PROgressive struCturEd Simulation-based Surgical Training Program (PROCESS) - Open Vascular Surgery (PROCESS)

June 6, 2024 updated by: Camilo Alejandro Velandia Sánchez, Fundación Cardioinfantil Instituto de Cardiología
A triple-arm, randomized, simple-blinded clinical trial will be conducted. A control sequence and an intervention sequence of three subgroups with different exposure levels to the simulation program are proposed. Group 1: open abdominal aortic repair (AAOR), Group 2: vascular anastomosis (VA) and AAOR, and Group 3: specific micro-surgical skills, VA and AAOR. Surgical residents of general, vascular, or cardiovascular surgery programs will be included. Sample size calculation resulted in 45 participants, 15 in each group. Simple blinding will involve external evaluators. Randomization will occur as a simple randomization.

Study Overview

Study Type

Interventional

Enrollment (Estimated)

45

Phase

  • Not Applicable

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Contact

Study Contact Backup

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Ages Eligible for Study

  • Adult
  • Older Adult

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

Yes

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

  • Vascular Surgery, Cardiothoracic Surgery, and General Surgery residents.
  • Over 18 years old.

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Serious illnesses, such as advanced cancer, decompensated cardiovascular diseases, or severe neurological disorders, could be exclusion criteria due to concerns about the participant's safety and ability to complete the study.
  • Participants who have known allergies to components of the interventions or have experienced severe adverse reactions in the past will be excluded from the study.
  • Any medical condition that could interfere with the participant's ability to complete assessments or follow study guidelines could be a reason for exclusion. This could include, for example, severe physical disabilities or illnesses requiring continuous hospitalization.
  • Individuals who cannot provide valid informed consent due to cognitive issues, mental impairment, or legal incapacity will be excluded from the study.
  • Individuals who have had prior exposure to structured simulation programs in vascular surgery will be excluded. Previous familiarity with simulation could influence study outcomes, introducing a prior learning bias that could distort the assessment of the intervention's effectiveness.

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

  • Primary Purpose: Other
  • Allocation: Randomized
  • Interventional Model: Parallel Assignment
  • Masking: Single

Arms and Interventions

Participant Group / Arm
Intervention / Treatment
Experimental: Group I
Will receive the complete structured and progressive training program involving specific micro-surgical skills, VA, and AAOR.
Participants will be exposed to different amounts of open vascular surgical training, but only group I will receive the complete structured and progressive training program. This ensures that all participants have access to the potential benefits derived from the intervention. Current evidence supports this approach, which supports the benefits of medical simulation in the training process of surgical residents.
Active Comparator: Group II
Will only receive VA and AAOR training.
Participants will be exposed to different amounts of open vascular surgical training, but only group I will receive the complete structured and progressive training program. This ensures that all participants have access to the potential benefits derived from the intervention. Current evidence supports this approach, which supports the benefits of medical simulation in the training process of surgical residents.
Active Comparator: Group III
Will only receive AAOR training.
Participants will be exposed to different amounts of open vascular surgical training, but only group I will receive the complete structured and progressive training program. This ensures that all participants have access to the potential benefits derived from the intervention. Current evidence supports this approach, which supports the benefits of medical simulation in the training process of surgical residents.

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Efficacy in the acquisition of technical surgical skills.
Time Frame: 4 months
Pre- and post-intervention individual measures will be taken using the OPEn Aortic Aneurysm Repair Assessment of Technical Expertise (OPERATE) tool to compare the efficacy of the simulated program. The unit of measure are the points of OPERATE Scale with a established passing score of 27.7. A higher score means a better outcome.
4 months

Secondary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
The efficacy given by the progression through the different structured modules.
Time Frame: 4 months
The results of the 3 arms will be compared. The unit of measure are the points of OPERATE Scale with a established passing score of 27.7. A higher score means a better outcome.
4 months
The satisfaction of the residents
Time Frame: 4 months

Surveys guided by a Likert Scale will measure the Level 1 of Kirkpatricks levels based on the reaction and satisfaction of the participants after the implementation of the interventions.

The unit of measure will be the result on the Likert scale; the minimum score is 1, and the maximum is 10. A higher score means a better outcome.

4 months

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start (Estimated)

July 21, 2024

Primary Completion (Estimated)

January 15, 2025

Study Completion (Estimated)

January 15, 2025

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

May 20, 2024

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

June 6, 2024

First Posted (Actual)

June 11, 2024

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Actual)

June 11, 2024

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

June 6, 2024

Last Verified

June 1, 2024

More Information

Terms related to this study

Additional Relevant MeSH Terms

Other Study ID Numbers

  • CEIC-013-2024

Plan for Individual participant data (IPD)

Plan to Share Individual Participant Data (IPD)?

NO

IPD Plan Description

The data may not be available for public access due to participant privacy concerns but may be available from the corresponding author upon reasonable request.

Drug and device information, study documents

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated drug product

No

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated device product

No

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Clinical Trials on Vascular Diseases

Clinical Trials on Progression and structured surgical training.

Subscribe