Long-term Follow-up of Children Born in the PETN Studies (LOOP)

August 1, 2024 updated by: Tanja Groten, Jena University Hospital

Langzeiteffekt Einer Pentaerithrityltetranitrat (PETN)-Behandlung in Der Schwangerschaft - Nachbeobachtung Der Kinder Der PETN-Studien

In every 10th pregnancy, the child in the uterus is insufficiently nourished, a so-called growth retardation. This occurs when the child cannot reach its growth potential due to an undersupply in the uterus. This inadequate supply is considered a developmental cause for the later development of physical diseases like cardiovascular diseases, sugar metabolism disorders and obesity as well as mental developmental problems (for example problems in cognitive skills, deficits in language development, concentration and attention).

From 2002 to 2008, 111 patients with impaired placental blood flow were included in a small study and treated with Pentalong or placebo. From 2017 to 2022, the positive effects of the study treatment were tested on a larger number of patients. A total of 317 pregnant women were included at 14 participating study centers in Germany.

In this follow-up study, the development of the children born in the two studies will be examined. The study consists of two independent parts: firstly, questionnaires are answered by the former participants and secondly, an on-site visit is carried out to check the physical and mental health of the child.

Study Overview

Detailed Description

Pregnancies in which impaired uterine blood flow is detected by Doppler measurements during routine examinations in the second trimester are at high risk of developing fetal growth restriction (FGR). FGR affects 10% of pregnancies and is the leading cause of perinatal mortality and morbidity. In addition, intrauterine growth restriction places a lifelong burden on the physical and mental health of affected children. Epidemiological studies have shown that children with FGR have an increased risk of developing type 2 diabetes mellitus, hypertension, dyslipidemia and a high BMI. In addition, the affected children show disorders in hormonal balance and pubertal development as well as specific impairments of various cognitive and neurocognitive functions. There is also a link between FGR and lower cognitive ability in preschool children, school-age children and young adults, as well as lower communication, language and reading skills in school-age children. Neuronal development (e.g. EEG frequency spectra, resting-state networks) and executive functions are also impaired by FGR.

In the follow-up study, the children will be examined from the age of 6. Here, the effects of PETN on the development of children of women with high-risk pregnancies can be further investigated and a comparative study of growth-retarded and normal-growth children can also be carried out.

Study Type

Observational

Enrollment (Estimated)

228

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Locations

      • Berlin, Germany, 10117
        • Not yet recruiting
        • Berlin Charité Campus Mitte
        • Contact:
          • Stefan Verlohren, PD Dr.
      • Berlin, Germany, 12351
        • Not yet recruiting
        • Berlin Vivantes Klinikum Neukölln
        • Contact:
          • Wolfgang Schlembach, PD Dr.
    • Baden-Württemberg
      • Tübingen, Baden-Württemberg, Germany, 72076
        • Not yet recruiting
        • Universitäts-Frauenklinik Tübingen
        • Contact:
          • Karl O Kagan, Dr.
        • Contact:
          • Harald Abele, Prof. Dr.
      • Ulm, Baden-Württemberg, Germany, 89075
        • Not yet recruiting
        • Universitatsklinikum Ulm
        • Contact:
          • Ulrike Friebe-Hoffmann, PD Dr.
    • Bayern
      • München, Bayern, Germany, 81377
        • Not yet recruiting
        • Klinikum der Universität München
        • Contact:
          • Christoph Hübener, Dr.
      • München, Bayern, Germany, 81545
        • Not yet recruiting
        • Städtisches Klinikum München
        • Contact:
          • Laura de Vries, Dr.
        • Contact:
          • Ninette Scharle
    • Niedersachsen
      • Hannover, Niedersachsen, Germany, 30625
        • Not yet recruiting
        • Medizinische Hochschule Hannover
        • Contact:
          • Constantin von Kaisenberg, Pr. Dr.
        • Contact:
          • Matthias Jentschke, Dr.
    • Nordrhein-Westfalen
      • Bonn, Nordrhein-Westfalen, Germany, 53127
        • Not yet recruiting
        • Universitätsklinikum Bonn
        • Contact:
          • Mateja Condic
        • Contact:
          • Julia Welz
    • Sachsen
      • Dresden, Sachsen, Germany, 01307
        • Not yet recruiting
        • Universitätsklinikum Dresden
        • Contact:
          • Matej Komar, Dr.
        • Contact:
          • Jennifer L Winkler, Dr.
      • Leipzig, Sachsen, Germany, 04103
        • Not yet recruiting
        • Uniklinikum Leipzig
        • Contact:
          • Anne Tauscher, Dr.
        • Contact:
          • Susanne Schrey-Petersen, Dr.
    • Sachsen-Anhalt
      • Halle, Sachsen-Anhalt, Germany, 06110
        • Not yet recruiting
        • Krankenhaus St. Elisabeth und St. Barbara
        • Contact:
          • Sven Seeger, Dr.
        • Contact:
          • Yvonne Jäger, Dr.
    • Schleswig-Holstein
      • Kiel, Schleswig-Holstein, Germany, 24105
        • Not yet recruiting
        • Universitatsklinikum Schleswig Holstein
        • Contact:
          • Ulrich Pecks, PD Dr.
        • Contact:
          • Christel Eckmann, Prof. Dr.
    • Thüringen
      • Jena, Thüringen, Germany, 07747
        • Recruiting
        • Universitatsklinikum Jena
        • Contact:
        • Contact:
          • Ekkehard Schleußner, Prof. Dr.

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Ages Eligible for Study

  • Child
  • Adult

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Sampling Method

Probability Sample

Study Population

all live born children from participants of the PETN-studies

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

  • mothers participation in one of the PETN studies
  • age above 5 years
  • completion of questionnaires for self reported data
  • written consent for physical examination

Exclusion Criteria - only physical examination:

  • physical and mental states preventing physical examination

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

Cohorts and Interventions

Group / Cohort
Intervention / Treatment
Placebo
children of mothers that have been taken placebos during participation of PETN study
The Child Behavior Checklist comprises items assigned to 8 subscales describing various behavioral areas. These subscales can be summed up to scores for internalizing and externalizing problems as well as a total score. Checklist scores are reported on a T-scale. Range of T-scale from scores 20 to 100 (average performance between scores 40 and 60). Higher scores mean higher amount of problems.
Other Names:
  • CBCL/6-18R
The Questionnaire Young Self Report comprises items assigned to 8 subscales describing various behavioral areas. These subscales can be summed up to scores for internalizing and externalizing problems as well as a total score.
Other Names:
  • YSR/11-18R
physical development examination including height (in cm), weight (in g) and tanner states
metabolic development using blood analysis including blood components, metabolic parameters (Glucose, HbA1c, cholestrol)
The RIAS is standardized intelligence test. The RIAS provides an "Total Intelligence Index" (GIX, estimate of the general intelligence/g-factor), Verbal Intelligence Index (VIX) and the Nonverbal Intelligence Index (NIX). Test scores are reported on a T-scale. Range of T-scale from scores 20 to 100 (average performance between scores 40 and 60). Higher scores mean better cognitive performance.
Other Names:
  • RIAS
neurocognitive development
Other Names:
  • EEG

The M-ABC-2 is an standardized test to assess the motoric development. Adding up subscores addressing manual dexterity, aiming and catching, and balance delivers a total score of the motoric performance.

Test scores are reported on a T-scale. Range of T-scale from scores 20 to 100 (average performance between scores 40 and 60). Higher scores mean better performance.

Other Names:
  • M-ABC-2
The CPT measures selective attention, sustained attention as well as impulsive behavior. Checklist scores are reported on a T-scale. Range of T-scale from scores 20 to 100 (average performance between scores 40 and 60). Higher scores mean worse performance.
Other Names:
  • CPT
The FBB-ADHS assesses a total score for ADHD-like behavior and subscores for the symptom trias of ADHD (attention deficit, motoric hyperactivity as well as impulsive behavior, Questionnaire scores are reported on a T-scale. Range of T-scale from scores 20 to 100 (average performance between scores 40 and 60). Higher scores mean higher amount of symptoms.
Other Names:
  • FBB-ADHS
urine examination (proteomics, cytokines, lipidomics)
The FTF 5-15R is a questionnaire to evaluate the child's developmental outcome in different areas of everyday life (cognition, language, and motor impairment as well as social, emotional, and behavioral problems). Individual item scores are added up per area and divided by the number of items. This results in a common scale value. Range of Percentile scores from 0 to 100 (0-90: no developmental problem; 90 and higher: hint for developmental problem). Higher scores mean worse developmental outcome.
Other Names:
  • FTF 5-15R
measurement of pulse wave velocity
Other Names:
  • Arteriograph
PETN
children of mothers that have been taken in PETN during participation of PETN study
The Child Behavior Checklist comprises items assigned to 8 subscales describing various behavioral areas. These subscales can be summed up to scores for internalizing and externalizing problems as well as a total score. Checklist scores are reported on a T-scale. Range of T-scale from scores 20 to 100 (average performance between scores 40 and 60). Higher scores mean higher amount of problems.
Other Names:
  • CBCL/6-18R
The Questionnaire Young Self Report comprises items assigned to 8 subscales describing various behavioral areas. These subscales can be summed up to scores for internalizing and externalizing problems as well as a total score.
Other Names:
  • YSR/11-18R
physical development examination including height (in cm), weight (in g) and tanner states
metabolic development using blood analysis including blood components, metabolic parameters (Glucose, HbA1c, cholestrol)
The RIAS is standardized intelligence test. The RIAS provides an "Total Intelligence Index" (GIX, estimate of the general intelligence/g-factor), Verbal Intelligence Index (VIX) and the Nonverbal Intelligence Index (NIX). Test scores are reported on a T-scale. Range of T-scale from scores 20 to 100 (average performance between scores 40 and 60). Higher scores mean better cognitive performance.
Other Names:
  • RIAS
neurocognitive development
Other Names:
  • EEG

The M-ABC-2 is an standardized test to assess the motoric development. Adding up subscores addressing manual dexterity, aiming and catching, and balance delivers a total score of the motoric performance.

Test scores are reported on a T-scale. Range of T-scale from scores 20 to 100 (average performance between scores 40 and 60). Higher scores mean better performance.

Other Names:
  • M-ABC-2
The CPT measures selective attention, sustained attention as well as impulsive behavior. Checklist scores are reported on a T-scale. Range of T-scale from scores 20 to 100 (average performance between scores 40 and 60). Higher scores mean worse performance.
Other Names:
  • CPT
The FBB-ADHS assesses a total score for ADHD-like behavior and subscores for the symptom trias of ADHD (attention deficit, motoric hyperactivity as well as impulsive behavior, Questionnaire scores are reported on a T-scale. Range of T-scale from scores 20 to 100 (average performance between scores 40 and 60). Higher scores mean higher amount of symptoms.
Other Names:
  • FBB-ADHS
urine examination (proteomics, cytokines, lipidomics)
The FTF 5-15R is a questionnaire to evaluate the child's developmental outcome in different areas of everyday life (cognition, language, and motor impairment as well as social, emotional, and behavioral problems). Individual item scores are added up per area and divided by the number of items. This results in a common scale value. Range of Percentile scores from 0 to 100 (0-90: no developmental problem; 90 and higher: hint for developmental problem). Higher scores mean worse developmental outcome.
Other Names:
  • FTF 5-15R
measurement of pulse wave velocity
Other Names:
  • Arteriograph

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
childrens behaviour
Time Frame: up to 2 years after study inclusion
total score of either CBCL/16-18R or YSR/11-18R
up to 2 years after study inclusion

Secondary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
physical development height
Time Frame: up to 2 years after study inclusion
height of the child in cm
up to 2 years after study inclusion
physical development weight
Time Frame: up to 2 years after study inclusion
weight of the child in kg
up to 2 years after study inclusion
age appropriate development
Time Frame: up to 2 years after study inclusion
age appropriate development documented as "yes or no" question in german routine examination plan ("Kinderuntersuchungsheft") in the last 6 years at caregivers
up to 2 years after study inclusion
cognitive, motoric, and exectuve function
Time Frame: up to 2 years after study inclusion
scores of the eight domains of the FTF 5-15-R
up to 2 years after study inclusion
physical development
Time Frame: age above 10 years
self reported tanner states
age above 10 years
cardiovascular development
Time Frame: age of 6 to 8 years
pulse wave velosity
age of 6 to 8 years
IQ development
Time Frame: age of 6 to 8 years
scores of RIAS test
age of 6 to 8 years
motoric development
Time Frame: age of 6 to 8 years
total score of M-ABC-2
age of 6 to 8 years
attention behaviour
Time Frame: age of 6 to 8 years
scores of the four domains of the cpt
age of 6 to 8 years
symptoms of attention and activity disorders
Time Frame: age of 6 to 8 years
total scores of DISYPS-III
age of 6 to 8 years
neurocognitive development
Time Frame: age of 6 to 8 years
results of EEG power measurement in alpha band
age of 6 to 8 years
neurocognitive development
Time Frame: age of 6 to 8 years
results of EEG power measurement in beta band
age of 6 to 8 years
neurocognitive development
Time Frame: age of 6 to 8 years
results of EEG power measurement in gamma band
age of 6 to 8 years
neurocognitive development
Time Frame: age of 6 to 8 years
results of EEG power measurement in delta band
age of 6 to 8 years
neurocognitive development
Time Frame: age of 6 to 8 years
results of EEG power measurement in theta band
age of 6 to 8 years
epigenetic analysis
Time Frame: age of 6 to 8 years
DNA-methylation
age of 6 to 8 years

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start (Actual)

June 1, 2024

Primary Completion (Estimated)

March 31, 2027

Study Completion (Estimated)

March 31, 2028

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

May 14, 2024

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

August 1, 2024

First Posted (Actual)

August 2, 2024

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Actual)

August 2, 2024

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

August 1, 2024

Last Verified

August 1, 2024

More Information

Terms related to this study

Plan for Individual participant data (IPD)

Plan to Share Individual Participant Data (IPD)?

NO

Drug and device information, study documents

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated drug product

No

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated device product

No

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Clinical Trials on Intrauterine Growth Restriction

Clinical Trials on Questionnaire Child Behaviour Checklist

Subscribe