Targeting Minority Stressors to Improve Eating Disorder Symptoms in Sexual Minority Individuals With Eating Disorders

October 1, 2025 updated by: Tiffany Brown, Auburn University

The goal of this clinical trial is to learn if a new intervention (Promoting Resilience to Improve Disordered Eating; PRIDE) can decrease internalized stigma and increase the ability to cope effectively with stressors in sexual minority populations diagnosed with eating disorders. The main question it aims to answer is:

Will an eating disorders treatment focused on decreasing internalized stigma and increasing sexual minority stress coping self efficacy in sexual minority populations? Participants Will

  • Complete a telephone screen with study staff to determine preliminary eligibility for the study
  • Undergo a behavioral eligibility screening that includes structured clinical interviewing in order to determine proper diagnosis of an eating disorder along with ensuring absence of non-eating disorder diagnoses
  • Complete self-report measures to determine study eligibility
  • Attend up to 14 weekly therapy sessions as part of the PRIDE intervention, where participants will work with qualified clinicians to address eating pathology and disordered body image along with developing effective strategies for coping with sexual minority stressors
  • Complete surveys upon completion of the intervention 3 and 6 months post follow-up

Study Overview

Detailed Description

Eating disorders are one of the deadliest psychiatric disorders and are associated with high economic burden (over $65 billion annually in the United States), and numerous physical health consequences. One of the most at-risk groups for developing eating disorders are sexual minority (SM; e.g., gay, lesbian, bisexual, pansexual, queer, non-heterosexual) individuals. Indeed, existing research finds that SM individuals have a 2-3 fold risk for developing an eating disorder compared to their non-SM peers and the these disparities have persisted during the past decade, with no signs of attenuating. This increased risk is due, in part, to chronic stressors (e.g., prejudice, victimization, discrimination) and subsequent SM stress reactions (e.g., internalized stigma) due to being part of a marginalized group. SM individuals experiencing perceived discrimination for their SM identity are 5-times more likely to develop an eating disorder. Data, including those from a large sample across the United States support that, in particular, internalized stigma is associated with increased eating disorder symptom severity in SM men and women. Prior research also supports in the face of SM stressors, SM individuals may be more likely to use maladaptive coping strategies, leading to low SM-stress coping self-efficacy, which has subsequently been shown to lead to disordered eating.

Despite this inequity, there are no known eating disorder treatments developed specifically for SM individuals to address the distinct processes that increase and maintain eating disorder risk. Further, existing treatments for eating disorders are only effective for ~50% of patients, calling for more targeted approaches. SM adults have been accessing eating disorder treatment at increasing rates over the last decade. However, pilot data from our group also suggests that SM individuals are also more likely to drop out of eating disorder treatment compared to their non-SM peers, suggesting that culturally sensitive treatments to address the unique needs of SM individuals with eating disorders are needed. To address this gap, and consistent with a mechanism-informed experimental therapeutics approach, the proposed study will test an innovative, virtually-delivered, treatment (Promoting Resilience to Improve Disordered Eating; PRIDE) integrating current evidence-based treatment for eating disorders with techniques and principles of SM-affirmative treatment to address SM stressors that are posited to maintain eating disorder symptoms. If PRIDE exerts a clinically meaningful effect on the posited targets (i.e., internalized stigma, SM-stress coping self-efficacy) during the R61 phase in a sample of n = 30 participants and is feasible/acceptable, the investigators will move to the R33 phase.

Study Type

Interventional

Enrollment (Estimated)

30

Phase

  • Phase 1

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Contact

Study Contact Backup

Study Locations

    • Alabama
      • Auburn, Alabama, United States, 36849-9027
    • California
      • San Diego, California, United States, 92182
        • Recruiting
        • San Diego State University
        • Contact:
        • Contact:

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Ages Eligible for Study

  • Adult
  • Older Adult

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

Yes

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

  • age 18 to 65 years
  • identify as lesbian, gay, bisexual, other non-heterosexual identities
  • meet criteria for a Diagnostic and Statistical Manual - 5 (DSM-5) eating disorder (i.e., anorexia nervosa, bulimia nervosa, binge eating disorder, other specified feeding or eating disorder)
  • reports current (past 12 months) experience with discrimination due to sexual orientation;
  • speaks English
  • has internet access and a working webcam
  • reside (and plan to continue to reside for the study duration) in California or one of the Psychology Interjurisdictional Compact (PSYPACT) states
  • able to provide informed consent

Exclusion Criteria:

  • inability to speak/read English
  • active suicidal plans or intent
  • other major untreated psychiatric diagnoses (e.g., untreated bipolar disorder, untreated psychosis)
  • body mass index below 17.0, a standard clinical cutoff used to denote moderate-severe underweight that may be indicated for a higher level of medical care than standard outpatient treatment

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

  • Primary Purpose: Treatment
  • Allocation: N/A
  • Interventional Model: Single Group Assignment
  • Masking: None (Open Label)

Arms and Interventions

Participant Group / Arm
Intervention / Treatment
Experimental: Psychotherapy
Participants in this arm will experience the PRIDE intervention. PRIDE is a 14-session treatment that incorporates aspects of cognitive behavioral therapy for eating disorders (CBT-E) and SM-affirmative therapy. CBT-E aspects of treatment include in-session weighing, self-monitoring (food logs), regular eating, and techniques to address overvaluation of weight and shape. SM-affirmative therapy techniques include discussing the impact of minority stress on health, resilience, and strength within the SM community, specific manifestations of minority stress on eating and body image, current coping strategies, emotion regulation skills, and developing mindful, present-focused reactions to minority stress.
See description under "Arms"
Other Names:
  • PRIDE

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Internalized Homophobia Scale (IHP)
Time Frame: Change from Baseline through 3- and 6-month follow-up
Assesses internalized stigma (9 items, 5-point scale, higher scores indicate greater internalized stigma).
Change from Baseline through 3- and 6-month follow-up
Sexual Orientation Implicit Association Test
Time Frame: Change from Baseline through 3- and 6-month follow-up
Assesses internalized stigma via computerized behavioral task involving categorizing positive/negative words with sexual minority and heterosexual people.
Change from Baseline through 3- and 6-month follow-up
Coping Self Efficacy Scale (CSES)
Time Frame: Change from Baseline through 3- and 6-month follow-up
Assesses sexual minority(SM)-stress coping self efficacy, as adapted for address SM stress in prior research (13 items, 11-point scale, higher scores indicate greater SM-stress coping self-efficacy).
Change from Baseline through 3- and 6-month follow-up

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Investigators

  • Principal Investigator: Tiffany Brown, PhD, Auburn University
  • Principal Investigator: Aaron Blashill, PhD, San Diego State University

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start (Actual)

February 28, 2025

Primary Completion (Estimated)

July 1, 2026

Study Completion (Estimated)

July 1, 2026

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

August 20, 2024

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

August 20, 2024

First Posted (Actual)

August 22, 2024

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Estimated)

October 6, 2025

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

October 1, 2025

Last Verified

October 1, 2025

More Information

Terms related to this study

Other Study ID Numbers

  • 1R61MH133710-01A
  • 1R61MH133710-01 (U.S. NIH Grant/Contract)

Plan for Individual participant data (IPD)

Plan to Share Individual Participant Data (IPD)?

YES

IPD Plan Description

Data will be available via NDA in compliance with the National Institute of Mental Health (NIMH) grant funding. Researchers will be able to use the standard processes at NDA, and the NDA Data Access Committee will decide which requests to grant. The standard NDA data access process allows access for one year and is renewable. As an alternative, instructions for contacting investigators (MPIs) will be placed on their lab websites so that researchers interested in using the data can contact them directly to obtain the de-identified data. The research team will require that any recipients of the data execute a data sharing agreement with Auburn University that will obligate recipients to 1) use data only for research; 2) not identify an individual participant; 3) commit to securing data using appropriate computer technology; and 4) commit to destroying or returning data after analyses are completed or three years have passed.

Drug and device information, study documents

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated drug product

No

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated device product

No

product manufactured in and exported from the U.S.

No

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Clinical Trials on Eating Disorders

Clinical Trials on Promoting Resilience to Improve Disordered Eating

Subscribe