Medically Used Tailored Traditional Food to Optimize Nutrition in Heart Failure (MUTTON-HF)

December 19, 2025 updated by: University of Pennsylvania

MUTTON-HF (Medically Used Tailored Traditional Food to Optimize Nutrition) in Heart Failure)

Study subjects with heart failure will receive either pre-prepared, home-delivered DASH/SRD-compliant meals incorporating local Navajo traditional foods or usual care for 60 days (14 meals weekly).

Study Overview

Detailed Description

The American Indian and Alaska Native population has experienced significant cardiovascular health disparities compared with other racial and ethnic groups in the U.S. [1] Heart failure, in particular, causes significant morbidity and mortality in Navajo Nation. For many Navajo patients, similar to other American Indian populations, food insecurity is a major driver of health disparities. [2][3] In fact, qualitative data from our heart failure patient advisory committee have found that 89% of patients with heart failure believe nutrition insecurity is a major barrier to optimal health. Dietary factors are believed to be an important cause of hospitalizations in patients with heart failure and cardiovascular outcomes. There is increasing evidence that direct dietary support, such as produce prescription or provision of medically tailored meals may improve cardiovascular outcomes and disease-specific quality of life.[4][5] Furthermore, there has been an increased focus in Indigenous communities to reclaim traditional indigenous foods to improve health. However, more evidence of the benefit of traditional Indigenous foods for cardiovascular health is needed.

The investigators, therefore, in discussion with community members and tribal partners at two Indian Health Service (IHS) sites in Navajo Nation, will implement and evaluate the effectiveness of a medically and Native-sourced culturally tailored meal delivery program to improve outcomes in heart failure in rural Navajo Nation. This study will include two phases, with a phase I pilot feasibility study, followed by phase II-a comparativeness effectiveness randomized control trial to compare the implementation of our medically and culturally tailored meal delivery program compared to usual care. Phase I outcomes will include implementation outcomes such as feasibility and acceptability to inform phase II. The primary outcome for the trial in Phase II will be the proportion of patients who have a hospitalization or ER visit for any cause within 90 days post implementation. Secondary outcomes will include: heart failure hospitalizations specifically, ER visits for volume overload specifically (ER visits for lower extremity edema, dyspnea, with clinical evaluation consistent with volume overload) within 90 days, Kansas City Cardiomyopathy Questionnaire clinical summary score at baseline and at 60 days; prescription adherence rates (% of filled prescriptions out of prescriptions made) for all medication as well as GDMT specifically at 60 days, weight at baseline (and BMI) at 60 days, and the following lab parameters and biomarkers at baseline and at 60 days: albumin, prealbumin, creatinine, NT-proBNP, HbA1c, Total cholesterol, LDL-C, HDL-C, Triglycerides, CRP, and measures of food insecurity. The investigators will also collect measures of Indigenous cultural connectiveness using the validated Cultural Connectedness Scale-California (CCS-CA) at baseline and at 60 days, as well as qualitative analyses of local food suppliers to evaluate how this program strengthens local food systems. The investigators will also evaluate food diaries and perform a survey at 90 days to evaluate for any sustainable change in diet and behavior post intervention. Semi-structured interviews will be performed of stakeholders including a subset of patients, primary care providers and food suppliers to assess implementation outcomes.

Study Type

Interventional

Enrollment (Actual)

206

Phase

  • Not Applicable

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Locations

    • New Mexico
      • Gallup, New Mexico, United States, 87301
        • Gallup Indian Medical Center
      • Tohatchi, New Mexico, United States, 87325
        • Tohatchi Health Clinic

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Ages Eligible for Study

  • Adult
  • Older Adult

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

  • Age >=18 years
  • ICD I50* diagnosis
  • Clinical encounter in last 12 months
  • Primary care physician at the two IHS sites
  • Hospitalization (any-cause) or ER visit within last 12 months

Exclusion Criteria

  • Hospice care
  • Living in acute rehabilitation or skilled nursing facility
  • Living outside the Gallup Service Unit (outside 50-mile catchment area)

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

  • Primary Purpose: Treatment
  • Allocation: Randomized
  • Interventional Model: Parallel Assignment
  • Masking: Single

Arms and Interventions

Participant Group / Arm
Intervention / Treatment
Active Comparator: Meal delivery program
Patients will receive 2 meals daily (14 meals weekly) of medically-tailored meals incorporating traditional Navajo foods, followed by a cooking class at the end of the meal program (meals provided for 60 days).
Patients will receive medically-tailored meals incorporating local traditional Navajo foods
Placebo Comparator: Usual Care
Patients will receive usual care
Usual care plus healthy recipes provided

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Hospitalization or Emergency Department Visit
Time Frame: 90 days
Hospitalization or Visit to Emergency Department (All-cause)
90 days

Secondary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Biomarker Data
Time Frame: 60 days
albumin, prealbumin, creatinine, NT-proBNP, HbA1c, Total cholesterol, LDL-C, HDL-C, Triglycerides, CRP
60 days
ER visits
Time Frame: 90 days
All cause
90 days
Hospitalizations
Time Frame: 90 days
All cause
90 days
Kansas City Cardiomyopathy Questionnaire (KCCQ-12)
Time Frame: 60 days
This is a validated score for evaluating quality of life and symptom measures in heart failure patients. Score ranges from 0-100, with 0 meaning very poor quality of life/symptoms and health status, 100 meaning excellent quality of life/symptom burden/health status.
60 days
ER visit for Heart Failure
Time Frame: 90 days
ER visit for volume overload or HF symptoms
90 days
Heart Failure hospitalization
Time Frame: 90 days
90 days
Kansas City Cardiomyopathy Questionnaire (KCCQ-12) Quality of Life Subset
Time Frame: 60 days
Subset of this is a validated score for evaluating quality of life measures in heart failure patients. Score ranges from 0-100, with 0 meaning very poor quality of life/symptoms and health status, 100 meaning excellent quality of life/symptom burden/health status.
60 days
KCCQ12-PL Physical Limitation Score
Time Frame: 60 Days
Subsection of KCCQ-12 Score
60 Days
KCCQ12-SF Symptom Frequency Score
Time Frame: 60 Days
Subsection of KCCQ12 Score
60 Days
KCCQ-SL Social Limitation Score
Time Frame: 60 Days
Subsection of KCCQ-12 Score
60 Days
Cultural Connectedness Scale-California
Time Frame: 60 days
The investigators will measure cultural connectedness utilizing a 6-question modified version of the validated Cultural Connectedness Scale-California (CCS-CA) at baseline and at 60 days. This is a validated score, developed by Indigenous scholars to measure cultural connectiveness in Indigenous populations, and has been shown to correlate with physical health and be a social determinant of health. This scale has previously been modified for use in Diné populations specifically by the investigators. The investigators will evaluate total score, as well as subcomponents of identity, traditions, and spirituality.
60 days
Food Security
Time Frame: 60 days
The investigators will evaluate baseline and 60-day rates of food insecurity utilizing the USDA Adult Food Security: Six Item short Form survey (USDA FSSM 6-Item).[12] At the 60-day evaluation, the investigators will adapt the USDA FSSM 6-Item questionnaire to evaluate food insecurity within the last 2 (rather than 12 months).
60 days
Weight
Time Frame: 60 days
Weight (kilograms). Weight and height will be combined to report BMI in kg/m^2
60 days
Diet Quality
Time Frame: 60 Days, 90 days
The investigators will assess diet quality using the 10-item DSQ [11] with an addition question to assess traditional Diné food intake (During the past month, how often did the participant eat traditional Diné foods (such as blue corn mush, steamed, roasted or dried corn, sumac berries, mutton, local varieties of squash or beans) at baseline and at the end of the intervention.
60 Days, 90 days
Financial Stress
Time Frame: 60 Days

The investigators will measure Financial Stress Scale at baseline and at 60 days using two questions:[16] How worried was the participant over the last 2 months about paying for housing (rent, mortgage, etc.)? How worried was the participant over the last 2 months about paying monthly bills?

§ All questions will be answered on a 4-point scale, where 1 = "not worried at all", 2 = "not too worried", 3 = "moderately worried", and 4 = "very worried"

60 Days
Intervention characteristics: Partnership
Time Frame: 60 Days

The investigators will evaluate the following:

  • % of meals that include locally sourced ingredients
  • % of food supply sourced by Diné producers/suppliers/farmers
  • % of meals sourced by Native suppliers/farmers
60 Days
Implementation Outcomes: Feasibility
Time Frame: 60 Days
The investigators will evaluate the percentage of meals delivered successfully to the patient (or percentage of meals that were successfully picked up by the patient if picked up from the food pantry or other location).
60 Days
Implementation Outcomes: Fidelity
Time Frame: 60 Days
The investigators will assess baseline dietary patterns through 3-day food diaries during week 1 and week 8 after enrollment. The investigators will also survey participants on the % of meals consumed at 60 days. Additionally at 90 days, the investigators will perform a survey to evaluate dietary patterns post intervention and adoption of any of the recipes/behavioral changes.
60 Days
Implementation Outcomes: Acceptability
Time Frame: 60 Days
The investigators will evaluate patient satisfaction by evaluating the Net Promoter Score (i.e. how likely is it that the patient would recommend this program to a community member?") post-intervention.
60 Days
Physical Activity
Time Frame: 60 Days
The investigators will evaluate how much physical activity/exercise patients are participating in weekly at baseline, and at 60 days by asking patients to estimate the number of minutes weekly that they are participating in formal exercise or physical activity.
60 Days
General Health Status
Time Frame: 60 Days
The investigators will evaluate patients' general health status using a single general health status question (would the patient that in general their health is excellent, very good, good, fair, or poor) at baseline and post-intervention
60 Days
Indigenous Nourishment Scale
Time Frame: Baseline, 60 days
The investigators will evaluate the Indigenous Nourishment Scale (Measure A), which is a scale developed through community-based methods in Indigenous communities to encompass multiple dimensions of nourishment. The investigators will assign score of 0-6 for each response (0 for never-6 for always), for a total score 0-54 (with 0 meaning low levels of nourishment and 54 high levels of nourishment.
Baseline, 60 days
Height
Time Frame: 60 days
Height (cm). Weight and height will be combined to report BMI in kg/m^2.
60 days
urine albumin:creatinine
Time Frame: 60 days
Urine albumin:creatinine ratio
60 days
Qualitative Implementation Outcomes: Fidelity, acceptability, feasibility, adoption
Time Frame: 60 Days
The investigators will perform semi-structured interviews of non-patient stakeholders (i.e. farmers that supplied produce, livestock farmers, food pantry) to assess acceptability and feasibility of providing produce for the meals, as well as the degree to which the program contributed to strengthening the local food system. The investigators will also perform semi-structured interviews of primary care providers and a subset of patients. Semi-structured interviews will be guided by the Consolidated Framework for Implementation Research (CFIR), and the investigators will explore multiple constructs within each CFIR domain that are hypothesized by the study team and based on existing literature to be relevant to acceptability and feasibility of the program.
60 Days

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Investigators

  • Principal Investigator: Lauren Eberly, MD, MPH, Indian Health Service (IHS)

Publications and helpful links

The person responsible for entering information about the study voluntarily provides these publications. These may be about anything related to the study.

Helpful Links

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start (Actual)

May 12, 2025

Primary Completion (Actual)

November 11, 2025

Study Completion (Actual)

December 1, 2025

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

August 8, 2024

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

August 8, 2024

First Posted (Actual)

August 12, 2024

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Actual)

December 29, 2025

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

December 19, 2025

Last Verified

December 1, 2025

More Information

Terms related to this study

Additional Relevant MeSH Terms

Other Study ID Numbers

  • 08072024

Plan for Individual participant data (IPD)

Plan to Share Individual Participant Data (IPD)?

NO

Drug and device information, study documents

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated drug product

No

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated device product

No

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Clinical Trials on Heart Failure

Clinical Trials on Medically Tailored Meal Program with Traditional Navajo Foods

Subscribe