Transportation for Cancer Care Navigation Tool for Reducing Travel Barriers Among Patients With Solid Tumors Receiving Radiation Therapy (TRACT)

May 26, 2026 updated by: Jinbing Bai, Emory University

Testing the Feasibility of a Transportation for Cancer Care Navigation Tool (TRACT) in Solid Tumors Patients Receiving Radiotherapy

This clinical trial evaluates whether the Transportation for Cancer Care Navigation Tool (TRACT) can reduce travel barriers among patients with solid tumors receiving radiation therapy. It is estimated that 20-30% patients with cancer experience travel-related barriers for cancer care. This is a particular problem for patients with radiation therapy as these patients frequently receive multiple treatment cycles, which often require daily treatment for multiple weeks or months. Addressing travel barriers has been a prerequisite for cancer care as travel barriers negatively influence cancer treatment adherence and cancer care outcomes, such as survival and quality of life. The TRACT program may help reduce travel barriers and therefore promote health equity among patients with solid tumors receiving radiation therapy.

Study Overview

Detailed Description

PRIMARY OBJECTIVES:

I. To work collaboratively with a Community Advisory Board (CAB, e.g., patients, caregivers, clinicians, and social workers) to refine a theory-driven TRACT program for solid tumor patients receiving radiation therapy (RT) with travel barriers.

II. To evaluate the feasibility of the TRACT program for patients with solid tumors receiving RT with travel barriers.

III. To explore the efficacy of the TRACT program on RT adherence (canceling, delaying, missing, or terminating essential care) and patient-reported outcomes (PROs) (distress, financial toxicity, and quality of life [QOL]) compared to enhanced usual care (EUC, usual care + transportation awareness brief video with Patient Advocate Foundation [PAF] pamphlet).

OUTLINE:

STAGE I (CAB): Participants meet with the study research team to develop and refine the TRACT program.

STAGE II: Patients are randomized to 2 groups.

GROUP I: Patients receive the TRACT program consisting: of 1) Screening of travel barriers; 2) Awareness of transportation obstacles and resources using videos, 3) Assistance with transportation resource application and utilization, and 4) Alignment of community resources to navigate individualized transportation support by the trained travel navigator for 3 months.

GROUP II: Patients receive usual care with PAF pamphlet for 3 months.

After completion of study intervention, patients are followed up at 3 months.

Study Type

Interventional

Enrollment (Estimated)

76

Phase

  • Not Applicable

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Locations

    • Georgia
      • Atlanta, Georgia, United States, 30322
        • Recruiting
        • Emory University Hospital/Winship Cancer Institute
        • Contact:
        • Principal Investigator:
          • Jinbing Bai
        • Contact:
      • Atlanta, Georgia, United States, 30308
      • Atlanta, Georgia, United States, 30342
      • Atlanta, Georgia, United States, 30308

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Ages Eligible for Study

  • Adult
  • Older Adult

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

  • Age ≥ 18 years
  • Diagnosed with solid tumors
  • Undergoing RT (not excluded with chemotherapy)
  • Competent to give consent
  • English-speaking
  • With travel barriers as screened by the reliable and validated 10-item Transportation Barriers Measure. In this study, item 2 ("how much trouble is it for you to get transportation to your doctor or treatment?") from the general barriers domain will be used to screen patients for travel barriers

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Receive palliative care
  • Are non-English-speaking (excluded due to pilot data without fund to support translation services)
  • Are enrolled in lodging programs (e.g., the American Cancer Society [ACS] Hope Lodge®)
  • Have major depression/anxiety disorders that interfere with their ability to participate (based on the electronic medical records report)

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

  • Primary Purpose: Supportive Care
  • Allocation: Randomized
  • Interventional Model: Parallel Assignment
  • Masking: None (Open Label)

Arms and Interventions

Participant Group / Arm
Intervention / Treatment
Experimental: Stage I (CAB)
Participants meet with the study research team to develop and refine the TRACT program.
Participate in a CAB
Other Names:
  • Discuss
Experimental: Stage II Group I (TRACT program)
Patients receive the TRACT program consisting: of 1) Screening of travel barriers; 2) Awareness of transportation obstacles and resources using videos, 3) Assistance with transportation resource application and utilization, and 4) Alignment of community resources to navigate individualized transportation support by the trained travel navigator for 3 months.
Ancillary studies
Receive the TRACT program
Active Comparator: Stage II Group II (usual care, video, pamphlet)
Patients receive usual care with PAF pamphlet for 3 months.
Ancillary studies
Receive usual care
Other Names:
  • standard of care
  • standard therapy
Receive PAF pamphlet
Other Names:
  • Education for Intervention
  • Intervention by Education
  • Intervention through Education
  • Intervention, Educational
Receive transportation awareness brief video

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Feasibility of screening patients for the Transportation for Cancer Care Navigation Tool (TRACT) program
Time Frame: At T0 (pre-intervention) and T1 (3 months post-intervention)
Will be assessed by response rates, time burden (minutes to complete the measure), and percent of positive screenings. Will use descriptive statistics. Differences between the two groups will be assessed by an independent two-sample t-test or Chi-squared test if applicable. A 95% level of statistical confidence will be assumed.
At T0 (pre-intervention) and T1 (3 months post-intervention)
Recruitment to the TRACT program (Feasibility)
Time Frame: At T0 (pre-intervention) and T1 (3 months post-intervention)
Will be assessed by the number of patients screened and randomized. Will use descriptive statistics. Differences between the two groups will be assessed by an independent two-sample t-test or Chi-squared test if applicable. A 95% level of statistical confidence will be assumed.
At T0 (pre-intervention) and T1 (3 months post-intervention)
Retention and adherence rate (Feasibility)
Time Frame: At T0 (pre-intervention) and T1 (3 months post-intervention)
Will be assessed by the total number of meetings and time spent with the travel navigator for travel resources, percentage of patients using travel resources, percentage of patients with completed measures. Differences between the two groups will be assessed by an independent two-sample t-test or Chi-squared test if applicable. A 95% level of statistical confidence will be assumed.
At T0 (pre-intervention) and T1 (3 months post-intervention)
Acceptability of the Transportation for Cancer Care Navigation Tool
Time Frame: At T0 (pre-intervention) and T1 (3 months post-intervention)
Will be assessed by the 4-item Acceptability of Intervention Measure with Cronbach alpha=0.85-0.91. Differences between the two groups will be assessed by an independent two-sample t-test or Chi-squared test if applicable. A 95% level of statistical confidence will be assumed.
At T0 (pre-intervention) and T1 (3 months post-intervention)
Distress
Time Frame: At T0 (3 months) and T1 (3 months post-intervention)
Will be measured by the National Comprehensive Cancer Network (NCCN) Distress Thermometer. The one-item 11-point Likert scale represented on a visual graphic of a thermometer ranging from 0 (no distress) to 10 (extreme distress) will be used to assess patients' distress. Will be assessed using mixed-effect analysis of variance to model the correlations.
At T0 (3 months) and T1 (3 months post-intervention)
Financial toxicity
Time Frame: At T0 (3 months) and T1 (3 months post-intervention)
Will be measured by the Comprehensive Score for Financial Toxicity (COST). The COST is a 5-point Likert scale evaluating financial toxicity in the past week. Will be assessed using mixed-effect analysis of variance to model the correlations.
At T0 (3 months) and T1 (3 months post-intervention)
Quality of life (QOL)
Time Frame: At T0 (3 months) and T1 (3 months post-intervention)
Will be measured by the European QoL 5-Dimension questionnaire (EQ-5D), a widely used instrument to measure patients' QOL. The EQ-5D is a 2-part questionnaire. Will be calculated based on the technique of composite time trade-off preferences and scores of the 5 domains, indicating that -0.573 = worst health and 1 = best health. Will be assessed using mixed-effect analysis of variance to model the correlations.
At T0 (3 months) and T1 (3 months post-intervention)
Travel barriers
Time Frame: At T0 (3 months) and T1 (3 months post-intervention)
Will be reported as transportation mode (e.g., public transportation, drive-myself, drive-someone else drives me), owning a car (yes/no), parking cost, and travel cost for each appointment. Travel distance and time to cancer treatment facilities will be estimated by ArcGIS 10.3. Categorical and continuous variables will be used to present this outcome variable.
At T0 (3 months) and T1 (3 months post-intervention)
Treatment adherence
Time Frame: At T1 (3 months post-intervention)
Will be assessed by canceling, missing, delaying, or terminating essential care. Nonadherence rates will be calculated as the number of no-shows, same-day cancellations, delays, and early stoppage of treatment divided by the total number of treatment days based on data within the electronic health records (EMRs). A percentage of completion rate of treatment will be calculated to present the treatment adherence.
At T1 (3 months post-intervention)

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Investigators

  • Principal Investigator: Jinbing Bai, Emory University Hospital/Winship Cancer Institute

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start (Actual)

November 6, 2024

Primary Completion (Estimated)

May 15, 2028

Study Completion (Estimated)

May 15, 2028

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

August 2, 2024

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

August 2, 2024

First Posted (Actual)

August 7, 2024

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Actual)

May 28, 2026

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

May 26, 2026

Last Verified

May 1, 2026

More Information

Terms related to this study

Drug and device information, study documents

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated drug product

No

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated device product

No

product manufactured in and exported from the U.S.

No

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Clinical Trials on Malignant Solid Neoplasm

Clinical Trials on Questionnaire Administration

Subscribe