Efficacy and Safety of Etoricoxib/Cyanocobalamin Versus Etoricoxib for Acute Low Back Pain

November 25, 2024 updated by: Laboratorios Silanes S.A. de C.V.

Efficacy and Safety of the Fixed-Dose Combination of Etoricoxib/Cyanocobalamin Versus Etoricoxib in the Treatment of Patients with Acute Low Back Pain

Phase III longitudinal, multicenter, randomized, double-blind clinical trial. The aim of this study is to evaluate the efficacy and safety of the Fixed-Dose Combination of Etoricoxib/Cyanocobalamin Versus Etoricoxib in Patients With Acute Low Back Pain

Study Overview

Detailed Description

Researchers will compare the fixed-dose combination of Etoricoxib/Cyanocobalamin versus Etoricoxib in acute low back pain by comparing the proportion of patients that reported an improvement in pain during the 7 days of follow up. The adverse events related to the interventions will be registered during follow up.

Participants will:

  • Be randomized into one of the 2 intervention groups (A or B)
  • Visit the clinic in 3 occasions (day 0, day 3 of follow up and day 7 of follow up)
  • In case needed the patient could take 50 mg of tramadol, as a rescue medication, previous authorization of de principal investigator

Study Type

Interventional

Enrollment (Actual)

190

Phase

  • Phase 3

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Locations

      • Mexico City, Mexico, 11000
        • Laboratorio Silanes, S.A. de C.V.

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Ages Eligible for Study

  • Adult
  • Older Adult

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

  • Agree to participate in the study and give written informed consent
  • Patient with pain reported as moderate to severe intensity with ≥ 40 mm on the Visual Analog Scale (VAS).
  • At least 4 points on the "Douleur Neuropathique-4 items" (DN-4) scale.
  • Diagnosis of acute low back pain as a first-time episode or a previous episode 6 months before the enrollment day and lasting no more than 6 weeks.
  • Women of childbearing potential under a medically acceptable method of contraception

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Patients participating in another clinical trial involving an investigational treatment or participation in one within 4 weeks prior to study start
  • Patients in whom the participation in the study may be influenced (employment relationship with the research site or sponsor, inmates, etc.)
  • At medical discretion, a disease that affects prognosis and prevents outpatient management, for example, but not limited to: end-stage cancer, kidney, heart, respiratory or liver failure, mental illness or with scheduled surgical or hospital procedures
  • History/presence of any disease or condition that, in the opinion of the Investigator, could pose a risk for the patient or confusing the efficacy and safety of the investigational product
  • Patients in whom the study drug is contraindicated for medical reasons
  • Patients with allergy or hypersensitivity to the active substance of the study drugs, related products or excipients (Etoricoxib of Cyanocobalamin)
  • Pregnant women, women breastfeeding or planning a pregnancy during the conducting the study
  • Significant history of gastrointestinal diseases (e.g., gastric ulcer, Crohn's disease, Ulcerative Colitis, etc.)
  • Active opioid and/or NSAID treatment including COX-2 inhibitors, reported in the medical record within the last 72 hours of study entry.
  • Patients with a history of congestive heart failure: NYHA II-IV.
  • Concomitant use of strong CYP1A2 inhibitors (e.g., fluvoxamine, ciprofloxacin, etc.).
  • Patients with a history of alcohol or drug abuse in the last year
  • Patients with a history of ischemic heart disease, peripheral artery disease, and/or cerebral vascular disease (including patients who have recently undergone coronary revascularization or angioplasty)
  • Patients with a history of seizures, epileptic status and/or grand mal seizures
  • History of chronic liver failure Child-Pugh A, B, and/or C
  • History of acute renal failure (glomerular filtration rate <30 ml/min/1.72 m2)
  • Patient with a history of chronic pain associated with fibromyalgia, Paget's disease or bone pain induced by metastatic cancer
  • Low back pain due to a history of major trauma in the past 12 months (e.g., vertebral fracture, post-traumatic spondylolisthesis) or due to a visceral disorder (e.g., dysmenorrhea, history of endometriosis).
  • Patients with symptoms suggestive of COVID-19 infection (fever, cough, dyspnea) and/or contact in the last 14 days with a suspected or positive patient for COVID-19

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

  • Primary Purpose: Treatment
  • Allocation: Randomized
  • Interventional Model: Parallel Assignment
  • Masking: Double

Arms and Interventions

Participant Group / Arm
Intervention / Treatment
Experimental: Etoricoxib+Cyanocobalamin
Administered orally, 1 tablet a day for 7 days.
One tablet of 90 mg / 0.50 mg a day
Other Names:
  • Etori + Cyano
Active Comparator: Etoricoxib
Administered orally, 1 pill a day for 7 days.
One pill of 90 mg a day
Other Names:
  • Etori

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Number of participants with treatment-related adverse events through the patient's diary record.
Time Frame: 7 dyas
To describe the frequency, intensity and causality of the adverse events presented during the clinical trial by treatment group. The adverse events will be registered by the patient in the diary record. Each adverse event will be followed up at the discretion of the researcher.
7 dyas
Comparison of the proportion of patients reporting pain improvement (reduction in pain intensity with a VAS ≤20 mm) at 1, 3, 5, and 7 days of follow-up, according to their baseline measurement in each treatment group
Time Frame: 7 dyas

The visual analog pain scale (VAS) is a straight line in which one end signifies absence of pain and the other means the worst pain imaginable. The researcher will apply the VAS scale to each patient at each visit to assess pain intensity. At the end of the clinical trial the change porcentage will be measured and compared between treatment groups.

The patient will visit the clinic at days 0,3 and 7. The researcher will call the patient for follow up at days 1 and 5.

7 dyas

Secondary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Analyze the average change in pain intensity according to VAS score at 1, 3, 5, and 7 days in each treatment group and in comparison with the baseline measurement.
Time Frame: 7 days

The visual analog pain scale (VAS) is a straight line in which one end signifies absence of pain and the other means the worst pain imaginable. The researcher will apply the VAS scale to each patient at each visit to assess pain intensity. At the end of the clinical trial the change porcentage will be measured and compared between treatment groups.

The patient will visit the clinic at days 0,3 and 7. The researcher will call the patient for follow up at days 1 and 5.

7 days
Analyze the percentage change in pain intensity based on VAS score at 1, 3, 5, and 7 days in each treatment group and in comparison with the baseline measurement.
Time Frame: 7 days
% change= ((Final Measurement-Initial Measurement)/(Initial Measurement))*100
7 days
Comparison of the proportion of subjects with pain improvement (reduction in pain intensity) through VAS, ≥ 30% at 1, 3, 5, and 7 days in each treatment group and in comparison with the baseline measurement.
Time Frame: 7 days
The visual analog pain scale (VAS) is a straight line in which one end signifies absence of pain and the other means the worst pain imaginable. The researcher will apply the VAS scale to each patient at each visit to assess pain intensity. The proportion of patiens with an improvement of pain >30% will be reported and compared between treatment groups at days 1,3,5 and 7.
7 days
Comparison of the proportion of subjects with pain improvement (reduction in pain intensity) through VAS, ≥ 50% at 1, 3, 5, and 7 days in each treatment group and in comparison with the baseline measurement.
Time Frame: 7 days
The visual analog pain scale (VAS) is a straight line in which one end signifies absence of pain and the other means the worst pain imaginable. The researcher will apply the VAS scale to each patient at each visit to assess pain intensity. The proportion of patiens with an improvement of pain >30% will be reported and compared between treatment groups at days 1,3,5 and 7.
7 days
Assess and compare the degree of physical disability due to acute low back pain, measured through the Oswestry disability questionnaire at 1, 3, 5, and 7 days in each treatment group and in comparison with the baseline measurement.
Time Frame: 7 days
The Oswestry questionnaire has been designed to give us information as to how the back pain has affected the ability to manage everyday life of patients, it classifies QOL as: no disability, mild disability, moderate disability, severe disability and completely disabled. The disability degree would be compared.
7 days
Assess and compare the degree of disability to perform daily activities due to low back pain, reported through Roland-Morris questionnaire at 1, 3, 5, and 7 days in each treatment group and in comparison with the baseline measurement.
Time Frame: 7 days
The Roland-Morris questionnaire has been designed to assess the activities of daily living functional mobility pain. A maximum score of 24 indicates the greatest degree of disability from pain. The disability degree will be compared.
7 days
Assess changes in the score on the "Douleur Neuropathique-4 items" scale (DN-4) at days 3 and 7 in each treatment group and in comparison with the baseline measurement.
Time Frame: 7 days
The DN4 is a clinician-administered, neuropathic pain diagnostic questionnaire, consisting of ten items grouped in four sections. The first seven items are related to the quality of pain (burning, painful cold, electric shocks) and its association to abnormal sensations (tingling, pins and needles, numbness, itching). The other three items are related to neurological examination in the painful area (touch hypoesthesia, pinprick hypoesthesia, tactile allodynia).
7 days
Report the number of patients who present therapeutic failure during the study among the treatment groups
Time Frame: 7 days

Therapeutic failure will be defined by the principal researcher previous medical consult, the following criteria must be present:

- When there is a decrease <10 mm or increase in VAS values compared to baseline and a ≥ 80% adherence to treatment

7 days

Other Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
To report the percentage of therapeutic adherence at day 7 of the intervention in each treatment group.
Time Frame: 7 days
Therapeutic adherence will be defined by the principal researcher. Adherence to treatment will be defined as a consumption ≥ 80% of the doses that the patient should have ingested at the time of the corresponding evaluation.
7 days
Report the number of patients who require the use of rescue medication during the clinical trial in each treatment group
Time Frame: 7 days

The rescue medication will be tramadol 50 mg:

- The patient that considers the need for rescue medication must call the doctor, who will be in charge of applying the VAS scale by telephone. If the doctor considers it necessary, the taking of the rescue medication will be indicated.

7 days

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Investigators

  • Principal Investigator: Ricardo Choza-Romero, MD, Centro de Atención e Investigación Clínica S.C.
  • Principal Investigator: Adelfia Urenda-Quezada, MD, Servicios Avanzados de Investigación Medica Mediadvance S.C.
  • Principal Investigator: Isabel E Rucker Joerg, MD, Clinical Research Institute S.C.
  • Principal Investigator: Jesus H Mendoza-Ramírez, MD, Unidad Clínica de Bioequivalencia, S. de R.L. de C.V.

Publications and helpful links

The person responsible for entering information about the study voluntarily provides these publications. These may be about anything related to the study.

General Publications

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start (Actual)

April 26, 2024

Primary Completion (Actual)

October 4, 2024

Study Completion (Actual)

October 11, 2024

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

July 18, 2024

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

July 18, 2024

First Posted (Actual)

July 24, 2024

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Estimated)

November 27, 2024

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

November 25, 2024

Last Verified

November 1, 2024

More Information

Terms related to this study

Plan for Individual participant data (IPD)

Plan to Share Individual Participant Data (IPD)?

NO

Drug and device information, study documents

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated drug product

No

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated device product

No

product manufactured in and exported from the U.S.

No

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Clinical Trials on Acute Low-back Pain

Clinical Trials on Etoricoxib + Cyanocobalamin fixed dose

Subscribe