- ICH GCP
- US Clinical Trials Registry
- Clinical Trial NCT06479876
Home-Based Cardiac Rehabilitation for Patients With Heart Failure (MOBILE HEART)
September 19, 2025 updated by: Brian Lindman, Vanderbilt University Medical Center
Home-Based Cardiac Rehabilitation Using Mobile Health Tools for Patients With Heart Failure (MOBILE HEART): A Randomized Controlled Trial
The vast majority of individuals with heart failure do not participate in center based cardiac rehabilitation (CBCR).
While steps to increase utilization of CBCR are important, many individuals will still not participate for a variety of reasons.
This pilot randomized controlled trial is evaluating a home-based cardiac rehabilitation (HBCR) intervention delivered using a custom app and digital tools in patients with heart failure.
After a brief roll-in period, participants are randomized to one of two groups: (1) control or (2) HBCR mobile health intervention.
The intervention targets key health behaviors and includes traditional cardiac rehabilitation components.
The study will assess the effect of the intervention on physical activity, quality of life, clinical events, and other outcomes.
Study Overview
Status
Recruiting
Conditions
Intervention / Treatment
Study Type
Interventional
Enrollment (Estimated)
100
Phase
- Not Applicable
Contacts and Locations
This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.
Study Contact
- Name: Bassim El-Sabawi, MD
- Phone Number: 615-589-6076
- Email: bassim.el-sabawi@vumc.org
Study Locations
-
-
Tennessee
-
Nashville, Tennessee, United States, 37232
- Recruiting
- Vanderbilt University Medical Center
-
Contact:
- Bassim El-Sabawi, MD
-
-
Participation Criteria
Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.
Eligibility Criteria
Ages Eligible for Study
- Adult
- Older Adult
Accepts Healthy Volunteers
No
Description
Inclusion Criteria Roll-in Phase
Stage C HF (NYHA Class I-III) AND
- Discharged from a HF hospitalization OR
- Scheduled for appointment in a cardiology clinic with a prior HF hospitalization within the past 12 months OR
- Scheduled for appointment in a cardiology clinic with a KCCQ-SS <75
- Receives longitudinal HF care at VUMC, including at least one visit prior to the roll-in phase
Randomized Controlled Trial (beyond roll-in phase)
1. Willingness to continue and participate in the study visits and other study activities required for the RCT
Exclusion Criteria Roll-in Phase
- Unwilling or unable to provide informed consent for participation in the RCT
- Requires a wheelchair all (or most) of the time inside and outside the house; it is acceptable if a wheelchair is needed, for example, for parking lot transfer for a clinic visit and navigating around the hospital without it being needed in the home
- If an individual uses a walker or cane all (or most) of the time, then he/she will be excluded if he/she scores 2 or lower on the Mini-Cog or the patient is unable to perform 2 chair sit-to-stands independently or is deemed to be at high fall risk during baseline visit assessment.
- History of falls over the last 6 months; an isolated explainable fall with no injury would not exclude the patient, but a tendency to falls indicative of balance/stability issues would exclude the patient.
- Age < 18 years
- Stage D HF (advanced HF under evaluation for LVAD or transplant)
- NYHA class IV symptoms
- Congenital heart disease
- Pregnant
- Group 1 pulmonary hypertension
- Moderate-severe or severe (> 3+) mitral or aortic valvular disease
- Physical or neuropsychiatric limitations that would prevent proficient use of the study tools and successful completion of the physical and quality of life assessments (e.g. blindness, dementia)
- Planned surgery within 3 months
- Planned discharge from hospital to hospice, assisted living, or inpatient rehabilitation facility (discharge to a senior facility permitted as long as they are considered Independent Living)
- Treating provider or study team physician indicates that participation in the RCT would be unsafe
- Participation in any ongoing randomized trial that has not completed follow-up
Randomized Controlled Trial (beyond roll-in phase)
- Not adherent to wearing the Actigraph activity tracker during the roll-in phase for a minimum of 4 (out of 10) compliant days (worn ³10 hours/day). Allowance will be made to include participants who wear the ActiGraph device ³10 hours/day for 3 days and also wear the ActiGraph device >9 hours/day for at least 1 day.
- Unable to complete the baseline study visit within 4 weeks of the completion of the roll-in actigraphy assessment.
Study Plan
This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.
How is the study designed?
Design Details
- Primary Purpose: Treatment
- Allocation: Randomized
- Interventional Model: Parallel Assignment
- Masking: Single
Arms and Interventions
Participant Group / Arm |
Intervention / Treatment |
|---|---|
|
No Intervention: Control
Standard of care course for an individual not participating in center based cardiac rehabilitation.
AHA Life's Essential 8 Fact Sheets are provided to promote healthy living.
|
|
|
Experimental: Home-based cardiac rehabilitation mobile health intervention
Home-based cardiac rehabilitation with mobile application and periodic video calls with exercise physiologist + AHA Life's Essential 8 sheets.
|
Home-based cardiac rehabilitation intervention facilitated by a custom app to deliver education, counseling on healthy living and modification of risk factors, mindfulness, and physical activity guidance.
Additionally, there are periodic video calls with an exercise physiologist.
|
What is the study measuring?
Primary Outcome Measures
Outcome Measure |
Measure Description |
Time Frame |
|---|---|---|
|
Average daily total activity counts
Time Frame: The actigraphy device will be worn for approximately one week and, using data from days when the device was worn >10 hours, the average daily total activity counts determined. The primary comparison will be at 12 weeks after randomization.
|
Daily total activity counts are determined by a triaxial actigraphy device.
|
The actigraphy device will be worn for approximately one week and, using data from days when the device was worn >10 hours, the average daily total activity counts determined. The primary comparison will be at 12 weeks after randomization.
|
Secondary Outcome Measures
Outcome Measure |
Measure Description |
Time Frame |
|---|---|---|
|
Average daily active minutes
Time Frame: The actigraphy device will be worn for approximately one week and, using data from days when the device was worn >10 hours, the average daily activity minutes determined. The comparison will be at 12 weeks after randomization.
|
Daily active minutes are determined by a triaxial actigraphy device.
|
The actigraphy device will be worn for approximately one week and, using data from days when the device was worn >10 hours, the average daily activity minutes determined. The comparison will be at 12 weeks after randomization.
|
|
Average daily steps
Time Frame: The actigraphy device will be worn for approximately one week and, using data from days when the device was worn >10 hours, the average daily steps determined. The comparison will be at 12 weeks after randomization.
|
Daily steps are determined by a triaxial actigraphy device.
|
The actigraphy device will be worn for approximately one week and, using data from days when the device was worn >10 hours, the average daily steps determined. The comparison will be at 12 weeks after randomization.
|
|
Average daily energy expenditure
Time Frame: The actigraphy device will be worn for approximately one week and, using data from days when the device was worn >10 hours, the average daily energy expenditure determined. The comparison will be at 12-weeks after randomization.
|
Average daily energy expenditure is determined by a triaxial actigraphy device.
|
The actigraphy device will be worn for approximately one week and, using data from days when the device was worn >10 hours, the average daily energy expenditure determined. The comparison will be at 12-weeks after randomization.
|
|
Average daily moderate to vigorous active minutes
Time Frame: The actigraphy device will be worn for approximately one week and, using data from days when the device was worn >10 hours, the average daily moderate to vigorous active mins determined. The comparison will be at 12-weeks after randomization.
|
Daily moderate to vigorous active minutes are determined by a triaxial actigraphy device.
|
The actigraphy device will be worn for approximately one week and, using data from days when the device was worn >10 hours, the average daily moderate to vigorous active mins determined. The comparison will be at 12-weeks after randomization.
|
|
Sustained physical activity bursts of 10 minutes or greater per day
Time Frame: The actigraphy device will be worn for approximately one week and, using data from days when the device was worn >10 hours, the average daily steps determined. The comparison will be at 12 weeks after randomization.
|
Physical activity bursts are determined by a triaxial actigraphy device.
|
The actigraphy device will be worn for approximately one week and, using data from days when the device was worn >10 hours, the average daily steps determined. The comparison will be at 12 weeks after randomization.
|
|
6 minute walk distance
Time Frame: The comparison will be at 12-weeks after randomization.
|
The distance walked in 6 minutes.
|
The comparison will be at 12-weeks after randomization.
|
|
Chair sit to stand time
Time Frame: The comparison will be at 12-weeks after randomization.
|
The time taken to complete 5 chair rises.
|
The comparison will be at 12-weeks after randomization.
|
|
5 meter gait speed
Time Frame: The comparison will be at 12-weeks after randomization.
|
The speed of walking 5 meters (meters/second).
|
The comparison will be at 12-weeks after randomization.
|
|
Balance test
Time Frame: The comparison will be at 12-weeks after randomization.
|
Score based on ability to stand unsupported for 10 seconds with feet in a certain position (feet together, semi tandem, full tandem).
Score ranges from 0-4 (higher score is better).
|
The comparison will be at 12-weeks after randomization.
|
|
AM-PAC Basic Mobility Outpatient Short Form (Low Function)
Time Frame: The comparison will be at 12-weeks after randomization.
|
Basic mobility will be assessed with the Activity Measure for Post-Acute Care (AM-PAC) Basic Mobility Outpatient Short Form (Low Function); (raw score range 0-39, higher score is better)
|
The comparison will be at 12-weeks after randomization.
|
|
Short Physical Performance Battery Score
Time Frame: The comparison will be at 12-weeks after randomization.
|
Composite score including 3 components (Chair sit to stand, 5 meter gait speed, balance test).
Score ranges from 0-12 (higher score is better).
|
The comparison will be at 12-weeks after randomization.
|
|
Heart-failure specific health status assessed by the KCCQ
Time Frame: The comparison will be at 12-weeks after randomization.
|
Assessed with the Kansas City Cardiomyopathy Questionnaire (KCCQ); (score range 0-100, higher is better health status).
|
The comparison will be at 12-weeks after randomization.
|
|
Physical health status assessed by the PROMIS 10
Time Frame: The comparison will be at 12-weeks after randomization.
|
Global physical health score from the PROMIS 10 Global Health Short Form questionnaire (raw score range 4-20, higher is better).
|
The comparison will be at 12-weeks after randomization.
|
|
Mental health status assessed by the PROMIS 10
Time Frame: The comparison will be at 12-weeks after randomization.
|
Global mental health score from the PROMIS 10 Global Health Short Form questionnaire (raw score range 4-20, higher is better)
|
The comparison will be at 12-weeks after randomization.
|
|
Mood disturbance assessed by PHQ9
Time Frame: The comparison will be at 12-weeks after randomization.
|
Patient health questionnaire 9 (PHQ9); (score range 1-27, lower is better)
|
The comparison will be at 12-weeks after randomization.
|
|
Behavioral Regulation In Exercise Questionnaire 3
Time Frame: The comparison will be at 12-weeks after randomization.
|
Behavioral Regulation In Exercise Questionnaire 3 (BREQ-3); (score range per question of 0-4, higher is better).
|
The comparison will be at 12-weeks after randomization.
|
|
Social support and exercise survey
Time Frame: The comparison will be at 12-weeks after randomization.
|
Social support and exercise survey (score range per question of 1-5, higher is better).
|
The comparison will be at 12-weeks after randomization.
|
|
Multidimensional Self-Efficacy for Exercise Scale
Time Frame: The comparison will be at 12-weeks after randomization.
|
Multidimensional Self-Efficacy for Exercise Scale (MSES); (score range per question of 0-10, higher is better).
|
The comparison will be at 12-weeks after randomization.
|
|
General self-efficacy scale
Time Frame: The comparison will be at 12-weeks after randomization.
|
General self-efficacy scale (GSE); (score range per question of 1-4, higher is better).
|
The comparison will be at 12-weeks after randomization.
|
|
Blood pressure
Time Frame: The comparison will be at 12-weeks after randomization.
|
The comparison will be at 12-weeks after randomization.
|
|
|
Modified Heart Failure Collaborative GDMT score
Time Frame: The comparison will be at 12-weeks after randomization in patients with LVEF of 40% or less.
|
Guideline directed medical therapy (GDMT) score includes 4 components of RAASi, BB, SGLT2i, and MRA (maximum score of 9, higher scores indicate increased GDMT utilization).
|
The comparison will be at 12-weeks after randomization in patients with LVEF of 40% or less.
|
|
Probability of the hierarchical clinical event composite
Time Frame: Over the entire available follow-up period for randomized participants (minimum of 12 weeks).
|
The hierarchical clinical event composite includes (in order of hierarchy): (1) all-cause death and (2) all-cause hospitalization.
To examine whether the intervention improves mortality and hospitalization, in heart failure patients, we will conduct Bayesian Markov longitudinal proportional odds model on weekly outcome measures.
The active treatment vs. control group comparison (primary comparison for the trial) will be estimated by contrasting the average of posterior probability that Y≥y of the active treatment group to the control group.
|
Over the entire available follow-up period for randomized participants (minimum of 12 weeks).
|
|
Worsening heart failure event
Time Frame: Over the entire available follow-up period for randomized participants (minimum of 12 weeks).
|
This includes inpatient, observation, ER visit, or urgent clinic visit for worsening heart failure.
|
Over the entire available follow-up period for randomized participants (minimum of 12 weeks).
|
|
All-cause mortality
Time Frame: Over the entire available follow-up period for randomized participants (minimum of 12 weeks).
|
Death for any reason.
|
Over the entire available follow-up period for randomized participants (minimum of 12 weeks).
|
|
"Thriving patient" composite
Time Frame: The comparison will be made at 12 weeks.
|
Percent of patients that meet the following criteria: 1) alive 2) no all-cause hospitalization 3) Improvement in average daily total activity counts by 10% or greater from baseline to 12 weeks.
|
The comparison will be made at 12 weeks.
|
|
All-cause unplanned rehospitalization
Time Frame: Over the entire available follow-up period for randomized participants (minimum of 12 weeks).
|
This includes inpatient, observation, or ER visit.
|
Over the entire available follow-up period for randomized participants (minimum of 12 weeks).
|
Collaborators and Investigators
This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.
Investigators
- Principal Investigator: Brian R Lindman, MD, MSCI, Vanderbilt University Medical Center
Study record dates
These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.
Study Major Dates
Study Start (Actual)
August 5, 2024
Primary Completion (Estimated)
August 1, 2026
Study Completion (Estimated)
August 1, 2026
Study Registration Dates
First Submitted
June 24, 2024
First Submitted That Met QC Criteria
June 24, 2024
First Posted (Actual)
June 28, 2024
Study Record Updates
Last Update Posted (Estimated)
September 24, 2025
Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria
September 19, 2025
Last Verified
September 1, 2025
More Information
Terms related to this study
Additional Relevant MeSH Terms
Other Study ID Numbers
- 240749
Plan for Individual participant data (IPD)
Plan to Share Individual Participant Data (IPD)?
NO
Drug and device information, study documents
Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated drug product
No
Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated device product
No
product manufactured in and exported from the U.S.
No
This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.
Clinical Trials on Cardiovascular Diseases
-
Hull University Teaching Hospitals NHS TrustNot yet recruitingCardiovascular Surgery | Cardiovascular Diseases (CVD)United Kingdom
-
Weill Medical College of Cornell UniversityAmerican Heart AssociationRecruitingCardiovascular | Cardiovascular Health | Cardiovascular (CV) Risk | Cardiovascular Disease (CVD) Risk FactorsUnited States
-
Fu Jen Catholic UniversityRecruitingCardiovascular Disease | Cardiovascular SurgeryTaiwan
-
Medical College of WisconsinNational Center for Complementary and Integrative Health (NCCIH)CompletedCardiovascular Diseases | Cardiovascular Risk Factor | Cardiovascular HealthUnited States
-
Hospital Mutua de TerrassaCompleted
-
IRCCS Policlinico S. DonatoIRCCS San Raffaele; Fondazione Policlinico Universitario Agostino Gemelli IRCCS and other collaboratorsRecruitingCardiovascular Risk | Genetic Cardiovascular RiskItaly
-
Oregon Health and Science UniversityCompletedCardiovascular Disease | Cardiovascular Risk FactorsUnited States
-
Women's College HospitalUniversity Health Network, Toronto; Sunnybrook Health Sciences Centre; Brigham... and other collaboratorsUnknownCARDIOVASCULAR DISEASESCanada, United States
-
Groupe Hospitalier Paris Saint JosephTerminatedCARDIOVASCULAR DISEASESFrance
-
Children's Hospital Medical Center, CincinnatiRecruitingCardiovascular Diseases (CVD)United States
Clinical Trials on HBCR
-
Vanderbilt University Medical CenterMedical University of South Carolina; University of Colorado, Denver; University... and other collaboratorsRecruitingValvular Heart DiseaseUnited States
-
West China HospitalEnrolling by invitationMyocardial Infarction | Coronary Artery DiseaseChina