Thermotherapy in Acute Nonspecific Neck Pain

July 12, 2024 updated by: Nuray Alaca, Acibadem University

Comparison of the Short-term Effect of Superficial Thermotherapy Applications in Acute Nonspecific Neck Pain-Randomised Controlled Trial

Neck pain is one of the most common musculoskeletal pain disorders secondary to low back pain. Medical and non-medical treatments such as physiotherapy are applied in its treatment. Patients with nonspecific neck pain (NBA) can be treated with various interventions such as drug therapy, manual therapy, heat and exercise. Although it is frequently used in clinical practice, there is no evidence that superficial thermotherapy (hot or cold) methods effectively relieve neck pain. Therefore, this study aims to compare the short-term effects of superficial hot or cold applications on pain, range of motion and functional status in patients with NBA.

Study Overview

Status

Recruiting

Conditions

Study Type

Interventional

Enrollment (Estimated)

60

Phase

  • Not Applicable

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Contact

Study Locations

      • Istanbul, Turkey, +90
        • Recruiting
        • Nuray ALACA
        • Contact:
          • Doğa Koçyiğit
      • Istanbul, Turkey, 34752

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Ages Eligible for Study

  • Adult
  • Older Adult

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

  • Being diagnosed with nonspecific neck pain by a doctor,
  • To be between the ages of 18-65,
  • Neck pain lasting for less than 1 month
  • No previous neck or shoulder surgery,
  • No shoulder pain due to any cause,
  • A tumour or inflammatory disease underlying the neck pain not to be found,
  • A clinically underlying stenosis or discogenic problem not to be present.
  • Negative results from the following clinical examination tests;

Spurling test, Lhermitte test, Cervical distraction test, Adson test,

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Not meeting the inclusion criteria,
  • Positive neurological examination (positive motor presence, reflex or sensory abnormalities indicating spinal root compression) or abnormal neurological findings related to nerve compression in the upper limb
  • Systemic rheumatological or metabolic diseases or cancer
  • Refusal to participate in the study,
  • Failure to complete treatment,
  • Having any neurological problem
  • Severe psychological illnesses

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

  • Primary Purpose: Treatment
  • Allocation: Randomized
  • Interventional Model: Parallel Assignment
  • Masking: Double

Arms and Interventions

Participant Group / Arm
Intervention / Treatment
Sham Comparator: Sham Group
An unrefrigerated room temperature Cold Pack will be wrapped in a towel and applied to the patient's posterior neck and back for 15 minutes while the patient is lying face down.
Active Comparator: Hot Pack Group
Hot pack (55-60 degrees) application will be wrapped in a towel and applied to the back side neck and back of the patient for 15 minutes while the patient is lying face down.
Active Comparator: Cold Pack Group
Cold pack application (2-4 degrees) will be wrapped in a towel and applied to the patient's back side neck and back for 15 minutes while the patient is lying prone.

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
The Numerical Rating Scale (NPRS-11)
Time Frame: Change from baseline pain score at 3th day
The Numerical Rating Scale (NPRS-11) is an 11-point scale for self-report of pain. It is the most commonly used unidimensional pain scale. The respondent selects a whole number (integers 0-10) that best reflects the intensity (or other quality if requested of his/her pain.0 point is the minimum and 10 point is the maximum. The higher the score, the more severe the pain.
Change from baseline pain score at 3th day
Range of Motion
Time Frame: Change from baseline range of motion at 3th day
CROM device will be used. The active range of motion of each individual will be measured and measured in accordance with the manufacturer's procedures
Change from baseline range of motion at 3th day
Global Rating of Change scale (Patient Satisfaction)
Time Frame: Change from baseline Global Rating of Change scale at 3th day
Patient satisfaction regarding improvement in shoulder function will be evaluated by the Global Rating of Change scale. All participants will be asked to rate their condition after a six-week intervention period compared to baseline by indicating whether they have improved significantly, improved slightly, unchanged, deteriorated slightly, or deteriorated significantly between -3 to +3, with a higher value indicating better condition in this study.
Change from baseline Global Rating of Change scale at 3th day

Secondary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Neck disability index
Time Frame: Change from baseline disability scale at 3th day
Since some parts of the 10-item questionnaire could not be answered by the patients (driving, working life), the average neck disability index score will be calculated by dividing the total score by the number of questions answered. The scoring is between 0 and 50. 0 points means the best result, 50 points means the worst result. 0 - 4 points; no disability, 5 - 14 points; mild disability, 15 - 24 points; moderate disability, 25 - 34 points; severe disability, > 35 points; complete disability
Change from baseline disability scale at 3th day
Pressure Pain Threshold
Time Frame: Change from baseline Pressure Pain Threshold at 3th day
A digital pressure algometer will be applied to the web space of the foot opposite the trigger point. Participants are instructed to say "stop" or "pain" so the stimulus can be terminated "when the sensation first transitions from pressure to pain" (pain threshold).
Change from baseline Pressure Pain Threshold at 3th day

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start (Actual)

July 10, 2024

Primary Completion (Estimated)

January 10, 2025

Study Completion (Estimated)

July 10, 2025

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

July 12, 2024

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

July 12, 2024

First Posted (Actual)

July 18, 2024

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Actual)

July 18, 2024

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

July 12, 2024

Last Verified

July 1, 2024

More Information

Terms related to this study

Additional Relevant MeSH Terms

Other Study ID Numbers

  • 2024/9/340

Plan for Individual participant data (IPD)

Plan to Share Individual Participant Data (IPD)?

UNDECIDED

Drug and device information, study documents

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated drug product

No

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated device product

No

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Clinical Trials on Neck Pain

Clinical Trials on Sham

Subscribe