Comparing the Safety and Efficacy of Cerebral TFA and TRA Methods

July 1, 2024 updated by: Humain Baharvahdat, Mashhad University of Medical Sciences

Comparing the Safety and Efficacy of Cerebral Angiography Using Trans-femoral Approach Versus Trans-radial Approach

Transradial diagnostic angiography in cardiovascular disease given lower vascular complications. However, neuroendovascular surgeons have not widely adopted the transradial approach for diagnostic approach and interventional procedures. This study aims to compare the efficacy, safety, and patient satisfaction with the transradial approach versus the transfemoral approach in diagnostic cerebral angiography.

Study Overview

Status

Recruiting

Detailed Description

Transradial diagnostic angiography in cardiovascular disease given lower vascular complications. However, neuroendovascular surgeons have not widely adopted the transradial approach for diagnostic approach and interventional procedures. This study aims to compare the efficacy, safety, and patient satisfaction with the transradial approach versus the transfemoral approach in diagnostic cerebral angiography.

Study Type

Interventional

Enrollment (Estimated)

600

Phase

  • Not Applicable

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Contact

Study Contact Backup

  • Name: Farid Qoorchi Moheb Seraj, MD
  • Phone Number: +98 936 939 24 44
  • Email: presfqm@gmail.com

Study Locations

    • Razavi Khorasan
      • Mashhad, Razavi Khorasan, Iran, Islamic Republic of
        • Recruiting
        • Mashhad University of Medical Sciences
        • Contact:
        • Contact:
          • Farid Qoorchi Moheb Seraj, MD
          • Phone Number: 98 936 939 24 44
          • Email: presfqm@gmail.com

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Ages Eligible for Study

  • Adult
  • Older Adult

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

  • All consecutive adult inpatients and outpatients referred for diagnostic cerebral angiography
  • the presence of the right radial pulse and at least one femoral pulse

Exclusion Criteria:

  • age<18
  • pregnant patients
  • occlusion of aorta or proximal both iliac/ femoral artery

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

  • Primary Purpose: Diagnostic
  • Allocation: Randomized
  • Interventional Model: Parallel Assignment
  • Masking: None (Open Label)

Arms and Interventions

Participant Group / Arm
Intervention / Treatment
Active Comparator: Transradial approach group
The diagnostic angiography was performed by radial approach.
In transradial access, no preprocedural upper extremity collateral blood supply testing was completed. When the radial access is unsuccessful, it is shifted to ulnar or femoral access. All right arms were secured in the fully supine position to allow access to both radial and ulnar arteries. At the conclusion of radial access procedures, a TR band was applied to close the access. Neurological exams as well as radial artery pulse and pulse oximeter of the right first finger were assessed during and on discharge by trained recovery nurses. Femoral access was performed in a standard manner. After the access (femoral or radial), a cerebral angiogram was performed in a standard manner using appropriate catheters (vertebral, bern, Simmons 2 or 3) according to the access. For the radial access, the patient was slightly sedated.
Active Comparator: Trasfemoral approach group
The diagnostic angiography was performed by femoral approach.
In transradial access, no preprocedural upper extremity collateral blood supply testing was completed. When the radial access is unsuccessful, it is shifted to ulnar or femoral access. All right arms were secured in the fully supine position to allow access to both radial and ulnar arteries. At the conclusion of radial access procedures, a TR band was applied to close the access. Neurological exams as well as radial artery pulse and pulse oximeter of the right first finger were assessed during and on discharge by trained recovery nurses. Femoral access was performed in a standard manner. After the access (femoral or radial), a cerebral angiogram was performed in a standard manner using appropriate catheters (vertebral, bern, Simmons 2 or 3) according to the access. For the radial access, the patient was slightly sedated.

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
technical success
Time Frame: during procedure
Incidence of sucess of performing the programmed cerebral angiogram through the randomised access without for crossover.
during procedure
access success
Time Frame: during procedure
Incidence of puncture success to insert a sheat in the access point
during procedure

Secondary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
total procedure time
Time Frame: during procedure
the duration (minutes) between the insertion of sheath and removal of sheath. fluoroscopy time, the need for performing 3D angiography, dose area product (DAP), total radiation dose, successful puncture (successful insertion of radial artery sheath and femoral artery sheath). Procedures that yielded angiograms with acceptable quality through the subclavian artery injection (with an inflated blood pressure cuff on the arm), in cases of failed vertebral artery cannulation, were also considered successful.
during procedure
total fluoroscopy time
Time Frame: during procedure
the duration of fluoroscopy
during procedure
complication
Time Frame: during procedure or one week after procedure
incidence of any procedural-related complication procedure
during procedure or one week after procedure

Other Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Patient Satisfaction
Time Frame: immediately after procedure, one hour after the procedure
The pain evaluation by the Visual analog score (VAS) by trained nurses and recorded as the scoring system (No pain: 0; Mild:1-3; Moderate:4-7; Severe:8-10).
immediately after procedure, one hour after the procedure

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start (Actual)

January 1, 2020

Primary Completion (Estimated)

August 1, 2024

Study Completion (Estimated)

December 1, 2024

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

October 17, 2023

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

July 1, 2024

First Posted (Actual)

July 8, 2024

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Actual)

July 8, 2024

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

July 1, 2024

Last Verified

July 1, 2024

More Information

Terms related to this study

Other Study ID Numbers

  • 4001116

Drug and device information, study documents

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated drug product

No

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated device product

No

product manufactured in and exported from the U.S.

Yes

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Clinical Trials on Cerebral Angiography

Clinical Trials on Diagnostic cerebral angiography

Subscribe