Effect of Genicular Arteries Embolization in Symptomatic Knee Osteoarthritis LipioJoint-2 (LIPIOJOINT-2)

October 11, 2024 updated by: Assistance Publique - Hôpitaux de Paris

A Randomized Sham-controlled, Multicenter Trial on the Effect of Genicular Arteries Embolization in Symptomatic Knee Osteoarthritis

Knee OsteoArthritis (KOA) is a common disease associated with pain and impaired function. Many patients are not relieved of their symptoms with enough efficacy by conservative treatments. Genicular Arteries Embolization (GAE) is a new minimally invasive endovascular treatment allowing symptoms relief. The investigator previously demonstrated the safety of GAE using an ethiodized oil-based emulsion for the treatment of painful knee osteoarthritis in a first-in-man single-arm clinical trial called LipioJoint-1 (clinicaltrials.gov: NCT04733092; EUDRACT: 2020-002206-10). This phase 1 study also provided encouraging evidence of GAE efficacy on knee pain and function.

The purpose of LipioJoint-2 study is to assess GAE efficacy using an ethiodized oil-based emulsion for the treatment of painful knee osteoarthritis in a multicenter, prospective, randomized sham-controlled clinical trial.

Study Overview

Detailed Description

Patients will be screened during current practice consultation in each recruiting center (Screening Visit). When a patient will meet the eligibility criteria, he will be informed about the protocol.

The Interventional Radiologist will further explain the protocol to the patient and check inclusion/non-inclusion criteria during baseline visit. The date of signature of the informed consent by the patient will be considered as the date of inclusion. GAE (embolization) will be scheduled within the next few days.

Randomization will occur during the embolization visit, before patient is taken to the operating room. Randomization in a 2:1 ratio of GAE using emulsion to the sham procedure will be performed with stratification on Kellgren and Lawrence score (2-3 versus 4). All target arteries will be injected with an ethiodized oil-based emulsion (GAE group). Patient will be kept blind to the actual treatment using headphones or virtual headset.

Follow-up visits will be scheduled 1, 3, 6 and 12 months after randomization. Patient will be informed about his randomisation group (GAE or sham) after the completion of questionnaires (VAS pain, WOMAC, EQ-5D, HAD) at the 3-month visit and will be allowed to choose further medical & clinical management of his target KOA.

Study Type

Interventional

Enrollment (Estimated)

130

Phase

  • Phase 3

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Contact

Study Contact Backup

Study Locations

      • Paris, France, 75012
        • Recruiting
        • Hôpital Saint Antoine - APHP
        • Principal Investigator:
          • Jérémie SELLAM, MD
        • Contact:
      • Paris, France, 75014
        • Recruiting
        • Hopital Cochin - APHP
        • Contact:
        • Principal Investigator:
          • François RANNOU, MD
      • Paris, France, 75015
        • Recruiting
        • Hôpital européen Georges Pomidou - APHP
        • Contact:
        • Contact:
        • Principal Investigator:
          • Marc SAPOVAL, MD

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Ages Eligible for Study

  • Adult
  • Older Adult

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

  • Diagnosis of primary KOA according to the classification of the American College of Rheumatology (ACR) (5)
  • Radiographic Kellgren and Lawrence score ≥ 2 (6)
  • VAS pain score ≥ 40 mm (scale 0-100 mm)
  • Previous intra-articular injection in the target knee
  • Patient not eligible to knee surgery
  • For woman of childbearing potential: negative bêta-HCG before randomization
  • Social security affiliation
  • Signed informed consent
  • Good understanding of the French language

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Intra-articular injection of any product in the target joint within 3 months before embolization
  • Prior knee surgery other than ligament repair
  • Any inflammatory joint disease other than osteoarthritis
  • Any contra-indication to puncture of the ipsilateral femoral artery
  • Current treatment with cyclosporine, tacrolimus, cisplatine, vancomycine, amphotericine B or any aminoside
  • Ipsilateral symptomatic hip OA
  • Treated hyperthyroidism
  • Known severe allergy to Lipiodol® and/or iodine contrast medium
  • Known moderate to severe kidney failure (creatinine clearance < 30 45 ml/min)
  • Known right-to-left cardiac shunt or intra-tumoral vascular shunt
  • Asthma attack in the 8 days before randomization
  • Exploration or treatment with radioactive iodine scheduled within 1 month after randomization
  • Symptomatic atheromatous lesion in the ipsilateral limb
  • Patient unable or unwilling to comply with the follow-up schedule (at the investigator's discretion)
  • Vulnerable populations (such as pregnant or breastfeeding women, patient under guardianship curatorship, deprived of liberty)
  • Patient under exclusion period in another trial
  • Patient on AME (state medical aid)

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

  • Primary Purpose: Treatment
  • Allocation: Randomized
  • Interventional Model: Parallel Assignment
  • Masking: Triple

Arms and Interventions

Participant Group / Arm
Intervention / Treatment
Experimental: Embolization group
Genicular arteries embolization of the target knee will be performed using an ethiodized oil-based emulsion (3:1 mix of ethiodized oil and contrast agent ioversol 300 mgI/ml); 86 patients will be allocated to embolization group (2:1 randomization).
Embolization of genicular arteries
Sham Comparator: Sham group

All the gestures will be mimed using the same equipment as in GAE group. Superficial femoral artery catheterization, selective catheterization of target arteries and emulsion injection will be mimicked by the interventional radiologist (table movements, syringes manipulation) to keep the patient blind from the actual treatment.

44 patients will be allocated to sham group (2:1 randomization).

Mimicked catheterization and embolization of genicular arteries

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Change of pain assessed by a Visual Analogue Scale (VAS) at 3 months compared to randomization.
Time Frame: 3 months
VAS pain is a validated, self-reported instrument assessing average pain over the past 48 hour period. Score ranges from 0 (no pain) to 100 (worst possible pain).
3 months

Secondary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Change of pain assessed by a Visual Analogue Scale (VAS) at 1 month compared to randomization.
Time Frame: 1 month
VAS pain is a validated, self-reported instrument assessing average pain over the past 48 hour period. Score ranges from 0 (no pain) to 100 (worst possible pain).
1 month
Change of pain assessed by a Visual Analogue Scale (VAS) at 6 months compared to randomization.
Time Frame: 6 months
VAS pain is a validated, self-reported instrument assessing average pain over the past 48 hour period. Score ranges from 0 (no pain) to 100 (worst possible pain).
6 months
Change of pain assessed by a Visual Analogue Scale (VAS) at 12 months compared to randomization.
Time Frame: 12 months
VAS pain is a validated, self-reported instrument assessing average pain over the past 48 hour period. Score ranges from 0 (no pain) to 100 (worst possible pain).
12 months
Change of the patient's global assessment of her/his health measured by the Visual Analogue Scale of EQ-5D questionnaire (EQ VAS) at 1, 3, 6, 12 months compared to randomization.
Time Frame: Up to 12 months
EQ-5D questionnaire is a validated, self-reported instrument assessing "today" health-related quality of life. EQ VAS is the second part of EQ-5D, consisting in a Visual Analogue Scale of health. Score ranges from 0 (worst health) to 100 (best health).
Up to 12 months
Change of the Western Ontario and McMaster Universities Arthritis (WOMAC) total and sub-scores (pain, function,stiffness) at 1, 3, 6, 12 months compared to randomization.
Time Frame: Up to 12 months

WOMAC questionnaire is a validated, self-reported instrument assessing the daily condition of patients with osteoarthritis of the lower limb. It has a multidimensional scale comprising 24 items grouped into three dimensions: pain (5 items), stiffness (2 items), and physical functioning (17 items).

Likert scale will be normalized to 100. Scores ranges from 0 (no impairment) to 100 (severe impairment).

Up to 12 months
Change of the Knee injury and Osteoarthritis Outcome Score (KOOS) total and sub-scores at 3 months compared to randomization.
Time Frame: 3 months

KOOS questionnaire is a validated, self-reported instrument assessing the daily condition of patients with osteoarthritis of the lower limb. It has a multidimensional scale comprising 42 items grouped into five dimensions: pain (9 items), symptoms (7 items), activities of daily living function (17 items), sport and recreation function (5 items), quality of life (4 items).

A Likert scale is used and all items have five possible answer options scored from 0 (No Problems) to 4 (Extreme Problems) and each of the five scores is calculated as the sum of the items included.

Scores are transformed to a 0-100 scale, with zero representing extreme knee problems and 100 representing no knee problems as common in orthopedic assessment scales and generic measures.

3 months
Change of the Hospital Anxiety and Depression (HAD) score and sub-scores at 3 months compared to randomization.
Time Frame: 3 months
HAD questionnaire is a validated, self-reported instrument assessing the levels of anxiety and depression. It has a multidimensional scale comprising 14 items grouped into two dimensions: anxiety (7 items), and depression (7 items). Scoring for each item ranges from zero to three, with three denoting highest anxiety or depression level. Total score ranges from 0 (no impairment) to 42 (severe impairement). A total sub-scale score of >8 points out of a possible 21 denotes considerable symptoms of anxiety or depression.
3 months
Change of semi-quantitative MRI scoring at 6 months compared to randomization.
Time Frame: 6 months
Semi-quantitative MRI scoring may include Whole-Organ Magnetic Resonance Imaging Score (WORMS), Knee Osteoarthritis Scoring System (KOSS), Boston-Leeds Osteoarthritis Knee Scoring (BLOKS), MRI Osteoarthritis Knee Score (MOAKS).
6 months
Description of pain medication at Month 1, 3, 6, 12.
Time Frame: Up to 12 months
Pain medication will be described using analgesic level.
Up to 12 months
Description of non-pharmacological treatments for target knee in both groups at 1, 3, 6, and 12 months.
Time Frame: Up to 12 months
Non-pharmacological interventions may include, but are not limited to, physiotherapy, osteopathy, acupuncture, massage, electroanalgesia, laser therapy, low-level light therapy, meditation.
Up to 12 months
Number of responder patients under OMERACT-OARSI definition in both groups at 3, 6 and 12 months.
Time Frame: Up to 12 months

A patient is defined as responder under OMERACT-OARSI criteria if one of the following conditions is satisfied:

  • Improvement in pain (0-100 mm VAS) or in WOMAC function score ≥50% and absolute change ≥20 is observed or
  • Improvement in at least 2 of the 3 following conditions:

    • Pain (0-100 mm VAS) ≥20% and absolute change ≥10
    • WOMAC function score ≥20% and absolute change ≥10
    • Patient's global assessment of her/his health (0-100 mm EQ-5D VAS) ≥20% and absolute change ≥10
Up to 12 months
Number of patients reaching an acceptable symptom state (PASS) in both groups at 3, 6, and 12 months.
Time Frame: Up to 12 months

PASS is defined for each patient reported outcome as:

  • Pain (0-100 mm VAS) ≤32.3,
  • Patients global assessment of her/his health (0-100 mm EQ-5D VAS) ≤32,
  • WOMAC function score (0-100) ≤31.
Up to 12 months
Number and description of adverse events and serious adverse events at 1, 3, 6 and 12 months.
Time Frame: Up to 12 months
Adverse events are defined according to Article 2 of the Regulation (EU) No 536/2014. Intensity of adverse events will be graded using Clavien-Dindo classification and CTCAE v 5.0.
Up to 12 months
Description of target knee events in both groups at 6 and 12 months.
Time Frame: Up to 12 months
Events of interest includes intra-articular injections, embolization, surgery.
Up to 12 months
Incremental efficiency of genicular arteries embolization compared to sham treatment (medico-economic analysis).
Time Frame: 6 months
Medico-economic study: incremental cost utility ratio
6 months

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Investigators

  • Principal Investigator: Marc SAPOVAL, MD, Assistance Publique - Hopitaux de Paris

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start (Actual)

September 30, 2024

Primary Completion (Estimated)

January 1, 2028

Study Completion (Estimated)

October 1, 2028

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

July 4, 2024

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

July 4, 2024

First Posted (Actual)

July 11, 2024

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Actual)

October 15, 2024

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

October 11, 2024

Last Verified

October 1, 2024

More Information

Terms related to this study

Other Study ID Numbers

  • APHP230828
  • PHRC-22-0033 (Other Grant/Funding Number: French Ministry of Health)
  • 2023-508844-24-00 (Ctis)

Plan for Individual participant data (IPD)

Plan to Share Individual Participant Data (IPD)?

YES

IPD Plan Description

Individual participant data (IPD) that underlie results in publication could be shared. IPD detailed in the protocol of a planned metaanalysis could be shared.

IPD Sharing Time Frame

Two years after the last publication

IPD Sharing Access Criteria

Data sharing must be accepted by the sponsor and the PI based on a scientific project and scientific involvement of the PI team. Collaboration will be fostered.

Teams wishing obtain IPD must meet the sponsor and PI team to present scientifics (and commercial) purpose, IPD needed, format of data transmission, and timeframe. Technical feasibility and financial support will be discussed before mandatory contractualization.

Processing of shared data must comply with European General Data Protection Regulation (GDPR).

IPD Sharing Supporting Information Type

  • STUDY_PROTOCOL
  • ICF

Drug and device information, study documents

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated drug product

No

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated device product

No

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Clinical Trials on Knee Osteoarthritis

Clinical Trials on Ethiodized Oil-based emulsion

Subscribe