RECOMMEND Platform Trial (RECOMMEND)

Generating New Evidence to Reduce Major Complications to Improve the Safety and Efficacy of ECMO in Severe Cardiac and Respiratory Failure (RECOMMEND)

The goal of this platform trial is to determine the efficacy, safety and cost-effectiveness of various interventions in patients with acute cardiorespiratory failure requiring extracorporeal membrane oxygenation (ECMO)

The main question the platform trial aims to address is to determine the effect of a range of interventions on survival, organ support and resource utilisation to day 28 for hospitalised patients receiving ECMO.

Researchers will compare various interventions within multiple platform trial domains to see if the interventions have effects on survival, organ support and resource utilisation for the patient cohort.

Participants will be enrolled in accordance with the platform trial's domain structure to answer the research questions.

Study Overview

Detailed Description

The RECOMMEND Platform trial is an investigator initiated, multicentre, open labelled, randomised controlled Platform Trial that will utilise Bayesian adaptive logic to investigate the efficacy and safety of multiple study interventions simultaneously or sequentially in cohorts of adult patients who are receiving ECMO from ICUs participating in the national ECMO registry (EXCEL) in Australian hospitals (EXCEL Registry NCT03793257).

In this platform trial, various interventions will be investigated for their potential to improve outcomes for patients undergoing ECMO.

Extracorporeal Membrane Oxygenation (ECMO) is an invasive and resource intensive treatment used to support critically ill patients suffering from severe cardiac arrest, cardiac failure or respiratory failure. ECMO provides mechanical circulatory support, temporarily replacing the function of the heart and/or lungs, allowing time for these organs to recover.

Globally, the use of ECMO has increased rapidly over the past decade. It is both invasive and expensive, with the average cost for a single admission in Australia exceeding more than $180,000 and a total annual cost of > $75 million. Despite its high cost, ECMO is associated with a high mortality rate, and many survivors have compromised functional recovery for months or years after discharge from hospital, further adding to the long-terms costs of care.

The main complications reported in the national ECMO registry from 2019-2022 include bleeding (51.4%), renal failure and fluid overload (78.4%), and death and ongoing disability (66%). These were confirmed as research priorities by consumers and end-users. While the use of ECMO increases swiftly, the evidence base to support the growing patient numbers receiving this care has not grown at the same rate, resulting in important evidence gaps.

The RECOMMEND Platform Trial will address these evidence gaps in ECMO services in Australia. A platform trial is a type of study design that evaluates multiple treatment interventions for a single condition or device simultaneously within a single, overarching framework. This framework operates similarly to a standard operating procedure for study logistics, ethics management, funding, staffing, and statistical and data collection methods. Having an approved process (platform) for the 'Platform Trial' to operate saves time and money and increases speed of clinical trial onboarding to outcome resolution for researchers, hospital staff, ethics committees, and stakeholders. With this platform in place, future studies of similar ECMO outcomes can be onboarded more efficiently, as described above, and it creates a more powerful pool of data for impactful patient-centred research.

Over the lifetime of RECOMMEND, it is anticipated that new interventions will be added as new domains. The creation of new domains will be considered according to priorities set by relevant working groups, based on existing or new clinical need and there being sufficient statistical power available within RECOMMEND.

Study Type

Interventional

Enrollment (Estimated)

600

Phase

  • Phase 3

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Contact

Study Contact Backup

Study Locations

    • New South Wales
      • Camperdown, New South Wales, Australia, 2050
      • Sydney, New South Wales, Australia, 2010
    • Victoria
      • Melbourne, Victoria, Australia, 3004

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Ages Eligible for Study

  • Child
  • Adult
  • Older Adult

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

Yes

Description

PLATFORM INCLUSION CRITERIA:

  • Patients receiving ECMO
  • Patients enrolled in the EXCEL Registry - NCT03793257

PLATFORM EXCLUSION CRITERIA:

  • Treating clinician regards death as imminent and inevitable
  • Treating clinician determines it is not in the patient's best interests

RBC TRANSFUSION DOMAIN INCLUSION CRITERIA:

• Aged 18 years or older

RBC TRANSFUSION DOMAIN EXCLUSION CRITERIA:

  • Contraindication to RBC transfusion (including known patient preference)
  • Limitations of care put in place either through patient wishes or the treating medical teams.
  • Participant has already received ECMO >12 hours. The start of ECMO is defined as the time of initiation of extracorporeal blood flow unless ECMO was initiated during a surgical intervention in which case the start of ECMO is defined as the arrival time into the initial ICU (post-surgery)
  • The treating physician anticipates that ECMO treatment will cease before the end of tomorrow
  • The treating physician deems the study is not in the patient's best interest
  • The treating physician has concern regarding patient ability to tolerate restrictive or liberal transfusion trigger thresholds
  • Actively listed for a solid organ transplant and has not yet received one
  • Suspected or confirmed to be pregnant
  • Previous ECMO treatment during the same hospital admission

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

  • Primary Purpose: Supportive Care
  • Allocation: Randomized
  • Interventional Model: Sequential Assignment
  • Masking: None (Open Label)

Arms and Interventions

Participant Group / Arm
Intervention / Treatment
Other: Participant Group/Arm

RBC Transfusion Domain:

Patients on ECMO in ICU enrolled in the RBC Transfusion Domain of RECOMMEND. Patients receive one of two RBC transfusion strategies (restrictive or liberal)

Liberal transfusion trigger group (patient receives RBC transfusion if Hb <90g/L).
Restrictive transfusion trigger group (patient receives RBC transfusion if Hb <70g/L).

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Daily Organ Support for patients on ECMO (DOSE-score).
Time Frame: 28-days.

The primary outcome is the Daily Organ Support for patients on ECMO (DOSE-score), a 6-level daily ordinal outcome measured as the worst status of a patient on each day from day 1 through to day 28 inclusive, which reflects survival, organ support and resource utilisation:

  1. dead;
  2. on ECMO;
  3. invasively mechanically ventilated without ECMO;
  4. in ICU but not invasively mechanically ventilated nor on ECMO;
  5. in hospital; and
  6. discharged from the hospital alive.
28-days.

Secondary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Development of major haemorrhage at 28 days
Time Frame: 28-days.
Development of major haemorrhage
28-days.
Development of intracranial haemorrhage at 28 days
Time Frame: 28 days
Development of intracranial haemorrhage
28 days
Mortality at 28 days
Time Frame: 28 days
Living status.
28 days
ECMO-free days at 28 days
Time Frame: 28 days
Number of days not receiving ECMO
28 days
Ventilator-free days at 28 days
Time Frame: 28 days
Number of days not receiving ventilation
28 days

Other Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Mortality at 180 days
Time Frame: 180 days
Platform Trial Tertiary Outcome
180 days
Disability at 180 days
Time Frame: 180 days
Platform Trial Tertiary Outcome - measured by WHODAS 2.0 at 180-days
180 days
Functional Status at 180 days
Time Frame: 180 days
Platform Trial Tertiary Outcome - measured using Lawton-Brody IADL and Barthel ADL
180 days
Quality of Life at 180 days
Time Frame: 180 days
Platform Trial Tertiary Outcome - measured by Eq-5D-5L and EQ-VAS
180 days
ICU Length of Stay
Time Frame: 180 days
Platform Trial Tertiary Outcome
180 days
Hospital Length of Stay
Time Frame: 180 days
Platform Trial Tertiary Outcome - separated for survivors and non-survivors
180 days
Number and Nature of SAEs
Time Frame: 28 days
RBC Transfusion Domain Specific Outcome
28 days
Mortality in ICU
Time Frame: 180 days
RBC Transfusion Domain Specific Outcome
180 days
Total Blood Products
Time Frame: 28 days
RBC Transfusion Domain Specific Outcome - administered until cessation of ECMO or 28 days, whichever occurs first
28 days
Total RBC Units
Time Frame: 28 days
RBC Transfusion Domain Specific Outcome - administered until cessation of ECMO or 28 days, whichever occurs first
28 days

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Investigators

  • Study Chair: Carol Hodgson, PhD FACP FAHMS, Monash University

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start (Actual)

March 23, 2026

Primary Completion (Estimated)

June 1, 2028

Study Completion (Estimated)

June 1, 2029

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

July 25, 2024

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

July 25, 2024

First Posted (Actual)

July 30, 2024

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Actual)

May 13, 2026

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

May 11, 2026

Last Verified

May 1, 2026

More Information

Terms related to this study

Plan for Individual participant data (IPD)

Plan to Share Individual Participant Data (IPD)?

NO

IPD Plan Description

No IPD is created as individual data are not shared. However, aggregated data presented in manuscripts and publications or similar works, will be accessible upon patient request or own investigation.

Drug and device information, study documents

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated drug product

No

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated device product

No

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Clinical Trials on Critical Illness

Clinical Trials on Liberal RBC Transfusion

Subscribe