
Uses the COHIP PROM
~8 years of age
Dental: patient-reported outcomes related to oral health
Time Frame: ~12 years of age
Uses the COHIP PROM
~12 years of age
Dental: patient-reported outcomes related to oral health
Time Frame: ~22 years of age
Uses the COHIP PROM
~22 years of age
Patient-reported outcomes related to eating/drinking
Time Frame: ~8 years of age
Uses the CLEFT-Q PROM
~8 years of age
Patient-reported outcomes related to eating/drinking
Time Frame: ~12 years of age
Uses the CLEFT-Q PROM
~12 years of age
Patient-reported outcomes related to eating/drinking
Time Frame: ~22 years of age
Uses the CLEFT-Q PROM
~22 years of age
Breathing: Patient-reported outcomes related to nasal and oral breathing
Time Frame: ~8 years of age
Uses the NOSE PROM
~8 years of age
Breathing: Patient-reported outcomes related to nasal and oral breathing
Time Frame: ~12 years of age
Uses the NOSE PROM
~12 years of age
Breathing: Patient-reported outcomes related to nasal and oral breathing
Time Frame: ~22 years of age
Uses the NOSE PROM
~22 years of age
Aesthetics: Patient-reported outcomes related to appearance
Time Frame: ~8 years of age
Uses the CLEFT-Q PROM
~8 years of age
Aesthetics: Patient-reported outcomes related to appearance
Time Frame: ~12 years of age
Uses the CLEFT-Q PROM
~12 years of age
Aesthetics: Patient-reported outcomes related to appearance
Time Frame: ~22 years of age
Uses the CLEFT-Q PROM
~22 years of age
Aesthetics: Clinical assessment of nasolabial and facial aesthetics
Time Frame: ~2 years of age
~2 years of age
Aesthetics: Clinical assessment of nasolabial and facial aesthetics
Time Frame: ~5 years of age
~5 years of age
Aesthetics: Clinical assessment of nasolabial and facial aesthetics
Time Frame: ~8 years of age
~8 years of age
Aesthetics: Clinical assessment of nasolabial and facial aesthetics
Time Frame: ~12 years of age
~12 years of age
Aesthetics: Clinical assessment of nasolabial and facial aesthetics
Time Frame: ~22 years of age
~22 years of age

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Sponsor

Investigators

  • Principal Investigator: Alexander C Allori, MD, MPH, Duke University

Publications and helpful links

The person responsible for entering information about the study voluntarily provides these publications. These may be about anything related to the study.

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start (Actual)

October 1, 2016

Primary Completion (Estimated)

December 1, 2031

Study Completion (Estimated)

December 1, 2031

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

October 16, 2015

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

March 3, 2016

First Posted (Estimated)

March 9, 2016

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Actual)

December 12, 2023

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

December 5, 2023

Last Verified

December 1, 2023

More Information

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Clinical Trials on Cleft Lip and Palate

Clinical Trials on cleft lip repair

3
Subscribe