Innovative Biomarkers in de Novo Parkinson's Disease (INNOBIOPARK)

May 6, 2022 updated by: University Hospital, Grenoble
This study aims at identifying potential new and innovative biomarkers in de novo Parkinson's disease patients. New finding will help phenotyping patients since the diagnosis of the disease and potentially also in the preclinical phase.

Study Overview

Detailed Description

The investigators will use 4 different approaches in parallel:

  1. detailed clinical evaluation using the current available validated clinical scales and the Dopamine transporter (DAT) SPECT imaging;
  2. anatomical and perfusional brain evaluation using functional MRI;
  3. cortical brain mapping and transcranial magnetic stimulation assessment using a robotized approach;
  4. emotional responses study using a novel paradigm. These 4 modalities will be assessed at baseline, 1 year and 2 years follow-up.

The investigators will integrate these 4 analysis using a mathematical paradigm in order to define specific phenotype of disease and disease progression.

Study Type

Interventional

Enrollment (Actual)

43

Phase

  • Not Applicable

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Locations

      • Grenoble, France, 38043
        • CHU Grenoble Alpes

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Ages Eligible for Study

30 years and older (Adult, Older Adult)

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Genders Eligible for Study

All

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

  • Parkinson's disease
  • Asymmetric bradykinesia and/or resting tremor and rigidity since less than 2.5 years ;
  • Hoehn & Yahr ≤ 2/5 ;
  • Montreal cognitive assessment ≥ 26/30 ;

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Treatment for Parkinson's disease (except selegiline and rasagiline)
  • Severe visual/retinal pathology revealed during ophthalmological assessment
  • Hyper-sensibility to gadolinium
  • Renal failure
  • Specific MRI contraindication
  • Specific TMS contraindication

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

  • Primary Purpose: Diagnostic
  • Allocation: Non-Randomized
  • Interventional Model: Parallel Assignment
  • Masking: None (Open Label)

Arms and Interventions

Participant Group / Arm
Intervention / Treatment
Other: Parkinson's disease patient
Brain functional MRI, robotic TMS + EEG, neuropsychological evaluation, neurological examination for motor and non motor symptoms
3 Tesla brain MRI for structural and perfusion evaluation, resting state analysis and functional MRI
Transcranial magnetic stimulation (TMS) coupled with electroencephalogram (EEG) study
Emotional, attentional and behavioral assessment using predefine scales and measures
Neurological evaluation, ophthalmologic assessement, Montreal cognitive assessment (MoCA), movement disorder society (MDS)- UPDRS
Other: Healthy controls
Brain functional MRI, robotic TMS + EEG, neuropsychological evaluation, neurological examination
3 Tesla brain MRI for structural and perfusion evaluation, resting state analysis and functional MRI
Transcranial magnetic stimulation (TMS) coupled with electroencephalogram (EEG) study
Emotional, attentional and behavioral assessment using predefine scales and measures
Neurological evaluation, ophthalmologic assessement, Montreal cognitive assessment (MoCA), movement disorder society (MDS)- UPDRS

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
To compare cortical excitability differences between subjects
Time Frame: In a seven months period after inclusion
The EEG data after transcranial magnetic stimulation testing will be compared between parkinsonian patients and controls
In a seven months period after inclusion
To compare brain structural differences between subjects
Time Frame: In a seven months period after inclusion
All subjects will have a 3 Tesla brain MRI to collect data concerning anatomy. All data will be compared between patients and controls. Brain MRI study will consist in having the following sequences: T1 and T2, Fast Gray Matter Acquisition T1 Inversion Recovery (FGATIR)
In a seven months period after inclusion
To compare brain perfusional differences between subjects
Time Frame: In a seven months period after inclusion
All subjects will have a 3 Tesla brain MRI to collect data concerning perfusion. All data will be compared between patients and controls. Brain MRI study will consist in having the following sequences: Pseudo-Continuous Arterial Spin Labeling (PCASL), T2 with gadolinium, FLAIR
In a seven months period after inclusion
To compare brain connectivity differences between subjects
Time Frame: In a seven months period after inclusion
All subjects will have a 3 Tesla brain MRI to collect data concerning functional connectivity at rest. All data will be compared between patients and controls. Brain MRI study will consist in having the following sequences: Echo planar imaging (EPI) for the blood oxygen level-dependent effect
In a seven months period after inclusion
To compare emotional, attentional and behavior differences between subject
Time Frame: In a seven months period after inclusion
Subjects will be asked to comment on different pictures (if the picture induces pleasure, sorrow or nothing; what would the subjects do). Attentional parameters will be recorded using the Eye tracker.
In a seven months period after inclusion
To compare emotional, attentional and behavior differences between subject with functional MRI
Time Frame: In a seven months period after inclusion
During a functional MRI study, subjects will be asked to comment on different pictures (if the picture induces pleasure, sorrow or nothing; what would the subjects do). Attentional parameters will be recorded using the Eye tracker.
In a seven months period after inclusion

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Investigators

  • Principal Investigator: Elena Moro, MD, PhD, CHU Grenoble Alpes

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start (Actual)

April 25, 2019

Primary Completion (Actual)

December 9, 2021

Study Completion (Actual)

December 9, 2021

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

April 4, 2019

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

May 3, 2019

First Posted (Actual)

May 7, 2019

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Actual)

May 12, 2022

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

May 6, 2022

Last Verified

May 1, 2022

More Information

Terms related to this study

Drug and device information, study documents

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated drug product

No

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated device product

No

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Clinical Trials on Parkinson's Disease

Clinical Trials on Brain MRI

3
Subscribe