Preliminary Efficacy Analysis of 'λ+α' Double-Tract Reconstruction After Laparoscopic Proximal Gastrectomy

August 13, 2024 updated by: Daorong Wang, Northern Jiangsu People's Hospital

Laparoscopic Proximal Gastrectomy With 'λ+α' Double-Tract Reconstruction for Upper-Third Early Gastric Cancer: A Randomized Clinical Trial.

The incidence of proximal gastric cancer has increased significantly in recent years. This may be due to weight gain, alcohol consumption, gastroesophageal reflux disease (GERD), and precancerous lesions. With a deeper understanding of the pattern of lymph node metastasis and the emergence of anti-reflux procedures, proximal gastrectomy has gradually received clinical attention. For early-stage upper gastric cancer and esophagogastric combination cancer cases that are expected to have a good prognosis, the ideal surgical procedure should be to preserve the distal stomach to improve the quality of life and to choose a reasonable digestive tract reconstruction method to prevent reflux. The anti-reflux effect of various proximal gastrectomy digestive tract reconstruction methods and the advantages and disadvantages of various surgical procedures are controversial, and the recognized ideal reconstruction method has not yet been established. Therefore, based on the stomach's anatomical features and the intercalated jejunum's anti-reflux mechanism, we propose a true dual-channel anastomosis for GI reconstruction, i.e., the "λ+α dual-channel anastomosis". This study aimed to investigate the efficacy and safety of proximal gastrectomy combined with "λ+α double-channel anastomosis" in the treatment of early gastric cancer.

Study Overview

Study Type

Interventional

Enrollment (Estimated)

60

Phase

  • Not Applicable

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Contact

Study Locations

      • Yangzhou, China
        • Recruiting
        • Northern Jiangsu People's Hospital
        • Contact:

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Ages Eligible for Study

  • Adult
  • Older Adult

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

Age between 18-75 years old, male or female; Pathological diagnosis of preoperative endoscopic biopsy: the tumor is located in the upper 1/3 of the stomach (including the esophagogastric junction), and the clinical staging of gastric cancer: Ia and Ib (T1N0M0, T1N1M0, and T2N0M0) (14) according to the eighth edition of the AJCC (15); No distant metastasis was observed on preoperative chest radiograph, abdominal ultrasound, or upper abdominal CT; ASA grade 1-3; Patients without contraindications to surgery; Patients and their families voluntarily signed the informed consent form and participated in the study;

Exclusion Criteria:

Patients diagnosed with primary tumors or distant metastasis; Patients whose tumor is located in the greater curvature side of the stomach; Patients with coagulation dysfunction that could not be corrected; Patients who were diagnosed with viral hepatitis and cirrhosis; Patients who were diagnosed with diabetes mellitus, uncontrolled or controlled with insulin; Patients with organ failure such as heart, lung, liver, brain, and kidney failure; Patients with ascites or cachexia preoperatively in poor general conditions; Patients diagnosed with immunodeficiency, immunosuppression, or autoimmune diseases (such as allogeneic bone marrow transplant, immunosuppressive drugs, SLE, etc.).

Patients refusing to sign the informed consent of the study;

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

  • Primary Purpose: Treatment
  • Allocation: Randomized
  • Interventional Model: Parallel Assignment
  • Masking: Double

Arms and Interventions

Participant Group / Arm
Intervention / Treatment
Experimental: λ+α double-tract anastomosis
  1. The lymphadenectomy is performed according to the Japanese Gastric Cancer Treatment Guidelines
  2. Transection of the esophagus is performed using a linear stapler 2cm away from the proximal end of the tumor.
  3. The jejunum is dissected 30 cm from the flexor ligament and the distal jejunum is lifted in an anterior colonic direction to the esophageal dissection.
  4. Esophagojejunal anastomosis at 16 cm from the distal jejunal stump;
  5. Residual gastrojejunostomy at 8 cm from the distal jejunal stump;
Active Comparator: double-tract anastomosis
  1. The lymphadenectomy is performed according to the Japanese Gastric Cancer Treatment Guidelines
  2. Transection of the esophagus is performed using a linear stapler 2cm away from the proximal end of the tumor.
  3. The jejunum is dissected 30 cm from the flexor ligament and the distal jejunum is lifted in an anterior colonic direction to the esophageal dissection.
  4. Esophagojejunal anastomosis at 16 cm from the distal jejunal stump;
  5. Residual gastrojejunostomy at 8 cm from the distal jejunal stump;

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
incidence of reflux esophagitis
Time Frame: 12 months after surgery
The percentage (%) of patients developing postoperative reflux esophagitis after surgery in each group.
12 months after surgery

Secondary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
incidence of anastomotic leakage
Time Frame: 30 days after surgery
The percentage (%) of patients developing postoperative anastomotic leakage after surgery in each group.
30 days after surgery
incidence of anastomotic stenosis
Time Frame: 12 months after surgery
The percentage (%) of patients developing anastomotic stenosis after surgery in each group.
12 months after surgery
operative time
Time Frame: 1 day after surgery
The duration, measured in minutes, spent on reconstructing the digestive tract using different reconstruction methods
1 day after surgery

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start (Actual)

August 1, 2024

Primary Completion (Estimated)

December 31, 2025

Study Completion (Estimated)

December 31, 2025

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

June 20, 2024

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

June 20, 2024

First Posted (Actual)

June 26, 2024

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Actual)

August 15, 2024

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

August 13, 2024

Last Verified

August 1, 2024

More Information

Terms related to this study

Drug and device information, study documents

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated drug product

No

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated device product

No

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Clinical Trials on Gastric Cancer

Clinical Trials on proximal gastrectomy combined with 'λ+α' double-tract anastomosis

Subscribe