Efficacy of Remifentanil in Preventing Emergence Agitation (agitation)

Efficacy of Remifentanil in Preventing Emergence Agitation in Patients Undergoing Nasal Surgery Under Desflurane Anesthesia: A Prospective Double-blind Randomized Controlled Trial.

The primary aim of the study was to test the hypothesis that remifentanil administered for analgesia prevents emergence agitation more effectively than fentanyl and N2O in patients undergoing rhinoplasty who received desflurane as an inhaled anesthetic agent. The secondary aim of the study was to compare the demographic data, intraoperative and postoperative hemodynamic data, surgical time and modified Aldrete score of patients who received different intraoperative analgesia methods.

Study Overview

Status

Recruiting

Conditions

Study Type

Interventional

Enrollment (Estimated)

99

Phase

  • Not Applicable

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Contact

Study Contact Backup

Study Locations

    • Kayapınar
      • Diyarbakır, Kayapınar, Turkey, 21070
        • Recruiting
        • Health Sciences University Gazi Yaşargil Training and Research Hospital
        • Contact:

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Ages Eligible for Study

  • Adult
  • Older Adult

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

Yes

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

The study included patients over the age of 18, planned to undergo rhinoplasty by the plastic and reconstructive surgery department, and American Society of Anesthesiologist (ASA) I-II.

-

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Patients with a known history of allergy to the drugs to be administered in the study, ASA III and above, body mass index (BMI) 35>kg/m2, younger than 18 years of age, any problems that would prevent general anesthesia in the preoperative evaluation (upper respiratory tract infection, etc.), and those who did not agree to participate in the study were excluded from the study.

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

  • Primary Purpose: Treatment
  • Allocation: Randomized
  • Interventional Model: Parallel Assignment
  • Masking: Triple

Arms and Interventions

Participant Group / Arm
Intervention / Treatment
Active Comparator: group 1 Remifentanily
Patients in Group 1 received 0.05-0.2 μg/kg/min IV remifentanil infusion as analgesic.
remifentanil infusion
Other Names:
  • Use of remifentanil infusion for analgesia
Active Comparator: group 2 N2O
N2O instead of 50% air was applied to patients in Group 2 for intraoperative analgesia.
Use of N2O for analgesia
Other Names:
  • Use of N2O for analgesia
Active Comparator: group 3 Fentanly
In addition to Desflurane, 50% oxygen and 50% air, 1 μg/kg IV fentanyl bolus was administered as analgesic when there was a 20% increase in heart rate and blood pressure values during the operation for patients in Group 3.
Use of Fentanylfor analgesia
Other Names:
  • Use of Fentanyl for analgesia

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Richmond Agitation-Sedation Scale (RASS)
Time Frame: Postoperative care unit 1.second_5. second_15.second
  • 4 Combative, violent, danger to staff
  • 3 Pulls or removes tube(s) or catheters; aggressive
  • 2 Frequent non-purposeful movement, fights ventilator
  • 1 Anxious, apprehensive, but not aggressive 0 Alert and calm

    • 1 Awakens to voice (eye opening/contact) > 10 seconds
    • 2 Light sedation; briefly awakens to voice (eye opening/contant) < 10 seconds
    • 3 Moderate sedation; movement or eye opening. No eye contact
    • 4 Deep sedation; no response to voice, but movement or eye opening to physical stimulation
    • 5 Unarousable; no response to voice or physical stimulation
Postoperative care unit 1.second_5. second_15.second

Secondary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
mean arterial pressure
Time Frame: Before induction ,After intubation 1 min,After intubation 5 min, After intubation 15 min After intubation 30 min
mmHg
Before induction ,After intubation 1 min,After intubation 5 min, After intubation 15 min After intubation 30 min
Heart rate
Time Frame: Before induction ,After intubation 1 min,After intubation 5 min, After intubation 15 min After intubation 30 min
beats/min
Before induction ,After intubation 1 min,After intubation 5 min, After intubation 15 min After intubation 30 min

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start (Actual)

August 1, 2024

Primary Completion (Estimated)

September 30, 2024

Study Completion (Estimated)

October 1, 2024

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

August 1, 2024

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

August 1, 2024

First Posted (Actual)

August 6, 2024

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Actual)

August 6, 2024

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

August 1, 2024

Last Verified

August 1, 2024

More Information

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Clinical Trials on Emergence Agitation

Clinical Trials on Remifentanil

Subscribe