Posterior Rectus Sheath Hiatal Augmentation in Paraesophageal Hernia Repair

January 29, 2026 updated by: University of Chicago

Prospective Trial of Posterior Rectus Sheath Hiatal Augmentation (PORSHA) in Paraesophageal Hernia Repair

This study will be a prospective observation study of the use of PoRSHA for repair in patients with challenging paraesophageal hernias.

One of the most challenging problems facing foregut surgeons is the large and complex paraesophageal hernia (PEH) repair in the older patient. The investigator has demonstrated good outcomes and durability with the initial use of a novel permanent autologous vascularized biologic fascial flap to reconstruct the diaphragmatic hiatus following standard hiatal hernia repair in selected patients. This technique is called a posterior rectus sheath flap hiatal augmentation or PoRSHA, which is performed to enhance the hiatal repair for large (type III and IV) and recurrent PEH. The investigator believes by using the patient's autologous vascularized and peritonealized fascia at the hiatal defect, PoRSHA could increase the strength and restore the hiatal complex properties in ways that synthetic mesh, or a primary repair cannot.

The hypothesis is that PoRSHA is a unique technique that has the potential to supplant current approaches to primary hiatal closure in select cases. By augmenting the hiatal closure with a vascularized fascial sheath, PoRSHA provides the tensile strength needed for the attenuated defects in large and complex PEHs.

Study Overview

Detailed Description

One of the most challenging problems facing foregut surgeons is the large and complex paraesophageal hernia (PEH) repair in the older patient. Patients often present for surgery after decades of chronic reflux disease and a known hiatal hernia that has finally progressed to a complete intrathoracic stomach with symptoms concerning for a gastric volvulus. Surgery in such patients involves extensive mediastinal dissection to reduce the large hernia sac, repositioning of the gastroesophageal junction into the abdomen and then repair of a significantly attenuated defect in older patients with attenuated diaphragmatic muscle integrity. Challenges with PEH repair are multifactorial and include primary closure of weakened crural muscle in a large attenuated diaphragmatic defect; the absence of a substantial fascial layer to use to close the defect; and the avoidance of permanent mesh due to the risk of shrinkage, dysphagia and esophageal erosion. While a tension free repair is the goal, the use of relaxing incisions, fixation to posterior structures, and other such modifications have not proven to be universally beneficial.

One of the most challenging problems facing foregut surgeons is the large and complex paraesophageal hernia (PEH) repair in the older patient. The investigator has demonstrated good outcomes and durability with the initial use of a novel permanent autologous vascularized biologic fascial flap to reconstruct the diaphragmatic hiatus following standard hiatal hernia repair in selected patients. This technique is called a posterior rectus sheath flap hiatal augmentation or PoRSHA, which is performed to enhance the hiatal repair for large (type III and IV) and recurrent PEH. The investigator believes by using the patient's autologous vascularized and peritonealized fascia at the hiatal defect, PoRSHA could increase the strength and restore the hiatal complex properties in ways that synthetic mesh, or a primary repair cannot.

While initial use of this technique is promising, the investigator believes that long-term and large patient population is necessary to better evaluate the outcomes. The use of the IDEAL framework (Idea, Development, Exploration, Assessment and Long-term follow-up) framework for surgical innovation, to determine its safe development and overall evaluation as a surgical innovation. Using this framework the investigators will evaluate the long-term outcomes in a large patient population.

Study Type

Observational

Enrollment (Estimated)

100

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Contact

Study Contact Backup

Study Locations

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Ages Eligible for Study

  • Adult
  • Older Adult

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Sampling Method

Non-Probability Sample

Study Population

All patients who underwent PoRSHA at UCMC. We estimate 80-100 patients per year. This study is for all racial and ethnic origins.

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

  • All patients undergoing PoRSHA. PoRSHA will be offered to all patients with PEH defects measuring greater than 4 cm.

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Patients that did not have PoRSHA.
  • Patients requiring therapeutic anticoagulation perioperatively or those with bleeding disorders, considering the added risk of bleeding at the donor site with exposed rectus muscle.

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Time Frame
Number of participants with recurrence of hernia as seen radiographically at routine esophagram
Time Frame: At 6 months, 2 year and 5 years' time points
At 6 months, 2 year and 5 years' time points

Secondary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Time Frame
Number or participants with Symptom Relief
Time Frame: At 6 months, 2 year and 5 years' time points
At 6 months, 2 year and 5 years' time points
Number of participants with use of anti-acid medications
Time Frame: At 6 months, 2 year and 5 years' time points
At 6 months, 2 year and 5 years' time points
Number of participants with dysphagia symptoms
Time Frame: At 6 months, 2 year and 5 years' time points
At 6 months, 2 year and 5 years' time points
Number of participants with abdominal wall deformities or symptoms
Time Frame: At 6 months, 2 year and 5 years' time points
At 6 months, 2 year and 5 years' time points

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Investigators

  • Principal Investigator: Yalini Vigneswaran, MD, MPH, University of Chicago

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start (Actual)

May 15, 2024

Primary Completion (Estimated)

May 1, 2029

Study Completion (Estimated)

May 1, 2029

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

August 8, 2024

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

August 8, 2024

First Posted (Actual)

August 13, 2024

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Actual)

February 2, 2026

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

January 29, 2026

Last Verified

January 1, 2026

More Information

Terms related to this study

Plan for Individual participant data (IPD)

Plan to Share Individual Participant Data (IPD)?

NO

Drug and device information, study documents

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated drug product

No

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated device product

No

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Clinical Trials on Paraesophageal Hernia

Clinical Trials on POSTERIOR RECTUS SHEATH HIATAL AUGMENTATION (PORSHA)

Subscribe