Exploring Pathology Related to Slowly Expanding Lesions Using Advanced Imaging (SELPET)

April 11, 2025 updated by: Turku University Hospital
This is an open, follow-up study to compare the performance of three critical imaging methods to detect chronic active lesions in Multiple Sclerosis (MS) in vivo.

Study Overview

Status

Enrolling by invitation

Conditions

Detailed Description

Smoldering inflammation is recognized as a critical contributor to MS progression-related central nervous system (CNS) damage. Activated microglia and macrophages particularly at chronic lesion edge are believed to promote lesion growth. Reversing their harmful activity may prove to be an efficient way to halt progression independent of relapses in MS.

These smoldering, or chronic active lesions can be detected in vivo using advanced imaging techniques. 1) Specific algorithms can be used to identify lesion growth, with a hypothesis that the slowly evolving lesions (SEL) are the ones harboring a rim of activated microglial cells, which contribute to damage in the surrounding tissue, and lesion growth. 2) Lesions partially or entirely surrounded by rims of increased tissue intensity on QSM-MRI (quantitative susceptibility mapping) sequences are considered as iron rim lesions, with iron-containing proinflammatory microglia/macrophages at the lesion edge. 3) In addition, 18 kDa translocator protein-positron emission tomography (TSPO-PET) imaging can be used to identify chronic active lesions based on TSPO-expression by activated innate immune cells, and their gathering at the edges of chronic active lesions. The TSPO-PET analysis of chronic active lesions can be semi-automated, and the specific radioligand binding at the chronic active lesion edge can be quantitated, which enhances the sensitivity of this method.

Despite existing preliminary data demonstrating increased QSM signal TSPO-positive lesions, it is yet to be demonstrated how these three imaging methods perform in identifying chronic active lesions when compared to each other at larger scale.

Study Type

Observational

Enrollment (Estimated)

15

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Locations

    • Finland Proper
      • Turku, Finland Proper, Finland, 20520
        • Turku PET Centre

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Ages Eligible for Study

  • Adult
  • Older Adult

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Sampling Method

Non-Probability Sample

Study Population

52 MS patients with simultaneous QSM-MRI and TSPO-PET and with available longitudinal brain MRI images (minimum 1 year) have been identified. With an average detection frequency of >= 1 SEL in 70% of MS patients, there will be sufficient imaging material for successful conduct of the study.

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

  • Signing the informed consent form
  • MS diagnosis in accordance with McDonald 2017 criteria
  • Available longitudinal brain MR images (minimum 1 year)
  • Simultaneous QSM MRI sequence and TSPO-PET
  • Lesions with iron rim/s

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Patients with other neurodegenerative disease than MS
  • Patients with other autoimmune disease than MS
  • Patients with other significant or malignant underlying disease of any other organ system
  • Patients that are pregnant or breast-feeding
  • Corticosteroid treatment within 4 weeks of imaging
  • Patients with significant abnormal findings other than MS in the screening MRI
  • Patients with claustrophobia, or a history of moderate to severe anxiety disorder or panic attacks (which could potentially lead to preterm termination of the imaging)
  • Contraindication to PET scan investigations
  • Exposure to experimental radiation in the past 12 months such that radiodosimetry limits would be exceeded by participating in this study
  • Intolerance to previous PET scans; i.e. previous hypersensitivity reactions to any PET ligand or imaging agent or failure to participate in and comply with previous PET scans

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

Cohorts and Interventions

Group / Cohort
Patients with Multiple Sclerosis
Patients who have previously participated in PET-imaging studies and from whom slowly expanding lesions as well as TSPO-rim-positive lesions and iron rims at the edge of lesions are found

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Number of lesions
Time Frame: 18 months, 36 months
The number of lesions identified using each respective method
18 months, 36 months
Co-localization of lesions
Time Frame: 18 months, 36 months
Potential co-localization of the RIM+ lesions identified using the various methods.
18 months, 36 months

Secondary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Correlation of PET imaging and clinical variables
Time Frame: 18 months, 36 months
Imaging variables from PET imaging correlated with clinical status of the patient evaluated with Expanded Disability Status scale (EDSS). EDSS describes the disability level and ranges from 0 to 10, where 0 means no disability due to MS and 10 means death due MS.
18 months, 36 months
Correlation of magnetic resonance imaging and clinical variables
Time Frame: 18 months, 36 months
Imaging variables from MR imaging correlated with clinical status of the patient evaluated with Expanded Disability Status scale (EDSS). EDSS describes the disability level and ranges from 0 to 10, where 0 means no disability due to MS and 10 means death due MS.
18 months, 36 months
Correlation of quality of life questionnaires and clinical variables
Time Frame: 18 months, 36 months
Correlation of quality of life questionnaires and clinical status of the patient evaluated with Expanded Disability Status scale (EDSS). EDSS describes the disability level and ranges from 0 to 10, where 0 means no disability due to MS and 10 means death due MS.
18 months, 36 months
Correlation of neuropsychological evaluation and clinical variables
Time Frame: 18 months, 36 months
Correlation of neuropsychological evaluation and clinical status of the patient evaluated with Expanded Disability Status scale (EDSS). EDSS describes the disability level and ranges from 0 to 10, where 0 means no disability due to MS and 10 means death due MS.
18 months, 36 months

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Investigators

  • Principal Investigator: Laura Airas, MD,Professor, Turku University Hospital, division of clinical neurosciences

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start (Actual)

October 3, 2024

Primary Completion (Estimated)

June 1, 2028

Study Completion (Estimated)

December 1, 2028

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

June 10, 2024

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

June 10, 2024

First Posted (Actual)

June 14, 2024

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Actual)

April 16, 2025

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

April 11, 2025

Last Verified

April 1, 2025

More Information

Terms related to this study

Drug and device information, study documents

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated drug product

No

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated device product

No

product manufactured in and exported from the U.S.

No

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Clinical Trials on Multiple Sclerosis

Subscribe