Educational Support Group Program for Bilingual and Spanish-speaking Carepartners and People With Progressive Aphasia

February 27, 2025 updated by: Stephanie Grasso, University of Texas at Austin

Educational Support Group Program for Carepartners of Bilingual and Spanish-speaking Persons With Progressive Forms of Aphasia and for Persons With Progressive Forms of Aphasia

The current study aims to examine the benefits of an education/support group program for individuals with progressive aphasia (caused by various etiologies, diagnoses) and their carepartners. The current study utilizes pre-, post-treatment, and follow-up assessments to measure effects of a psychoeducational support group and an implementation/communication skills training phase on measures of psychosocial function, communicative effectiveness and speech/language function. Analysis of study-specific surveys and semi-structured interviews will provide qualitative data regarding outcomes. Before beginning the education and support group, focus groups will be run in order to set priorities for the themes to be included in the education program. Participants will join via tele-based means if preferred and these participants may reside in the United States, or internationally including Mexico and Spain.

Study Overview

Detailed Description

Two educational/support group routes will be offered:

  1. Progressive aphasia (PA) educational/support group or
  2. Caregiver educational support group with an implementation phase (including their partner with PA).

The caregiver educational support group path will be delivered in two phases, whereas the PA educational support group path will only consist of the first phase. The first phase of the caregiver educational support group will focus on the educational support group and the second phase will consist of implementation and practice of strategies with feedback provided by the clinician.

The educational/support groups (Routes 1 and 2) will include opportunities for discussion of issues related to language-led dementia or progressive aphasia (e.g., coping with changes in cognition and language, use of strategies for effective communication) and education regarding the disorder provided by relevant experts (e.g., speech-language pathologists, licensed professional counselors), separately for carepartners and individuals with progressive aphasia.

The implementation phase (Route 2, only) will allow for practice of strategies and skills learned in the first phase.

The total amount of time participants will be involved in the study will be 9 months, inclusive of follow-up.

Phase 1. Timeline for the support group portion of the study: Participants will complete pre-treatment measures during a period of 1-2 weeks prior to their first meeting. After four months of twice monthly meetings, post-treatment measures will be completed within 1-2 weeks of treatment completion. Follow-up evaluation will take place at 3-months post-treatment.

Phase 2. Timeline for the implementation/dyad training portion of the study: Post-treatment assessment from Phase 1 will serve as pre-treatment assessment for Phase 2. Treatment sessions will be held once weekly for 4 weeks, and post-treatment assessment will be completed within 1-2 weeks of phase 2 treatment completion. Follow-up evaluation will take place at 3-months post-treatment.

Study Type

Interventional

Enrollment (Estimated)

120

Phase

  • Early Phase 1

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Contact

Study Locations

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Ages Eligible for Study

  • Adult
  • Older Adult

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

Yes

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

All participants must:

  • speak Spanish and/or English (although participants may speak other languages in addition to Spanish and/or English)
  • identify as Hispanic and/or Latinx,
  • or their spouse/family member with PA identifies as Hispanic and/or Latinx
  • see and hear well enough to participate
  • have access to a computer or mobile device with video capability
  • have an internet connection

Additional inclusion criteria for PA/ language-led dementia support group participants:

  • Individuals with PA:
  • Has a diagnosis of PA, or language-led dementia, and aphasia is one of the primary causes of difficulty with activities of daily living
  • Aware of language difficulties and willing to discuss them
  • Able to actively engage in group discussion and complete activities with minimal support
  • Able to regularly attend meetings
  • Willing to follow the rules of the support group for interacting with others respectfully

Additional inclusion criteria for care partner support group plus implementation phase participants:

  • Individuals with PA:
  • Diagnosis of aphasia or dementia that is progressive in nature, and aphasia is one of the primary causes of difficulty with activities of daily living
  • Have some ability to communicate and understand communication in order to participate in training sessions
  • Are functionally able to engage in training sessions (e.g., able to maintain some attention, minimal challenging behavior that would cause disruption)
  • Have a care partner who also consents to participating in the project
  • Care partners:
  • Self-identification as a caregiver of an individual with a diagnosis of PA or language-led dementia
  • Willing to discuss caregiving for individuals with PA/ language-led dementia
  • Able to regularly attend meetings
  • Willing to follow the rules of the support group for interacting with others respectfully

Exclusion Criteria:

• Beyond the inclusion criteria included above, no additional exclusion criteria apply

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

  • Primary Purpose: Treatment
  • Allocation: Non-Randomized
  • Interventional Model: Single Group Assignment
  • Masking: None (Open Label)

Arms and Interventions

Participant Group / Arm
Intervention / Treatment
Experimental: Treatment Condition
Support group meetings and strategy practice
Psychosocial educational, support group and implementation of strategies

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Treatment/Acceptability Survey
Time Frame: Baseline, Immediately following treatment, Follow-up at 3-months post-treatment
In-house Acceptability and Perception of Change Survey
Baseline, Immediately following treatment, Follow-up at 3-months post-treatment

Secondary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Acceptability Measure
Time Frame: Baseline, Immediately following treatment, Follow-up at 3-months post-treatment
Acceptability scale for healthcare interventions (the Theoretical Framework of Acceptability based questionnaire; Sekhon et al., 2022)
Baseline, Immediately following treatment, Follow-up at 3-months post-treatment
% participants who complete intervention, % sessions completed
Time Frame: Baseline, Immediately following treatment, Follow-up at 3-months post-treatment
Adherence/receipt of intervention, 0-100, greater better
Baseline, Immediately following treatment, Follow-up at 3-months post-treatment
% completion of homework
Time Frame: Baseline, Immediately following treatment, Follow-up at 3-months post-treatment
Engagement, 0-100, greater better
Baseline, Immediately following treatment, Follow-up at 3-months post-treatment
Retention
Time Frame: Baseline, Immediately following treatment, Follow-up at 3-months post-treatment
Number of dropouts, reasons for dropout (related to intervention or not), and overall, retention rate at final assessment and follow-up; 80% is successful at the final post-treatment assessment and 80% is successful at the 2-month follow-up, 0-100, greater better
Baseline, Immediately following treatment, Follow-up at 3-months post-treatment
Aphasia Impact Questionnaire
Time Frame: Baseline, Immediately following treatment, Follow-up at 3-months post-treatment
Aphasia impact, Higher score indicates poorer quality of life (worse) Range of scores for each question: 0-4 Total 0-84
Baseline, Immediately following treatment, Follow-up at 3-months post-treatment
Mini-Mental State Exam
Time Frame: Baseline, Immediately following treatment, Follow-up at 3-months post-treatment
Cognitive screener, 0-30, greater better
Baseline, Immediately following treatment, Follow-up at 3-months post-treatment
Quick Aphasia Battery
Time Frame: Baseline, Immediately following treatment, Follow-up at 3-months post-treatment
Aphasia severity, 0-10, greater better
Baseline, Immediately following treatment, Follow-up at 3-months post-treatment
Stroke and Aphasia Quality of Life Scale- 39
Time Frame: Baseline, Immediately following treatment, Follow-up at 3-months post-treatment
Quality of life, greater score is better, 0-195
Baseline, Immediately following treatment, Follow-up at 3-months post-treatment
Progressive Aphasia Severity Scale (PASS)
Time Frame: Baseline, Immediately following treatment, Follow-up at 3-months post-treatment
Aphasia severity, higher score = worse, 0-3
Baseline, Immediately following treatment, Follow-up at 3-months post-treatment
The Neuropsychiatric Inventory
Time Frame: Baseline, Immediately following treatment, Follow-up at 3-months post-treatment
Neuropsychiatric status, higher score = worse, 0-36
Baseline, Immediately following treatment, Follow-up at 3-months post-treatment
Clinical Dementia Rating Scale (CDR)
Time Frame: Baseline, Immediately following treatment, Follow-up at 3-months post-treatment
Dementia Rating, higher score = worse, 0-3
Baseline, Immediately following treatment, Follow-up at 3-months post-treatment
Quality of the Caregiver Patient Relationship (QCPR)
Time Frame: Baseline, Immediately following treatment, Follow-up at 3-months post-treatment
Quality of life, higher scores is better,14-70
Baseline, Immediately following treatment, Follow-up at 3-months post-treatment
Dementia Quality of Life
Time Frame: Baseline, Immediately following treatment, Follow-up at 3-months post-treatment
Quality of life, higher score is better, 28-112
Baseline, Immediately following treatment, Follow-up at 3-months post-treatment
Geriatric Depression Scale
Time Frame: Baseline, Immediately following treatment, Follow-up at 3-months post-treatment
Depression, higher score is worse, 0-15
Baseline, Immediately following treatment, Follow-up at 3-months post-treatment
Dementia Knowledge Assessment Scale
Time Frame: Baseline, Immediately following treatment, Follow-up at 3-months post-treatment
Dementia Knowledge, higher score is better, 0-60
Baseline, Immediately following treatment, Follow-up at 3-months post-treatment
Center for Epidemiologic Studies Depression Scale
Time Frame: Baseline, Immediately following treatment, Follow-up at 3-months post-treatment
Depression, higher score is worse, 0- 60
Baseline, Immediately following treatment, Follow-up at 3-months post-treatment
Cuestionario de Salud 36-Item Short Form Survey Instrument
Time Frame: Baseline, Immediately following treatment, Follow-up at 3-months post-treatment
General health, higher score is better, 0-100
Baseline, Immediately following treatment, Follow-up at 3-months post-treatment
General Anxiety Disorder-7
Time Frame: Baseline, Immediately following treatment, Follow-up at 3-months post-treatment
Anxiety, higher score is worse, 0-21
Baseline, Immediately following treatment, Follow-up at 3-months post-treatment
The Duke University Religion Index
Time Frame: Baseline, Immediately following treatment, Follow-up at 3-months post-treatment
Religion Index
Baseline, Immediately following treatment, Follow-up at 3-months post-treatment
Familism Scale
Time Frame: Baseline, Immediately following treatment, Follow-up at 3-months post-treatment
Familism Scale, higher score= greater religiosity, 1-15 considering all subscales
Baseline, Immediately following treatment, Follow-up at 3-months post-treatment
Acculturation Rating Scale for Mexican Americans
Time Frame: Baseline, Immediately following treatment, Follow-up at 3-months post-treatment
Acculturation, higher score is better, 20-124
Baseline, Immediately following treatment, Follow-up at 3-months post-treatment
Adult Carer Quality of Life Questionnaire
Time Frame: Baseline, Immediately following treatment, Follow-up at 3-months post-treatment
Quality of Life, higher score is better, 0 -105
Baseline, Immediately following treatment, Follow-up at 3-months post-treatment
Brief COPE
Time Frame: Baseline, Immediately following treatment, Follow-up at 3-months post-treatment
Coping strategies, higher score is better, 0-6
Baseline, Immediately following treatment, Follow-up at 3-months post-treatment
Brief Assessment Scale for Caregivers
Time Frame: Baseline, Immediately following treatment, Follow-up at 3-months post-treatment
Coping strategies, higher score = worse, -28-28
Baseline, Immediately following treatment, Follow-up at 3-months post-treatment
Zarit Burden Interview
Time Frame: Baseline, Immediately following treatment, Follow-up at 3-months post-treatment
Burden, higher score = worse, 0-88
Baseline, Immediately following treatment, Follow-up at 3-months post-treatment
Perceived Stress Scale
Time Frame: Baseline, Immediately following treatment, Follow-up at 3-months post-treatment
Stress level, higher = worse, 0-40
Baseline, Immediately following treatment, Follow-up at 3-months post-treatment
Devereux Adult Resilience Scale
Time Frame: Baseline, Immediately following treatment, Follow-up at 3-months post-treatment
Resilience
Baseline, Immediately following treatment, Follow-up at 3-months post-treatment
Dementia Management Strategies Scale (Tan et al., 2013)
Time Frame: Baseline, Immediately following treatment, Follow-up at 3-months post-treatment
Dementia management, higher score= higher frequency of action, subscales 8-55
Baseline, Immediately following treatment, Follow-up at 3-months post-treatment

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Publications and helpful links

The person responsible for entering information about the study voluntarily provides these publications. These may be about anything related to the study.

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start (Actual)

May 21, 2024

Primary Completion (Estimated)

May 1, 2030

Study Completion (Estimated)

December 1, 2030

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

June 6, 2024

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

July 18, 2024

First Posted (Actual)

July 22, 2024

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Actual)

March 25, 2025

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

February 27, 2025

Last Verified

February 1, 2025

More Information

Terms related to this study

Plan for Individual participant data (IPD)

Plan to Share Individual Participant Data (IPD)?

UNDECIDED

Drug and device information, study documents

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated drug product

No

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated device product

No

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Clinical Trials on Dementia

Clinical Trials on Psychosocial educational, support group and implementation of strategies

Subscribe