Evaluation of Clinical-functional and Radiographic Outcomes in Patients Who Underwent Meniscal Allograft Transplantation (MAT) at 10 Years. (MAT 10 Y)

August 1, 2025 updated by: Stefano Zaffagnini, Istituto Ortopedico Rizzoli

Menisci are crescent-shaped cartilage structures that are fundamentally important for the biomechanics and physiology of the knee joint. They play a primary role in load transmission, assist the ligaments in ensuring knee stability, and thus protect against the onset of knee osteoarthritis. Meniscal injuries are the most frequently encountered joint pathology and can cause pain, mechanical blocks, and recurrent effusions. The treatment of these injuries has progressively evolved from meniscectomy (removal of damaged meniscal tissue) to the use of meniscal sutures (where possible) to allow the preservation of the greatest amount of meniscus: numerous studies have shown a correlation between the amount of meniscus removed and the future onset of osteoarthritis (Hutchinson AJSM 2014, Harston KSSTA 2012).

However, in some cases, especially in the presence of complex and/or chronic lesions, meniscectomy remains the only viable surgical solution even today. Over time, months or years later, a subgroup of patients experiences symptoms such as pain, joint swelling, and mechanical overload of the compartment subjected to meniscectomy, a condition known as "post-meniscectomy syndrome." Some of these patients will subsequently develop knee osteoarthritis, requiring invasive interventions such as partial or total knee replacement.

Meniscal allograft transplantation (MAT) represents a valid therapeutic option for post-meniscectomy syndrome. This procedure aims to restore joint functionality and stability through the transplantation of a meniscus from a cadaver donor. MAT has been widely adopted in clinical practice, showing success in reducing pain and improving joint functionality.

Current studies suggest that meniscal transplantation can offer significant protection against osteoarthritis, but the duration of this preventive effect is not yet fully understood. Furthermore, there are no studies that can demonstrate the state of osteoarthritis with radiographic controls pre- and post-treatment at a follow-up of over 10 years.

Study Overview

Status

Recruiting

Study Type

Observational

Enrollment (Estimated)

397

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Contact

Study Locations

      • Bologna, Italy, 40136
        • Recruiting
        • IRCCS Istituto Ortopedico Rizzoli
        • Contact:

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Ages Eligible for Study

  • Adult
  • Older Adult

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Sampling Method

Non-Probability Sample

Study Population

A total of 397 patients will be considered, recruited from all individuals who underwent meniscal transplantation at the Rizzoli Orthopedic Institute between June 2004 and October 2020, and who were previously recruited for the MAT study.

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

  • Patients aged between 18 and 65 at the time of surgery
  • Both male and female
  • Patients who underwent meniscal transplantation at the Rizzoli Orthopedic Institute at least 10 years ago

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Patients who do not give consent to be included in the study
  • Patients who are no longer reachable
  • Presence of infection or hematologic, rheumatic, or coagulation disorders at the time of evaluation

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Lysholm Knee Score
Time Frame: 10 years
It is a validated measurement scale that assesses knee functionality through 8 items, which allow for determining the condition of the knee in response to the functional demands of daily life activities. This evaluation form is used to assess the outcomes of surgery on patients operated on for ligamentous or meniscal knee injuries. The final score is obtained by summing the various scores obtained in the different items, ranging from 0 to 100. The scores are divided into subgroups: Excellent (95-100); Good (84-94); Fair (65-83); Poor (<64).
10 years
Kellgren-Lawrence scale
Time Frame: 10 years
Clinical and imaging material in the patient's possession will be collected to evaluate the potential development of osteoarthritis. If the patient does not have radiological documentation performed according to the study protocol within the last 12 months, a weight-bearing knee X-ray in two projections will be performed to assess the degree of osteoarthritis according to the Kellgren-Lawrence scale.
10 years

Secondary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
VAS
Time Frame: 10 years
It is a 10-point quantitative unidimensional numerical scale for pain assessment. The scale requires the patient to select the number that best describes the intensity of their pain, from 0 to 10, at that precise moment. 0 means no pain, and 10 indicates the worst possible pain.
10 years
Tegner Score
Time Frame: 10 years
It allows estimating the level of motor activity of a subject with a score between 0 and 10, where 0 represents 'inability' and 10 represents 'participation in competitive sports, such as national or international level soccer.' This score is the most commonly used to define the level of motor activity in patients with knee disorders. In the study, the Tegner Score will be completed directly by the investigator through an interview with the patient.
10 years
KOOS score
Time Frame: 10 years
The Knee Injury and Osteoarthritis Outcome Score (KOOS) is a questionnaire aimed at assessing symptoms related to the knee joint in individuals with joint injuries or primary osteoarthritis. It evaluates knee functionality across 5 aspects: symptoms, pain, Activities of Daily Living (ADL), sports, and Quality of Life (QOL). The final score is obtained by summing the various scores from the different items and ranges from 0 to 100.
10 years

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start (Actual)

October 24, 2024

Primary Completion (Estimated)

July 1, 2030

Study Completion (Estimated)

July 1, 2030

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

July 22, 2024

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

July 22, 2024

First Posted (Actual)

July 26, 2024

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Actual)

August 6, 2025

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

August 1, 2025

Last Verified

August 1, 2025

More Information

Terms related to this study

Additional Relevant MeSH Terms

Other Study ID Numbers

  • MAT 10 Y

Drug and device information, study documents

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated drug product

No

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated device product

No

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Clinical Trials on Arthritis Knee

Subscribe