Efficacy of the "Living With Type 1 Diabetes to Grown-Up" Interactive Podcast Program

October 10, 2024 updated by: Yueh-Tao Chiang, Chang Gung University

Efficacy of the Interactive Podcast Program "Living With Type 1 Diabetes to Grown-Up": A Two-arm Randomized Controlled Trial

The present study aims to evaluate the intervention effectiveness of the Online Interactive Podcast Program"Living with Type 1 Diabetes to Grown-Up"in patients with type 1 diabetes transitioning from adolescence to early adulthood.

Study Overview

Detailed Description

Individuals aged 16-25 with Type 1 Diabetes (T1D) face significant transitional challenges in their lives, with an increased risk of worsening disease management. Addressing these challenges, an interactive podcast program,

"Living with Type 1 Diabetes to Grown-Up"; is being developed with a one-year grant from the National Science and Technology Council. This continued project will span three years, employing a mixed-method research design for evaluation. Participants will be recruited from pediatric endocrinology and genetics clinics and wards across two medical centers in Northern Taiwan. In line with recommendations from prior reviewers, the study will incorporate a two-phased approach: the first phase is a quantitative study, structured around transitional theory and self-regulation theory using PRIDE steps. It adopts a double-blinded, randomized controlled experimental method with data collector and sham treatment participants blinded. Subjects will be randomly assigned to either the experimental group (N=44) or the active control group (N=44). Comparative analyses will focus on variations in disease control, emotional disturbance, confidence in self-management, self-care behaviors, diabetes knowledge, interpersonal disturbance, and family conflict at baseline, and post-interventions of immediate, 3-month, and 6-month periods. In the subsequent qualitative phase, 15-20 cases from the experimental group will be selected for in-depth interviews to evaluate the impact of the " Living with Type 1 Diabetes to GrownUp " interactive podcast program.

The outcomes of this research are anticipated to contribute significantly to the clinical management and technological intervention strategies for T1D adolescents in their transitional phase to adulthood.

Study Type

Interventional

Enrollment (Estimated)

88

Phase

  • Not Applicable

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Contact

  • Name: Yueh-Tao Chiang, PhD
  • Phone Number: +886-3-2118800 Ext. 3866
  • Email: nurs2004@gmail.com

Study Contact Backup

  • Name: Fu-Sung Lo, BSN
  • Phone Number: +886-3-281200 Ext. 8969
  • Email: lofusu@kimo.com

Study Locations

      • Taoyuan, Taiwan, 33302
        • Chang-Gung University and Chang-Gung Memorial Hospital
        • Contact:
        • Contact:
        • Principal Investigator:
          • Yueh-Tao Chiang, PhD.
        • Sub-Investigator:
          • Hsing-Yi Yu, PhD.
        • Sub-Investigator:
          • Chi-wen Chen, PhD.
        • Sub-Investigator:
          • Chi-Wen Chang, PhD.
        • Sub-Investigator:
          • Chienlung Hsu, PhD.
        • Principal Investigator:
          • Fu-Sung Lo, BSN
        • Sub-Investigator:
          • Philip Moons, PhD.
        • Sub-Investigator:
          • Pei-kwei Tsay, PhD.
        • Sub-Investigator:
          • Wei-Hsin Ting, MS.
        • Sub-Investigator:
          • Wen Yen Lin, PhD.

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Ages Eligible for Study

  • Child
  • Adult

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

  • a confirmed diagnosis of T1D by an endocrinologist before the age of 16 and a disease duration of >6months
  • patients aged 16-25 years
  • mean HbA1C level ≥7.5% one year before inclusion
  • ability to communicate in Chinese or Mandarin
  • patients who own smartphones with internet access
  • patients who agreed to voice recording during a session explaining the treatment process
  • patients who signed the informed consent form prior to participation; for minors, a legal representative must provide consent and sign the informed consent form.

Exclusion Criteria:

# T1D patients with other concomitant metabolic diseases, chromosomal aberrations, major illnesses, and cognitive impairment will be excluded from this study.

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

  • Primary Purpose: Health Services Research
  • Allocation: Randomized
  • Interventional Model: Parallel Assignment
  • Masking: Double

Arms and Interventions

Participant Group / Arm
Intervention / Treatment
Experimental: podcast intervention
The podcast will be used for intervention in the experimental group.
The podcast content was designed based on the results of previous research.Subjects will be randomly assigned to either the experimental group (N=44) or the comparison group (N=44). Comparative analyses will focus on variations in disease control, emotional disturbance,confidence in self-management, self-care behaviors, diabetes knowledge,interpersonal disturbance, and family conflict at baseline, and post-interventions of immediate, 3-month, and 6-month periods.
Sham Comparator: Ebook intervention
Participants in the active control group will use E-book.
Participants in the active control group will use Ebook.According to the research results from the project leader's app effectiveness evaluation (Chiang, 2020-2022), the e-book did not show significant effects on blood sugar control, disease management confidence, self-care behaviors, disease-related knowledge, or interpersonal distress. Therefore, the active control group received a sham treatment in the form of an e-book. The research team extracted content from the CEO APP e-book, with an expert validity of 0.91, and reorganized it into an electronic health education manual titled "Transitioning from Adolescence to Early Adulthood: The Ins and Outs of Type 1 Diabetes."

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Concentration of HbA1C (%) in participants
Time Frame: Baseline and 3, 6months
HbA1c from baseline, 3month and 6 months
Baseline and 3, 6months
percentage of self-monitored blood glucose readings within the 70-180 mg/dl range in Participants
Time Frame: Baseline and 3, 6months
the percentage of self-monitored blood glucose levels within the optimal range of 70-180 mg/dL
Baseline and 3, 6months
Number of Hyperglycemic Events in Participants
Time Frame: Baseline and 3, 6months
Number of events of each participant with blood sugar >200 mg/dl or" high" on glucometer, Ketoacidosis diagnosed
Baseline and 3, 6months
Number Hypoglycemic Events in Participants
Time Frame: Baseline and 3, 6months
Number of events of each participant with blood sugar <60 mg/dl or "low" on glucometer, Hypoglycemia diagnosed
Baseline and 3, 6months

Secondary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Score of Diabetes Distress in Participants
Time Frame: Baseline and 3, 6months
Change in Diabetes Distress Scale score over time.Diabetes Distress Scale (DDS): The original scale was developed by Polonsky et al. (2005). The Chinese version consists of 18 items across four subscales. Items are scored on a 4-point Likert scale ranging from 1 (no distress) to 4 (severely distressed), with higher scores indicating more severe emotional distress. Cronbach's α and test-retest reliability values of the DDS were 0.89 and 0.81, respectively (Liu et al., 2010).
Baseline and 3, 6months
Score of Diabetes Self-Managemen in Participants
Time Frame: Baseline and 3, 6months
Perceived Diabetes Self-Management Scale (PDSMS):The original questionnaire was developed by Wallston et al. (2007). It consists of 8 items scored on a 5-point Likert scale ranging from 1 (strongly disagree) to 5 (strongly agree),The translated questionnaire has content validity, Cronbach's α, and test-retest reliability values of 0.75, 0.93, and 0.97, respectively.
Baseline and 3, 6months
Score of Diabetes Self-care in Participants
Time Frame: Baseline and 3, 6months
Self-care Behavior Assessment Scale: This scale was developed by Wang (2010) to measure self-care behaviors of adolescents with T1D. A total of 39 items are scored on a 5-point Likert scale ranging from 1 (not achieved at all) to 5 (completely achieved). The total score ranges from 39 to 195, with higher scores indicating better self-care behaviors. Cronbach's α and the content validity index (CVI) value based on content rating by experts are 0.87 and 0.92, respectively.
Baseline and 3, 6months
Score of Diabetes Knowledge in Participants
Time Frame: Baseline and 3, 6months
Diabetes Knowledge Questionnaire (DKQ): The original questionnaire was developed by Garcia et al. (2001). The Chinese version comprises 24 items that are answered "Yes," "No" or "I don't know"; 1 point is awarded for each correct answer. The total score ranges from 0 to 24 points.reliability and Cronbach's α values of 0.78 and 0.89, respectively Hu et al.(2013)
Baseline and 3, 6months
Score of Interpersonal Distress in Participants
Time Frame: Baseline and 3, 6months
Analyze the score changes in the "Diabetes-Related Interpersonal Distress" subscale within the Diabetes Distress Scale (as previously mentioned in the Diabetes Distress Scale score ).
Baseline and 3, 6months
Score of Diabetes-Related Family Conflict in Participants
Time Frame: Baseline and 3, 6months
The Diabetes Family Conflict Scale-Revised (DFCS), revised by Hood et al. (2007), is used to assess family conflict and disagreements related to diabetes care in adolescents with T1D and their parents. The scale consists of 19 items and uses a 3-point scoring system: "Almost Never" scores 1 point, "Sometimes" scores 2 points, and "Almost Always" scores 3 points. Higher scores indicate more conflict. The DFCS has strong psychometric properties, with a Cronbach's α value of .95 for the adolescent version of the scale.
Baseline and 3, 6months

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Investigators

  • Study Director: Yueh-Tao Chiang, PhD, Chang Gung University
  • Study Director: Fu-Sung Lo, BSN, Chang Gung Memorial Hospital

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start (Estimated)

November 1, 2024

Primary Completion (Estimated)

December 31, 2027

Study Completion (Estimated)

December 31, 2027

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

June 13, 2024

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

June 13, 2024

First Posted (Actual)

June 18, 2024

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Actual)

October 15, 2024

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

October 10, 2024

Last Verified

October 1, 2024

More Information

Terms related to this study

Drug and device information, study documents

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated drug product

No

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated device product

No

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Clinical Trials on Type 1 Diabetes Mellitus

Clinical Trials on E-book

Subscribe