Evaluation of the Effectiveness of the Administration of Local Anesthetics Via Two Catheters Placed During Surgery, and Study of the Benefits on Respiratory Function and Therefore on Recovery Time (PARALSTER)

November 12, 2024 updated by: CHU de Reims

Impact of Bilateral Parasternal Infusion of Local Anesthetics in Patients With Respiratory Risk Factors Over the Length of Hospitalization and Morphine Sparing in the Intensive Care Unit After On-pump Coronary Bypass Surgery

Currently intravenous analgesics are used for postoperative analgesia. But the analgesia of these products is tempered by their adverse effects (sedation, confusion, nausea or vomiting, delayed transit, urinary retention and pruritus) which can slow down postoperative recovery.

The aim of this study is to evaluate the effectiveness of the administration of local anesthetics via two catheters placed during surgery, but also to study their benefit on respiratory function and therefore on recovery time and morphine sparing.

Study Overview

Detailed Description

Medical context:

Cardiac surgery and more specifically coronary bypass surgery are very painful postoperative surgeries, especially during the first 48 hours following the operation. These pains, present at rest, are increased when the patient is mobilized, during coughing, deep inspiration, chairing or mobilization in bed.

In cardiac surgery, it has been shown that respiratory complications remain a significant cause of morbidity and mortality. They can lead to an extension of the length of hospitalization and therefore an increase in hospital costs. Indeed, these are increased compared to other surgeries because of the sternotomy and the pain it causes, as well as the type of ventilation during extracorporeal circulation (sharp reduction or even stopping of mechanical ventilation).

Patients having, prior to surgery, risk factors for postoperative respiratory complications, present increased risks of pneumonia, postoperative atelectasis, pleurisy, re-intubation, mortality and therefore an additional cost of hospitalization.

Limiting postoperative pain allows better rehabilitation of the patient by improving patient mobilization, participation in respiratory physiotherapy and therefore potentially a reduction in respiratory complications.

Currently, multimodal analgesia combining opioids, nefopam, nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory drugs, ketamine, lidocaine and paracetamol, is the most widely used technique in patients. The analgesic efficacy provided by opioids is tempered by their side effects (sedation, confusion, nausea or vomiting, transit delay, urinary retention, pruritus) which may slow postoperative recovery. In addition, opioids can also decrease the cough reflex and impair respiratory control.

It is therefore important to find alternatives to the analgesic management of these patients who, thanks to the improvement of surgical and anesthetic techniques, are more and more numerous.

The use of para-sternal catheters with bilateral infusion of local anesthetics has already shown its effectiveness in terms of reducing opioid consumption and safety. However, no benefit has yet been proven in terms of reducing the length of hospital stay in subjects at respiratory risk undergoing surgery such as on pump coronary bypass surgery.

Goal :

Show that the use of a bilateral para-sternal infusion of local anesthetics (ropivacaine 0.2%) by multi-perforated catheters in patients with respiratory risk factors who have undergone coronary bypass surgery, makes it possible to reduce the length of stay in an intensive care unit.

Study Type

Interventional

Enrollment (Estimated)

114

Phase

  • Not Applicable

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Contact

Study Locations

      • Reims, France
        • Recruiting
        • Damien JOLLY
        • Contact:

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Ages Eligible for Study

  • Older Adult

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Description

This study will include adults over 18 years of age requiring on-pump coronary bypass surgery with at least one of the following respiratory risk factors:

  • BMI > or = 30 Kg / m2
  • Active or withdrawn smoking for less than 6 weeks
  • COPD documented by pulmonologist or respiratory function test (LVEF/ FVC <0.7 not reversible after bronchodilator)
  • Restrictive ventilatory disorders, defined by a CPT less than 80% of normal
  • Chronic respiratory failure, defined by a PaO2, at rest, in ambient air, less than 70 mmHg
  • Age > or = 75 years old exclusion criteria:

Any patient meeting one of the following criteria will be excluded from the study:

  • Emergency surgery
  • Other operative procedure planned during the same intervention (for example vascular), apart from the saphenous sample
  • Aortic dissection
  • Preoperative renal failure with GFR <30 mL / min / 1.73 m2
  • Left heart failure with Ejection fraction <30%
  • Pulmonary arterial hypertension> 50 mmHg
  • Hepatic cytolysis with ALT or AST> 2N
  • ASA score > or = 4
  • Coagulopathy
  • Anticoagulants or antiaggregants not stopped in time (according to usual protocols) or with poorly performed or unjustified relay
  • Chronic use of opioids or history of drug addiction
  • Progressive pregnancy or breastfeeding
  • Inability to understand protocol and sign consent
  • Known allergy to one of the substances in the study protocol
  • Patients requiring assistance such as ECMO, intra-aortic counter pulsation balloon or Impella will be excluded from the protocol.

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

  • Primary Purpose: Supportive Care
  • Allocation: Randomized
  • Interventional Model: Parallel Assignment
  • Masking: None (Open Label)

Arms and Interventions

Participant Group / Arm
Intervention / Treatment
Experimental: WITH catheter
A "multi-perforated catheter" arm benefiting from opioid analgesia (Patient controlled Analgesia ((PCA)) morphine (bolus-only mode or morphine titration if PCA not available), nefopam, non-steroidal anti-inflammatory drugs, ketamine, pregabalin and paracetamol associated with analgesia by continuous infusion of local anesthetics (ropivacaine) via two multi-perforated catheters
After skin closure, cardiac surgeons place multi-perforated catheters aseptically.
Active Comparator: WITHOUT catheter
A "control" arm benefiting from opioid analgesia (PCA morphine in bolus mode alone or morphine titration if PCA not available), nefopam, non-steroidal anti-inflammatory drugs, ketamine, pregabalin and paracetamol.
opioid analgesia (PCA morphine in bolus mode alone or morphine titration if PCA not available), nefopam, non-steroidal anti-inflammatory drugs, ketamine, pregabalin and paracetamol

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Evaluation of the duration of hospitalization in intensive care unit
Time Frame: Day 1
Study of the benefit of the administration of local anesthetics via two catheters placed during surgery on recovery time versus currently intravenous analgesics that are used for postoperative analgesia, which are tempered by their adverse effects, and can slow down postoperative recovery.
Day 1

Secondary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Evaluation of the pain at rest and on mobilization using a visual pain evaluation scale
Time Frame: Day 2
Study of the effectiveness of the administration of local anesthetics via two catheters placed during surgery, including their benefit on respiratory function, versus currently intravenous analgesics that are used for postoperative analgesia, which are tempered by their adverse effects.
Day 2
Evaluation of the total consumption of opioids
Time Frame: At 48 hours
Study of the use of local anesthetics via two catheters placed during surgery for morphine sparing versus the use of currently intravenous analgesics that are used for postoperative analgesia which are multimodal analgesia combining opioids like nefopam, nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory drugs, ketamine, lidocaine and paracetamol
At 48 hours
Evaluation of the patient mortality
Time Frame: Day 30
Study of the benefit of the administration of local anesthetics via two catheters placed during surgery on respiratory function and complications which remains a significant cause of morbidity and mortality versus currently intravenous analgesics that are used for postoperative analgesia, which are tempered by their adverse effects.
Day 30
Evaluation of the occurrence of the side effects of opioids
Time Frame: At 48 hours
Study of the benefit of the administration of local anesthetics via two catheters placed during surgery versus currently intravenous analgesics that are used for postoperative analgesia, which are tempered by their adverse effects as sedation, confusion, nausea or vomiting, delayed transit, urinary retention and pruritus.
At 48 hours

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Sponsor

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start (Actual)

February 8, 2023

Primary Completion (Estimated)

November 8, 2025

Study Completion (Estimated)

February 8, 2026

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

August 14, 2023

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

June 14, 2024

First Posted (Actual)

June 18, 2024

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Estimated)

November 13, 2024

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

November 12, 2024

Last Verified

June 1, 2024

More Information

Terms related to this study

Drug and device information, study documents

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated drug product

No

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated device product

No

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Clinical Trials on Duration of Hospitalization in Intensive Care Unit

Clinical Trials on multi-perforated catheter

Subscribe