Strategy for Withdrawal of Pharmacological Treatment for Urinary Incontinence in Children (StayDry)

December 5, 2025 updated by: University of Aarhus

The primary objective is to investigate if abrupt withdrawal versus gradual withdrawal of pharmacotherapy (solifenacin and/or mirabegron) influences the risk of recurrence of incontinence.

Children aged 5-14 years diagnosed with urinary incontinence, treated with pharmacotherapy of solifenacin and/or mirabegron and ready for withdrawal will be randomized 1:1 to either abrupt or gradual withdrawal, according to the medical treatment that the child is receiving.

Study Overview

Detailed Description

Background and rationale: The pharmacological handling of pediatric incontinence is considered temporary and withdrawal attempts are recommended after continence has been achieved. There is no generally accepted withdrawal strategy for solifenacin and/or mirabegron in children. Currently, two different withdrawal strategies are being employed in the clinical setting, namely abrupt withdrawal, and gradual withdrawal, wherein the dosage of the drug prescribed is reduced or the interval between dosages given is increased. Studies report on the differences in withdrawal strategies of antidiuretic therapy targeted at enuresis in pediatric populations. Several studies have reported on the application of structured withdrawal of desmopressin, indicating that gradual withdrawal of desmopressin therapy results in prolonged intervals of continence without relapse. However, to the best of our knowledge, no studies have investigated the strategy of withdrawal of pharmacological treatment with solifenacin and/or mirabegron in children diagnosed with urinary incontinence that have achieved continence on these pharmaceuticals. Our study is proposed to ensure an evidence-based approach to a withdrawal of strategy for pharmacological treatment with solifenacin and/or mirabegron in children with urinary incontinence.

Objectives: The primary objective is to investigate if abrupt withdrawal versus gradual withdrawal of pharmacotherapy (solifenacin and/or mirabegron) influences the risk of recurrence of incontinence. We hypothesize that gradual withdrawal is superior to abrupt withdrawal regarding the risk of recurrence of incontinence.

Study design: This is an open-label prospective randomized trial, allocating participant to each of the three pharmaceutical groups, according to the medical treatment that the child is receiving (solifenacin, mirabegron or solifenacin in combination with mirabegron). Within each pharmaceutical group, the participant will be randomized 1:1 to the intervention being compared; either abrupt withdrawal or gradual withdrawal.

Perspectives:The results are expected to influence the withdrawal strategy of pharmacological treatment with solifenacin and/or mirabegron in children with daytime urinary incontinence.

Ethics: All pharmacological side effects will be handled in accordance with the Danish legislation. No risk or unknown side effects are expected to medical treatment or withdrawal. The therapeutic potential for future patients justifies the project to be carried out. Participation in this study will not lead to any disadvantages for the patient in their treatment. The study will be conducted in accordance with the protocol, applicable regulatory requirements according to Good Clinical Practice and the ethical principles of the Declaration of Helsinki. The study has been approved by the authorities and was initiated in May 2024. Significant additions or changes to the protocol may be conducted after the application for amendment is approved by the Regulatory Authority and the Ethics Committee. Information regarding the participants is protected according to the General Data Protection Regulation and the actual law. The study is registered at the research inventory of the Regions of Denmark (1-16-02-211-24) and at Aarhus University (ARG-2024-731-23833). The study is registered at CTIS (EU CT 2023-510187-13-00).

Study Type

Interventional

Enrollment (Estimated)

216

Phase

  • Phase 4

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Contact

Study Contact Backup

  • Name: Ann-Kristine Mandøe Svendsen, MD
  • Phone Number: +45 78430408
  • Email: ankrso@rm.dk

Study Locations

    • Aalborg
      • Aalborg, Aalborg, Denmark, 9000
        • Recruiting
        • Department of Pediatric and Adolescent Medicine, Aalborg University Hospital
        • Contact:
          • Søren Hagstrøm, Professor
          • Phone Number: +45 97663374
          • Email: soha@rm.dk
    • Aarhus N
      • Aarhus, Aarhus N, Denmark, 8200
        • Recruiting
        • Department of Pediatric and Adolescent Medicine, Aarhus University Hospital
        • Contact:
        • Sub-Investigator:
          • Ann-Kristine Mandøe Svendsen, MD
    • Esbjerg
      • Esbjerg, Esbjerg, Denmark, 6700
        • Not yet recruiting
        • Department of Pediatric and Adolescent medicine, Esbjerg Hospital
        • Contact:
    • Herning
      • Herning, Herning, Denmark, 7400
        • Recruiting
        • Department of Pediatric and Adolescent Medicine, Gødstrup Hospital
        • Contact:
        • Principal Investigator:
          • Ann-Kristine Mandøe Svendsen, MD
    • Kolding
      • Kolding, Kolding, Denmark, 6000
        • Not yet recruiting
        • Department of Pediatric and Adolescent Medicine, Kolding Hospital
        • Contact:

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Ages Eligible for Study

  • Child

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

  1. The participants custody holder(s) must voluntarily sign and date an informed consent prior to initiation of any study specific procedures.
  2. Age 5 to 14 years (inclusive) at the time of signing the consent and inclusion.
  3. Diagnose with urinary incontinence as per ICCS criteria.
  4. Pharmacological treatment with solifenacin and/or mirabegron.
  5. Continence has been achieved on pharmacological therapy with solifenacin and/or mirabegron.
  6. Previously withdrawal attempts are accepted.
  7. Continence remained on the same dosage of medication for a minimum of three months.

Exclusion Criteria:

  1. Inability of the patent(s) or parental custody holder(s) to understand the Danish written and oral information.
  2. Neurogenic detrusor overactivity (neurogenic bladder)

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

  • Primary Purpose: Treatment
  • Allocation: Randomized
  • Interventional Model: Parallel Assignment
  • Masking: None (Open Label)

Arms and Interventions

Participant Group / Arm
Intervention / Treatment
Experimental: Abrupt withdrawal of solifenacin

Abrupt withdrawal indicates stopping the medication on the date of withdrawal initiation.

Gradual withdrawal involves taking the applied dosage of the medication every other day over a period of 14 days, with the complete cessation of the medication occurring 14 days after the gradual withdrawal process begins.

Experimental: Gradual withdrawal of solifenacin

Abrupt withdrawal indicates stopping the medication on the date of withdrawal initiation.

Gradual withdrawal involves taking the applied dosage of the medication every other day over a period of 14 days, with the complete cessation of the medication occurring 14 days after the gradual withdrawal process begins.

Experimental: Abrupt withdrawal of mirabegron

Abrupt withdrawal indicates stopping the medication on the date of withdrawal initiation.

Gradual withdrawal involves taking the applied dosage of the medication every other day over a period of 14 days, with the complete cessation of the medication occurring 14 days after the gradual withdrawal process begins.

Experimental: Gradual withdrawal of mirabegron

Abrupt withdrawal indicates stopping the medication on the date of withdrawal initiation.

Gradual withdrawal involves taking the applied dosage of the medication every other day over a period of 14 days, with the complete cessation of the medication occurring 14 days after the gradual withdrawal process begins.

Experimental: Abrupt withdrawal of solifenacin + mirabegron

Abrupt withdrawal indicates stopping the medication on the date of withdrawal initiation.

Gradual withdrawal involves taking the applied dosage of the medication every other day over a period of 14 days, with the complete cessation of the medication occurring 14 days after the gradual withdrawal process begins.

Experimental: Gradual withdrawal of solifenacin + mirabegron

Abrupt withdrawal indicates stopping the medication on the date of withdrawal initiation.

Gradual withdrawal involves taking the applied dosage of the medication every other day over a period of 14 days, with the complete cessation of the medication occurring 14 days after the gradual withdrawal process begins.

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Recurrence of incontinence after withdrawal
Time Frame: Baseline and up to 12 months follow-up
Assessed by a 14-day calendar of incontinence episodes
Baseline and up to 12 months follow-up

Secondary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Development of any symptoms related to abrupt or gradual withdrawal symptoms
Time Frame: Baseline up to 44 days after initiation of withdrawal
Assessed by a questionnaire on withdrawal symptoms
Baseline up to 44 days after initiation of withdrawal

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Investigators

  • Study Director: Luise Borch, MD, PhD, Department of Pediatric and Adolescent Medicine, Gødstrup Hospital

Publications and helpful links

The person responsible for entering information about the study voluntarily provides these publications. These may be about anything related to the study.

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start (Actual)

May 27, 2024

Primary Completion (Estimated)

December 1, 2027

Study Completion (Estimated)

December 1, 2027

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

June 13, 2024

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

June 13, 2024

First Posted (Actual)

June 20, 2024

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Actual)

December 15, 2025

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

December 5, 2025

Last Verified

December 1, 2025

More Information

Terms related to this study

Plan for Individual participant data (IPD)

Plan to Share Individual Participant Data (IPD)?

NO

Drug and device information, study documents

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated drug product

No

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated device product

No

product manufactured in and exported from the U.S.

No

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Clinical Trials on Urinary Incontinence in Children

Clinical Trials on Solifenacin

Subscribe