Substance Use Treatment and Its Role in Supporting Social Cognition (SUE)

November 24, 2024 updated by: Madison Roopchand, Nova Southeastern University
This study aims to assess changes in empathy levels before and after residential treatment among individuals with substance use disorders.

Study Overview

Status

Recruiting

Conditions

Intervention / Treatment

Detailed Description

Despite the lack of a consensus on the conceptualization of empathy among researchers and practitioners, psychologists generally agree that empathy and valuable interpersonal relations are contingent upon the willingness to understand another's perspective as well as share feelings and experiences. Adults with a variety of substance use disorders (SUDs) experience impairments in various facets of empathetic processing compared to healthy controls. Impairments in empathy could lead to a weak therapeutic alliance, lower adherence to treatment, and higher relapse rate. Furthermore, the therapeutic relationship has been described as one of the strongest predictors of treatment drop-out for patients with SUDs. In addition, an impaired ability to relate to and understand the affective and mental state of others may contribute to key typologies of patients with SUDs including, impulsivity, aggression, and antisocial behavior. Review of literature emphasizes a need for research into an understudied, yet modifiable factor of empathy in the trajectory of SUDs. Particularly, identifying specific psychotherapeutic techniques capable of improving the expression of empathy in these patients. Given the importance of empathetic ability in optimal social functioning, understanding whether empathetic impairments improve with treatment is important to achieve the best treatment outcomes for individuals struggling with SUDs.This study will help improve the knowledge and understanding of how substance use treatment affects empathy, as measured by gains in empathetic ability in treatment seeking individuals. To date, there are no reported studies that examined the impact of residential SU treatment on empathy. The study will be an observational quasi-experimental design that utilizes a pre-test and post-test to examine change in empathy for recently detoxed substance use patients and a follow-up assessment to monitor long term outcomes. The results of this study will further our understanding of treatment's potential role in cultivating a fundamental interpersonal skill, empathy.

Study Type

Observational

Enrollment (Estimated)

108

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Contact

Study Contact Backup

Study Locations

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Ages Eligible for Study

  • Adult
  • Older Adult

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Sampling Method

Non-Probability Sample

Study Population

Individual receiving treatment at a local addiction treatment center.

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

  • Meet criteria for a substance Use Disorder, receiving treatment at Recovery Unplugged Addiction Treatment Center, at least 18 years of age.

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Neurological disorder, severe cognitive impairment, comorbid thought disorder such as schizophrenia, failure to complete detox period,

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

Cohorts and Interventions

Group / Cohort
Intervention / Treatment
RUP
Individuals receiving TAU from RUP
Individuals will receive residential level of care followed by treatment at their partial hospitalization program.

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
empathy
Time Frame: pre to post treatment and 2 month post treatment follow-up (4 months total)
The Empathy Quotient-Short (EQ-Short) is a self-report questionnaire designed to assess individual differences in empathy. It is used to measure levels of empathy, including affective, cognitive, and total empathy. The unit of measure for the outcome is the total empathy score derived from responses to 22 items, with each item rated on a 4-point Likert scale ranging from 1 ("I strongly disagree") to 4 ("I strongly agree"). For example, one of the items asks, "I can pick up quickly if someone says one thing but means another." This scale is designed to assess various facets of empathy, including the ability to recognize emotions in others (cognitive empathy) and the ability to share or respond to those emotions (affective empathy). Previous multivariate analyses suggest that the Empathy Quotient-Short is a reliable and adequate tool for assessing individual differences in empathizing.
pre to post treatment and 2 month post treatment follow-up (4 months total)

Secondary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
differences in empathy gains by sex
Time Frame: pre and post treatment, 2 month post treatment follow-up (4 months total)
A secondary outcome of this study is to assess differences in empathy gains between men and women. Specifically, the study will examine how levels of empathy change over time as a function of sex. Empathy will be measured using the Empathy Quotient-Short (EQ-Short), which evaluates affective, cognitive, and total empathy. The unit of measure for this outcome is the change in total empathy scores before and after the intervention, with the empathy score calculated based on participants' responses to 22 items on a 4-point Likert scale. The analysis will focus on comparing the magnitude of empathy changes between male and female participants to identify potential differences in the extent to which empathy increases for each sex. This will provide insight into whether the intervention leads to varying levels of empathy development based on sex.
pre and post treatment, 2 month post treatment follow-up (4 months total)

Other Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Substance Use
Time Frame: Baseline and 2 months post treatment follow-up
The Brief Addiction Monitor (BAM) (Cacciola et al., 2013) is a 17-item self-report questionnaire used to assess substance use behaviors. The tool includes three subscales: (1) Current Use, (2) Current Risk, and (3) Protective Factors. The unit of measure for this outcome is the frequency and intensity of substance use behaviors, as assessed by responses to individual items within the subscales. Of the 17 items, 16 are single-response, and one is a multi-response item regarding drug use frequency. Specifically, ten items are rated on a 5-point Likert scale (0 to 10), denoting the number of days participants engaged in substance-related behaviors. Five items are rated on a 5-point ordinal scale ranging from (1) "Not at All" to (5) "Extremely," one item uses a binary scale (Yes/No), and one item is rated from "poor" to "excellent." At Time 2 and Time 3 assessments during treatment, the substance use-related items will be omitted.
Baseline and 2 months post treatment follow-up
Social Support
Time Frame: Baseline and post treatment as well as 2 month post treatment follow-up
The Multidimensional Scale of Perceived Social Support (MSPSS) is a 12-item self-report questionnaire used to assess an individual's perception of social support from three key sources: family, friends, and a significant other. The unit of measure for this outcome is the perceived level of social support, with responses rated on a 7-point Likert scale ranging from (1) "I very strongly disagree" to (7) "I very strongly agree." For example, one item asks, "There is a special person who is around when I am in need." The Multidimensional Scale of Perceived Social Support has demonstrated strong internal consistency, test-retest reliability, validity, and a stable factorial structure across multiple studies, making it a reliable tool for measuring perceived social support.
Baseline and post treatment as well as 2 month post treatment follow-up
Therapeutic Alliance
Time Frame: Baseline, pre-discharge from residential and at PHP treatment pre-discharge
The Working Alliance Inventory-Short Form (WAI-SF) is a 12-item self-report questionnaire used to assess the working alliance in therapy. The measure will be completed by both participants and therapists to evaluate their perceptions of the working relationship. The unit of measure for this outcome is the perceived strength of the working alliance, with responses rated on a 5-point Likert scale ranging from (1) "never" to (5) "always." For example, one item asks, "My therapist and I are working towards mutually agreed upon goals." The Working Alliance Inventory-Short Form consists of three subscales: (1) Goals (agreement on therapy goals), (2) Tasks (agreement on therapy tasks), and (3) Bond (the emotional connection between therapist and client). The WAI has demonstrated strong psychometric properties, including high internal consistency and good construct validity, making it a reliable tool for measuring the quality of the therapeutic alliance.
Baseline, pre-discharge from residential and at PHP treatment pre-discharge
Report of therapist Emapthy
Time Frame: Baseline, pre-discharge from residential , pre-discharge from PHP
The Barrett-Lennard Relationship Inventory-Empathy (BLRI-Empathy) is a self-report measure of empathy that is widely used in therapeutic settings. The unit of measure for this outcome is the perceived level of empathy, with participants rating their perception of the therapist's empathy and therapists rating their perception of the patient's empathy. The empathy subscale consists of 16 items (e.g., "My therapist understands me"), which are rated on a 6-point Likert scale ranging from (-3) "I strongly feel that it is not true" to (3) "I strongly feel that it is true." The Barrett-Lennard Relationship Inventory-Empathy has demonstrated strong internal consistency, test-retest reliability, and both convergent and divergent validity, as well as predictive validity in past research, supporting its use as a reliable tool for assessing empathy in therapeutic relationships.
Baseline, pre-discharge from residential , pre-discharge from PHP
Reflective Functioning
Time Frame: Baseline, Pre-discharge residential, pre-discharge PHP, two month follow-up
The Reflective Functioning Questionnaire (RFQ) is a self-report questionnaire designed to assess an individual's capacity for mentalization-the ability to understand and interpret one's own and others' behaviors based on underlying mental states. The unit of measure for this outcome is the level of reflective functioning, with higher scores indicating greater mentalization capacity. The questionnaire consists of 8 items (e.g., "Sometimes I do things without really knowing why"), which are rated on a 7-point Likert scale from (1) "I strongly agree" to (7) "I strongly disagree." Higher total scores reflect higher reflective functioning. The Reflective Functioning Questionnaire has demonstrated good reliability and test-retest consistency, making it a valid and reliable tool for measuring reflective functioning.
Baseline, Pre-discharge residential, pre-discharge PHP, two month follow-up
Therapeutic Orientation Processes
Time Frame: Baseline, pre-discharge from residential, pre-discharge from PHP
The Therapy Process Observational Coding System (TPOCS) is a coding system designed to assess the therapeutic process in psychodynamic and cognitive behavioral therapies. The unit of measure for this outcome is the relative difference in therapeutic processes between psychodynamic and cognitive behavioral therapies, with higher scores indicating a greater emphasis on psychodynamic interventions. The measure consists of 22 items that capture therapist interventions and processes unique to each therapy type. For example, an item might read, "My therapist emphasizes my feelings to help me experience them more deeply." Responses are rated on a 7-point Likert scale ranging from (1) "not at all" to (7) "very much so." The TPOCS will be analyzed using the relative psychodynamic therapies difference score (psychodynamic therapies minus cognitive behavioral therapies), which accounts for various sources of measurement error.
Baseline, pre-discharge from residential, pre-discharge from PHP
Confidence to Participate
Time Frame: Baseline, pre-discharge from residential and at PHP treatment pre-discharge
To assess a participant's confidence and likelihood of participating in the upcoming assessment, we use a single-item measure: "On a scale from 1 to 10, how confident are you in your ability to participate in the upcoming assessment, with 1 being 'Not confident at all' and 10 being 'Extremely confident'?" This question will help to gauge the participant's self-reported readiness and assurance about engaging in the assessment process, providing a straightforward indicator of their anticipated involvement and commitment.
Baseline, pre-discharge from residential and at PHP treatment pre-discharge
Participation in Additional Services
Time Frame: Two month follow-up post treatment
To assess a participant's participation in professional treatment or self-help involvement two items will be used: "Since the conclusion of your treatment at the partial hospitalization program, how frequently have you engaged in any self-help activities?" and "Since the conclusion of your treatment at the partial hospitalization program at recovery unplugged, how frequently have you engaged in any other professional treatment?" The items are measured on a 5-point Likert scale denoting the number of days engaged in additional services over the past 60 days. This assessment will help gauge the participant's self-reported engagement in additional services, providing a straightforward indicator of their involvement post-intervention.
Two month follow-up post treatment

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start (Actual)

October 22, 2024

Primary Completion (Estimated)

October 22, 2025

Study Completion (Estimated)

January 1, 2026

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

July 30, 2024

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

July 30, 2024

First Posted (Actual)

August 2, 2024

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Estimated)

November 27, 2024

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

November 24, 2024

Last Verified

November 1, 2024

More Information

Terms related to this study

Other Study ID Numbers

  • 2024-286

Plan for Individual participant data (IPD)

Plan to Share Individual Participant Data (IPD)?

UNDECIDED

Drug and device information, study documents

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated drug product

No

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated device product

No

product manufactured in and exported from the U.S.

No

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Clinical Trials on Substance Use

Clinical Trials on Treatment as Usual

Subscribe