Efficacy of Personalized Tumorogram-based Therapy in Cancer Established From Patient-derived Organoid (AVATAR) (AVATAR)

January 27, 2026 updated by: Institut Curie

Efficacy of Personalized Tumorogram-based Therapy in Cancer Established From Patient-derived Biological Avatar: Proof-of-concept Study

A biopsy of a tumor lesion (breast or other localisation) will be performed for processing to establish avatars (patient-derived organoids -PDO). A personalized tumorogram for each patient will be provided, based on the results of the drug screening (= tumor predicted as sensitive, intermediate, resistant or non-evaluable for each drug tested). Patients with an informative tumorogram will receive one of the recommended treatments (line N+1) in the event of tumor progression, administered according to standard procedures and validated at medical meetings specific to each center, and their fate will be monitored.

Study Overview

Status

Recruiting

Intervention / Treatment

Detailed Description

A biopsy of a tumor lesion (breast or other localisation) will be performed and transferred to the LIP laboratory at the Institut Curie (Laboratoire d'Investigation Préclinique, Département de Recherche Translationnelle) for processing to establish avatars (patient-derived organoids -PDO).

Step 1: Establishment of avatar (PDO): follow-up of line N (standard care) when the tumorogram is established, then follow-up of standard line N+1.

  • The patient will then be treated (line N) as part of standard care while awaiting the result of the tumorogram.
  • A drug screening will be carried out on the PDO (~5-10 drugs/patient), which will be progressive and adapted to the clinical context (including treatment history), including drugs used in standard care (cf. list in Table 1).
  • A personalized tumorogram for each patient will be provided, based on the results of the drug screening (= tumor predicted as sensitive, intermediate, resistant or non-evaluable for each drug tested).
  • A multidisciplinary committee will be set up for this study, which will meet regularly (~1 time per week) to discuss patients included in the study, obtaining PDOs, drugs to be prioritized in the screening, results of the drug screening and personalized tumorograms. The committee will include at least one oncologist and one biologist from the laboratory.
  • The multidisciplinary committee will make a therapeutic recommendation based on the personalized tumorogram, which may include several drugs considered sensitive to the tumour
  • A tumorogram will be considered as informative if it proposes at least one chemotherapy molecule considered as sensitive in the PDO model.
  • Patients whose PDO could not be obtained, or whose tumorogram was not informative, will receive standard treatment.

Step 2: informative tumorogram: follow-up of experimental line N+1 Patients with an informative tumorogram will receive one of the recommended treatments (line N+1) in the event of tumor progression, administered according to standard procedures and validated at medical meetings specific to each center, and their fate will be monitored.

Study Type

Interventional

Enrollment (Estimated)

110

Phase

  • Not Applicable

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Contact

Study Contact Backup

Study Locations

      • Paris, France, 75005
        • Recruiting
        • Institut Curie
        • Principal Investigator:
          • LUC CABEL, MD
        • Contact:
          • Luc CABEL, MD
      • Paris, France, 75010
        • Not yet recruiting
        • Hôpital Saint-Louis - AP-HP Senopole
        • Principal Investigator:
          • Delphine COCHEREAU, MD
        • Contact:
          • Delphine COCHEREAU, MD
      • Saint-Cloud, France, 92210
        • Recruiting
        • Institut Curie
        • Contact:
          • Alexandre DE MOURA, MD
        • Principal Investigator:
          • Alexandre DE MOURA, MD

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Ages Eligible for Study

  • Adult
  • Older Adult

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

  1. Patient over 18 years of age
  2. Advanced breast cancer
  3. Triple-negative phenotype (HR-/HER2-) or HR+/HER2- after hormone resistance (progression after treatment with hormone therapy + CDK4/6 inhibitor)
  4. Tumor measurable according to RECISTv1.1 criteria, accessible to biopsy
  5. Performans Status 0-1

Exclusion Criteria:

  1. More than 3 lines of chemotherapy in the advanced setting (excluding hormone therapy/CDK4/6 inhibitor)
  2. Progressive brain metastases
  3. Leptomeningeal metastasis

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

  • Primary Purpose: Treatment
  • Allocation: Non-Randomized
  • Interventional Model: Parallel Assignment
  • Masking: None (Open Label)

Arms and Interventions

Participant Group / Arm
Intervention / Treatment
Other: Line N in step 1
Step 1: follow-up of line N (standard care) when the tumorogram is established. Intervention is the biopsy performed before start of treatment in line N. Standard of Care treatment
The recommandation done based on informative tumorogram is up to study investigator
Other Names:
  • Line N+1 treatment recommandation
Experimental: Line N+1 in step 2
Step 2: in case of informative tumorogram: follow-up of experimental line N+1. If tumorogram is informative on organoid issued from biospy, a specific standard of Care treatment will be recommanded.
The recommandation done based on informative tumorogram is up to study investigator
Other Names:
  • Line N+1 treatment recommandation

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Tumor response rate
Time Frame: 6 months

Evaluation in the cohort of patients treated according to the informative tumorogram: tumor response rate within 6 months of the start of this treatment.

Tumor response is defined as partial or complete response, assessed based on radiological criteria (RECIST v1.1) or clinical criteria where applicable.

6 months

Secondary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Comparison of response rate between both the arms
Time Frame: 6 months
Comparison of response rate and PFSn+1 (recommended treatment) with response rate and PFSn+1 of patients who did not have an established tumorogram;
6 months
Organoid cultures achievement
Time Frame: 6 months
Percentage of achievement of a PDO
6 months
Tumorograms performance
Time Frame: 6 months
Percentage of informative tumorograms versus number of tumorograms returned
6 months
Overall survival
Time Frame: up to 18 months
Comparison of overall survival (OSn+1, defined as the time between the start of treatment on line n+1 and death) between patients treated according to the tumorogram and patients without a tumorogram and treated according to the guidelines.
up to 18 months

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Sponsor

Investigators

  • Principal Investigator: Luc CABEL, MD, Institut Curie

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start (Actual)

December 6, 2024

Primary Completion (Estimated)

December 15, 2027

Study Completion (Estimated)

September 30, 2028

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

May 27, 2024

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

June 10, 2024

First Posted (Actual)

June 14, 2024

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Actual)

January 29, 2026

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

January 27, 2026

Last Verified

January 1, 2026

More Information

Terms related to this study

Plan for Individual participant data (IPD)

Plan to Share Individual Participant Data (IPD)?

YES

IPD Plan Description

Investigators will share de-identified data sets with interested researchers, educators or clinicians. Materials generated under the project will be disseminated in accrodance with Institut Curie policies.

IPD Sharing Time Frame

Data requests can be submitted starting 9 months after article publication and will be made accessible for up to 12 months.

IPD Sharing Access Criteria

Access to trial individual participant data can be requested by qualified researchers engaging in independent scientific reserach, and will be provided following review and approval of a research proposal and Statistical Analysis Plan (SAP) and execution of a data sharing agreement (DSA).

IPD Sharing Supporting Information Type

  • STUDY_PROTOCOL
  • CSR

Drug and device information, study documents

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated drug product

No

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated device product

No

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Clinical Trials on Metastatic Breast Cancer

Clinical Trials on Biopsy

Subscribe