Neovaginoplasty Using Photoinduced-imine-crosslink Hydrogel in MRKH Patients

July 12, 2024 updated by: Keqin Hua, Obstetrics & Gynecology Hospital of Fudan University

Study on the Effectiveness and Safety of Neovaginoplasty Using Photoinduced-imine-crosslink Hydrogel in Patients With Mayer-Rokitansky-Kuster-Hauser Syndrome

Evaluating the effectiveness and safety of neovaginoplasty using photoinduced-imine-crosslink hydrogel in patients with MRKH syndrome by comparing the differences in the degree of squamous epithelialization, vaginal length and width, and sexual life quality.

Study Overview

Detailed Description

This is a randomized controlled trial. Patients meeting the inclusion criteria will be enrolled in this study: 1)Diagnosed with MRKH syndrome; 2)Without previous treatments; 3)Age: 18-35 years old; 4)Voluntary agreement to participate in the study, sign the informed consent form, and demonstrate good compliance with follow-up.

A centralized block randomization will be used to randomly assign patients to ensure that there will be an equal number of patients (1:1) in the hydrogel group and control group. The sample size is 20.

Under general anesthesia and catheterized bladder, the patient was in the lithotomy position. In the connective tissue plane between the bladder and rectum, the vestiges of the müllerian ducts were identified. With the index finger in the rectum as a direction and protection, Hegar's dilators of increasing size (4.5-10) were pushed through the dimples gently. After that, a double-barreled canal appeared. Then, the raphe between the canals was incised. The neovagina was created. According to the randomization, a vaginal mold spreaded with hydrogel or not was placed. The patients were suggested to wear the vaginal mold continuously over the following 6 months. After that, they were allowed to have the first sexual intercourse. Otherwise, the mold wearing time was 1 h daily, until they had sexual activity at least twice a week.

The primary endpoint is the degree of vaginal squamous epithelialization 1 month, 3 months, 6 months after surgery. The secondary endpoints include neovaginal length and width, sexual life quality, and surgical complications.

Study Type

Interventional

Enrollment (Estimated)

20

Phase

  • Not Applicable

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Contact

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Ages Eligible for Study

  • Adult

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

  1. Diagnosed with MRKH syndrome;
  2. Without previous related treatments; 3)18-35 years old;

4)Voluntary agreement to participate in the study, sign the informed consent form, and demonstrate good compliance with follow-up.

Exclusion Criteria:

  1. With any previous artificial colpoplasty or other related treatment;
  2. With history of diabetes or systemic immune system disease.

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

  • Primary Purpose: Treatment
  • Allocation: Randomized
  • Interventional Model: Parallel Assignment
  • Masking: Double

Arms and Interventions

Participant Group / Arm
Intervention / Treatment
Experimental: Arm 1
After neovaginoplasty, a vaginal mold spreaded with photoinduced-imine-crosslink hydrogel was placed in the neovagina.
Under general anesthesia and catheterized bladder, the patient was in the lithotomy position. In the connective tissue plane between the bladder and rectum, the vestiges of the müllerian ducts were identified. With the index finger in the rectum as a direction and protection, Hegar's dilators of increasing size (4.5-10) were pushed through the dimples gently. After that, a double-barreled canal appeared. Then, the raphe between the canals was incised. The neovagina was created. According to the randomization, a vaginal mold spreaded with hydrogel or not was placed in the neovagina for 6 months. The patients were suggested to wear the vaginal mold continuously over the following 6 months. After that, they were allowed to have the first sexual intercourse. Otherwise, the mold wearing time was 1 h daily, until they had sexual activity at least twice a week.
Other: Arm 2
After neovaginoplasty, a vaginal mold was placed in the neovagina directly without anything spreaded.
Under general anesthesia and catheterized bladder, the patient was in the lithotomy position. In the connective tissue plane between the bladder and rectum, the vestiges of the müllerian ducts were identified. With the index finger in the rectum as a direction and protection, Hegar's dilators of increasing size (4.5-10) were pushed through the dimples gently. After that, a double-barreled canal appeared. Then, the raphe between the canals was incised. The neovagina was created. According to the randomization, a vaginal mold spreaded with hydrogel or not was placed in the neovagina for 6 months. The patients were suggested to wear the vaginal mold continuously over the following 6 months. After that, they were allowed to have the first sexual intercourse. Otherwise, the mold wearing time was 1 h daily, until they had sexual activity at least twice a week.

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Degree of vaginal squamous epithelialization
Time Frame: 1 month
Percentage of squamous epithelialization of neovagina
1 month
Degree of vaginal squamous epithelialization
Time Frame: 3 months
Percentage of squamous epithelialization of neovagina
3 months
Degree of vaginal squamous epithelialization
Time Frame: 6 months
Percentage of squamous epithelialization of neovagina
6 months

Secondary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
length of neovagina
Time Frame: 1 month
length in centimetre, measured by a ruler
1 month
length of neovagina
Time Frame: 3 months
length in centimetre, measured by a ruler
3 months
length of neovagina
Time Frame: 6 months
length in centimetre, measured by a ruler
6 months
width of neovagina
Time Frame: 1 month
width in centimetre, measured by ruler
1 month
width of neovagina
Time Frame: 3 months
width in centimetre, measured by ruler
3 months
width of neovagina
Time Frame: 6 months
width in centimetre, measured by ruler
6 months
Sexual life quality
Time Frame: 6 months
Female Sexual Function Index, a self-reported questionnaire to measure sexual life quality
6 months
Sexual life quality
Time Frame: 1 year
Female Sexual Function Index, a self-reported questionnaire to measure sexual life quality
1 year

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Investigators

  • Principal Investigator: Keqin Hua, Doctor, Obstetrics & Gynecology Hospital of Fudan University

Publications and helpful links

The person responsible for entering information about the study voluntarily provides these publications. These may be about anything related to the study.

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start (Estimated)

August 1, 2024

Primary Completion (Estimated)

June 30, 2025

Study Completion (Estimated)

June 30, 2026

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

June 27, 2024

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

July 12, 2024

First Posted (Actual)

July 18, 2024

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Actual)

July 18, 2024

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

July 12, 2024

Last Verified

July 1, 2024

More Information

Terms related to this study

Plan for Individual participant data (IPD)

Plan to Share Individual Participant Data (IPD)?

NO

Drug and device information, study documents

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated drug product

No

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated device product

No

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Clinical Trials on Mayer Rokitansky Kuster Hauser Syndrome

Subscribe