Measuring Brain Complexity to Detect and Predict Recovery of Consciousness in the ICU (COMPASS)

May 12, 2025 updated by: Brian L. Edlow, M.D., Massachusetts General Hospital

Measuring Brain Complexity to Detect and Predict Recovery of Consciousness in the ICU (COMPASS)

Disorders of consciousness (DoC) caused by severe brain injury affect millions of people worldwide each year. A patient's level of consciousness in the intensive care unit (ICU) significantly impacts the recovery from disability and is a primary determinant of family decisions about withdrawal of life-sustaining therapy (WLST). However, reliable assessment of consciousness in the ICU remains elusive. Transcranial magnetic stimulation-electroencephalography (TMS-EEG) is a tool that has shown the best performance in detecting signs of consciousness in patients with chronic DoC. The goals of this prospective, observational study are to demonstrate the diagnostic performance and prognostic utility of TMS-EEG in the ICU setting.

Study Overview

Detailed Description

Disorders of consciousness (DoC) caused by severe brain injury affect millions of people worldwide each year. A patient's level of consciousness in the intensive care unit (ICU) significantly influences the recovery from disability and may affect family decisions about withdrawal of life-sustaining therapy (WLST). Transcranial magnetic stimulation-electroencephalography (TMS-EEG) has shown the best performance in detecting signs of consciousness in patients with chronic DoC. The goals of this multi-center observational study are to demonstrate the diagnostic performance and prognostic utility of TMS-EEG in patients with DoC caused by severe brain injuries in the ICU.

Through this research, we aim to demonstrate that:

  • TMS-EEG can detect 95% of conscious patients who are defined as conscious by a combination of tests that aim to detect overt and covert consciousness.
  • TMS-EEG measurements can predict 6-month outcomes on the Disability Rating Scale (DRS) in patients in an acute vegetative state, controlling for age, Glasgow Coma Scale (GCS) score, and injury mechanism

All participants will undergo repeated behavioral assessments, task-based electroencephalography (EEG), and TMS-EEG. Of note, conventional brain magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) and task-based functional MRI are optional.

Study Type

Interventional

Enrollment (Estimated)

120

Phase

  • Not Applicable

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Contact

Study Contact Backup

Study Locations

    • Massachusetts
      • Boston, Massachusetts, United States, 02114
        • Recruiting
        • Massachusetts General Hospital
        • Contact:
        • Principal Investigator:
          • Brian L. Edlow, MD
        • Sub-Investigator:
          • Matteo Fecchio, PhD
    • Wisconsin
      • Madison, Wisconsin, United States, 53792
        • Not yet recruiting
        • UW Health University Hospital
        • Principal Investigator:
          • Melanie Boly, MD, PhD
        • Contact:
          • Melanie Boly, MD, PhD

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Ages Eligible for Study

  • Adult
  • Older Adult

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Study Population

Patients diagnosed with disorders of consciousness after acquired brain injury within the last 28 days and treated in the intensive care unit

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

  1. Age greater than or equal to 18
  2. Functionally independent at baseline
  3. Acquired brain injury within the last 28 days
  4. Disorder of consciousness, as defined by no instance of following commands (i.e., Glasgow Coma Scale motor score = 6) on two or more consecutive assessments
  5. Continuous intravenous sedation able to be discontinued for at least 10 minutes
  6. ICU clinicians approve safe placement of 64-electrode EEG cap on the scalp

Additional inclusion criteria are present in the study protocol.

Exclusion Criteria:

  1. Status epilepticus or uncontrolled seizure disorder
  2. No head CT scan from current hospital admission AND contraindications for MRI: conductive, ferromagnetic, or other magnetic-sensitive metals implanted in the head (e.g., cochlear implants, implanted electrodes/stimulators, aneurysm clips or coils, stents, bullet fragments)
  3. Medical instability, restlessness, or other factors identified by the PI that would either prevent safe participation or compromise data acquisition
  4. Hemicraniectomy

If a subject meets a contraindication for MR imaging, the subject may participate in all other aspects of the study except MRI.

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

  • Primary Purpose: Diagnostic
  • Allocation: N/A
  • Interventional Model: Single Group Assignment
  • Masking: None (Open Label)

Arms and Interventions

Participant Group / Arm
Intervention / Treatment
Experimental: Patients with acute disorders of consciousness receiving TMS-EEG
Adults with acute severe traumatic brain injury who undergo advanced neuroimaging and electrophysiological studies while in the intensive care unit and are followed for 6 months post-injury.
The presence of consciousness will be classified considering the highest level of consciousness revealed by repeated behavioral examinations, functional electroencephalography (task-based EEG), and functional brain imagery (task-based fMRI). Based on the results of this composite standard reference, we will evaluate the diagnostic and prognostic accuracy of TMS-EEG measurements of brain complexity

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Presence of consciousness as defined by a composite reference standard for consciousness that combines behavior, task-based EEG, and task-based fMRI
Time Frame: 48 hours after the end of the TMS-EEG assessment

Behavioral assessments of consciousness (up to 5): The CRS-R consists of 6 subscales designed to assess auditory function, receptive and expressive language, visuoperception, communication ability, motor functions, and arousal level. The lowest score on each sub-scale represents reflexive activity; the highest represents behaviors mediated by cognitive input. The total score ranges between 0 (worst) and 23 (best). The CRSR-FAST assesses only those CRS-R behaviors that differentiate conscious (i.e., MCS) from unconscious (i.e., coma/VS) patients.

Functional assessments of covert consciousness: A participant is classified as being conscious on task-based EEG if the probability with which the classifier distinguished task from rest conditions is p < 0.05 and the accuracy value that indicates the classifier's performance is ≥ 60%. A participant is classified as being conscious on task-based fMRI if there is one statistical activation within a pre-specified region of interest.

48 hours after the end of the TMS-EEG assessment
Disability Rating Scale (DRS) total score
Time Frame: 6 months post injury
The Disability Rating Scale (DRS) provides quantitative information regarding functional disability in patients recovering from severe brain injury. The total score on the DRS ranges from 0 to 29 with higher scores indicating a greater degree of disability. DRS subscale scores include eye opening [score range 0-3], communication [score range 0-4], motor response [score range 0-5], cognitive ability for feeding [score range 0-3], cognitive ability for toileting [score range 0-3], cognitive ability for grooming [score range 0-3], level of function [score range 0-5], and employability [score range 0-3]. Subscale scores are summed to produce the total score.
6 months post injury

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Investigators

  • Principal Investigator: Brian L. Edlow, MD, Massachusetts General Hospital

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start (Actual)

November 8, 2024

Primary Completion (Estimated)

August 1, 2029

Study Completion (Estimated)

August 1, 2029

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

August 21, 2024

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

August 21, 2024

First Posted (Actual)

August 23, 2024

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Actual)

May 15, 2025

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

May 12, 2025

Last Verified

May 1, 2025

More Information

Terms related to this study

Drug and device information, study documents

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated drug product

No

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated device product

No

product manufactured in and exported from the U.S.

No

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Clinical Trials on Consciousness Disorders

Clinical Trials on Repeated behavioral assessments, functional electroencephalography and brain imagery, TMS-EEG

Subscribe