- ICH GCP
- US Clinical Trials Registry
- Clinical Trial NCT06467929
Prospective Collection of Endoscopic and Histopathologic Data From Endoscopic Procedures Performed in UZ Gent
This is an observational study in which images (photos and/or videos of lesions found during endoscopy) will be collected and the associated data about these lesions (size, location in the body, outcome of histology, if resected and examined).
The images will be taken while performing a diagnostic or therapeutic endoscopy. This footage can be recorded in different light modalities, and various lesions can be removed during one procedure. It is of importance that the images are recorded in the best possible image quality.
The images can be either endoscopic images or endoscopic images combined with room view (this means that the endoscopic room can be filmed, for example, to visualize the endoscopist and thus show techniques of the procedure, without the patient being identified). The GDPR regulations will be respected at all times during the video recordings.
The purpose of this registry is to create a database with images in the form of photos and video clips, histopathological data, demographic data of patients and data about the endoscopic procedure. The recording of this data is standard with every endoscopic procedure that patients undergo at UZ Gent.
The data will be used for the following purposes: linking procedural outcomes with procedural data and patient data to improve endoscopic technique and to guarantee quality in our endoscopic unit. In this way the investigators will also be able to identify trends and link adverse events back to the patient data with the aim of informing the patient. In addition, as a university center, the investigators can train doctors in training with this educational material. The footage can be shared via online and/or live presentations that are only accessible to/by healthcare workers and without the patient being identifiable. Such material and its dissemination is essential to improve (the safety of) techniques (such as those of today), to share knowledge about techniques, and in this way to train the next generation of doctors and nurses.
Study Overview
Status
Conditions
Detailed Description
Background Endoscopy and more specifically polypectomy during endoscopy is well established as an effective way of reducing cancer mortality. The majority of lesions detected and removed at colonoscopy are adenomas <10mm in size without advanced histology. These lesions have a low risk of progression to malignancy and are relatively easily removed by standard snare polypectomy with low complication rates. Polyps that are sessile or flat and greater than 20mm in size are found in approximately 1% of all colonoscopies and are more difficult to manage. These lesions, known as large sessile lesions (LSL), have a high rate of advanced histology. Traditionally they have been managed by referral for open or laparoscopic surgery, which is definitive, but invasive, costly, and associated with a significant mortality risk in patients with advanced age or comorbidities. Endoscopic Mucosal Resection (EMR) has emerged in recent years as an alternative to surgery that is now becoming the standard of care. It is an outpatient procedure which is effective, safe and less costly than surgery when delivered at a tertiary referral centre.
Prospective studies have been successful in addressing several aspects of the resection of LSL, producing robust information on the efficacy of the procedure, recurrence rates, bleeding complications and mortality and costs when compared to surgery. Assessment and management strategies for bleeding and deep mural injury or perforation have been derived from analysis of the data. Snare tip soft coagulation of the resection margin post-EMR has been shown to reduce recurrence in a randomised controlled trial.
There remain a number of unanswered questions regarding the endoscopic resection of large lesions and a new study incorporating a greater number of endoscopy units around the world will allow these to be addressed as well as answer questions on the clinical effectiveness of the technique. Enhancing the prediction of submucosal invasive cancer, advanced lesion classification, validation of the assessment of deep injury, treatment of lesion margins post resection to reduce recurrence, prevention and prophylaxis of bleeding, and subtype analyses of the different histological groups of colonic lesions will be examined.
In addition, other techniques such as endoscopic submucosal dissection (ESD) and full thickness resection (FTR) have emerged in recent years and require assessment of their performance versus endoscopic mucosal resection in prospective observational studies.
The same techniques (EMR and ESD) are used to resect lesions in the upper gastrointestinal tract (oesophagus, stomach, and small intestine) and the same prospective observations are necessary to assess effectiveness of these techniques and outcomes to improve future upper gastrointestinal endoscopy.
Trial objectives This monocenter trial aims to prospectively collect video material, images and data of diagnostic and therapeutic endoscopic procedures and the data of the follow up. The imaging during the endoscopy can be done in white light, narrow-band imaging (NBI), blue-light imaging (BLI), I-scan, linked-color imaging or any other available image enhancement technique, including dye-enhancement with indigo carmine or methylene blue.
The aim of this study is to collect these data prospectively in het UZ Gent. The collected videos, images and data will be used for educational (education and/or training of fellows, publications and postgraduate education) or scientific (discussion amongst peers, scientific meetings and presentations and medical research) purposes by all participating sites.
Endpoint Creation of a large digital database of prospectively collected images, videos and data of endoscopic procedures using any type of imaging technique (e.g., white light endoscopy, video chromoendoscopy, …) and with consecutive resection of lesions providing a corresponding histology report.
Study Type
Enrollment (Estimated)
Contacts and Locations
Study Contact
- Name: Karolien Haenebalcke
- Phone Number: +32 93321063
- Email: karolien.haenebalcke@uzgent.be
Study Locations
-
-
East Flanders
-
Ghent, East Flanders, Belgium, 9000
- Recruiting
- University Hospital Ghent
-
Contact:
- Karolien Haenebalcke
-
-
Participation Criteria
Eligibility Criteria
Ages Eligible for Study
- Adult
- Older Adult
Accepts Healthy Volunteers
Sampling Method
Study Population
Description
Inclusion Criteria:
- Age => 18 years
- Referral for a surveillance, diagnostic or therapeutic endoscopy
- Digital video material of the endoscopic procedure
- Digital images of the endoscopic procedure
- Videos and/or images can be made in white light or any virtual of dye-based enhancement technique
- Endoscopic procedures performed after IRB approval for this study
- Material collected in adult patients of all sex or race, including pregnant women
Exclusion Criteria:
- Age < 18 years
- Any contraindication to undergo an endoscopic procedure
- Patient did not sign informed consent
Study Plan
How is the study designed?
Design Details
What is the study measuring?
Primary Outcome Measures
Outcome Measure |
Measure Description |
Time Frame |
|---|---|---|
|
Digital Database of Prospectively collected images, videos and data of endoscopic procedures
Time Frame: 01/11/2022 - 30/10/2025
|
Creation of a large digital database of prospectively collected images, videos and data of endoscopic procedures using any type of imaging technique (e.g., white light endoscopy, video chromoendoscopy, …) and with consecutive resection of lesions providing a corresponding histology report.
|
01/11/2022 - 30/10/2025
|
Collaborators and Investigators
Sponsor
Investigators
- Principal Investigator: David Tate, Doctor, UZ Gent
Publications and helpful links
General Publications
- Winawer SJ, Zauber AG, Ho MN, O'Brien MJ, Gottlieb LS, Sternberg SS, Waye JD, Schapiro M, Bond JH, Panish JF, et al. Prevention of colorectal cancer by colonoscopic polypectomy. The National Polyp Study Workgroup. N Engl J Med. 1993 Dec 30;329(27):1977-81. doi: 10.1056/NEJM199312303292701.
- Repici A, Hassan C, Vitetta E, Ferrara E, Manes G, Gullotti G, Princiotta A, Dulbecco P, Gaffuri N, Bettoni E, Pagano N, Rando G, Strangio G, Carlino A, Romeo F, de Paula Pessoa Ferreira D, Zullo A, Ridola L, Malesci A. Safety of cold polypectomy for <10mm polyps at colonoscopy: a prospective multicenter study. Endoscopy. 2012 Jan;44(1):27-31. doi: 10.1055/s-0031-1291387. Epub 2011 Nov 28.
- Gupta N, Bansal A, Rao D, Early DS, Jonnalagadda S, Wani SB, Edmundowicz SA, Sharma P, Rastogi A. Prevalence of advanced histological features in diminutive and small colon polyps. Gastrointest Endosc. 2012 May;75(5):1022-30. doi: 10.1016/j.gie.2012.01.020. Epub 2012 Mar 9.
- Moss A, Williams SJ, Hourigan LF, Brown G, Tam W, Singh R, Zanati S, Burgess NG, Sonson R, Byth K, Bourke MJ. Long-term adenoma recurrence following wide-field endoscopic mucosal resection (WF-EMR) for advanced colonic mucosal neoplasia is infrequent: results and risk factors in 1000 cases from the Australian Colonic EMR (ACE) study. Gut. 2015 Jan;64(1):57-65. doi: 10.1136/gutjnl-2013-305516. Epub 2014 Jul 1.
- Moss A, Bourke MJ, Williams SJ, Hourigan LF, Brown G, Tam W, Singh R, Zanati S, Chen RY, Byth K. Endoscopic mucosal resection outcomes and prediction of submucosal cancer from advanced colonic mucosal neoplasia. Gastroenterology. 2011 Jun;140(7):1909-18. doi: 10.1053/j.gastro.2011.02.062. Epub 2011 Mar 8.
- Klein A, Tate DJ, Jayasekeran V, Hourigan L, Singh R, Brown G, Bahin FF, Burgess N, Williams SJ, Lee E, Sidhu M, Byth K, Bourke MJ. Thermal Ablation of Mucosal Defect Margins Reduces Adenoma Recurrence After Colonic Endoscopic Mucosal Resection. Gastroenterology. 2019 Feb;156(3):604-613.e3. doi: 10.1053/j.gastro.2018.10.003. Epub 2018 Oct 6.
- Burgess NG, Bassan MS, McLeod D, Williams SJ, Byth K, Bourke MJ. Deep mural injury and perforation after colonic endoscopic mucosal resection: a new classification and analysis of risk factors. Gut. 2017 Oct;66(10):1779-1789. doi: 10.1136/gutjnl-2015-309848. Epub 2016 Jul 27.
- Jayanna M, Burgess NG, Singh R, Hourigan LF, Brown GJ, Zanati SA, Moss A, Lim J, Sonson R, Williams SJ, Bourke MJ. Cost Analysis of Endoscopic Mucosal Resection vs Surgery for Large Laterally Spreading Colorectal Lesions. Clin Gastroenterol Hepatol. 2016 Feb;14(2):271-8.e1-2. doi: 10.1016/j.cgh.2015.08.037. Epub 2015 Sep 11.
- Ahlenstiel G, Hourigan LF, Brown G, Zanati S, Williams SJ, Singh R, Moss A, Sonson R, Bourke MJ; Australian Colonic Endoscopic Mucosal Resection (ACE) Study Group. Actual endoscopic versus predicted surgical mortality for treatment of advanced mucosal neoplasia of the colon. Gastrointest Endosc. 2014 Oct;80(4):668-676. doi: 10.1016/j.gie.2014.04.015. Epub 2014 Jun 7.
- Burgess NG, Metz AJ, Williams SJ, Singh R, Tam W, Hourigan LF, Zanati SA, Brown GJ, Sonson R, Bourke MJ. Risk factors for intraprocedural and clinically significant delayed bleeding after wide-field endoscopic mucosal resection of large colonic lesions. Clin Gastroenterol Hepatol. 2014 Apr;12(4):651-61.e1-3. doi: 10.1016/j.cgh.2013.09.049. Epub 2013 Oct 1.
- Burgess NG, Williams SJ, Hourigan LF, Brown GJ, Zanati SA, Singh R, Tam W, Butt J, Byth K, Bourke MJ. A management algorithm based on delayed bleeding after wide-field endoscopic mucosal resection of large colonic lesions. Clin Gastroenterol Hepatol. 2014 Sep;12(9):1525-33. doi: 10.1016/j.cgh.2014.01.026. Epub 2014 Jan 28.
- Tate DJ, Klein A, Sidhu M, Desomer L, Awadie H, Lee EYT, Mahajan H, McLeod D, Bourke MJ. Endoscopic submucosal dissection for suspected early gastric cancer: absolute versus expanded criteria in a large Western cohort (with video). Gastrointest Endosc. 2019 Sep;90(3):467-479.e4. doi: 10.1016/j.gie.2019.04.242. Epub 2019 May 8.
- Pohl H, Srivastava A, Bensen SP, Anderson P, Rothstein RI, Gordon SR, Levy LC, Toor A, Mackenzie TA, Rosch T, Robertson DJ. Incomplete polyp resection during colonoscopy-results of the complete adenoma resection (CARE) study. Gastroenterology. 2013 Jan;144(1):74-80.e1. doi: 10.1053/j.gastro.2012.09.043. Epub 2012 Sep 25. Erratum In: Gastroenterology. 2021 Oct;161(4):1347. doi: 10.1053/j.gastro.2021.08.018.
Study record dates
Study Major Dates
Study Start (Actual)
Primary Completion (Estimated)
Study Completion (Estimated)
Study Registration Dates
First Submitted
First Submitted That Met QC Criteria
First Posted (Actual)
Study Record Updates
Last Update Posted (Actual)
Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria
Last Verified
More Information
Terms related to this study
Keywords
Other Study ID Numbers
- ONZ-2022-0177
Drug and device information, study documents
Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated drug product
Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated device product
This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.
Clinical Trials on Endoscopy
-
Buddhist Tzu Chi General HospitalUnknownMethods of Nasal Anesthesia Before Transnasal Endoscopy | Side Effects of Transnasal Endoscopy | Patient's Tolerance to Transnasal EndoscopyTaiwan
-
Gaziosmanpasa Research and Education HospitalRecruiting
-
Seoul National University HospitalUnknownEndoscopyKorea, Republic of
-
Sheffield Teaching Hospitals NHS Foundation TrustCompletedEndoscopyUnited Kingdom
-
Centre Hospitalier Universitaire, AmiensCompleted
-
Queen's UniversityAmerican Society for Gastrointestinal EndoscopyCompleted
-
St. Joseph's Healthcare HamiltonMcMaster UniversityCompleted
-
Fujifilm Medical Systems USA, Inc.Completed
-
Children's Mercy Hospital Kansas CityCompletedEndoscopyUnited States