- ICH GCP
- US Clinical Trials Registry
- Clinical Trial NCT06480045
Usage Of Artificial Intelligence-Integrated Usg In Application of Pectoral Block In Mastectomies
June 27, 2024 updated by: Çağla Yazar, MD, Baskent University
The investigator's goal in this study is to apply PECS II block, before starting surgery, by either conventional USG or artificial intelligence integrated USG to patients who will undergo mastectomy under general anesthesia to determine the effect of the block on hemodynamics and opioid consumption in the intraoperative period.
Besides, the investigatorwanted to investigate the contribution of artificial intelligence integrated USG use in the success of a 4-year anesthesiology resident for imaging the injection site.
Study Overview
Status
Completed
Conditions
Detailed Description
After receiving the approval of the Clinical Research Ethics Committee of Başkent University (KA21/353), 70 patients with ASA I-II, between the ages of 18-75, who were scheduled for mastectomy surgery were included in the study.
A 4. year anesthesiology resident under the supervision of two senior anesthesiologists, performed a PECS II block with AI-integrated USG or conventional USG (Group AI-USG and Group USG) after randomization.
Although the resident had no experience with pectoral blocks, she had experience with the use of USG and regional anesthesia related to other trunk-area and peripheral blocks.
The block was performed after induction of general anesthesia.
Patient data in terms of hemodynamic changes in the intraoperative period, opioid (remifentanil) consumption, and postoperatively hemodynamics, pain scores (VAS), postoperative opioid [tramadol administered with a patient-controlled analgesia pump (PCA)] and, if necessary, rescue analgesic agent (non-steroidal antiinflammatory agent) consumption were monitored in the post anesthesia care unit (PACU), and at postoperative 6., 12. and 24.hours.
Study Type
Interventional
Enrollment (Actual)
70
Phase
- Not Applicable
Contacts and Locations
This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.
Study Locations
-
-
-
Antalya, Turkey, 07090
- Çağla Yazar, MD
-
-
Participation Criteria
Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.
Eligibility Criteria
Ages Eligible for Study
- Adult
- Older Adult
Accepts Healthy Volunteers
No
Description
Inclusion Criteria:
- 18-70 years
- ASA I and II
- Female
- Underwent mastectomy surgery
- Without local anesthetic allergy
Exclusion Criteria:
- Patients with ASA III and above
- Obesity (body mass index >30)
- Psychotropic drug use
- Bleeding diathesis
- Local anesthetic allergy
- Chest wall deformity
- Infection at the injection site
- Chronic analgesic usage
Study Plan
This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.
How is the study designed?
Design Details
- Primary Purpose: Other
- Allocation: Randomized
- Interventional Model: Parallel Assignment
- Masking: None (Open Label)
Arms and Interventions
Participant Group / Arm |
Intervention / Treatment |
|---|---|
|
Active Comparator: Group AI-USG
performed a PECS II block with AI-integrated USG
|
A 4-year anesthesiology resident, under the supervision of two senior anesthesiologists, performed a PECS II block with AI-integrated USG.
|
|
Active Comparator: Group USG
performed a PECS II block with conventional USG
|
A 4-year anesthesiology resident, under the supervision of two senior anesthesiologists, performed a PECS II block with conventional USG.
|
What is the study measuring?
Primary Outcome Measures
Outcome Measure |
Measure Description |
Time Frame |
|---|---|---|
|
Pain in the postoperative period was evaluated using the VAS score.
Time Frame: 24 hours
|
The researchers investigate whether postoperative pain increases or decreases, using the VAS score at the postoperative anesthesia care unit, at postoperative 6 hours, 12 hours, and 24 hours.
|
24 hours
|
Secondary Outcome Measures
Outcome Measure |
Measure Description |
Time Frame |
|---|---|---|
|
Incorporating the use of AI applications reduces the time required to block.
Time Frame: During the procedure.
|
This software finds the image, implements the block quickly, and spends less time.
|
During the procedure.
|
Collaborators and Investigators
This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.
Sponsor
Investigators
- Study Director: Elvin Kesimci, Baskent University
- Principal Investigator: Çağla Yazar, Baskent University
Publications and helpful links
The person responsible for entering information about the study voluntarily provides these publications. These may be about anything related to the study.
General Publications
- Sites BD, Chan VW, Neal JM, Weller R, Grau T, Koscielniak-Nielsen ZJ, Ivani G; American Society of Regional Anesthesia and Pain Medicine; European Society Of Regional Anaesthesia and Pain Therapy Joint Committee. The American Society of Regional Anesthesia and Pain Medicine and the European Society Of Regional Anaesthesia and Pain Therapy Joint Committee recommendations for education and training in ultrasound-guided regional anesthesia. Reg Anesth Pain Med. 2009 Jan-Feb;34(1):40-6. doi: 10.1097/AAP.0b013e3181926779.
- Blanco R, Parras T, McDonnell JG, Prats-Galino A. Serratus plane block: a novel ultrasound-guided thoracic wall nerve block. Anaesthesia. 2013 Nov;68(11):1107-13. doi: 10.1111/anae.12344. Epub 2013 Aug 7.
- Bashandy GM, Abbas DN. Pectoral nerves I and II blocks in multimodal analgesia for breast cancer surgery: a randomized clinical trial. Reg Anesth Pain Med. 2015 Jan-Feb;40(1):68-74. doi: 10.1097/AAP.0000000000000163.
- Blanco R. The 'pecs block': a novel technique for providing analgesia after breast surgery. Anaesthesia. 2011 Sep;66(9):847-8. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2044.2011.06838.x. No abstract available.
- Blanco R, Fajardo M, Parras Maldonado T. Ultrasound description of Pecs II (modified Pecs I): a novel approach to breast surgery. Rev Esp Anestesiol Reanim. 2012 Nov;59(9):470-5. doi: 10.1016/j.redar.2012.07.003. Epub 2012 Aug 29.
- Afonso AM, Newman MI, Seeley N, Hutchins J, Smith KL, Mena G, Selber JC, Saint-Cyr MH, Gadsden JC. Multimodal Analgesia in Breast Surgical Procedures: Technical and Pharmacological Considerations for Liposomal Bupivacaine Use. Plast Reconstr Surg Glob Open. 2017 Sep 15;5(9):e1480. doi: 10.1097/GOX.0000000000001480. eCollection 2017 Sep.
- la Grange P, Foster PA, Pretorius LK. Application of the Doppler ultrasound bloodflow detector in supraclavicular brachial plexus block. Br J Anaesth. 1978 Sep;50(9):965-7. doi: 10.1093/bja/50.9.965.
- Kumar S, Goel D, Sharma SK, Ahmad S, Dwivedi P, Deo N, Rani R. A randomised controlled study of the post-operative analgesic efficacy of ultrasound-guided pectoral nerve block in the first 24 h after modified radical mastectomy. Indian J Anaesth. 2018 Jun;62(6):436-442. doi: 10.4103/ija.IJA_523_17.
- Karaca O, Pinar HU, Arpaci E, Dogan R, Cok OY, Ahiskalioglu A. The efficacy of ultrasound-guided type-I and type-II pectoral nerve blocks for postoperative analgesia after breast augmentation: A prospective, randomised study. Anaesth Crit Care Pain Med. 2019 Feb;38(1):47-52. doi: 10.1016/j.accpm.2018.03.009. Epub 2018 Apr 5.
- Warfield DJ Jr, Barre S, Adhikary SD. Current understanding of the fascial plane blocks for analgesia of the chest wall: techniques and indications update for 2020. Curr Opin Anaesthesiol. 2020 Oct;33(5):692-697. doi: 10.1097/ACO.0000000000000909.
- Gungor I, Gunaydin B, Oktar SO, M Buyukgebiz B, Bagcaz S, Ozdemir MG, Inan G. A real-time anatomy identification via tool based on artificial intelligence for ultrasound-guided peripheral nerve block procedures: an accuracy study. J Anesth. 2021 Aug;35(4):591-594. doi: 10.1007/s00540-021-02947-3. Epub 2021 May 19.
- Bowness J, Varsou O, Turbitt L, Burkett-St Laurent D. Identifying anatomical structures on ultrasound: assistive artificial intelligence in ultrasound-guided regional anesthesia. Clin Anat. 2021 Jul;34(5):802-809. doi: 10.1002/ca.23742. Epub 2021 May 11.
- Jacobs A, Lemoine A, Joshi GP, Van de Velde M, Bonnet F; PROSPECT Working Group collaborators#. PROSPECT guideline for oncological breast surgery: a systematic review and procedure-specific postoperative pain management recommendations. Anaesthesia. 2020 May;75(5):664-673. doi: 10.1111/anae.14964. Epub 2020 Jan 26.
- Momenimovahed Z, Salehiniya H. Epidemiological characteristics of and risk factors for breast cancer in the world. Breast Cancer (Dove Med Press). 2019 Apr 10;11:151-164. doi: 10.2147/BCTT.S176070. eCollection 2019.
- FitzGerald S, Odor PM, Barron A, Pawa A. Breast surgery and regional anaesthesia. Best Pract Res Clin Anaesthesiol. 2019 Mar;33(1):95-110. doi: 10.1016/j.bpa.2019.03.003. Epub 2019 Apr 6.
- Khemka R, Chakraborty A. Ultrasound-guided modified serratus anterior plane block for perioperative analgesia in breast oncoplastic surgery: A case series. Indian J Anaesth. 2019 Mar;63(3):231-234. doi: 10.4103/ija.IJA_752_18.
- Elsharkawy H, Pawa A, Mariano ER. Interfascial Plane Blocks: Back to Basics. Reg Anesth Pain Med. 2018 May;43(4):341-346. doi: 10.1097/AAP.0000000000000750.
- Bartakke DAA, Varma DMK. Analgesia for breast surgery - A Brief Overview. Medicine. 2019;7.
- Bakeer AH, Kamel KM, Abdelgalil AS, Ghoneim AA, Abouel Soud AH, Hassan ME. Modified Pectoral Nerve Block versus Serratus Block for Analgesia Following Modified Radical Mastectomy: A Randomized Controlled Trial. J Pain Res. 2020 Jul 14;13:1769-1775. doi: 10.2147/JPR.S252539. eCollection 2020.
- Kuş A. Pektoral blok derleme. Türkiye Klinikleri Anesteziyoloji Reanimasyon - Özel Konular. 2015;8(3):74-7.
- Akkus Z, Cai J, Boonrod A, Zeinoddini A, Weston AD, Philbrick KA, Erickson BJ. A Survey of Deep-Learning Applications in Ultrasound: Artificial Intelligence-Powered Ultrasound for Improving Clinical Workflow. J Am Coll Radiol. 2019 Sep;16(9 Pt B):1318-1328. doi: 10.1016/j.jacr.2019.06.004.
- Bowness J, El-Boghdadly K, Burckett-St Laurent D. Artificial intelligence for image interpretation in ultrasound-guided regional anaesthesia. Anaesthesia. 2021 May;76(5):602-607. doi: 10.1111/anae.15212. Epub 2020 Jul 29. No abstract available.
- Hadzic A. Hadzic's Textbook of Regional Anesthesia and Acute Pain Management. 2nd edition. New York: McGraw Hill / Medical; 2017. 1536 p.
- Helander EM, Webb MP, Kendrick J, Montet T, Kaye AJ, Cornett EM, Kaye AD. PECS, serratus plane, erector spinae, and paravertebral blocks: A comprehensive review. Best Pract Res Clin Anaesthesiol. 2019 Dec;33(4):573-581. doi: 10.1016/j.bpa.2019.07.003. Epub 2019 Jul 17.
- Lopez-Rincon RM, Hendrix JM, Kumar V. Ultrasound-Guided Intercostal Nerve Block. 2023 Jul 19. In: StatPearls [Internet]. Treasure Island (FL): StatPearls Publishing; 2024 Jan-. Available from http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/books/NBK555900/
- Hinchcliff KM, Hylton JR, Orbay H, Wong MS. Intraoperative Placement of Pectoral Nerve Block Catheters: Description of a Novel Technique and Review of the Literature. Ann Plast Surg. 2017 May;78(5 Suppl 4):S189-S193. doi: 10.1097/SAP.0000000000000954.
- Maheshwari K, Cywinski JB, Papay F, Khanna AK, Mathur P. Artificial Intelligence for Perioperative Medicine: Perioperative Intelligence. Anesth Analg. 2023 Apr 1;136(4):637-645. doi: 10.1213/ANE.0000000000005952. Epub 2023 Mar 16.
- Hashimoto DA, Rosman G, Rus D, Meireles OR. Artificial Intelligence in Surgery: Promises and Perils. Ann Surg. 2018 Jul;268(1):70-76. doi: 10.1097/SLA.0000000000002693.
- Nathan N. Perioperative Artificial Intelligence. Anesth Analg. 2023 Apr 1;136(4):636. doi: 10.1213/ANE.0000000000006427. Epub 2023 Mar 16. No abstract available.
- Morse J, Terrasini N, Wehbe M, Philippona C, Zaouter C, Cyr S, Hemmerling TM. Comparison of success rates, learning curves, and inter-subject performance variability of robot-assisted and manual ultrasound-guided nerve block needle guidance in simulation. Br J Anaesth. 2014 Jun;112(6):1092-7. doi: 10.1093/bja/aet440. Epub 2014 Jan 23.
- Bowness JS, El-Boghdadly K, Woodworth G, Noble JA, Higham H, Burckett-St Laurent D. Exploring the utility of assistive artificial intelligence for ultrasound scanning in regional anesthesia. Reg Anesth Pain Med. 2022 Jun;47(6):375-379. doi: 10.1136/rapm-2021-103368. Epub 2022 Jan 28.
- Szamborski M, Janc J, Rosinczuk J, Janc JJ, Lesnik P, Lysenko L. Use of Ultrasound-Guided Interfascial Plane Blocks in Anterior and Lateral Thoracic Wall Region as Safe Method for Patient Anesthesia and Analgesia: Review of Techniques and Approaches during COVID-19 Pandemic. Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2022 Jul 17;19(14):8696. doi: 10.3390/ijerph19148696.
- Jindal R, Meena S, Bhati S, Patel P, Gulati C, Singh S. Postoperative Analgesic Efficacy of Intraoperative Pectoral Nerve Block for Modified Radical Mastectomy: a Double-Blind Prospective Randomised Interventional Study. Indian J Surg Oncol. 2023 Mar;14(1):215-221. doi: 10.1007/s13193-022-01680-x. Epub 2022 Nov 14.
- Cesur S, Aksu C, Guler SA, Kus A. Modified pectoral nerve block versus bi-level erector spinae plane block for postoperative analgesia after radical mastectomy surgery: a prospective, randomized, controlled trial. Korean J Anesthesiol. 2023 Aug;76(4):317-325. doi: 10.4097/kja.22188. Epub 2023 Mar 14.
- Kocer Tulgar Y, Tulgar S, Guven Kose S, Kose HC, Cevik Nasirlier G, Dogan M, Thomas DT. Anesthesiologists' Perspective on the Use of Artificial Intelligence in Ultrasound-Guided Regional Anaesthesia in Terms of Medical Ethics and Medical Education: A Survey Study. Eurasian J Med. 2023 Jun;55(2):146-151. doi: 10.5152/eurasianjmed.2023.22254.
Study record dates
These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.
Study Major Dates
Study Start (Actual)
November 5, 2021
Primary Completion (Actual)
February 5, 2023
Study Completion (Actual)
May 5, 2023
Study Registration Dates
First Submitted
December 7, 2023
First Submitted That Met QC Criteria
June 27, 2024
First Posted (Actual)
June 28, 2024
Study Record Updates
Last Update Posted (Actual)
June 28, 2024
Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria
June 27, 2024
Last Verified
June 1, 2024
More Information
Terms related to this study
Additional Relevant MeSH Terms
Other Study ID Numbers
- KA21/353
Plan for Individual participant data (IPD)
Plan to Share Individual Participant Data (IPD)?
NO
Drug and device information, study documents
Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated drug product
No
Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated device product
No
This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.
Clinical Trials on Breast Neoplasms
-
G1 Therapeutics, Inc.TerminatedBreast Cancer | Breast Neoplasm | Triple-Negative Breast Cancer | Triple-Negative Breast NeoplasmsUnited States, Bulgaria, Croatia, Slovenia, Serbia, Belgium, North Macedonia, Slovakia
-
Innocrin PharmaceuticalCompletedBreast Cancer | Advanced Breast Cancer | Metastatic Breast Cancer | Triple Negative Breast Cancer | Male Breast Cancer | ER+ Breast Cancer | Cancer of the BreastUnited States
-
Dana-Farber Cancer InstituteIncyte CorporationActive, not recruitingInflammatory Breast Cancer (IBC)United States
-
Providence Health & ServicesBrooklyn ImmunoTherapeutics, LLCCompletedBreast Neoplasm | Triple Negative Breast Cancer | Breast Neoplasm, MaleUnited States
-
Xijing HospitalActive, not recruitingBreast Cancer | Breast Cancer (Triple Negative Breast Cancer (TNBC))China
-
BerGenBio ASAMerck Sharp & Dohme LLCTerminatedTriple Negative Breast Cancer | Inflammatory Breast Cancer Stage IVSpain, United States, United Kingdom, Norway
-
CytomX TherapeuticsCompletedNeoplasms | Breast Cancer | Breast Neoplasms | Breast Neoplasms, Triple-Negative | Breast Neoplasms, Hormone Receptor Positive/HER2 NegativeUnited States, Spain, Korea, Republic of
-
Emory UniversityEisai Inc.TerminatedBreast Cancer | Breast Neoplasms | Breast Tumors | Neoplasms, Breast | Cancer of the Breast | Tumors, BreastUnited States
-
Emory UniversityCompletedBreast Cancer | Breast Neoplasms | Breast Tumors | Neoplasms, Breast | Cancer of Breast | Cancer of the Breast | Human Mammary CarcinomaUnited States
-
Sun Yat-Sen Memorial Hospital of Sun Yat-Sen UniversityRecruitingBreast Cancer | Triple -Negative Breast CancerChina